Implementation of entrustable professional activities in multiple surgical residencies: A quality improvement approach.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic decreased the operative case volume for surgical residents. Our institution implemented Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) in all core surgical training programs to document the competency of graduating residents. Continuation of this project aimed to improve implementation. METHODS: This project occurred at a large academic center with eight surgical specialties during the 2020-21 (Year 1) and 2021-22 (Year 2) academic years. Each specialty chose five EPAs, and residents were asked to obtain three micro-assessments per EPA. After the initial pilot year, program directors were surveyed regarding perceptions of EPA utility and barriers to implementation. RESULTS: Seventy senior residents completed 732/906 (80.8%) micro-assessments. Of these, 99.6% were deemed practice ready. Total micro-assessment completion rates in four specialties, four specific EPAs (including one EPA identified "at risk" due to the COVID-19 pandemic), and overall were significantly higher in Year 2 than Year 1 (p â€‹< â€‹0.05) CONCLUSIONS: Implementing EPAs in all core surgical specialties at an institution is achievable, though expectedly initially imperfect. An ongoing quality collaborative initiative focused on barriers to implementation can improve completion rates.

Forum Theatre to Address Peer-to-Peer Mistreatment in General Surgery Residency.

OBJECTIVE: Mistreatment is widespread in graduate medical education, and much attention has been generated on this topic and its relationship to burnout in general surgery residency. In particular, peer-to-peer mistreatment poses a developmental dilemma - as junior residents find themselves mistreated and some turn around and perpetuate that mistreatment. There is a paucity of effective interventions. Forum Theatre (FT) is a novel educational tool to engage participants in solving difficult situations. We present the use of FT as a tool to explore solutions to address peer-to-peer mistreatment in a surgery residency. FT starts with the performance of a culture-specific conflict scenario and then invites the audience to participate in renditions of the situation ending in a collective solution. DESIGN: Stakeholder support was obtained from the general surgery program leadership. Time was protected during two 1-hour scheduled wellness didactic sessions. First, focus groups with each PG year identified the residents' experience of mistreatment. Themes regarding peer-to peer mistreatment were identified and presented to a group of 3 volunteer actor residents who chose to focus on the unintended consequences of public, corrective feedback with the understanding this would be presented to the residency at large. Following this, they developed a scenario for enactment which was implemented during the second didactic session. The enacted scenario posed a problem with public feedback ending unsatisfactorily. The audience was then invited to engage the actors and participate in replays of the situation until a collective solution was identified. Retrospective pre-post survey and a 6-month post survey were administered. SETTING: General surgery residency at University of Texas Health San Antonio. PARTICIPANTS: General surgery residents. 32 of 66 (48.5%) residents participated. RESULTS: Participants noted an improved understanding of mistreatment, felt more confident in recognizing mistreatment, reported improved confidence in their ability to intervene when witnessing mistreatment and to recognize when they themselves were involved in mistreatment (p < 0.001 for all). In fact, of the residents who reported participating in mistreatment, 100% reported directing it towards peers. After the FT, 89% of residents said they "definitely" or "most likely" recommended participating in a FT to address mistreatment. 85.7% reported that the intervention was moderately to extremely effective for teaching topics in professionalism. These trends remained steady in the survey 6 months after the intervention as well. CONCLUSIONS: We found FT was feasible to implement in a busy general surgery residency and well received with sustained, self- reported behavior change. FT is a novel tool to engage residents to self-evaluate and participate in methods to address mistreatment. FT interventions can be tailored to the local culture to address conflicts specific to that setting.

Lived Experiences of Mistreatment in a General Surgery Residency.

OBJECTIVE: Explore the lived experiences of General Surgery residents to identify how they perceive, define mistreatment, and which factors can contribute to or mitigate mistreatment within the Clinical Learning Environment. DESIGN: This is a phenomenological study conducted during 2019-2020 using Giorgi's psychological descriptive phenomenology methodology. Researcher bias, trustworthiness, and triangulation were addressed using bracketing, check-ins with program leadership, comparisons to resident survey, and team consensus based on Consensual Qualitative Research. SETTING: General Surgery Residency program at Long School of Medicine, UT Health San Antonio, Texas. PARTICIPANTS: All residents in the general surgery program were invited to participate (n= 66, 43% female and 63% non-Hispanic). Specific demographic and identifying data for each participant was not collected. Approximately 50 (76% of program) residents from General Surgery participated. RESULTS: We were able to identify four themes that helped to delineate the lived experience of residents including program cultural factors, resident internal processing, and perceived effects of mistreatment by the residents. The resulting psychological structure and conceptual framework help clarify the interrelations between the themes and the Clinical Learning Environment. The scenarios discussed were adapted and depersonalized to use as prompts for the Forum Theater intervention. This project set out to explore resident's lived experiences and allow the data to reveal the main outcomes. The data was coded and analyzed following strict guidelines from descriptive psychological phenomenology and Consensual Qualitative Research with the aim of informing a later experiential intervention based on Forum Theater. CONCLUSIONS: The lived experience of general surgery residents helped identify cultural factors and behaviors that contribute to and/or mitigate mistreatment providing information to plan interventions at the resident and faculty level. Mitigating or stopping mistreatment can improve the Clinical Learning Environment and hence, the quality of training.

