Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
1.
Am J Prev Med ; 53(6): 845-853, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28867143

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Pregnant women are at risk for severe influenza-related complications; however, only 52% reported receiving an influenza vaccination during the 2013-2014 influenza season. Text4baby, a free national text service, provides influenza vaccination education and reminders to pregnant women. This study examined reported influenza vaccination during pregnancy among Text4baby participants who reported receiving influenza messages and women who reported never participating in Text4baby. METHODS: Opt-in Internet Panel Surveys (April 2013 and 2014) of pregnant women collected demographic and other characteristics; influenza vaccination knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors; and Text4baby participation. Women aged 18-49 years, pregnant anytime from October to January (N=3,321) were included. Text4baby influenza message recallers reported receiving Text4baby influenza messages during their current/most recent pregnancy (n=377). Text4baby non-participants reported never receiving Text4baby messages (n=2,824). Multivariable logistic regression was performed (2014-2016) controlling for demographic and other characteristics, high-risk conditions, and provider recommendation and offer to vaccinate. Adjusted prevalence ratios (APRs) were calculated. Random sampling was assumed for this non-probability sample. RESULTS: Text4baby recallers were more likely than non-participants to report influenza vaccination regardless of receipt of provider recommendation and/or offer to vaccinate (provider recommendation/offer APR=1.29, 95% CI=1.21, 1.37, provider recommendation/no offer APR=1.52, 95% CI=1.07, 2.17). Among women receiving neither a provider recommendation nor offer to vaccinate, Text4baby recallers were more than three times as likely to report influenza vaccination compared with non-participants (APR=3.39, 95% CI=2.03, 5.67). CONCLUSIONS: Text4baby status was associated with higher influenza vaccination, especially among women whose provider did not recommend or offer the vaccine. Encouraging Text4baby enrollment may help ensure influenza vaccination is given to protect mothers and infants.


Subject(s)
Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control , Text Messaging , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Internet , Logistic Models , Middle Aged , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/virology , Seasons , Surveys and Questionnaires , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
2.
Am J Prev Med ; 49(4): 563-72, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26232904

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Pregnant women, postpartum women, and infants are at high risk for complications from influenza. From October to November 2012, Text4baby, a free national text service for pregnant women and mothers of infants aged <1 year, implemented a module of interactive messages encouraging maternal influenza vaccination. A program evaluation examined whether a text-based reminder or tailored education improved self-reported influenza vaccination or intent to be vaccinated later in the influenza season among Text4baby participants. METHODS: Nearly one third (28,609/89,792) of enrollees responded to a text asking about their vaccination plans. Those planning to receive vaccination were randomly assigned to receive an encouragement message or an encouragement message plus the opportunity to schedule a reminder (n=3,021 at follow-up). Those not planning to be vaccinated were randomly assigned to receive general education or education tailored to their reason for non-vaccination (n=3,820 at follow-up). The effect of the enhanced messages was assessed using multinomial logistic regression in 2013-2014. RESULTS: A reminder increased the odds of vaccination at follow-up among mothers (AOR=2.0, 95% CI=1.4, 2.9) and of continued intent to be vaccinated later in the season (pregnant, AOR=2.1, 95% CI=1.4, 3.1; mother, AOR=1.7, 95% CI=1.1, 2.5). Among mothers not planning to be vaccinated because of cost, those who received a tailored message about low-cost vaccination had higher odds of vaccination at follow-up (AOR=1.9, 95% CI=1.1, 3.5). Other tailored messages were not effective. CONCLUSIONS: Text reminders and tailored education may encourage influenza vaccination among this vulnerable population; both have now been incorporated into Text4baby.


