Comparing Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Stems at a High-Volume Revision Center.

Introduction: Hybrid fixation and fully cemented fixation are commonly used in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). These two techniques are typically done based on surgeon preference and one has not demonstrated superiority over the other. The purpose of this study was to examine if there was a difference in survivorship between the two different techniques. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of all consecutive patients undergoing rTKA (CPT 27487) from January 1, 2011 to January 1, 2018 at a single academic center was performed. Patients were divided into cemented and hybrid rTKA groups with comparison of patient demographic, clinical and radiological outcomes, reoperation, change in post-operative hemoglobin (HgB), and length of stay (LOS). Results: A total of 133 rTKA for 122 patients were identified: 30.1% in the cemented and 69.9% in the hybrid groups. There was no significant difference in age (p = 0.491), sex (p = 0.250), laterality (p = 0.421), or body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.609) between the two groups. Mean LOS (hybrid 4.13 days, cemented 3.65 days; p = 0.356) and change in Hgb (hybrid 2.95 mg/dL, cemented 2.62mg/dL; p = 0.181) were not statistically different between the groups. Mean follow up for the hybrid (25.4 months, range 2-114 months) and cemented (24.6 months, range 3-75.5 months) rTKA was not statistically significant (p = 0.825). Overall survival rates were 80.9% in the hybrid and 84.6% in the cemented groups (p = 0.642). Conclusions: Hybrid and fully cemented rTKA techniques have similar survival rates at a minimum followup of 2 years. Additionally, in our cohort, age, gender, and BMI were not associated with failure in either group. Furthermore, we did not observe differences in LOS or change in hemoglobin suggesting early postoperative complications may not differ between cemented and hybrid stemmed groups. Continued long-term research is required for defining the best rTKA technique.

Hip and Knee Bracing: Categorization, Treatment Algorithm, and Systematic Review.

Hip and knee braces or orthoses are often used to provide support after surgery and to prevent or reduce the severity of injuries. The braces are used for stabilization, immobilization, mechanical correction, and rehabilitation. Hip braces consist of stabilization and unloader variations, whereas knee braces are composed of knee sleeves and patellofemoral, prophylactic, unloader, and functional braces. Indications vary widely and depend on the type of brace. Hip braces can treat osteoarthritis to instability after total hip arthroplasty. Knee brace indications range from mild arthralgias to instability and osteoarthritis. Although braces are routinely used clinically, high-level evidence is sparse for their use. With this review, the different types and uses of hip and knee braces have been defined, and their indications exemplified in hopes of spurring future research.

A model to evaluate Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures.

While many femoral neck fractures can be reliably treated with surgical intervention, Pauwels III femoral neck fractures in the young adult population continue to be a challenging injury, and there is no consensus on optimal treatment. As such, there are past and ongoing biomechanical studies to evaluate the fixation provided by different constructs for this inherently unstable fracture. While many investigations rely on cadavers to evaluate the biomechanical performance of a construct, significant inter-subject variability can confound the analysis. Biomechanical femur analogs are being used more frequently due to more consistent mechanical properties; however, they have not been stringently evaluated for morphology or suitability for instrumentation. This study sought to determine the variability among composite femoral analogs as well as consistently create a Pauwels III injury and instrument the analogs without the need for fluoroscopic guidance. In total, 24 fourth-generation composite femoral analogs were evaluated for femoral height, neck-shaft angle, anteversion, and cortical thickness. A method was developed to simulate a Pauwels III fracture and to prepare three different constructs: an inverted triangle of cannulated screws, a sliding hip screw, and a hybrid inverted triangle with cannulated screws and a sliding hip screw. Radiographs were utilized to evaluate the variation in implant position. All but one of the morphological parameters varied by <1%. The tip-to-apex distance for all sliding hip screw hardware was 18.8 ± 3.3 mm, and all relevant cannulated screw distances were within 5 mm of the adjacent cortex. All screws were parallel, on average, within 1.5° on anterior-posterior and lateral films. Fourth-generation composite femora were found to be morphologically consistent, and it is possible to consistently instrument the analogs without the use of fluoroscopy. This analog and hardware implantation model could serve as a screening model for new fracture repair constructs without the need for cadaveric tissues or radiologic technology.

The New Surgical Technique for Improving Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty Outcomes: Patient Selection.

BACKGROUND: Inclusion of patient satisfaction scores in setting reimbursements has been suggested by health care policy makers to contain cost and improve outcomes. The Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) score provides a health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measure of arthroplasty outcome. Although previous work identified factors that influence this score for hip and knee arthroplasty patients, they did not focus on how a surgeon might use this information in a clinical setting. The present study examined whether relatively simple criteria might identify patients more likely to experience minimal HRQoL improvement. METHODS: "Improvements" in SF-36 composite physical scores and subscales were calculated from the difference between initial (preoperative) and SF-36 scores at 1 year. The rates of achieving a clinically significant improvement were compared between patient groups. RESULTS: After knee arthroplasty, women and younger patients achieved a clinically significant improvement in physical function more frequently than men and older patients (P = .04 and .02, respectively). The largest differences in improvement occurred between the diabetic and nondiabetic groups (P = .001), where the diabetic patients with ≥2 additional comorbidities demonstrated the lowest rate of achieving a clinically significant improvement in physical function and bodily pain. In comparison, in hip patients only age had significant influence on gains in physical function, but this did not alter the rate at which patients achieved a clinically significant improvement. CONCLUSION: These data indicate simple screening criteria can identify patients where arthroplasty might provide marginal HRQoL improvement. They suggest HRQoL-based reimbursement incentives will favor practices with younger, healthier patient populations.