Correlations between ultrasonographic and subsequent radiographic findings of developmental dysplasia of the hips

Purpose@#The study aimed to investigate the utility of ultrasonographic (US) findings in predicting the subsequent radiographic parameters of developmental dysplasia of the hips. @*Methods@#In this 12-year retrospective cohort study, all new-born infants with a positive clinical examination or risk factors were included. They were scheduled for hip ultrasonography in the first 3 months, and subsequent radiographs at 1 year of life. The US images were evaluated using the Graf classification, Harcke’s dynamic screening method, and Terjesen’s femoral head coverage method. The radiographic images were evaluated using the acetabular index and femoral head position. The overall US or radiographic findings were considered abnormal if they were classified as abnormal for any of their respective parameters. The overall US and radiographic parameters were correlated. @*Results@#A total of 160 patients were included. The overall US and radiographic parameters showed no statistically significant difference (P=0.050). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the overall US parameters were 57.1%, 84.9%, and 81.3%, respectively. All three individual US parameters showed no statistically significant differences, with the overall radiographic findings and acetabular index (P>0.05). However, they showed a statistically significant difference, with the position of the femoral head (P<0.001), with the US parameters having an excellent negative predictive value of 100% for identifying an abnormal femoral head position. @*Conclusion@#The current study suggests that US findings evaluated in the first 3 months of life showed no statistically significant difference with radiographic findings evaluated at 1 year of life. The US parameters showed an excellent negative predictive value for abnormal femoral head position on radiographs.

The earliest timing of ultrasound in screening for developmental dysplasia of the hips

PURPOSE: The current study aimed to evaluate the results of ultrasound screening for developmental dysplasia of the hips (DDH) done at various weeks of life, to determine the earliest time that ultrasound screening can be performed reliably. METHODS: In this 17-year cohort study, all neonates who underwent ultrasound screening prior to the 12th week of life with subsequent follow-up radiography done at 1 year of life were included. The ultrasound images were evaluated according to the Graf classification, Harcke’s dynamic ultrasound screening method, and Terjesen’s femoral head coverage method. The radiographic images were evaluated according to the acetabular index and the femoral head position. The accuracy and correlation between the ultrasound findings from various weeks of life with the radiographic findings at 1 year of life were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 348 neonates were included in the study, of whom 92 had abnormal ultrasound findings and 42 had abnormal radiographic findings at 1 year. Significant differences were identified between the findings of ultrasound screening examinations performed prior to the fourth week of life (day 21 and before) and the radiographic findings at 1 year of life (P0.05). The accuracy of ultrasound screening was 79.2% or higher when performed during or after the fourth week of life (day 22 and beyond). CONCLUSION: The earliest that ultrasound screening for DDH can be performed reliably is during the fourth week of life (day 22 and beyond).

Clinical outcomes of below knee amputations in diabetic foot patients

<p><b>INTRODUCTION</b>This study aims to evaluate the predictive factors affecting the clinical outcome of Below Knee Amputations (BKA) performed in diabetic foot patients admitted to National University Hospital (NUH) Multi-Disciplinary Diabetic Foot Team.</p><p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS</b>This is a prospective cohort study of 151 patients admitted to the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NUH, for Diabetic Foot Problems (DFP) from January 2006 to January 2010. All had undergone BKA performed by NUH Multi-Disciplinary Diabetic Foot Team. Statistical analyses (univariate and multivariate analysis with logistic regression) were carried out using SPSS version 18.0, for factors such as demographic data, diabetic duration and control, clinical findings and investigations, indications for surgery, preoperative investigations and evaluation, microbiological cultures, and these were compared to the clinical outcome of the patient. A good clinical outcome is defined as one not requiring proximal re-amputation and whose stump healed well within 6 months. The ability to ambulate with successful use of a prosthesis after 1 year was documented. Statistical significance was set at P <0.050.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Mean age of study population was 55.2 years with a male to female ratio of about 3:2. Mean follow up duration was 36 months. Of BKAs, 73.5% gave a good outcome. Univariate analysis showed that smoking, previous limb surgery secondary to diabetes, high Total White Count (TW), Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), C-Reactive Protein (CRP), Urea, Creatinine (Cr), Neutrophils, absence of posterior tibial and popliteal pulses, low Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) and Toe Brachial Index (TBI) were associated with poor clinical outcome. Multivariate analysis showed that high CRP, ESR, Neutrophils, absence of popliteal pulse and low ABI were associated with poor clinical outcome. Of patients, 50.3% attained mobility with prosthesis after 1 year. Mortality rate was 21.2% within 6 months of operation, with sepsis being the most significant cause of death.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Success rate of BKA was 73.5%, with mortality rate being 21.2% within 6 months. In this cohort, 50.3% were able to attain eventual mobility with prosthesis after 1 year. Sepsis was the most significant cause of death. Markers of infection such as high CRP, ESR, neutrophils; and indicators of poor vascularity such as absence of popliteal pulse and low ABI were significantly associated with poor clinical outcome.</p>

Assessment of sensory neuropathy in patients with diabetic foot problems.

