Fear of childbirth after induced abortion in primiparous women: Population-based register study from Finland.

INTRODUCTION: Fear of childbirth (FOC) is a common obstetrical challenge that complicates about every 10th pregnancy. Background factors of FOC are diverse. We evaluated the association of induced abortion (IA) and FOC in subsequent pregnancy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Population-based register study based on three Finnish national registers: the Register of Induced Abortions, the Medical Birth Register and the Hospital Discharge Register. The study cases were primigravid women undergoing an IA in 2000-2015 and subsequent pregnancy ending in live singleton birth up to 2017. Each case had three controls, matched by age and residential area, whose first pregnancy ended in a live birth. The main outcome was the incidence of FOC in the subsequent pregnancy. In a secondary analysis, we assessed other risk factors for FOC. RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 21 455 women and 63 425 controls. Altogether, 4.2% of women had a diagnosis of FOC. The incidence was higher in women with a history of IA than in controls (5.6% vs 3.7%, P < 0.001). A history of IA was associated with higher odds for FOC: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.20 with 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11-1.30. In addition, a history of psychiatric diagnosis (aOR 3.48, 95% CI 3.15-3.83), high maternal age, 30-39 years old (aOR 1.55, 95% CI 1.43-1.67; P < 0.001) and ≥40 years old (aOR 3.00, 95% CI 2.37-3.77; P < 0.001) and smoking (aOR 1.20, 95% CI 1.11-1.31; P < 0.001) were associated with increased odds for FOC. Women living in densely populated or rural areas and those with lower socioeconomic class had lower odds for FOC. CONCLUSIONS: A history of IA is associated with increased odds for FOC in subsequent pregnancy. However, the associations of FOC with a history of psychiatric diagnosis and elevated maternal age (especially ≥40 years old) are more pronounced.

Patient-controlled intravenous versus on-demand oral, intramuscular or mcs intravenous administration of oxycodone during medical induced abortion from 64 to 128 days of Gestation: A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare oxycodone administration via intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IVPCA) vs on-demand administration during late-first- and second-trimester medically induced abortion. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective randomized controlled study. We enrolled women between 64 to 128 days of gestation in the study between June 2016 and August 2018. Participants were randomized to receive oxycodone either via IVPCA or given on-demand orally, intramuscularly, or intravenously. Pain intensity and satisfaction with care were measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS, 0-100mm). RESULTS: Altogether 99 participants were randomized: 48 in IVPCA group and 51 in on-demand group. Median gestational age was similar between groups (74 days [Interquartile range, IQR 69-81] in the IVPCA group vs 72 [69-80] in the control group, p = 0.587). Peak maximal pain was severe in both groups (median pain VAS was 62 [IQR 44-84] and 71 [IQR 56-90], p = 0.52). The odds for severe pain (highest pain VAS≥70) were similar between the groups (IVPCA group OR 0.51 [95% Confidence Interval 0.22-1.18], p = 0.118). In contrast, the odds for mild or tolerable pain (highest pain VAS≤40) were higher in the IVPCA group (OR 4.06 [95% CI 1.05-16.04], p = 0.043). Nevertheless, satisfaction with care was high (VAS 94 [89-100]) in both groups. Of those experiencing severe pain, 94.0% declared pain medication as adequate. CONCLUSION: Women often experience severe pain during medical abortion irrespective of the mode of opiate administration. Oxycodone administration via IVPCA permits women to self-administer analgesics when experiencing pain, raising the odds for mild or tolerable pain during abortion care. Satisfaction with care was high. IMPLICATIONS: Medical abortion in late-first- and second-trimester is often painful experience. IVPCA offers a good method of choice for analgesia and raises the odds for tolerable pain (pain VAS less than 40) experience when compared to on-demand administration of analgesics.

Fear of childbirth after medical vs surgical abortion. Population-based register study from Finland.