Identifying Potential Attrition during the Residency Applicant Screening Process Using a Situational Judgment Test.

OBJECTIVE: As USMLE Step 1 moves to pass/fail, residency programs are seeking alternate interview selection processes. Attrition in general surgery is reported as high as 26%. Thus, it is important to ensure that programs are selecting and matching applicants with shared values. Situational judgment tests (SJTs) measure educational and cultural values by posing ambiguous situations and individuals rate the effectiveness of possible reactions. SJTs have previously been shown to identify job applicants with shared values while promoting diversity. Scoring categories are high, moderate, or low values congruence. We sought to explore predictive validity of the SJT relative to program attrition. DESIGN: Residents who matched into our program between 2018 and 2021 completed the SJT. We tracked attrition. SETTING: UT Health San Antonio, Texas PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-six categorical general surgery residents RESULTS: Per SJT ratings, the numbers of residents who had high, moderate, and low values congruence were 27, 16, and 13, respectively. Attrition numbers for residents who scored high and moderate congruence were similar, indicating that these ratings were indistinguishable. As such, we combined those 2 categories to create a 2 × 2 matrix and used signal detection theory as a framework for analysis. Overall attrition was 16.1% (9/56). Of the 43 residents who scored high or moderate congruence, 90.7% remained in the program. There was a 9.3% chance of attrition for these residents. Of the 13 residents who scored low congruence, 38.5% attrited. While scoring as low congruence on the SJT does not definitively indicate attrition, it does indicate that attrition is 4.14 times more likely for these residents (chi-square, p = 0.0121). CONCLUSIONS: One of the most important aspects of residency applicant selection and interviewing is mitigating risk by identifying applicants who carry a high risk of attrition. The SJT significantly identifies at-risk applicants.

Correlation of Supervised Independence and Performance with Procedure Difficulty amongst Surgical Residents Stratified by Post Graduate Year.

PURPOSE: This study investigates the role of procedure difficulty on attending ratings of supervised levels of independence and procedural performance amongst general surgery residents, while accounting for case complexity. METHODS: Attending ratings for residents were obtained from System for Improving and Measuring Procedural Learning (SIMPL) database. Current procedural terminology (CPT) codes were used to match procedures to a corresponding work relative value unit (wRVU) as a surrogate for procedure difficulty. Three categories of wRVU (<13.07, 13.07-22, >22) were identified using recursive partitioning. Procedures were also divided into 'Core' or 'Advanced' as defined by the American Board of Surgery Surgical Council on Resident Education (SCORE). Temporal advancement in resident skill was accounted for through academic quarterly analysis. A generalized estimating equations (GEE) approach was used to form separate multivariable logistic regression models for meaningful autonomy (MA) and satisfactory performance (SP) adjusted for potential clustering by program, subject, and rater. Models were further adjusted for core/advanced procedures, attending rated complexity, and academic quarter. RESULTS: A total of 33,281 ratings were analyzed. Overall, 51.6% were rated as MA and 44.4% as SP. For core procedures, surgical residents rated as MA (53.5%) and SP (45.7%), which was twice as high as those for advance procedures (MA-29.2%, SP-29.0%). MA and SP both decreased with increasing wRVU (Figure 2 &3). Using a wRVU<13.07 as a reference, the adjusted odds ratios of MA and SP were significantly lower with increasing procedure difficulty, 0.44 for wRVU 13.07-22.0 and 0.24 for wRVU >22.00 (Table 3). Post graduate year (PGY) 5 residents in the final quarter of training obtain MA in 95.5% and SP 92.9% for core procedures with wRVU <13.07 (Table 4). CONCLUSION: Increasing procedural difficulty is independently associated with decreases in meaningful autonomy and satisfactory performance. As residents approach graduation the level of meaningful autonomy and satisfactory performance both reach high levels for common core procedures but decrease as procedural difficulty increases.

General Surgery Resident Autonomy: Truth and Myth.

Within general surgery education circles, the state of autonomy for residents in surgery training programs has been of growing concern. Although there is no direct evidence showing less autonomy in modern surgical training, multiple surrogates have been cited as reasons for concern. Many reasons have been given for lost autonomy including the 80-hour work week, financial constraints, concerns over quality of patient care, patient expectations, new and innovative technologies, legal limitations, and public opinion. This article discusses the current state of general surgery resident autonomy, why autonomy is important, barriers to autonomy, and ways to support autonomy.

Surgical Trainees' Sense of Responsibility for Patient Outcomes: A Multi-institutional Appraisal.

BACKGROUND: Surgeon educators express concern about trainees' sense of patient ownership. We aimed to compare resident and faculty perceptions on residents' sense of personal responsibility for patient outcomes and to correlate patient ownership with resident and residency characteristics. METHODS: An anonymous electronic questionnaire surveyed 373 residents and 390 faculty at seven academic surgery residencies across the United States. We modified an established psychological ownership scale to measure patient ownership among surgical trainees. RESULTS: Respondents included 123 residents and 136 faculty (response rate 33% and 35%, respectively). Overall, 78.0% of faculty agreed that residents took personal responsibility for patient outcomes, but only 26.4% thought residents felt a similar or higher degree of patient ownership compared with themselves. Faculty underestimated the proportion of residents that routinely checked on their patients when off-duty (36.8 versus 92.6%, P < 0.001). Higher means on the patient ownership scale correlated with female sex (5.9 versus. 5.5 for males, P = 0.009), advanced post graduate year level (5.3, 5.5, 5.7, 5.8, 6.1, for post graduate year 1-5, respectively, P = 0.02), and the sense that patient outcomes affected the resident respondent's mood (5.8 versus 4.8 for those whose mood was not affected, P < 0.001). In addition, trainees who perceived better resident camaraderie (P = 0.004), faculty mentorship (P < 0.001), and that their program provided appropriate autonomy (P = 0.03) felt greater responsibility for patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Most faculty agree that residents assume personal responsibility for patient outcomes, but many still underestimate residents' sense of patient ownership. Certain modifiable aspects of residency culture including camaraderie, mentorship, and autonomy are associated with patient ownership among trainees.

Surgical Inpatient's Attitudes Toward Resident Participation: All About Expectations.

OBJECTIVE: Determine whether an educational video can improve surgical inpatients' attitudes toward resident participation in their care. METHODS: Patients admitted to the Trauma/Emergency General Surgery Service at University Hospital (San Antonio, Texas) were randomly divided into control and intervention groups. Patients in the intervention group viewed a short educational video about the role and responsibilities of medical students, residents, and attending surgeons. All patients then completed a previously published survey. RESULTS: A total of 140 patients responded to the survey (control = 81 and intervention = 59 patients). Overall, 86.4% of patients were welcoming of resident participation. Patients who were expecting residents to be involved in their care had attitudes that are more favorable on almost all survey questions regardless of their study condition. However, patients in the intervention group who expected resident involvement in their care had more favorable attitudes about senior residents (postgraduate year 3-5) assisting in routine or complicated surgery than those in the control group who were expecting resident involvement (both p ≤ 0.001). This same group of patients also had more favorable attitudes about surgical outcomes and overall surgical health when residents are involved (p = 0.004, p = 0.001, respectively). Most patients (79%) said they had no residents previously involved in their care, or they were unsure if residents were previously involved. CONCLUSIONS: Patient expectation of resident involvement is one of the most important factors influencing perceptions of inpatients about resident participation in surgery. Our goal should be early and frequent discussion with patients about resident involvement in order to foster an atmosphere of trust, including full transparency regarding resident involvement in surgical procedures. An educational video may help introduce the roles of trainees and attending surgeons but should not be used in lieu of direct discussion with patients.

The millennials have arrived: What the surgeon educator needs to know to teach millennials.

Numerous authors have described the millennial generation, defined as a cohort of people born between the early 1980s and late 1990s, as unique from preceding generations, such as Generation X and the baby boomers. Many surgical educators generally belong to elder generations, and there is some concern that intergenerational differences may be source of friction between teacher and learner. There is renewed interest in both addressing pedagogic strategies to train millennial surgery residents and providing the nonmillennial surgeon educator with instruction techniques best suited for millennials. However, surgical educators sometimes encounter or propagate uncertainties, conflicts, or stereotypes regarding millennial characteristics and ideal teaching strategies. We review the relevant literature regarding intergenerational teaching strategies as they pertain to training millennial surgery residents.

Resident training experience with robotic assisted transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair.

BACKGROUND: General surgery is the fastest growing field in the adoption of robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery. Here, we present the results of one institution's experience in training surgical residents in robotic assisted transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repairs. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected on patients undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with residents. Data points included patient age, gender, complications, hernia difficulty, resident technical competency as measured by GEARS, Zwisch scores, operative time, and the number of robotic console cases reported by residents as primary surgeon. RESULTS: Residents who performed >30 robotic cases had significantly higher mean modified GEARS scores (p ≤ .002). Residents who completed 10 or fewer robotic cases achieved significantly lower mean modified GEARS and Zwisch scores than those who completed 11 or more (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Resident competency and autonomy improve with increasing total robotic case load. Attending surgeons grant more autonomy to residents with higher competency scores.

Surgery Program Director Turnover Correlates With Residency Graduate Failure on American Board of Surgery Examinations in Civilian Residency Programs.

PURPOSE: The Review Committee for Surgery requires a minimum program director (PD) tenure of 6 years. The impact of PD turnover on the performance of program graduates is unknown. We hypothesize that (1) the majority of PDs step down before 6-year tenure and (2) higher PD turnover is associated with higher failure rate on American Board of Surgery (ABS) examinations. METHODS: Start and stop dates of all surgery PDs between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2017 were obtained for civilian surgery programs. A Kaplan-Meier curve of PD "survival" was constructed. Programs were divided into High Turnover (HT; ≥4 PD changes, n = 33) and Low Turnover (LT; ≤3 PD changes, n = 191) groups. Five-year (2013-2017) ABS pass rates were also obtained. Pass rates and compliance with current standards were compared between groups. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that 40% of PDs do not comply with ACGME policy and serve <6 years. HT programs had lower mean pass rates on ABS certifying exam than LT programs (76% vs 83%, p < 0.01), but not qualifying exam (88% vs 88%). HT programs are less likely to meet the current 65% pass rate standard (82% vs 93%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: (1) An estimated 40% of general surgery PDs had tenures of <6 years. (2) Greater PD turnover is associated with lower ABS pass rates among general surgery graduates.

Primary Desmoid Tumor of the Small Bowel: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Desmoid tumors, also known as aggressive fibromatosis, are fibromuscular neoplasms that arise from mesenchymal cell lines. They may occur in almost all soft tissue compartments. Primary desmoids of the small bowel are rare but potentially serious tumors presenting unique challenges to the general surgeon. We present one case of a 59-year-old man presenting with three months of abdominal distension secondary to a small bowel desmoid. Computed tomography of the abdomen showed an 18-cm mass in the mid-abdomen without obvious vital structure encasement. Percutaneous biopsy of the mass indicated a desmoid tumor. The patient underwent a successful elective exploratory laparotomy with resection and primary enteric anastomosis. Final pathology revealed the mass to be a primary desmoid of the small bowel. His post-operative course was uneventful. At two years after surgery, he is symptom free, and there is no evidence of disease recurrence. Due to the rare nature of primary small bowel desmoids, there are few specific care pathways outlined. This is a challenging pathology to treat that often requires a multidisciplinary team of surgical and medical oncologists.

Acid Peptic Disease.

The management of peptic ulcer disease has radically changed over the last 40 years from primarily surgical treatment to medical therapy nearly eliminating the need for elective surgery in these patients. Although there has been a decline in patients requiring acute surgical intervention for complications of peptic ulcer disease (perforation, bleeding, and obstruction), these patients still make up a significant proportion of hospital admissions every year. The modern acute care surgeon must have significant knowledge of the multiple treatment modalities used to appropriately care for these patients.

Video-Based Patient Education Improves Patient Attitudes Toward Resident Participation in Outpatient Surgical Care.