Our aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of three different modalities for testing sensory neuropathy in diabetic patients with and without diabetic foot problems. The three devices used included the pin-prick testing using the Neurotip® (PPT), the Semmes-Weinstein 5.07/10 g monofilament testing (SWMT), and the rapid-current perception threshold (R-CPT) measurements using the Neurometer® testing. Our study population consisted of 54 patients (108 feet) with diabetic foot problems treated at the National University Hospital in Singapore by our multi-disciplinary diabetic foot care team. Our results showed no difference in sensory neuropathy detected by PPT and 5.07/10 g SWMT in both the pathological and normal foot. In the pathological foot, there was significant increase in sensory neuropathy detected by the Neurometer® device at both the big toe and ankle sites as compared to PPT and 5.07/10 g SWMT. In the normal foot, there was a significant increase in sensory neuropathy detected by the Neurometer® device at the big toe site only as compared to PPT and 5.07/10 g SWMT. Finally, the Neurometer® measurements detected a statistically higher proportion of feet with sensory neuropathy as compared to detection by the PPT or 5.07/10 g SWMT.

Value of team approach combined with clinical pathway for diabetic foot problems: a clinical evaluation.

AIMS: To evaluate the effectiveness of management of diabetic foot problems (DFP) by the National University Hospital (NUH) Multidisciplinary Diabetic Foot Team combined with a clinical pathway in terms of average length of stay (ALOS), readmission rates, hospitalisation cost per patient, major reamputation rate, and complication rate. METHODS: 939 patients admitted to the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NUH, for DFP from 2002 (before team formation) to 2007 (after team formation). It consisted of six cohorts of patients - 61 for 2002, 70 for 2003, 148 for 2004, 180 for 2005, 262 for 2006, and 218 for 2007. All patients were managed by the NUH Multidisciplinary Diabetic Foot Team combined with a clinical pathway. Statistical analyses were carried out for five parameters (ALOS, hospitalisation cost per patient, major amputation rate, readmission rate, and complication rate). RESULTS: From 2002 to 2007, the ALOS was significantly reduced from 20.36 days to 12.20 days (p=0.0005). Major amputation rate was significantly reduced from 31.15 to 11.01% (p<0.0005). There was also a significant reduction in complication rate from 19.67 to 7.34% (p=0.005). There were reductions in the hospitalisation cost per patient and readmission rate after formation of the multidisciplinary team but they were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Our evaluation showed that a multidisciplinary team approach combined with the implementation of a clinical pathway in NUH was effective in reducing the ALOS, major amputation rate, and complication rate of DFP.

Socioeconomic profile of diabetic patients with and without foot problems.

INTRODUCTION: To identify the differences in a socioeconomic profile between two cohorts of diabetic patients - one with diabetic foot problems and another without diabetic foot problems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cohort with diabetic foot problems (including cellulitis, abscess, osteomyelitis, septic arthritis, gangrene, ulcers, or Charcot joint disease) consisted of 122 diabetic patients, while the other cohort without foot problems consisted of 112 diabetic patients. Both were seen at the National University Hospital from January to April 2007. A detailed protocol was designed and the factors studied included patient profile, average monthly household income, education, compliance to diabetic medication, attendance at clinics for diabetic treatment, exercise, smoking, alcohol consumption, gender, and glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1(C)) level. These were studied for significant differences using univariate and stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: With multivariate analysis, Malay ethnicity (p<0.001), education of up to secondary school only (p=0.021), low average monthly household income of less than SGD $2,000 (p=0.030), lack of exercise (at least once a week, p=0.04), and elevated HbA1(C) level (>7.0%; p=0.015) were found to be significantly higher in the cohort with diabetic foot problems than the cohort without. CONCLUSIONS: There are significant differences in the socioeconomic factors between diabetic patients with diabetic foot problems and those without.