Risk factors for postoperative pneumonia in patients after lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer - results of a cohort study.

Postoperative pneumonia is the most common complication in patients after lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The tolerable incidence of this complication ranges from 5 to 8 %. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of initial risk factors on the incidence of postoperative pneumonia in patients undergoing lung resection for NSCLC. A retrospective cohort study was conducted at the University Hospital Ostrava between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2022. All adult patients who underwent pulmonary lobectomy for primary NSCLC during the study period were included in the study. A total of 350 patients were included in the study. The incidence of postoperative pneumonia was 10.9%. Analysis of baseline risk factors did not show a statistically significant association with the incidence of this complication. The only statistically significant finding was a longer hospital stay in patients with postoperative pneumonia. The risk of postoperative pneumonia in patients undergoing lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer cannot be clearly explained by the initial risk factors examined alone. The complex nature of this risk also requires a comprehensive approach to prevention, including both patient-centred measures and improved postoperative care.

Radicality and safety of mediastinal lymphadenectomy in lung resection: a comparative analysis of uniportal thoracoscopic, multiportal thoracoscopic, and thoracotomy approaches.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer poses a significant challenge with high mortality rates. Minimally invasive surgical approaches, including the uniportal thoracoscopic technique, offer potential benefits in terms of recovery and patient compliance. This study focuses on evaluating the radicality of mediastinal lymphadenectomy during uniportal thoracoscopic lung resection, specifically assessing the reachability of established lymphatic stations. METHODS: A comparative study was conducted at the University Hospital Ostrava from January 2015 to July 2022, focusing on the evaluation of radicality in mediastinal lymphadenectomy across three patient subgroups: uniportal thoracoscopic approach, multiportal thoracoscopic approach, and thoracotomy approach. The study implemented the routine identification and excision of 8 lymph node stations from the respective hemithorax to assess the radicality of lymph node harvesting. RESULTS: A total of 428 patients were enrolled and evaluated. No significant differences were observed in the number of lymph nodes removed between the subgroups. The mean number of lymph nodes removed was 6.50 in the left hemithorax and 6.49 in the right hemithorax. The 30-day postoperative morbidity rate for the entire patient population was 27.3%, with 17.5% experiencing minor complications and 6.5% experiencing major complications. Statistically significant differences were observed in major complications between the uniportal approach and the thoracotomy approach (3.5% vs 12.0%, p = 0.002). The overall mortality rate in the study population was 3%, with a statistically significant difference in mortality between the uniportal and multiportal approaches (1.0% vs 6.4%, p = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: The uniportal approach demonstrated comparable accessibility and lymph node yield to multiportal and thoracotomy techniques. It is equivalent to established methods in terms of postoperative complications, with fewer major complications compared to thoracotomy. While our study indicates a potential for lower mortality following uniportal lung resection in comparison to multiportal lung resection, and demonstrates comparable outcomes to thoracotomy, it is important to approach these findings cautiously and refrain from drawing definitive conclusions.

Ideal marker for targeted axillary dissection (IMTAD): a prospective multicentre trial.

BACKGROUND: Targeted axillary dissection (TAD) is an established method for axillary staging in patients with breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). TAD consists of sentinel lymph node biopsy and initially pathological lymph node excision, which must be marked by a reliable marker before NAC. METHODS: The IMTAD study is a prospective multicentre trial comparing three localisation markers for lymph node localisation (clip + iodine seed, magnetic seed, carbon suspension) facilitating subsequent surgical excision in the form of TAD. The primary outcome was to prospectively compare the reliability, accuracy, and safety according to complication rate during marker implantation and detection and marker dislodgement. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-nine patients were included in the study-in 135 patients clip + iodine seed was used, in 30 patients magnetic seed and in 24 patients carbon suspension. The complication rate during the marker implantation and detection were not statistically significant between individual markers (p = 0.263; p = 0.117). Marker dislodgement was reported in 4 patients with clip + iodine seed localisation (3.0%), dislodgement did not occur in other localisation methods (p = 0.999). The false-negativity of sentinel lymph node (SLN) was observed in 8 patients, the false-negativity of targeted lymph nodes (TLN) wasn´t observed at all, the false-negativity rate (FNR) from the subcohort of ypN + patients for SLN is 9.6% and for TLN 0.0%. CONCLUSION: The IMTAD study indicated, that clip + iodine seed, magnetic seed and carbon suspension are statistically comparable in terms of complications during marker implantation and detection and marker dislodgement proving their safety, accuracy, and reliability in TAD. The study confirmed, that the FNR of the TLN was lower than the FNR of the SLN proving that the TLN is a better marker for axillary lymph node status after NAC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04580251. Name of registry: Clinicaltrials.gov. Date of registration: 8.10.2020.

