Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 67
Filter
1.
Prev Chronic Dis ; 13: E47, 2016 Apr 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27055264

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: In 2010, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) launched Communities Putting Prevention to Work (CPPW), a $485 million program to reduce obesity, tobacco use, and exposure to secondhand smoke. CPPW awardees implemented evidence-based policy, systems, and environmental changes to sustain reductions in chronic disease risk factors. This article describes short-term and potential long-term benefits of the CPPW investment. METHODS: We used a mixed-methods approach to estimate population reach and to simulate the effects of completed CPPW interventions through 2020. Each awardee developed a community action plan. We linked plan objectives to a common set of interventions across awardees and estimated population reach as an early indicator of impact. We used the Prevention Impacts Simulation Model (PRISM), a systems dynamics model of cardiovascular disease prevention, to simulate premature deaths, health care costs, and productivity losses averted from 2010 through 2020 attributable to CPPW. RESULTS: Awardees completed 73% of their planned objectives. Sustained CPPW improvements may avert 14,000 premature deaths, $2.4 billion (in 2010 dollars) in discounted direct medical costs, and $9.5 billion (in 2010 dollars) in discounted lifetime and annual productivity losses through 2020. CONCLUSION: PRISM results suggest that large investments in community preventive interventions, if sustained, could yield cost savings many times greater than the original investment over 10 to 20 years and avert 14,000 premature deaths.


Subject(s)
Health Care Costs , Health Promotion/methods , Obesity/prevention & control , Tobacco Smoke Pollution/prevention & control , Tobacco Use/prevention & control , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Cost Savings , Health Promotion/economics , Humans , Mortality, Premature/trends , Program Evaluation , United States
2.
Sex Transm Dis ; 43(1): 61-4, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26650999

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients in sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinic waiting rooms represent a potential audience for delivering health messages via video-based interventions. A controlled trial at 3 sites found that patients exposed to one intervention, Safe in the City, had a significantly lower incidence of STDs compared with patients in the control condition. An evaluation of the intervention's cost could help determine whether such interventions are programmatically viable. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cost of producing the Safe in the City intervention was estimated using study records, including logs, calendars, and contract invoices. Production costs were divided by the 1650 digital video kits initially fabricated to get an estimated cost per digital video. Clinic costs for showing the video in waiting rooms included staff time costs for equipment operation and hardware depreciation and were estimated for the 21-month study observation period retrospectively. RESULTS: The intervention cost an estimated $416,966 to develop, equaling $253 per digital video disk produced. Per-site costs to show the video intervention were estimated to be $2699 during the randomized trial. CONCLUSIONS: The cost of producing and implementing Safe in the City intervention suggests that similar interventions could potentially be produced and made available to end users at a price that would both cover production costs and be low enough that the end users could afford them.


Subject(s)
Health Education/economics , Health Promotion/economics , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/prevention & control , Audiovisual Aids/economics , Community Health Centers , Costs and Cost Analysis , Focus Groups , Humans , Time Factors , Video Recording/economics
3.
Sex Transm Dis ; 40(5): 366-71, 2013 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23588125

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Men who have sex with men (MSM) who have a current or recent history of rectal Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) infection are at greater risk for HIV than MSM with no history of rectal infection. Screening and treating MSM for rectal CT/GC infection may help reduce any increased biological susceptibility to HIV infection. METHODS: We used 2 versions of a Markov state-transition model to examine the impact and cost-effectiveness of screening MSM for rectal CT/GC infection in San Francisco: a static version that included only the benefits to those screened and a dynamic version that accounted for population-level impacts of screening. HIV prevention through reduced susceptibility to HIV was the only potential benefit of rectal CT/GC screening that we included in our analysis. Parameter values were based on San Francisco program data and the literature. RESULTS: In the base case, the cost per quality-adjusted life year gained through screening MSM for rectal CT/GC infection was $16,300 in the static version of the model. In the dynamic model, the cost per quality-adjusted life year gained was less than $0, meaning that rectal screening was cost-saving. The impact of rectal CT/GC infection on the risk of HIV acquisition was the most influential model parameter. CONCLUSIONS: Although more information is needed regarding the impact of rectal CT/GC screening on HIV incidence, rectal CT/GC screening of MSM can potentially be a cost-effective, scalable intervention targeted to at-risk MSM in certain urban settings such as San Francisco.


