Magnetic resonance angiography of aorto-iliac disease.

BACKGROUND: Four different techniques for aorto-iliac magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) were assessed for accuracy using a digital subtraction angiography (DSA) gold standard. Surgeons' confidence in their ability to generate treatment plans with MRA and DSA was assessed, in consultation with a radiologist. METHODS: Two different two-dimensional (2D) time-of-flight (TOF) sequences, a phase-contrast sequence, and a contrast-enhanced (CE) MRA sequence were used. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted and areas (A(z)) calculated from radiologists' readings. Surgeons' confidence in their ability to utilize the images for treatment planning was assessed with a 5-point Likert scale. Thirty-six patients were evaluated. RESULTS: CE MRA had a sensitivity, specificity, and A(z) of.92,.93, and.96, respectively, for stenoses 50% or greater. CE MRA performed better than other sequences, but the improvement compared with gated 2D TOF was not statistically significant. Interobserver agreement for CE MRA and DSA yielded identical Kappa values. Surgeons were most confident in DSA, followed by CE MRA, which was significantly preferred to other techniques. CONCLUSIONS: CE MRA closely approximates DSA in terms of diagnostic accuracy. Surgeons considering treatment plans are confident in the CE MRA technique, relative to other MRA methods.

Comparison of treatment plans for lower extremity arterial occlusive disease made with electrocardiography-triggered two-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction angiography.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to determine whether preoperative treatment plans for patients with lower extremity ischemia can be made with electrocardiography (EKG)-triggered two-dimensional (2D) time-of-flight (TOF) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) as accurately as digital subtraction angiography (DSA). METHODS: Forty patients were prospectively evaluated with the combination of EKG-triggered 2D TOF MRA, DSA, and pulse volume recordings. Blinded reviewers graded arterial segments for disease severity. Accuracy of separate MRA- and DSA-based treatment plans was compared with the procedures performed based on all available information. RESULTS: There was an 86% exact match between MRA- and DSA-based plans (92% MRA and 94% DSA accuracy). The MRA-based plan accurately predicted 90% of suprainguinal and 95% of infrainguinal procedures, whereas the DSA-based plan accurately predicted 100% of suprainguinal and 85% of infrainguinal procedures. Two-year primary patency was 83% for all procedures. Radiologists' review of disease severity resulted in a mean exact correlation between studies of 81% (kappa = 0.64). The agreement between radiologists interpreting the MRA was 84% (kappa = 0.7) compared with 82% (kappa = 0.66) for the DSA. CONCLUSIONS: MRA- and DSA-based preoperative management plans were of comparable efficacy. Significant interobserver variability was seen with the interpretations of both preoperative studies. EKG-triggered 2D TOF MRA can be used to plan arterial reconstructions; however, all patients require arterial pressure measurements prior to suprainguinal repair and confirmatory intraoperative angiography during infrainguinal revascularization.

Use of magnetic resonance angiography for the preoperative evaluation of patients with infrainguinal arterial occlusive disease.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to determine whether magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) will allow preoperative management decisions without the need for contrast arteriography in patients with lower extremity ischemia caused by infrainguinal arterial occlusive disease. METHODS: Forty-five patients with lower extremity ischemia in 50 limbs were evaluated by both two-dimensional time-of-flight MRA and intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) between February 1992 and June 1995. Independent management plans were based on clinical presentation, pulse volume recordings, and separate reviews of the MRA and DSA. RESULTS: Of 50 limbs, 23 required arterial bypass, 19 percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, 5 patch angioplasty, and 3 amputation. MRA and DSA correlated exactly in 89.5% of infrainguinal arterial segments, whereas interpretations disagreed in 10.5% of arterial segments. Mismatches that had an influence on patient treatment decisions occurred in only 8 (2.3%) of 352 arterial segments. Independent MRA- and DSA-based revascularization plans agreed in 45 (90%) extremities. MRA predicted the level of arterial reconstruction in all 23 limbs that required arterial bypass. MRA identified focal stenoses amenable to percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in 18 (94.7%) of the 19 limbs that ultimately underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. A strategy of preoperative planning by MRA with confirmatory intraoperative arteriography would represent a 31% cost savings per patient at our institution while eliminating the morbidity of preoperative DSA. CONCLUSIONS: When used in combination with the patient's physical examination and segmental limb pressures with plethysmography, MRA is sufficient for planning infrainguinal arterial bypass procedures and selecting patients for percutaneous transluminal angioplasty.