Subject(s)
Immunization Programs , Influenza Vaccines , Reminder Systems , Text Messaging , Female , Humans , Pregnancy
3.
Matern Child Health J ; 18(3): 634-9, 2014 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23775248

ABSTRACT

The objectives are to report the estimated prevalence of pregnancy complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes in a defined population of Alaska Native women and also examine factors contributing to an intensive and successful collaboration between a tribal health center and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Investigators abstracted medical record data from a random sample of singleton deliveries to residents of the study region occurring between 1997 and 2005. We used descriptive statistics to estimate the prevalence and 95% confidence intervals of selected pregnancy complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Records were examined for 505 pregnancies ending in a singleton delivery to 469 women. Pregnancy complication rates were 5.9% (95% CI 4.0, 8.4) for gestational diabetes mellitus, 6.1% (95% CI 4.2, 8.6%) for maternal chronic hypertension and 11.5% (95% CI 8.8, 14.6) for pregnancy associated hypertension, and 22.9% (95% CI 19.2-26.5 %) for anemia. The cesarean section rate was 5.5% (95% CI 3.5, 7.5) and 3.8% (95% CI 2.3, 5.8) of newborns weighed >4,500 g. Few previous studies reported pregnancy outcomes among Alaska Native women in a specific geographic region of Alaska and regarding the health needs in this population. We highlight components of our collaboration that contributed to the success of the study. Studies focusing on special populations such as Alaska Native women are feasible and can provide important information on health indicators at the local level.


Subject(s)
Community Health Services , Cooperative Behavior , Federal Government , Inuit , Pregnancy Complications/ethnology , Pregnancy Outcome/ethnology , Adolescent , Adult , Alaska/epidemiology , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Confidence Intervals , Female , Humans , Medical Audit , Pregnancy , United States , Young Adult
4.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand ; 92(6): 648-55, 2013 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23551054

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine the potential effects of prenatal smokeless tobacco use on selected birth outcomes. DESIGN: A population-based, case-control study using a retrospective medical record review. POPULATION: Singleton deliveries 1997-2005 to Alaska Native women residing in western Alaska. METHODS: Hospital discharge codes were used to identify potential case deliveries and a random control sample. Data on tobacco use and confirmation of pregnancy outcomes were abstracted from medical records for 1123 deliveries. Logistic regression was used to examine associations between tobacco use and pregnancy outcomes. Adjusted odds ratios (OR), 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), and p-values were calculated. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Preterm delivery, pregnancy-associated hypertension, and placental abruption. RESULTS: In unadjusted analysis, smokeless tobacco use was not significantly associated with preterm delivery (OR 1.44, 95% CI 0.97-2.15). After adjustment for parity, pre-pregnancy body mass index, and maternal age, the point estimate was attenuated and remained non-significant. No significant associations were observed between smokeless tobacco use and pregnancy-associated hypertension (adjusted OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.56-1.51) or placental abruption (adjusted OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.53-2.33). CONCLUSIONS: Prenatal smokeless tobacco use does not appear to reduce risk of pregnancy-associated hypertension or to substantially increase risk of abruption. An association between smokeless tobacco and preterm delivery could not be ruled out. Components in tobacco other than nicotine likely play a major role in decreased pre-eclampsia risk in smokers. Nicotine adversely affects fetal neurodevelopment and our results should not be construed to mean that smokeless tobacco use is safe during pregnancy.


Subject(s)
Abruptio Placentae/epidemiology , Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced/epidemiology , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Tobacco, Smokeless , Adult , Alaska/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
6.
Disaster Med Public Health Prep ; 6(2): 97-103, 2012 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22700016

ABSTRACT

During the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) pandemic, many pregnant women experienced severe illness and some gave birth while ill with suspected or confirmed pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza. Because of concerns about possible transmission of this novel virus to immunologically naïve newborns, and the absence of definitive studies regarding this risk, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reviewed relevant literature to understand the potential burden of disease and routes of transmission affecting newborns. This report describes the issues considered during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic as CDC developed guidance to protect newborns in hospital settings. Also presented is a framework of protection efforts to prevent novel influenza infection in fetuses/newborns before birth and in hospital settings. Although developed specifically for the pandemic, the framework may be useful during future novel influenza outbreaks.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/prevention & control , Infection Control/organization & administration , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/prevention & control , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Antiviral Agents/administration & dosage , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/transmission , Health Personnel , Hospital Administration , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Influenza, Human/transmission , Milk, Human , Pandemics/prevention & control , United States
7.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand ; 91(1): 93-103, 2012 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21902677