Subject(s)
Chlamydia Infections/diagnosis , Gonorrhea/diagnosis , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Homosexuality, Male/statistics & numerical data , Mass Screening/economics , Rectal Diseases/diagnosis , Rectal Diseases/microbiology , Adult , Chlamydia Infections/economics , Chlamydia Infections/epidemiology , Chlamydia trachomatis/isolation & purification , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Gonorrhea/economics , Gonorrhea/epidemiology , HIV Infections/economics , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Male , Markov Chains , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/isolation & purification , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Rectal Diseases/economics , Rectal Diseases/epidemiology , San Francisco/epidemiology , Sexual Behavior , Surveys and Questionnaires
4.
Am J Public Health ; 103(5): 910-6, 2013 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23488482

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We examined the association between racial disparity in income and reported race-specific county-level bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in the United States focusing on disparities between Blacks and Whites. METHODS: Data are from the US 2000 decennial census. We defined 2 race-income county groups (high and low race-income disparity) on the basis of the difference between Black and White median household incomes. We used 2 approaches to examine disparities in STI rates across the groups. In the first approach, we computed and compared race-specific STI rates for the groups. In the second approach, we used spatial regression analyses to control for potential confounders. RESULTS: Consistent with the STI literature, chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis rates for Blacks were substantially higher than were those for Whites. We also found that racial disparities in income were associated with racial disparities in chlamydia and gonorrhea rates and, to a lesser degree, syphilis rates. CONCLUSIONS: Racial disparities in household income may be a more important determinant of racial disparities in reported STI morbidity than are absolute levels of household income.


Subject(s)
Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Health Status Disparities , Income/classification , Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Bacterial/ethnology , White People/statistics & numerical data , Chlamydia Infections/economics , Chlamydia Infections/ethnology , Female , Gonorrhea/economics , Gonorrhea/ethnology , Humans , Income/statistics & numerical data , Male , Regression Analysis , Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Bacterial/economics , Spatial Analysis , Syphilis/economics , Syphilis/ethnology , United States/epidemiology
5.
Am J Epidemiol ; 177(5): 463-73, 2013 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23403986

ABSTRACT

Observational studies have found mixed results on the impact of jail-based chlamydia screen-and-treat programs on community prevalence. In the absence of controlled trials or prospectively designed studies, dynamic mathematical models that incorporate movements in and out of jail and sexual contacts (including disease transmission) can provide useful information. We explored the impact of jail-based chlamydia screening on a hypothetical community's prevalence with a deterministic compartmental model focusing on heterosexual transmission. Parameter values were obtained from the published literature. Two analyses were conducted. One used national values (large community); the other used values reported among African Americans--the population with the highest incarceration rates and chlamydia burden (small community). A comprehensive sensitivity analysis was carried out. For the large-community analysis, chlamydia prevalence decreased by 13% (from 2.3% to 2.0%), and based on the ranges of parameter values (including screening coverage of 10%-100% and a postscreening treatment rate of 50%-100%) used in the sensitivity analysis, this decrease ranged from 0.1% to 58%. For the small-community analysis, chlamydia prevalence decreased by 54% (from 4.6% to 2.1%). Jail-based chlamydia screen-and-treat programs have the potential to reduce chlamydia prevalence in communities with high incarceration rates. However, the magnitude of this potential decrease is subject to considerable uncertainty.


Subject(s)
Chlamydia Infections/diagnosis , Disease Transmission, Infectious/prevention & control , Mass Screening/methods , Prisons , Adolescent , Adult , Chlamydia Infections/prevention & control , Chlamydia Infections/transmission , Cost of Illness , Female , Humans , Male , Models, Theoretical , Prevalence , Public Health
6.
Sex Transm Dis ; 40(3): 197-201, 2013 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23403600

