Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 109
Filter
1.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol ; 63(1): 121-123, 2023 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36471532

Subject(s)
Cannabis , Gynecology , Humans
2.
Med Teach ; 42(1): 30-35, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30696315

ABSTRACT

Increasing numbers of health professions students are being trained in healthcare facilities that are geographically removed from central academic hospitals. Consequently, studies have evaluated this distributed training, assessed the impact that it has on student learning as well as on the facilities where the training occurs, and explored factors that enable and constrain successful clinical training at such sites. The 12 tips presented in this article have been developed from a longitudinal project that has focused on developing a framework for effective distributed health professions training through an extensive review of the literature and a national consultative process. These 12 tips should, therefore, have applicability across multiple contexts. The purpose of this article is to assist people in implementing, adapting, upscaling, maintaining, and evaluating the distributed training of students in the health professions.


Subject(s)
Cooperative Behavior , Health Occupations/education , Interinstitutional Relations , Health Facilities , Humans , Interprofessional Relations , Learning , South Africa
3.
BJOG ; 125(4): 511, 2018 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29210163

Subject(s)
Research , Constriction
4.
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med ; 9(1): e1-e6, 2017 Sep 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29041802

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Health professions training institutions are challenged to produce greater numbers of graduates who are more relevantly trained to provide quality healthcare. Decentralised training offers opportunities to address these quantity, quality and relevance factors. We wanted to draw together existing expertise in decentralised training for the benefit of all health professionals to develop a model for decentralised training for health professions students. METHOD: An expert panel workshop was held in October 2015 initiating a process to develop a model for decentralised training in South Africa. Presentations on the status quo in decentralised training at all nine medical schools in South Africa were made and 33 delegates engaged in discussing potential models for decentralised training. RESULTS: Five factors were found to be crucial for the success of decentralised training, namely the availability of information and communication technology, longitudinal continuous rotations, a focus on primary care, the alignment of medical schools' mission with decentralised training and responsiveness to student needs. CONCLUSION: The workshop concluded that training institutions should continue to work together towards formulating decentralised training models and that the involvement of all health professions should be ensured. A tripartite approach between the universities, the Department of Health and the relevant local communities is important in decentralised training. Lastly, curricula should place more emphasis on how students learn rather than how they are taught.


Subject(s)
Curriculum , Education, Medical/organization & administration , Schools, Medical/standards , Universities/standards , Consensus , Education, Medical/methods , Humans , Politics , Schools, Medical/organization & administration , South Africa , Universities/organization & administration
6.
Rev Obstet Gynecol ; 5(2): 112-3, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22866191
7.
Rev Obstet Gynecol ; 5(2): 113, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22866192
8.
Rev Obstet Gynecol ; 5(2): 113-4, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22866193
9.
Rev Obstet Gynecol ; 5(2): 114, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22866194
10.
Rev Obstet Gynecol ; 5(2): 114-5, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22866195
11.
Rev Obstet Gynecol ; 5(1): 56-7, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22582128
12.
Rev Obstet Gynecol ; 5(1): 57, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22582129
13.
Rev Obstet Gynecol ; 5(1): 57-8, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22582130
14.
Rev Obstet Gynecol ; 5(1): 58-9, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22582131
15.
Rev Obstet Gynecol ; 5(3-4): e166-7, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23484061
16.
Rev Obstet Gynecol ; 5(3-4): e167, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23484062
17.
Rev Obstet Gynecol ; 5(3-4): e168-9, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23484064
18.
Rev Obstet Gynecol ; 5(3-4): e167-8, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23484063
19.
Rev Obstet Gynecol ; 5(3-4): e169, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23484065
20.
Rev Obstet Gynecol ; 5(3-4): e169-70, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23484066
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...