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of maternal prenatal smokeless tobacco use on infant birth size. DESIGN: A retrospective medical record review of 502 randomly selected deliveries. POPULATION AND SETTING: Singleton deliveries to Alaska Native women residing in a defined geographical region in western Alaska, 1997-2005. METHODS: A regional medical center's electronic records were used to identify singleton deliveries. Data on maternal tobacco exposure and pregnancy outcomes were abstracted from medical records. Logistic models were used to estimate adjusted mean birthweight, length and head circumference for deliveries to women who used no tobacco (n=121), used smokeless tobacco (n=237) or smoked cigarettes (n=59). Differences in mean birthweight, length and head circumference, 95% confidence intervals and p-values were calculated using non-users as the reference group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Infant birthweight, crown-heel length and head circumference. RESULTS: After adjustment for gestational age and other potential confounders, the mean birthweight of infants of smokeless tobacco users was reduced by 78 g compared with that of infants of non-users (p=0.18) and by 331 g in infants of smokers (p<0.01). No association was found between maternal smokeless tobacco use and infant length or infant head circumference. CONCLUSIONS: We found a modest but non-significant reduction in the birthweight of infants of smokeless tobacco users compared with infants of tobacco non-users. Because smokeless tobacco contains many toxic compounds that could affect other pregnancy outcomes, results of this study should not be construed to mean that smokeless tobacco use is safe during pregnancy.


Subject(s)
Birth Weight/drug effects , Body Height/drug effects , Indians, North American , Tobacco, Smokeless/adverse effects , Adult , Alaska , Cephalometry , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Logistic Models , Male , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Smoking/adverse effects , Smoking/ethnology
8.
Matern Child Health J ; 16(8): 1657-64, 2012 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21822963

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to explore pregnant and recently pregnant women's perceptions of influenza vaccine and antivirals during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic. We conducted 18 focus groups with pregnant and recently pregnant women in three US cities in September 2009. Participants were segmented into groups by insurance status (no or public insurance vs. private insurance), vaccine attitudes (higher vs. lower likelihood of acceptance of any vaccines, not only influenza vaccines), and parity (first child vs. other children in the home) based on information they provided on the screening questionnaire at the time of recruitment. We found that women are not well informed about influenza vaccinations and antiviral medicine and have significant concerns about taking them during pregnancy. An interest in their infant's well-being, however, can be strong motivation to adopt preventive recommendations, including vaccination. A woman's health care provider is a highly trusted source of information about the 2009 H1N1. Pregnant women have unique communication needs for influenza. Messages directing pregnant women to adopt public health recommendations, particularly for vaccination or prophylactic medication should include a detailed description of the benefits or lack of risk to the fetus and the safety of breastfeeding. Additionally, messages should recognize that pregnant women are taught to be selective about taking medication and provide a clear rationale for why the medicine or vaccine is necessary.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/administration & dosage , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control , Pregnant Women/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Communication , Female , Focus Groups , Humans , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Insurance, Health , Pandemics , Parity , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Perception , Pregnancy , Professional-Patient Relations , Public Health , Risk Factors , Seasons , Socioeconomic Factors , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
9.
Matern Child Health J ; 16(2): 479-85, 2012 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21350843

ABSTRACT

To better understand the knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of providers regarding influenza infection and vaccination in pregnancy, fourteen focus groups were conducted among 92 providers in Atlanta, GA; Dallas, TX; and Portland, OR in late 2009. NVivo 8.0 was used for analysis. Most providers had no experience with pregnant women severely affected by influenza. Many perceived the 2009 H1N1 pandemic to be limited and mild. Providers knew that pregnant women should receive the 2009 H1N1 vaccine and reported plans to vaccinate more patients than the previous season. Most knew CDC guidelines for antiviral treatment and prophylaxis, but some reported hesitancy with presumptive treatment. Although awareness of influenza's potential to cause severe illness in pregnant women was observed, providers' experience and comfort with influenza prevention and treatment was suboptimal. Sustained efforts to educate prenatal care providers about influenza in pregnancy through trusted channels are critical.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control , Prenatal Care , Adult , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Community Health Services , Female , Focus Groups , Humans , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza, Human/drug therapy , Influenza, Human/virology , Perception , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/drug therapy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/virology , Prenatal Care/methods , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States/epidemiology , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
10.
Am J Public Health ; 99(5): 893-8, 2009 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19299672

