Dentists with enhanced skills (Special Interest) in Endodontics: gatekeepers views in London.

BACKGROUND: Dentists with a special interest hold enhanced skills enabling them to treat cases of intermediate complexity. The aim of this study was to explore primary dental care practitioners' views of dentists with a special interest (DwSIs) in Endodontics in London, with reference to an educational and service initiative established by (the former) London Deanery in conjunction with the NHS. METHODS: A cross-sectional postal survey of primary care dentists working across different models of care within London was conducted, with a target to achieve views of at least 5 % of London's dentists. The questionnaire instrument was informed by qualitative research and the dental literature and piloted prior to distribution; data were analysed using SPSS v19 and STATA v12.0. RESULTS: Six per cent of London's primary care dentists (n = 243) responded to the survey; 53 % were male. Just over one third (37 %; n = 90) were aware of the DwSI service being provided. Most practitioners reported that having access to a DwSI in Endodontics would support the care of their patients (89 %; n = 215), would carry out more endodontic treatment in the NHS primary dental care if adequately reimbursed (93 %; n = 220), and had more time (76 %; n = 180). Female respondents appeared to be less confident in doing endodontic treatment (p = 0.001). More recently qualified respondents reported greater need for training/support for performing more endodontic treatment in the NHS primary dental care (p = 0.001), were more dissatisfied with access to endodontic service in the NHS primary dental care (p = 0.007) and more interested to train as a DwSI in endodontics (p = 0.001) compared with respondents having a greater number of years of clinical experience since qualification. CONCLUSION: The findings lend support to the concept of developing dentists with enhanced skills as well as ensuring additional funding, time and support to facilitate more routine endodontics through the NHS primary care to meet patient needs. More recently qualified dentists working in London were more concerned regarding endodontic service access, expressed need for training/support for undertaking more endodontic treatment in the NHS primary dental care and a desire to train as a DwSI in endodontics.

Barriers encountered using skill-mix to deliver caries prevention in dental practices.

This opinion paper provides an analysis of the barriers and successes experienced when developing and implementing a pilot scheme to deliver caries prevention using skill-mix in the National Health Service (NHS) General Dental Services. A training programme was initiated to develop the skills of extended duties dental nurses to deliver fluoride varnish to patients in selected dental practices in Croydon, London, UK. In the light of the evaluation of this programme, a recommendation is made that similar preventive schemes should be delivered in the future within the NHS dental contract.

Should dentists be concerned about the weight of their patients?

This opinion paper considers obesity and its relationship to dental practice. Twenty-three per cent of people in England are estimated to be obese, a figure that is predicted to continue rising. It follows that obese patients are frequently encountered in general dental practice. The authors review the links between obesity and dental health, the possible barriers and challenges to providing dental care for obese people, and how these may be overcome. They also report the findings of a London survey investigating the current provision of specialist dental services for obese patients who cannot be treated in a standard dental chair. Services across London were highly variable and in some areas no provision was identified. The implications of the rising prevalence of obesity for service planners and practitioners are also discussed.

A baseline audit of referral and treatment delivered to patients in the intermediate minor oral surgery service in Croydon PCT.

INTRODUCTION: Patients attending for primary dental care may require oral surgery procedures beyond the capability of a generalist and thus need to be treated by a dentist with greater expertise. In the United Kingdom, it is increasingly accepted that such care may be provided in primary care settings by specialists or dentists with a special interest. In response to local pressures, an intermediate minor oral surgery (IMOS) service has been established in Croydon, south west London, to provide oral surgery treatment for non-urgent patients on referral. AIM: To audit the appropriateness and quality of oral surgery referrals after triage to an IMOS service in Croydon and to set standards for future audits on this topic. METHODS: An audit tool was developed in line with the local referral guidelines and agreed with local stakeholders. Information on 501 (10%) triaged referrals to IMOS practices over a 24-month period was obtained through the referral management centre. A 10% sample of referrals per month to each practice was calculated and IMOS providers randomly selected the relevant patient records. Using an agreed audit pro forma, information on the indications for referral, treatment provided, and dates relating to patient management, in addition to the age and sex of patients, was collected from the IMOS providers by one investigator. Descriptive analysis of the data was performed. RESULTS: Of the 501 patient records that were examined, 99% of patients were treated in IMOS practices, with only three (less than 1%) patients being referred on to hospital consultant services. The largest proportion (237; 40%) of referrals was for the extraction of teeth considered to have special difficulty, followed by lower third molars (154; 26%). Almost one-third (159; 32%) of patients were referred for more than one procedure. One in eight (72; 13%) teeth removed by the IMOS providers were recorded as a simple extraction without medical complications. CONCLUSIONS: In general, patients were referred appropriately to the primary care oral surgery service in Croydon, with only a minority recorded as receiving simple care that should not have required referral. The clinician-led triage process using a referral management system worked well in selecting appropriate patients for treatment by IMOS providers in primary care and reduced referrals to hospital. Suggested standards for future audits of IMOS referrals have been set.

