Multiple differences between patients who initiate fish oil supplementation post-myocardial infarction and those who do not: the TRIUMPH Study.

The utility of fish oil supplements (FOS) in patients who survive an acute myocardial infarction (MI) remains controversial, with randomized trials showing less benefit than observational studies would suggest. The differences in the characteristics of MI patients who use FOS in routine clinical care are unknown but may help explain this discrepancy. We used data from a 24-site registry study in which extensive information was available on 4340 MI patients at admission and 1, 6, and 12 months postdischarge. After excluding those using FOS at admission (n = 651), those who died before the 1-month follow-up visit (n = 63), and those with missing data at 1 month (n = 1228), 2398 remained. Of them, 377 (16%) started FOS within 1 month of their MI. We analyzed 53 patient characteristics associated with FOS use. We observed differences (P < .001) in 20 demographic, socioeconomic, treatment, disease severity, and health status domains. The FOS users were more likely than nonusers to be white, married, financially secure, highly educated, and eating fish. They also had a higher ejection fraction at discharge, were more likely to have had in-hospital percutaneous coronary interventions, and were more likely to have participated in cardiac rehabilitation programs. The FOS users were less likely to have a history of diabetes, alcohol abuse, stroke, MI, and angina. In conclusion, post-MI patients who initiate FOS within 1 month of discharge in routine clinical practice differ substantially from those who do not. These differences are strongly associated with a better post-MI prognosis and may illuminate several sources of unmeasured confounding in observational studies.

Prevalence and predictors of persistent health status impairment in patients referred to a vascular clinic with intermittent claudication.

BACKGROUND: The goal of treatment for lower extremity peripheral artery disease is often to improve health status. Factors associated with failure to improve are unknown. METHODS: Health status was assessed with the Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ) at baseline and 2 years in 344 patients referred to vascular clinics. Improvement was defined as an increase of ≥5 points on the PAQ Summary Score. Multivariable logistic regression identified patient and treatment characteristics associated with impaired baseline health status, and predictors of no improvement (<5 points). RESULTS: Older age, bilateral symptoms, female sex and prior revascularization were associated with impaired baseline health status. At 2 years 36% reported unimproved health status. Factors associated with no improvement were older age (Odds Ratio 1.67/decade, CI 1.28, 2.19), better baseline health status (OR 1.40/10-points, CI 1.24, 1.59), beta blocker use (OR 2.53, CI 1.37, 4.68), prior stroke (OR 4.12, CI 1.33, 12.77) and bilateral claudication (OR 1.79, CI 1.07, 2.99). SUMMARY: Older patients, women, and those with bilateral symptoms or prior revascularization have worse health status at vascular referral. Over 1/3 of patients' health status did not improve over 2 years; older patients and those with bilateral or milder symptoms, prior stroke or using beta blockers were less likely to improve.