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We sought to estimate the effect of universal implementation of a clinic-based, psychosocial smoking cessation intervention for pregnant women. METHODS: We used data from US birth certificates (2005) and the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (2004) to estimate the number of women smoking at conception. To calculate the number of women eligible to receive the cessation intervention, we used estimates from the literature of the percentage of women who quit spontaneously (23%), entered prenatal care before the third trimester (96.5%), and disclosed smoking to their provider (75%). We used the pooled relative risk (RR) for continued smoking from the 2004 Cochrane Review as our measure of the intervention's effectiveness (RR = 0.94). RESULTS: We estimated that 944,240 women smoked at conception. Of these, 23.0% quit spontaneously, 6.3% quit with usual care, and an additional 3.3% quit because of the intervention, leaving 67.4% smoking throughout pregnancy. The calculated smoking prevalence in late pregnancy decreased from 16.4% to 15.6% because of the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Universal implementation of a best-practice, clinic-based intervention would increase the total number of quitters but would not substantially reduce smoking prevalence among pregnant women.


Subject(s)
Health Promotion/statistics & numerical data , Maternal Welfare/statistics & numerical data , Maternal-Child Health Centers/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology , Prenatal Care/statistics & numerical data , Smoking/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Population Surveillance , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/prevention & control , Prevalence , Risk , Smoking Prevention , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
11.
Matern Child Health J ; 10(3): 303-10, 2006 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16555141

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Use of vaginal douche products has been linked with a variety of reproductive health problems; nonetheless, the practice of douching persists. The goals of this study were to 1) determine the use of vaginal douches and other feminine hygiene products, 2) ascertain how safe women think vaginal douche products are, and 3) evaluate women's readiness to stop douching. METHODS: A random-digit-dial computer-assisted telephone survey was conducted among US women between the ages of 18 and 44. RESULTS: Of the 2,602 women interviewed, 11.8% (n = 307) engaged in regular douching (White: 9.1%; African American: 27.7%; Hispanic: 15.0%). Women who douched, compared to women who did not douche, used other feminine hygiene products significantly more often (vaginal sprays [ p < .0001], wipes/towelettes [ p < 0.01], vaginal powder [ p < 0.0001] and bubble bath for feminine cleansing [ p < 0.001]). Women who douched also were more likely than nondouchers to agree with the statement, "Douche products are safe to use; otherwise they wouldn't be on the market" (70.3% vs. 33.4%, respectively; p < 0.0001). Nearly all women (90.0%) who douched had no intention to discontinue the practice. CONCLUSION: Compared with women who do not douche, women who douche use other feminine hygiene products at a much higher rate and also believe that douche products are safe. Women who douche will remain resistant to stopping the practice without innovative interventions. Given that most women start douching in adolescence, teens should be targeted for prevention efforts.


Subject(s)
Consumer Product Safety , Intention , Vaginal Douching/methods , Vaginal Douching/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Commerce , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Interviews as Topic , United States , Women's Health
12.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 186(6): 1345-50, 2002 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12066120

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the association between vaginal douching and preterm birth. STUDY DESIGN: We enrolled hospitalized women after delivery in a case-control study. Women who were delivered of a live preterm singleton infant were assigned as cases. Women who were delivered at term were randomly selected as control subjects. We surveyed women about their douching habits and risk factors for preterm birth and abstracted data from the records. RESULTS: After adjustment, vaginal douching within 6 months of pregnancy was not significantly associated with preterm birth (odds ratio, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.8-1.6). However, in secondary analyses, douching more than once per week (odds ratio, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.0-15.5) or longer than 10 years (odds ratio, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1-3.2) was associated with preterm birth. CONCLUSION: Vaginal douching does not appear to be a strong risk factor for preterm birth. Further study is needed to confirm the risk that is associated with frequent or long-term douching.


