ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: It is reported that low dose radiation received by the contralateral breast (CLB) during adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) is carcinogenic. This trial was planned to evaluate the CLB skin doses received during adjuvant RT of breast carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-four breast carcinoma patients treated locally or locoregionally with adjuvant RT were included. RT was performed with only tangential fields (TA) in 6 patients whereas 9 patients had an extra internal mammary (IM) field (TAIM). The remaining 9 patients received 5-field locoregional RT (5FLR). All patients were treated with wedge filters except for 3 TA patients. Of 9 5FLR patients IM fields were treated with Co60 in 5 and with electrons in the remaining 4 patients. LiF(2)-based Ribbon type thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD) were used for dose evaluation. An average of 10 TLD's, placed with 1 cm gaps beginning from the medial border of the treatment field along the central axis were used to obtain dose measurements. Median measure of TLD's between 2-8 cm and maximum dose point (MDP) values in the same range were used to evaluate the CLB dose. RESULTS: In TA patients the CLB skin received 6.3% of the total dose in patients treated with wedge filters and 7.13% with half-beam blocks. For 6 TAIM patients with IM fields treated with Co60, the CLB dose was 7.24%. In 5 of 9 5FLR patients, whose IM fields were treated with Co60 the CLB skin received 8.8% of the total dose, while for electron beam therapy the CLB dose was 5.44%. CLB median MDP values were as follows: 12.76% in TA patients treated with wedge filters and 11.45% with half-beam blocking; 11.89% in TAIM patients with IM fields treated with Co60 and 7.83% with electron beams; 12.29% in 5FLR patients of whose IM fields were treated with Co60 and 8.94% with electron beams. CONCLUSION: When compared to wedge filters, halfbeam blocks caused 13% increase in CLB doses. If IM fields were added, 27.5% and 62% increases at CLB doses were established with Co60 when compared to electron beam RT in 3-field and 5-field treatments, respectively. CLB doses increased by 15-40% with the increased number of treatment fields. MDP values were also found to be higher with IM fields treated with Co60, but the number of treatment fields and accessories used seemed to have no effect on MDP doses. We conclude that by using wedge filters instead of half-beam blocks and by increasing the number of fractions treated with electron energies for IM fields, apparent decreases in CLB doses can be obtained. Large number of cases is needed to statistically establish the significant differences between subgroups.
ABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to evaluate retrospectively the treatment results of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with palliative intent in Dokuz Eylul University Hospital, Radiation Oncology Department. One hundred and fifteen inoperable, non-metastatic and symptomatic NSCLC patients were treated with palliative radiotherapy (PRT) between July 1991 and May 2000. PRT was used in patients with low performance status, weight loss more than 10% within last 6 months, secondary malignancies, co-morbid diseases and socio-economic problems. Parallelly opposed isocentric antero-posterior fields including both the parenchymal and mediastinal masses were used. 10-55 Gy total doses were delivered in 1-23 fractions with a median of 30 Gy. Nineteen patients received systemic chemotherapy before PRT. Survival analysis was made from the treatment beginning date, and subjective palliation rates were assessed according to clinical improvements in symptomatology evaluated 1-6 weeks after PRT. The median follow-up time was 28 weeks (1-234 weeks). Totally, 245 disease-related symptoms were detected in 115 patients. Overall "improvement" in symptomatology was found to be 90% (221/245) with a "near-total response" rate of 46% (113/245). Hemoptysis was the best palliated symptom. Median survival time was 30 weeks. Karnofsky performance status (KPS) (p=0.015), weight loss (p=0.0015), histologic tumor type (p=0.0024) and tumor size (p=0.02) were found to effect overall survival rates significantly in uni-variant analysis. Multi-variant analysis revealed statistically significant effect with histological tumor type and weight loss status. Only 16% of patients (3/19) showed partial and 5% (1/19) complete response to systemic treatment. Median survival time was 46 weeks in this group. In conclusion, this retrospective study of patients with poor prognostic factors confirms that PRT is an effective treatment modality in symptomatic locally advanced NSCLC patients resulting in 90% symptomatic improvement rate and a median survival of 30 weeks.