OBJECTIVE: Decipher if patient attitudes toward resident participation in surgical care can be improved with patient education using a video-based modality. DESIGN: A survey using a 5-pt Likert scale was created, piloted, and distributed in general and colorectal surgery outpatient clinics that had residents involved with patient care at 2 facilities, both with control and intervention groups. The intervention group viewed a short video (∼4 min) explaining the role, education, and responsibilities of medical students, residents, and attending surgeons prior to answering the survey. SETTING: General and colorectal surgery outpatient clinics at the University of Texas Health San Antonio, Texas. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 383 responses were collected, all clinic patients were eligible. RESULTS: The majority of patients (82%) welcomed resident participation in their health care. Eighteen percent of patients did not expect residents to be involved in their care. Patients had favorable views of residents participating during their surgical procedures with 77% responding "agree" or "strongly agree" to a senior resident assisting with a complicated procedure. Patients who viewed the video versus control were less concerned with how much of the procedure the resident would perform (76% vs 86%, p = 0.010). Patients who viewed the video felt less inconvenienced (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients are welcoming to resident participation in their surgical care but only 54% were expecting resident involvement at their clinic visit. Early explanation with an educational video of resident roles, education, and responsibilities may help bridge the gap and improve patient experience.

The Cost of Compliance: The Financial Burden of Fulfilling Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and American Board of Surgery Requirements.

OBJECTIVE: There has been a significant increase in the number of regulatory requirements for general surgery graduate medical education (GME) programs over the last 20 years from the governing bodies of the American Board of Surgery (ABS) and the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). We endeavored to calculate the cost to general surgery GME programs of regulatory requirements. DESIGN: We examined the requirements for General Surgery ABS Certification as well as the 2017 ACGME Program Requirements in General Surgery for all mandates that require funding by the surgery program to achieve. The requirements requiring funding include certification in Advanced Cardiac Life Support, Advanced Trauma Life Support, Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery, Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery; access to medical references; simulation capability, program director protected time (30%); program coordinator salary (Association for Hospital Medical Education reported mean); and faculty time devoted to morbidity and mortality conference, journal club, Clinical Competency Committee, and Program Evaluation Committee. We then identified the cost of each mandate based on the average program in the United States of 5 residents per year in 5 clinical years. RESULTS: Total cost for the average program per year as the result of ABS or ACGME mandate equaled a minimum of $227,043. The ABS associated costs are $8900 per year. The ACGME associated costs are $218,143. The cost of program director and faculty time to meet the minimum ACGME requirements equaled $159,600. CONCLUSIONS: The most significant cost associated with mandates set forth by the ABS and ACGME are program director and faculty time devoted to resident education and evaluation. Recognition of this cost burden by institutions and policymakers for the allocation of funds is important to maintain strong general surgery GME programs.

Failure on the American Board of Surgery Examinations of General Surgery Residency Graduates Correlates Positively with States' Malpractice Risk.

It has been suggested that in environments where there is greater fear of litigation, resident autonomy and education is compromised. Our aim was to examine failure rates on American Board of Surgery (ABS) examinations in comparison with medical malpractice payments in 47 US states/territories that have general surgery residency programs. We hypothesized higher ABS examination failure rates for general surgery residents who graduate from residencies in states with higher malpractice risk. We conducted a retrospective review of five-year (2010-2014) pass rates of first-time examinees of the ABS examinations. States' malpractice data were adjusted based on population. ABS examinations failure rates for programs in states with above and below median malpractice payments per capita were 31 and 24 per cent (P < 0.01) respectively. This difference was seen in university and independent programs regardless of size. Pearson correlation confirmed a significant positive correlation between board failure rates and malpractice payments per capita for Qualifying Examination (P < 0.02), Certifying Examination (P < 0.02), and Qualifying and Certifying combined index (P < 0.01). Malpractice risk correlates positively with graduates' failure rates on ABS examinations regardless of program size or type. We encourage further examination of training environments and their relationship to surgical residency graduate performance.

Immediate Auditory Feedback is Superior to Other Types of Feedback for Basic Surgical Skills Acquisition.

OBJECTIVE: We examined the effect of timing and type of feedback on medical students' knot-tying performance using visual versus auditory and immediate versus delayed feedback. We hypothesized that participants who received immediate auditory feedback would outperform those who received delayed and visual feedback. METHODS: Sixty-nine first- and second-year medical students were taught to tie 2-handed knots. All participants completed 3 pretest knot-tying trials without feedback. Participants were instructed to tie a knot sufficiently tight to stop the "blood" flow while minimizing the amount of force applied to the vessel. Task completion time was not a criterion. Participants were stratified and randomly assigned to 5 experimental groups based on type (auditory versus visual) and timing (immediate versus delayed) of feedback. The control group did not receive feedback. All groups trained to proficiency. Participants completed 3 posttest trials without feedback. RESULTS: There were fewer trials with leak (p < 0.01) and less force applied (p < 0.01) on the posttest compared to the pretest, regardless of study group. The immediate auditory feedback group required fewer trials to achieve proficiency than each of the other groups (p < 0.01) and had fewer leaks than the control, delayed auditory, and delayed visual groups (p < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In a surgical force feedback simulation model, immediate auditory feedback resulted in fewer training trials to reach proficiency and fewer leaks compared to visual and delayed forms of feedback.