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Millions of cases of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) occur in the United States each year, resulting in substantial medical costs to the nation. Previous estimates of the total direct cost of STIs are quite dated. We present updated direct medical cost estimates of STIs in the United States. METHODS: We assembled recent (i.e., 2002-2011) cost estimates to determine the lifetime cost per case of 8 major STIs (chlamydia, gonorrhea, hepatitis B virus, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), human papillomavirus, genital herpes simplex virus type 2, trichomoniasis and syphilis). The total direct cost for each STI was computed as the product of the number of new or newly diagnosed cases in 2008 and the estimated discounted lifetime cost per case. All costs were adjusted to 2010 US dollars. RESULTS: Results indicated that the total lifetime direct medical cost of the 19.7 million cases of STIs that occurred among persons of all ages in 2008 in the United States was $15.6 (range, $11.0-$20.6) billion. Total costs were as follows: chlamydia ($516.7 [$258.3-$775.0] million), gonorrhea ($162.1 [$81.1-$243.2] million), hepatitis B virus ($50.7 [$41.3-$55.6] million), HIV ($12.6 [$9.5-$15.7] billion), human papillomavirus ($1.7 [$0.8-$2.9] billion), herpes simplex virus type 2 ($540.7 [$270.3-$811.0] million), syphilis ($39.3 [$19.6-$58.9] million), and trichomoniasis ($24.0 [$12.0-$36.0] million). Costs associated with HIV infection accounted for more than 81% of the total cost. Among the nonviral STIs, chlamydia was the most costly infection. CONCLUSIONS: Sexually transmitted infections continue to impose a substantial cost burden on the payers of medical care in the United States. The burden of STIs would be even greater in the absence of STI prevention and control efforts.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/economics , Chlamydia Infections/economics , Condylomata Acuminata/economics , Female , Gonorrhea/economics , HIV Infections/economics , Health Care Costs/trends , Hepatitis B/economics , Herpes Genitalis/economics , Humans , Male , Models, Economic , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/epidemiology , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/prevention & control , Syphilis/economics , Trichomonas Infections/economics , United States/epidemiology
8.
Am J Public Health ; 102(8): e26-9, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22698048

ABSTRACT

To assess chlamydia testing in women in community health centers, we analyzed data from national surveys of ambulatory health care. Women with chlamydial symptoms were tested at 16% of visits, and 65% of symptomatic women were tested if another reproductive health care service (pelvic examination, Papanicolaou test, or urinalysis) was performed. Community health centers serve populations with high sexually transmitted disease rates and fill gaps in the provision of sexual and reproductive health care services as health departments face budget cuts that threaten support of sexually transmitted disease clinics.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Chlamydia Infections/diagnosis , Chlamydia trachomatis/isolation & purification , Community Health Centers/statistics & numerical data , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Private Practice/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Gynecological Examination , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Mass Screening/methods , Papanicolaou Test , Urine/microbiology , Vaginal Smears , Young Adult
9.
Sex Transm Dis ; 39(6): 458-64, 2012 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22592832

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine rates of 3 bacterial sexually transmitted diseases (STDs; syphilis, gonorrhea, and chlamydia) in 8 subpopulations (known as the "eight Americas") defined by race and a small number of county-level sociodemographic and geographical characteristics. The eight Americas are (1) Asians and Pacific Islanders in specific counties; (2) Northland low-income rural white; (3) Middle America; (4) Low-income whites in Appalachia and Mississippi Valley; (5) Western Native American; (6) Black middle America; (7) Southern low-income rural black; and (8) High-risk urban black. METHODS: A list of the counties comprising each of the eight Americas was obtained from the corresponding author of the original eight Americas project, which examined disparities in mortality rates across the eight Americas. Using county-level STD surveillance data, we calculated syphilis, gonorrhea, and chlamydia rates (new cases per 100,000) for each of the eight Americas. RESULTS: Reported STD rates varied substantially across the eight Americas. STD rates were generally lowest in Americas 1 and 2 and highest in Americas 6, 7, and 8. CONCLUSIONS: Although disparities in STDs across the eight Americas are generally similar to the well-established disparities in STDs across race/ethnicity, the grouping of counties into the eight Americas does offer additional insight into disparities in STDs in the United States. The high STD rates we found for black Middle America are consistent with the assertion that sexual networks and social factors are important drivers of racial disparities in STDs.


Subject(s)
Chlamydia Infections/epidemiology , Gonorrhea/epidemiology , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Sexual Behavior/statistics & numerical data , Syphilis/epidemiology , Appalachian Region/epidemiology , Asian People/statistics & numerical data , Black People/statistics & numerical data , Chlamydia Infections/transmission , Ethnicity , Female , Gonorrhea/transmission , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Indians, North American/statistics & numerical data , Male , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander/statistics & numerical data , Sex Distribution , Socioeconomic Factors , Syphilis/transmission , United States/epidemiology , White People/statistics & numerical data
10.
Sex Transm Dis ; 39(5): 349-53, 2012 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22504597