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the effect of method of induced abortion and other abortion-associated variables on the incidence of fear of childbirth in subsequent pregnancy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This population-based register study cohort includes all nulliparous women with their first pregnancy ending in an induced abortion in 2000-2015 and subsequent pregnancy with live singleton delivery between 2000 and 2017 (n = 21 479). Data were derived from three national registers maintained by the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare. We divided the study population in three cohorts: (a) medical and (b) surgical abortion during first trimester (≤84 days of gestation), and (c) medical abortion during second trimester (85-168 days of gestation). Primary outcome measures were the incidence of registry-identified fear of childbirth and cesarean delivery related to it. RESULTS: The overall incidence of fear of childbirth was 5.6% (n = 1209). Altogether, 19.2% (n = 4121) of women underwent cesarean delivery. The odds were elevated especially for elective cesarean delivery (odds ratio [OR] 9.30, 95% CI 7.95-10.88, P < .001) in women with fear of childbirth. In multivariable analysis, the odds for fear of childbirth (adjusted OR [aOR] 0.80, 95% CI 0.68-0.94) and cesarean delivery (aOR 0.66, 95% CI 0.84-0.90) were decreased in women with a history of first-trimester medical abortion compared with those with first-trimester surgical abortion. Second-trimester medical abortion had no effect on the odds for fear of childbirth (aOR 1.04, 95% CI 0.71-1.50). Maternal age of 30-39 years and interpregnancy interval over 2 years were additional risk factors for both fear of childbirth and cesarean delivery, but surgical evacuation of uterus after the abortion was not. CONCLUSIONS: One first- or second-trimester medical abortion does not increase the odds for fear of childbirth, and cesarean delivery related to it in subsequent pregnancy when compared with first-trimester surgical abortion. Older maternal age and longer interpregnancy interval emerged as risk factors for fear of childbirth.

Pain during medical abortion in early pregnancy in teenage and adult women.

INTRODUCTION: Women experience pain during medical abortion, yet optimal pain management remains unclear. We studied the pain experience and need of analgesics during early medical abortion (≤63 days of gestation) among teenage and adult women. We also assessed predictive factors of severe pain. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We recruited 140 primigravid women: 60 teenagers and 80 adult women aged between 25 and 35 years old. The group of teenagers included 19 women under the age of 18 years old (minors). The abortion was performed with mifepristone (200 mg) followed by vaginal misoprostol (800 µg), mainly self-administered at home for adults. Minors were hospitalized during misoprostol administration. Pain medication consisted of ibuprofen 600 mg and paracetamol 1000 mg, first doses taken simultaneously with misoprostol and repeated, if needed, up to three times daily. Additional opiates (mainly tramadol or oxycodone) were administered at hospital if needed. Pain was measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS, 0-100 mm). RESULTS: The maximal pain VAS (median, interquartile range) was 75 (54-91). Of all the women, 57.7% experienced severe pain (VAS ≥70) during abortion care and 93.5% of women needed additional analgesics in addition to prophylactic pain medication. Teenagers needed additional analgesics more often than adults (5 [3-8] vs 3 [2-6] times, P = .021); 38.0% of all teenagers (64.7% of the minors) received additional opiates compared with 7.9% in adult women. Severe pain (VAS ≥70) was associated with history of dysmenorrhea (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.60 [95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21-5.59, P = .014]), anxiety at baseline (2.64 [1.03-6.77], P = .044) and emesis during abortion (5.24 [2.38-11.57], P < .001). Hospital administration of misoprostol did not lower the risk for severe pain experience (OR 0.84 [95% CI 0.34-2.05], P = .694). Satisfaction with care was high in study population (median VAS 91 [interquartile range 79-97]) and was not associated with the use of narcotic analgesic or place of misoprostol administration. CONCLUSIONS: Pain intensity was high both in teenage and adult women undergoing medical abortion, yet satisfaction on care was high. More effective analgesics than ibuprofen and paracetamol should be offered to all women undergoing early medical abortion, especially to those with history of dysmenorrhea. Also, routine use of antiemetics might be advisable.