The Effect of Patient Education on the Perceptions of Resident Participation in Surgical Care.

OBJECTIVE: To decipher if patient attitudes toward resident participation in their surgical care can be improved with patient education regarding resident roles, education, and responsibilities. DESIGN: An anonymous questionnaire was created and distributed in outpatient surgery clinics that had residents involved with patient care. In total, 3 groups of patients were surveyed, a control group and 2 intervention groups. Each intervention group was given an informational pamphlet explaining the role, education, and responsibilities of residents. The first pamphlet used an analogy-based explanation. The second pamphlet used literature citations and statistics. SETTING: Keesler Medical Center, Keesler AFB, MS. University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 454 responses were collected and analyzed-211 in the control group, 118 in the analogy pamphlet group, and 125 in the statistics pamphlet group. RESULTS: Patients had favorable views of residents assisting with their surgical procedures, and the majority felt that outcomes were the same or better regardless of whether they read an informational pamphlet. Of all the patients surveyed, 80% agreed or strongly agreed that they expect to be asked permission for residents to be involved in their care. Further, 52% of patients in the control group agreed or strongly agreed to a fifth-year surgery resident operating on them independently for routine procedures compared to 62% and 65% of the patients who read the analogy pamphlet and statistics pamphlet, respectively (p = 0.05). When we combined the 2 intervention groups compared to the control group, this significant difference persisted (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Most patients welcome resident participation in their surgical care, but they expect to be asked permission for resident involvement. Patient education using an information pamphlet describing resident roles, education, and responsibilities improved patient willingness to allow a chief resident to operate independently.

Predicting and enhancing American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination performance: does writing questions really help?

BACKGROUND: The generative learning model posits that individuals remember content they have generated better than materials created by others. The goals of this study were to evaluate question generation as a study method for the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) and determine whether practice test scores and other data predict ABSITE performance. METHODS: Residents (n = 206) from 6 general surgery programs were randomly assigned to one of the two study conditions. One group wrote questions for practice examinations. All residents took 2 practice examinations. RESULTS: There was not a significant effect of writing questions on ABSITE score. Practice test scores, United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 scores, and previous ABSITE scores were significantly correlated with ABSITE performance. CONCLUSIONS: The generative learning model was not supported. Performance on practice tests and other data can be used for early identification of residents at risk of performing poorly on the ABSITE.

How do Perceptions of Autonomy Differ in General Surgery Training Between Faculty, Senior Residents, Hospital Administrators, and the General Public? A Multi-Institutional Study.

OBJECTIVE: Identify barriers to resident autonomy in today's educational environment as perceived through 4 selected groups: senior surgical residents, teaching faculty, hospital administration, and the general public. DESIGN: Anonymous surveys were created and distributed to senior residents, faculty, and hospital administrators working within 3 residency programs. The opinions of a convenience sample of the general public were also assessed using a similar survey. SETTING: Keesler Medical Center, Keesler AFB, MS; the University of Texas Health Science of San Antonio, TX; and the University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 169 responses were collected: 32 residents, 50 faculty, 20 administrators, and 67 general public. RESULTS: Faculty and residents agree that when attending staff grant more autonomy, residents' self-confidence and sense of ownership improve. Faculty felt that residents should have less autonomy than residents did (p < 0.001). When asked to reflect on the current level of autonomy at their institution, 47% of residents felt that they had too little autonomy and 38% of faculty agreed. No resident or faculty felt that residents had too much autonomy at their institution. The general public were more welcoming of resident participation than faculty (p = 0.002) and administrators (p = 0.02) predicted they would be. When the general public were asked regarding their opinions about resident participation with complex procedures, they were less welcoming than faculty, administrators, and residents thought (p < 0.001). The general public were less likely to think that resident involvement would improve their quality of care (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Faculty and senior residents both endorse resident autonomy as important for resident development. The general public are more receptive to resident participation than anticipated. However, with increasing procedural complexity and resident independence, they were less inclined to have residents involved. The general public also had more concerns regarding quality of care provided by residents than the other groups had.