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: HIV-infected men who have sex with men (MSM) are at increased risk of viral hepatitis because of similar behavioral risk factors for acquisition of these infections. Our objective was to estimate adherence to HIV management guidelines that recommend screening HIV-infected persons for hepatitis A, B, and C infection, and vaccinating for hepatitis A and B if susceptible. METHODS: We evaluated hepatitis prevention services received by a random sample of HIV-infected MSM in 8 HIV clinics in 6 US cities. We abstracted medical records of all visits made by the patients to the clinic during the period from 2004 to 2007, to estimate hepatitis screening and vaccination rates overall and by clinic site. RESULTS: Medical records of 1329 patients who had 14,831 visits from 2004 to 2006 were abstracted. Screening rates for hepatitis A, B, and C were 47%, 52%, and 54%, respectively. Among patients who were screened and found to be susceptible, 29% were vaccinated for hepatitis A and 25% for hepatitis B. The percentage of patients screened and vaccinated varied significantly by clinic. CONCLUSIONS: Awareness of hepatitis susceptibility and hepatitis coinfection status in HIV-infected patients is essential for optimal clinical management. Despite recommendations for hepatitis screening and vaccination of HIV-infected MSM, rates were suboptimal at all clinic sites. These low rates highlight the importance of routine review of adherence to recommended clinical services. Such reviews can prompt the development and implementation of simple and sustainable interventions to improve the quality of care.


Subject(s)
AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections/epidemiology , Hepatitis A/prevention & control , Hepatitis B, Chronic/prevention & control , Hepatitis C, Chronic/prevention & control , Homosexuality, Male/statistics & numerical data , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/epidemiology , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Viral Hepatitis Vaccines/administration & dosage , Adult , Aged , Ambulatory Care Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Coinfection , Hepatitis A/diagnosis , Hepatitis A/epidemiology , Hepatitis B, Chronic/diagnosis , Hepatitis B, Chronic/epidemiology , Hepatitis C, Chronic/diagnosis , Hepatitis C, Chronic/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Sentinel Surveillance , Sexual Behavior
11.
Am J Prev Med ; 42(4): 337-41, 2012 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22424245

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Annual chlamydia screening for sexually active women aged ≤25 years is recommended, and chlamydia testing rates have continuously increased. However, several studies have shown that many providers screen all women of reproductive age in public settings. PURPOSE: To examine chlamydia testing patterns in private settings for women and young women aged 15-44 years (hereafter referred to as women). METHODS: A large commercial claims database was used to estimate the chlamydia testing rate for women aged 15-44 years who had reproductive health services in 2008. Such services and tests were identified using diagnostic and procedural codes in 2008. RESULTS: Of 3.2 million women aged 15-44 years who had reproductive health services in 2008, 19.2% had at least a claim for a sexually transmitted disease (STD), 29.3% for pregnancy, and 81.2% for a gynecologic exam. Of those 3.2 million, 22.3% had chlamydia testing: 34.2% aged 15-25 years vs 18.3% aged 26-44 years. Of the 0.7 million who were tested, 65% were aged 26-44 years, and the reason for the healthcare visit in which their first chlamydia test was performed was an STD for 22.7% and pregnancy for 33.5%. CONCLUSIONS: In this population of insured women, young women are undertested and older women are overtested for chlamydia. Efforts to improve screening practices should be evaluated.


Subject(s)
Chlamydia Infections/diagnosis , Chlamydia trachomatis/isolation & purification , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Reproductive Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Chlamydia Infections/epidemiology , Databases, Factual/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Insurance Claim Review , Insurance Coverage/statistics & numerical data , Mass Screening/standards , Pregnancy , Reproductive Health Services/standards , Young Adult
12.
Sex Transm Dis ; 38(10): 889-91, 2011 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21934557

ABSTRACT

We conducted a literature review of studies of the economic burden of sexually transmitted diseases in the United States. The annual direct medical cost of sexually transmitted diseases (including human immunodeficiency virus) has been estimated to be $16.9 billion (range: $13.9-$23.0 billion) in 2010 US dollars.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/economics , Humans , Inflation, Economic , United States
14.
Obstet Gynecol ; 116(6): 1319-1323, 2010 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21099597