Level I axillary dissection in patients with breast cancer and tumor-involved sentinel lymph node after NAC is not sufficient for adequate nodal staging.

Objectives: The purpose of the study was to investigate the oncological sufficiency of level I axillary dissection for adequate histological nodal staging (ypN) in patients with breast cancer and tumor-involved sentinel lymph node (SLN) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Material and Methods: A prospective multicentre pilot study took place from 01.01.2018 to 30.11.2020 in three mammary centres in the Czech Republic in patients with breast cancer after NAC (NCT03556397). Patients in the cohort with positive histological frozen section of SLN were indicated to separate axillary dissection of levels I and II. Results: Sixty-one patients with breast cancer after NAC were included in the study according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Twelve patients with breast cancer and tumour involved SLN after NAC were further included in the analysis. Two (16.7%) patients had positive non-sentinel lymph nodes in level I only, one (8.3%) patient had positive lymph nodes in level II only, and seven (58.3%) patients had positive lymph nodes in both levels. Level I axillary dissection in a patient with tumour involved SLN after NAC would have resulted in understaging in five (41.7%) patients, mostly ypN1 instead of ypN2. Conclusion: According to our pilot result, level I axillary dissection is not sufficient in terms of adequate histological nodal staging in breast cancer patients after NAC, and level II axillary dissection should not be omitted.

Laparoscopic Repair Modality of Perforated Peptic Ulcer: Less Is More?

Perforation, per se, presents the most serious complication of peptic ulcer disease with a mortality rate that cannot be underestimated. Surgery is the only treatment option, which can be performed laparoscopically or via conventional laparotomy. The present study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of laparoscopy and laparotomy techniques in the surgical treatment of peptic ulcer perforation. A retrospective study design was structured to compare the perioperative and short-term postoperative outcomes of 102 patients who had undergone laparoscopic and conventional repair of the perforated peptic ulcer over a six-year interval (January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2021). Of these, 44 (43.1%) had undergone laparoscopic repair while 58 (56.9%) had surgical repair via conventional laparotomy. The operative time and length of hospital stay were comparable in both subgroups (p=0.984 and p =0.585). Nevertheless, 30-day postoperative morbidity was significantly higher in the open surgery subgroup (75.9% vs. 59.1%, p= 0.032). The risk of relaparotomy was similar in both study subgroups; however, suture dehiscence as a reason for surgical revision was significantly more frequent in the laparoscopic subgroup (13.6% vs 3.4%). Of note, the mortality rate in the laparoscopic group of patients was 13.6%, and in the laparotomy group 41.4%. The laparoscopic approach to peptic ulcer perforation is the procedure of choice for low-risk patients. Conventional surgery seems to be associated with a significantly higher incidence of severe postoperative complications and mortality. However, the higher mortality in these patients is probably related to their worse initial clinical condition.

Magnetic Seed (Magseed) Localisation in Breast Cancer Surgery: A Multicentre Clinical Trial.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of the Magseed magnetic marker in breast cancer surgery. METHODS: Thirty-nine patients with 41 implanted Magseeds undergoing surgical treatment in 3 surgical oncology departments were included in the retrospective trial to study pilot use of the Magseed magnetic marker in the Czech Republic for localisation of breast tumours or pathological axillary nodes in breast cancer patients. RESULTS: Thirty-four breast cancer and 7 pathological lymph node localisations were performed by Magseed implantation. No placement failures, or perioperative detection failures of Magseeds were observed (0/41, 0.0%), but one case of Magseed migration was present (1/41, 2.4%). All magnetic seeds were successfully retrieved (41/41, 100.0%). Negative margins were achieved in 29 of 34 (85.3%) breast tumour localisations by Magseed. CONCLUSION: Magseed is a reliable marker for breast tumour and pathological axillary node localisation in breast cancer patients. Magseed is comparable to conventional localisation methods in terms of oncosurgical radicality and safety.