Improving access to oral surgery services in primary care.

This paper describes the innovative use of National Health Service (NHS) dental commissioning powers to develop specialist primary care based oral surgery services. The outcomes, after one full year of the scheme, have been substantial improvement in access and reduced waiting times for patients, further development of NHS primary care dental services through commissioning processes, increased use and engagement of oral surgery specialists outside of a hospital setting, and considerable ongoing savings to the NHS. Collaborative working between hospital consultants and managers, Primary Care Trust dental commissioners, general dental practice providers, specialist oral surgeons and a dental public health consultant has resulted in sustainable benefits to patients and the NHS within the World Class Commissioning framework.

What do you think of your dentist? A dental practice assessment questionnaire.

Background In order to comply with clinical governance requirements and receive payments under the Qualities and Outcomes Framework, GPs are required to undertake an annual survey of patient experience using a validated assessment tool. Dentists, in contrast, have embryonic clinical governance structures. The provision of quality dental services was identified in NHS Dentistry: Options for Change as a priority for the future. In anticipation of the PCT role in commissioning quality NHS dental care, Croydon PCT has developed an instrument to examine various aspects of the patient experience. Methods A review of existing literature identified five generic dimensions of patient satisfaction with dental care: technical competence, interpersonal factors, convenience, costs and facilities. The dental practice assessment questionnaire was developed to cover all of these dimensions using a number of validated measures and modified questions. A small scale pilot was undertaken before the questionnaire was sent to a 10% random stratified sample of the PCT population. Results Validation analyses were undertaken in conjunction with the GKT Dental Institute. Cronbach's alpha demonstrated very high levels of internal consistency, and factor analysis and correlation coefficients demonstrated high levels of factorial and concurrent validity respectively. Subgroup analysis revealed differences in reported satisfaction by age and ethnic group, and that those who attend because of pain or a dental emergency are generally less satisfied with the care they receive. These results are consistent with previous research findings. Conclusion The dental practice assessment questionnaire is a valid and consistent measurement tool. Its use could be extended across the NHS without difficulty.

Cognitive-behavioral therapy and psychosocial factors in low back pain: directions for the future.

STUDY DESIGN: An amalgamated review of the current state of knowledge about psychosocial factors in low back pain (LBP), as presented at the plenary session at the Fourth International Forum on LBP Research in Primary Care (March 16-18, 2000, Israel). OBJECTIVES: To outline evidence-based theories that have lead to the identification of yellow flags (psychosocial risk factors for developing long-term disability) for nonspecific LBP. To discuss the role of clinicians in primary care in detecting and addressing these psychosocial factors and to outline future directions for research to clarify this role. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: It is widely accepted that psychological and social factors play an important role in LBP; however, it is currently unclear which specific factors merit intervention to reduce the burden of disease. METHOD: The review is an integration based on the plenary session presented at the Fourth International Forum on LBP Research in Primary Care. The presentations included original research studies, a systematic review, and theoretical descriptions of models of risk and treatment. RESULTS: There is good evidence to support the role of psychological risk factors at early stages of LBP in the development of long-term disability. There are evidence-based theories and models that provide directions for future interventions. CONCLUSION: In the treatment of psychological factors, the role of clinicians in primary care remains unclear. Further evidence is needed to identify specific psychological risk factors, primary care tools for their identification need developing, and interventions at different stages of LBP by different professionals need to be tested.