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: An American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Practice Bulletin published in 2009 recommended that cervical cancer screening should begin at age 21 years and women younger than 30 years should be rescreened every 2 years rather than annually. The purpose of this study is to estimate the effect that decreased frequency of cervical cancer screening would have on chlamydia screening, which is recommended annually for sexually active women aged 25 years or younger. METHODS: Using an administrative database of medical claims from commercially insured girls and women, we compared annual chlamydia screening rates of sexually active adolescent girls and young women aged 15 to 25 years in 2007 among those who underwent cervical cancer screening and those who were not screened for cervical cancer. RESULTS: We identified 701,193 sexually active adolescent girls and young women aged 15 to 25 years. Chlamydia screening rates were significantly higher among adolescent girls and young women who underwent cervical cancer screening compared with those who did not: 43.6% compared with 9.5% for adolescent girls and young women aged 15 to 20 years and 36.1% compared with 12.2% for women aged 21 to 25 years. Among adolescent girls and young women identified as sexually active in 2007, 90.5% had visits for reproductive health services other than cervical cancer screening that could provide opportunities for chlamydia screening. CONCLUSION: Although the revised American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Practice Bulletin recommending less frequent cervical cancer screening will likely reduce chlamydia screening rates in adolescent girls and young women, health care providers should be aware of other opportunities for chlamydial testing. Options include patient self-collected vaginal swabs and urine specimens collected during visits at which adolescent girls and young women seek other reproductive health or preventive services.


Subject(s)
Chlamydia Infections/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Vaginal Smears , Adolescent , Adult , Cytodiagnosis , Female , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Sexual Behavior , Young Adult
15.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 16(8): 1315-7, 2010 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20678335

ABSTRACT

To determine the effects of school closure, we surveyed 214 households after a 1-week elementary school closure because of pandemic (H1N1) 2009. Students spent 77% of the closure days at home, 69% of students visited at least 1 other location, and 79% of households reported that adults missed no days of work to watch children.


Subject(s)
Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/isolation & purification , Influenza, Human/economics , Pandemics/economics , Child , Child, Preschool , Family Characteristics , Humans , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Interviews as Topic , Pennsylvania/epidemiology , Schools , Socioeconomic Factors , Students
17.
Sex Transm Dis ; 37(12): 771-6, 2010 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20585275

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: National guidelines for the care of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected persons recommend asymptomatic routine screening for sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). Our objective was to determine whether providers who care for HIV-infected men who have sex with men (MSM) followed these guidelines. METHODS: We abstracted medical records to evaluate STD screening at 8 large HIV clinics in 6 US cities. We estimated the number of men who had at least one test for syphilis, chlamydia (urethral and/or rectal), or gonorrhea (urethral, rectal, and/or pharyngeal) in 2004, 2005, and 2006. Urethral testing included nucleic acid amplification tests of both urethral swabs and urine. We also calculated the positivity of syphilis, chlamydia, and gonorrhea among screened men. RESULTS: Medical records were abstracted for 1334 HIV-infected MSM who made 14,659 visits from 2004-2006. The annual screening rate for syphilis ranged from 66.0% to 75.8% during 2004-2006. Rectal chlamydia and rectal and pharyngeal gonorrhea annual screening rates ranged from 2.3% to 8.5% despite moderate to high positivity among specimens from asymptomatic patients (3.0%-9.8%) during this period. Annual urethral chlamydia and gonorrhea screening rates were higher than rates for nonurethral sites, but were suboptimal, and ranged from 13.8% to 18.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Most asymptomatic HIV-infected MSM were screened for syphilis, indicating good provider adherence to this screening guideline. Low screening rates for gonorrhea and chlamydia, especially at rectal and pharyngeal sites, suggest that substantial barriers exist for complying with these guidelines. The moderate to high prevalence of asymptomatic chlamydial and gonococcal infections underscores the importance of screening. A range of clinical quality improvement interventions are needed to increase screening, including increasing the awareness of nucleic acid amplification tests for nonurethral screening.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care Facilities , HIV Infections/complications , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Homosexuality, Male/statistics & numerical data , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Chlamydia Infections/diagnosis , Gonorrhea/diagnosis , Gonorrhea/epidemiology , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Male , Medical Records , Middle Aged , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/etiology , Syphilis/diagnosis , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
18.
Am J Prev Med ; 38(6): 652-7, 2010 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20494242