MR angiography flow analysis. Neurovascular applications.

The ability to directly measure velocity and volume flow rates adds a new dimension to the MR angiographic evaluation of patients with cerebrovascular disease. Reduced volume flow rates are associated with flow restrictive stenoses. Flow volumes begin to drop when the area of the vessel lumen is reduced by greater than 80%. Cerebrovascular flow reserve also can be determined by obtaining volume flow measurements before and after the administration of a vasodilator such as acetazolamide. Recent applications include the investigation of the flow dynamics associated with subclavian steal, aneurysms, and arteriovenous malformations.

Magnetic resonance angiography and duplex imaging: noninvasive tests for selecting symptomatic carotid endarterectomy candidates.

BACKGROUND: This report describes our experience with the use of duplex imaging and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in the diagnosis and management of 70 patients with symptomatic carotid artery disease. Prospective evaluation of our first 30 patients showed that duplex imaging and MRA accurately correlated with conventional cerebral arteriograms (XRA) in patients with symptoms with greater than 70% ipsilateral carotid artery stenoses. In MRA versus XRA accuracy was 94%, sensitivity 100%, and specificity 93%. With duplex scanning versus XRA accuracy was 88%, sensitivity 93%, and specificity 93%. METHODS: We are now performing carotid endarterectomy on patients with symptoms without preoperative XRA when there is exact correlation between duplex imaging and MRA. Patients must have focal hemispheric symptoms, ipsilateral duplex peak systolic velocity greater than 2 m/sec, and high-quality MRA imaging of the carotid vessels. RESULTS: We have prospectively entered 40 patients for preoperative evaluation with duplex imaging and MRA. High-quality MRA and duplex studies were obtained in 35 patients (88%). XRA was required in the remaining five patients (12%) because of discrepancies between duplex scanning and MRA. Endarterectomy was performed without morbidity or death. Combined use of duplex scanning and MRA eliminated XRA in 35 cases and created a net savings of more than $125,000. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience suggests that preoperative XRA may not be necessary when duplex imaging and MRA confirm the presence of severe extracranial disease.

Combined use of duplex imaging and magnetic resonance angiography for evaluation of patients with symptomatic ipsilateral high-grade carotid stenosis.

PURPOSE: Advances in cerebral vascular imaging suggest that patients with critical levels of carotid artery stenosis (> 70%) who have symptoms can be identified accurately and necessary information about the intracranial and extracranial circulation obtained before surgery without conventional angiography. We have used carotid duplex imaging in combination with magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) to evaluate 20 patients with symptomatic ipsilateral high-grade carotid stenosis. METHODS: All patients underwent CT and magnetic resonance imaging brain scans, as well as MRA and conventional arteriography of the cerebral circulation. Magnetic resonance angiograms were obtained with two-dimensional phase contrast and time-of-flight techniques. Phase contrast was used for intracranial vascular imaging and for determining qualitative flow velocities and the direction of blood flow in the circle of Willis. Two-dimensional time of flight was used to assess the carotid bifurcations. RESULTS: Twenty patients with symptoms (six with strokes, 11 with transient ischemic attacks, and three with amaurosis fugax) had duplex evidence of high-grade carotid stenoses. Computed tomographic and magnetic resonance brain scans were positive for cerebral infarction in six patients with clinical strokes. Comparison of MRA with conventional angiography was 91% accurate for high-grade stenoses and occlusions (sensitivity 100% and specificity 90% for stenosis; sensitivity/specificity was 100% for complete occlusion). Comparison of duplex imaging with conventional angiography demonstrated 86% accuracy for detection of severe stenosis or occlusion (sensitivity 94% and specificity 89% for stenosis; sensitivity and specificity were 100% for complete occlusion). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that combined use of MRA and duplex imaging is accurate for detection and evaluation of high-grade carotid stenoses in patients with symptoms.