Subject(s)
Obstetric Labor, Premature/etiology , Therapeutic Irrigation/adverse effects , Vagina , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Odds Ratio , Pregnancy , Risk Factors , Therapeutic Irrigation/statistics & numerical data , Time Factors
13.
Epidemiology ; 13(3): 328-33, 2002 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11964935

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To examine the hypothesized association between vaginal douching and preterm delivery, we conducted a study among women in a managed care organization in Atlanta, GA. METHODS: We drew a stratified random sample of 262 preterm (20-36 weeks' gestation) and 804 term deliveries that occurred between January 1996 and April 1997. Data were collected from telephone interviews and medical records. We used proportional hazards regression to compute gestation-specific conditional probabilities of delivery. The risk of preterm delivery associated with douching was examined, adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS: Douching during pregnancy increased the overall risk of preterm delivery (hazard ratio = 1.9, 95% confidence interval = 1.0-3.7). CONCLUSIONS: Further research to clarify the relation between douching and preterm delivery should pay particular attention to the role of vaginal infections.


Subject(s)
Obstetric Labor, Premature/epidemiology , Therapeutic Irrigation/adverse effects , Vagina , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Female , Georgia/epidemiology , Gestational Age , Humans , Middle Aged , Obstetric Labor, Premature/ethnology , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Proportional Hazards Models , Risk Factors , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Therapeutic Irrigation/statistics & numerical data , Time Factors , Vagina/physiology
14.
Matern Child Health J ; 6(4): 227-36, 2002 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12512764

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Ectopic pregnancy is a common condition with significant health consequences; complications are a major cause of maternal mortality in the United States. Accurate ascertainment of the number of ectopic pregnancies occurring in the United States has been dramatically affected by changing medical practices, causing estimates based on hospital data to be falsely low. This study was performed to identify nationally representative data on ectopic pregnancies and determine overlap of these data, to calculate the annual weighted number of ectopic pregnancies and confidence intervals for these estimates, and to determine barriers to estimation of ectopic pregnancy incidence. METHODS: To assess whether a national estimate of the incidence of ectopic pregnancy could be calculated, we analyzed 1992-99 data from the six nationally representative data sets that include information on ectopic pregnancy. We examined relevant data in each data set and assessed whether any combination of data sets could be used to estimate ectopic pregnancy incidence. We calculated weighted estimates and 95% confidence intervals for hospitalizations, outpatient surgeries, outpatient medical procedures, and physician visits for and self-reports of ectopic pregnancy. RESULTS: Small sample sizes severely limited calculation of estimates of ectopic pregnancy. Data needed for assessing multiple counting was not available consistently. The likelihood of multiple counting of cases was substantial when data set counts were combined. CONCLUSIONS: A reliable incidence rate for ectopic pregnancy in the United States could not be estimated from existing nationally representative data sources. Major advances in diagnosis and treatment of ectopic pregnancy have affected surveillance in two ways: inpatient hospital treatment of ectopic pregnancy has decreased, and multiple health care visits for a single ectopic pregnancy have increased. Alternate means of surveillance are needed to improve understanding of risk factors and trends for ectopic pregnancy, and we recommend examination of the databases of public and private insurance systems and managed care systems. Similar alternate means of surveillance may be needed for other health conditions with comparable changes in management of care.


Subject(s)
Health Care Surveys , Population Surveillance/methods , Pregnancy, Ectopic/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Confidence Intervals , Current Procedural Terminology , Female , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Incidence , Maternal Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Patient Discharge/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy , Pregnancy, Ectopic/surgery , Pregnancy, Ectopic/therapy , Public Health Informatics , United States/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...