Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab ; 43(5): 531-534, 2018 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29272606

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to investigate blood glucose changes, as measured by a continuous glucose monitoring system, that occur in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) following an acute bout of moderate-intensity walking after consuming a high-carbohydrate/low-fat meal. This study found that moderate-intensity walking induced greater postprandial glucose control compared with sedentary activity and it appears that moderate-intensity activity may be used to reduce postprandial glucose levels in women with GDM.


Subject(s)
Blood Glucose/metabolism , Diabetes, Gestational/blood , Postprandial Period , Walking , Adult , Body Mass Index , Body Weight , Diabetes, Gestational/therapy , Diet, Carbohydrate Loading , Diet, Fat-Restricted , Female , Humans , Meals , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, Third , Sedentary Behavior , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
3.
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs ; 25(3): 226-32; quiz 233-4, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21825911

ABSTRACT

Screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes has lacked uniform criteria both nationally and internationally. In addition, the relationship between the degree of hyperglycemia or glucose intolerance and the risk of maternal, fetal, and neonatal adverse outcomes has not been clearly established. The International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) recently published their recommendation for diagnosing and classifying gestational hyperglycemia in pregnancy after evaluation of the results of the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) observational study. Their recommendations have recently been accepted by the American Diabetes Association and are currently under review by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologist (ACOG) in the United States. If accepted in the United States and internationally, the world would have consistent thresholds for evaluating hyperglycemia in pregnancy, which would not only include the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus but also overt diabetes, which has not been encompassed by previously accepted definitions.


Subject(s)
Diabetes, Gestational/prevention & control , Prenatal Diagnosis , Adult , Diabetes, Gestational/classification , Diabetes, Gestational/epidemiology , Diabetes, Gestational/nursing , Female , Humans , Internationality , Neonatal Nursing , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology
4.
Med Sci Sports Exerc ; 43(6): 1100-5, 2011 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21085037

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine the step count accuracy of three pedometers and one accelerometer in pregnant women during treadmill walking. METHODS: Participants were 30 women in the second or third trimester (20-34 wk) who were screened for pregnancy-related risk factors. Each participant was fitted with a belt containing three physical activity monitors: Yamax Digiwalker SW-200 (DW), New Lifestyles NL 2000 (NL), and GT3X ActiGraph accelerometer (ACT). The Omron HJ-720ITC (HJ) was placed in the pants' front pocket. Participants walked at 54, 67, 80, and 94 m · min for 2 min each. Actual steps were determined by an investigator using a hand-tally counter. The mean percent of steps recorded was calculated for each device at each speed and compared. Pearson correlations were used to determine the effect of body mass index and tilt angle on pedometer accuracy. RESULTS: There was a significant interaction between speed and device (F9,20 = 7.574, P < 0.001). Across all speeds, the NL and HJ had the lowest error. The ACT and DW underestimated the actual steps taken, particularly at the slower walking speeds. At 54 m · min, the ACT averaged 77.5% of steps and the DW averaged 56.9% of steps. Significant differences in the mean percent of steps recorded were found between devices at all speeds. Body mass index was only significantly correlated with percent of steps recorded by the NL, and there were no significant correlations between steps recorded and tilt angle. CONCLUSIONS: In pregnant women, the ACT and DW had more error than the NL and HJ. On the basis of these results, the NL and HJ should be considered for use in further research studies and physical activity programs that focus on walking during pregnancy.


Subject(s)
Monitoring, Ambulatory/instrumentation , Walking , Adult , Body Mass Index , Female , Humans , Pregnancy
5.
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs ; 34(3): 329-34, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15890831

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of reporting of self-monitored blood glucose in pregnant women with diabetes. DESIGN: A descriptive study. Patient-recorded logs of self-monitored blood glucose values were compared to meter memory values. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of 85 pregnant women with pregestational and gestational diabetes enrolled in a perinatal diabetes program in an urban teaching hospital. RESULTS: Accuracy significantly differed by diabetes type (p = .015). Women with type 1 diabetes did not accurately record on average 36.7% of blood glucose values as compared to 8.5% of type 2, 21.2% of GDMA(1) (gestational diabetes mellitus, diet controlled), and 23.4% of GDMA(2) (gestational diabetes mellitus, insulin controlled). Age positively affected accuracy, but accuracy was not affected by marital status, educational background, or duration of diabetes. Statistical significance was shown between values from women with private health insurance and women with Medicaid. Eighty percent of the sample overreported by adding phantom values in the logbook, which did not differ by diabetes type. Approximately 70% underreported by not logging values in the meter memory that was statistically significant by diabetes type. CONCLUSION: Assessment of the reliability of self-monitored blood glucose results from pregnant women with diabetes is recommended owing to a significant degree of falsification.


Subject(s)
Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring/methods , Diabetes, Gestational/blood , Obstetric Nursing/standards , Pregnancy in Diabetics/blood , Prenatal Care/methods , Adult , Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring/nursing , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/blood , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/blood , Diabetes, Gestational/nursing , Diet, Diabetic , Female , Glucose Intolerance/blood , Glycated Hemoglobin/metabolism , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy , Pregnancy in Diabetics/nursing , Reproducibility of Results , Socioeconomic Factors
6.
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs ; 18(1): 14-25; quiz 26-7, 2004.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15027665

ABSTRACT

Preconception care in women with diabetes reduces the risk of spontaneous abortion and congenital malformations as a result of improved glycemic control before and during organogenesis. Prepregnancy planning encompasses optimizing glycemic control and also affording the opportunity for genetic counseling, contraceptive selection, management of diabetes complications, and evaluation of psychosocial aspects of pregnancy, childbearing, and diabetes care. The purpose of this article is to provide nurses with current clinical assessment and management strategies of women with diabetes in order to implement a comprehensive individualized preconception plan of care.


Subject(s)
Attitude to Health , Diabetes Mellitus/psychology , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Health Education , Maternal Behavior/psychology , Preconception Care/standards , Abortion, Spontaneous/prevention & control , Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring/psychology , Family Planning Services/organization & administration , Female , Health Education/methods , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Promotion/standards , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnancy in Diabetics/psychology , Pregnancy in Diabetics/therapy , United States , Women's Health Services/standards
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...