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Screening for chlamydia has been reported to reduce pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) at the individual level. However, information on population-level association (or causality) is scant. PURPOSE: This study aims to examine the association between chlamydia and gonorrhea screening and PID diagnoses using time-series analyses. METHODS: Monthly chlamydia and gonorrhea screening and PID diagnosis rates were extracted for a cohort of 207,695 continuously enrolled privately insured women from January 2001 to December 2006. An autoregressive integrated moving average model was used to examine whether rates of PID diagnoses in a given month were associated with rates of chlamydia and gonorrhea screening in previous months. RESULTS: Monthly screening rates increased from about 300 to almost 700 per 100,000 for chlamydia and from 250 to almost 650 per 100,000 for gonorrhea, whereas PID diagnosis rates declined during the same period (40-20 per 100,000). Increases in screening rates were associated with decreases in PID diagnosis rates 4 months later. On average, a one-unit (or 10%) increase in the growth of chlamydia and gonorrhea screening rates, separately, in the prior fourth month was significantly associated with a 0.36 (or 3.6%, p<0.05) and 0.32 (or 3.2%, p<0.10) decrease in the growth rate of the PID diagnosis rate, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although analyses such as these cannot prove causality, the results are consistent with the hypothesis that increases in chlamydia and gonorrhea screening coverage can lead to reductions in PID at the population level. A population-level focus offers advantages over individual-level analyses of screening and PID, such as the ability to capture indirect benefits of increased screening.


Subject(s)
Chlamydia Infections/diagnosis , Gonorrhea/diagnosis , Mass Screening/methods , Pelvic Inflammatory Disease/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Chlamydia Infections/complications , Cohort Studies , Databases, Factual , Female , Gonorrhea/complications , Humans , Mass Screening/trends , Pelvic Inflammatory Disease/diagnosis , Pelvic Inflammatory Disease/microbiology , Time Factors , United States , Young Adult
19.
J Adolesc Health ; 46(4): 324-30, 2010 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20307820

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We examined utilization patterns of adolescents and young women as they seek general and reproductive health services in physician offices and hospital outpatient clinics. METHODS: We analyzed physician office visits in the 2003-2006 National Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys, and hospital outpatient clinic visits in the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys, to examine utilization patterns of females aged 9-26 years by 2-year age intervals and other characteristics such as physician specialty or clinic type. RESULTS: The number of visits to primary care physician offices increased with age, from 4.9 million for ages 9-10 years to 9.0 million for ages 25-26 years. The proportion of visits made to obstetrician-gynecologists and family practitioners increased with age, and by ages 15-16 years fewer than half of all visits to primary care providers were made to pediatricians. The proportion of visits to family practitioners increased from 25% at ages 9-10 years to 30% at ages 25-26 years. By ages 17-18 years, a larger proportion of visits were made to obstetrician-gynecologists (33% of 7.0 million visits) and to family practitioners (34%) than to pediatricians (23%). The proportion of visits for reproductive health services peaked at 53% of 7.5 million physician visits at ages 20-21 years. Similar utilization patterns were observed for the 11.0 million hospital outpatient visits to primary care providers. CONCLUSIONS: Because adolescents and young women most commonly utilize healthcare services provided by obstetrician-gynecologists and family practitioners, these specialties should be priority targets for interventions to improve the quality and availability of reproductive health services.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Office Visits/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Reproductive Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adolescent Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Age Distribution , Attitude to Health , Child , Child Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Health Care , United States , Women's Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
20.
Obstet Gynecol ; 115(4): 753-759, 2010 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20308835

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To analyze whether rectal testing among women increased chlamydia and gonorrhea case-finding and whether reported receptive anal intercourse was a risk factor for rectal infection. METHODS: From March 2007 to August 2008, women receiving pelvic examinations at the San Francisco sexually transmitted disease clinic were tested for rectal gonorrhea and chlamydia by using a transcription-mediated amplification assay. Results of testing and clinical and demographic data were analyzed using a cross-sectional study design. RESULTS: Of 1,308 women with both rectal and vaginal tests, test results were positive for 79 patients (6.0%) for rectal chlamydia or gonorrhea and 88 patients (6.7%) for genital chlamydia or gonorrhea. Test results were positive for 13 patients (1.0%) at the rectum only, increasing detection from 88 to 101 patients (14.8%; 95% confidence interval 8.1-23.9). No correlation existed between reported anal sex and rectal chlamydia (P=.74); however, 50% of women with rectal gonorrhea reported anal sex compared with 21% of women without rectal gonorrhea (P=.002). CONCLUSION: Sexually transmitted disease clinics might improve chlamydia and gonorrhea case-finding through rectal testing of women, but more study is needed to determine the effects of finding and treating such infections. Reporting anal intercourse did not predict rectal chlamydial infection among women tested at both the rectum and the vagina. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.


Subject(s)
Chlamydia Infections/diagnosis , Gonorrhea/diagnosis , Rectal Diseases/diagnosis , Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Bacterial/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques , Rectum/microbiology , Sexual Behavior , Vaginal Smears , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...