Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Transplant ; 19(7): 1955-1963, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30623581

ABSTRACT

HLA typing in solid organ transplantation (SOT) is necessary for determining HLA-matching status between donor-recipient pairs and assessing patients' anti-HLA antibody profiles. Histocompatibility has traditionally been evaluated based on serologically defined HLA antigens. The evolution of HLA typing and antibody identification technologies, however, has revealed many limitations with using serologic equivalents for assessing compatibility in SOT. The significant improvements to HLA typing introduced by next-generation sequencing (NGS) require an assessment of the impact of this technology on SOT. We have assessed the role of high-resolution 2-field HLA typing (HR-2F) in SOT by retrospectively evaluating NGS-typed pre- and post-SOT cases. HR-2F typing was highly instructive or necessary in 41% (156/385) of the cases. Several pre- and posttransplant scenarios were identified as being better served by HR-2F typing. Five different categories are presented with specific case examples. The experience of another center (Temple University Hospital) is also included, whereby 21% of the cases required HR-2F typing by Sanger sequencing, as supported by other legacy methods, to properly address posttransplant anti-HLA antibody issues.


Subject(s)
HLA Antigens/classification , Histocompatibility Testing/methods , Histocompatibility , Organ Transplantation/methods , Patient Selection , Tissue Donors/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Follow-Up Studies , HLA Antigens/genetics , HLA Antigens/immunology , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/methods , Humans , Immunogenetics , Infant , Male , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sequence Analysis, DNA
2.
Am J Phys Anthropol ; 154(3): 424-35, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24861725

ABSTRACT

Midfacial reduction in primates has been explained as a byproduct of other growth patterns, especially the convergent orbits. This is at once an evolutionary and developmental explanation for relatively short snouts in most modern primates. Here, we use histological sections of perinatal nonhuman primates (tamarin, tarsier, loris) to investigate how orbital morphology emerges during ontogeny in selected primates compared to another euarchontan (Tupaia glis). We annotated serial histological sections for location of osteoclasts or osteoblasts, and used these to create three-dimensional "modeling maps" showing perinatal growth patterns of the facial skeleton. In addition, in one specimen we transferred annotations from histological sections to CT slices, to create a rotatable 3D volume that shows orbital modeling. Our findings suggest that growth in the competing orbital and neurocranial functional matrices differs among species, influencing modeling patterns. Distinctions among species are observed in the frontal bone, at a shared interface between the endocranial fossa and the orbit. The medial orbital wall is extensively resorptive in primates, whereas the medial orbit is generally depositional in Tupaia. As hypothesized, the orbital soft tissues encroach on available interorbital space. However, eye size cannot, by itself, explain the extent of reduction of the olfactory recess. In Loris, the posterior portion of medial orbit differed from the other primates. It showed evidence of outward drift where the olfactory bulb increased in cross-sectional area. We suggest the olfactory bulbs are significant to orbit position in strepsirrhines, influencing an expanded interorbital breadth at early stages of development.


Subject(s)
Face/anatomy & histology , Facial Bones/anatomy & histology , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Primates/anatomy & histology , Animals , Biological Evolution , Eye/anatomy & histology , Eye/diagnostic imaging , Face/diagnostic imaging , Facial Bones/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Tupaia/anatomy & histology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL