[Effect of ultrasonic energy dissection technique in breast reconstruction with the autologous latissimus dorsi flap]. / Apport du bistouri à ultrasons dans la reconstruction mammaire autologue par lambeau de grand dorsal.

OBJECTIVE: To study the ultrasonic energy dissection technique in breast reconstruction with the autologous latissimus dorsi flap and to evaluate its effect on seroma formation and other postoperative complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective monocentric study, between October 2003 and April 2004, including all the patients with breast reconstruction with the autologous latissimus dorsi flap performed with Ultracision Harmonic Scalpel. The patients were followed daily for one month and postoperative drainage volume, seroma formation, local infection or other wound complications were noted. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients, aged 47 to 62 years old, underwent breast reconstruction with this technique. The median operating time was 74 minutes. The median drainage volume was 102.2 ml/day for the first week, 58.1 ml/day for the second week, and 28.4 ml/day for the third week. The last drain was removed at the 25th day postoperatively, half of the patients were drain free at the 20th day. No blood transfusion was necessary. The postoperative complications were dehiscent scars in two patients, with a wound infection in one case. Only one patient (4.8%) required two seroma punctures. CONCLUSION: The ultrasonic energy dissection technique in breast reconstruction was found to be an interesting alternative to the conventionnal scalpel with less seroma formation and no additional disadvantages.

[Standards, options and recommendations: nutritional support in palliative or terminal care of adult patients with progressive cancer]. / Standards, options et recommandations: nutrition en situation palliative ou terminale de l'adulte porteur de cancer évolutif.

CONTEXT: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the National Federation of Comprehensive Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), the 20 French Cancer Centers and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery. OBJECTIVES: To develop clinical practice guidelines according to the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations project for nutritional support in adult patients with advanced or terminal cancer. METHODS: Data were identified by searching Medline, web sites and using the personal reference lists of members of the expert groups. Once the guidelines were defined, the document was submitted for review to 95 independent reviewers. RESULTS: The main recommendations for nutritional support in adult patients with advanced or terminal cancer are: 1) Palliative care has been defined in a consensual way and is governed by the law (standard). Nutritional support is a palliative care which aim is to maintain and restore the "well-being" of the patient (standard). 2) Digestive symptoms and nutritional troubles are frequently noted in patients with advanced or terminal cancer (standard, level of evidence B2). Karnofsky index (KPS) and performance status (PS) are functional scores with a prognostic value and have to be used (standard, level of evidence B2). 3) Anorexia has a bad predictive value in patients with advanced or terminal cancer (standard, level of evidence B2). 4) In France, patients with advanced or terminal cancer are referred to medical institutions, palliative care units or remained at home (standard). Patients need a multidisciplinary follow-up (standard). An active participation of patients and/or their family circle is very important and physicians have to pay attention for their opinions (standard). 5) Dietetic counseling can help patients to improve their alimentation and its drawbacks (standard). 6) Palliative nutritional care often includes medicinal treatments (standard). 7) Artificial nutrition can slow down nutritional degradation, avoid dehydration and improve quality of life in patients with advanced stage cancer (especially head and neck cancer for enteral nutrition and digestive occlusions for parenteral nutrition) and unable to eat adapted meals (standard, level of evidence C). 8) When life expectancy is below 3 months with a KPS 3/4 50% (or PS > 2), artificial nutrition is not recommended (recommendation, expert agreement). 9) The assessment of nutritional care in patients with advanced or terminal cancer has to include functional scores measurement, quality of life and satisfaction degree of the patient and/or their family (standard, expert agreement).

[Standards, Options and Recommendations for home parenteral or enteral nutrition in adult cancer patients]. / Standards, Options et Recommandations: Nutrition artificielle à domicile du malade cancéreux adulte.

CONTEXT: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), the 20 French Cancer Centres and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery. OBJECTIVES: To develop clinical practice guidelines according to the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations project for home parenteral or enteral nutrition in adult cancer patients. METHODS: Data were identified by searching Medline, Cancerlit, web sites and using the personal reference lists of members of the expert groups. Once the guidelines were defined, the document was submitted for review to 72 independent reviewers. RESULTS: The main recommendations for home parenteral or enteral nutrition in adult cancer patients are: 1) Home parenteral or enteral nutrition concerns cancer patients with malnutrition or with inadequate/impossible oral intake, during therapy of because of therapeutic after-effects (standard). Same indications apply for home and hospital artificial nutrition (standard). 2) Patients need a multidisciplinary follow-up (oncologists, nutritionists, and pain specialists), and this follow-up will make treatment adaptations according to the nutritional status possible (recommendation, expert agreement). An active participation of patients and/or their family circle is very important (standard). 3) The benefit of home parenteral or enteral nutrition on the quality of life of terminally ill patients (vs. hydration) has not been demonstrated. When life expectancy is below 3 months, and the Karnofsky index below 50, the drawbacks of home artificial nutrition are more important than its advantages. In this case, home parenteral or enteral nutrition is not recommended (recommendation, expert agreement). 4) Prospective clinical trials are recommended to evaluate the impact of home nutrition on quality of life in cancer patients (expert agreement). 5) The use of educational booklets that mention the telephone number of a referent health care and what to do when a problem happens (e.g. fever on home parenteral nutrition) is recommended (expert agreement). In France, patients should be referred to authorized home parenteral nutrition centres (recommendation, expert agreement).

[Standards, Options and Recommendations (SOR) for the use of appetite stimulants in oncology. Work group. Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC)]. / Standards, Options et Recommandations (SOR) pour l'utilisation des médicaments orexigènes en cancérologie.

CONTEXT: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), the 20 French Cancer Centres and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery. OBJECTIVES: To develop clinical practice guidelines according to the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations project for the use of appetite stimulants in oncology. METHODS: Data were identified by searching Medline and the personal reference lists of members of the expert groups. Once the guidelines were defined, the document was submitted for review to 55 independent reviewers, and to the medical committees of the 20 French Cancer Centres. RESULTS: The main recommendations for the use of appetite stimulants in oncology are: 1) Corticosteroids and the synthetic progestogens (megestrol acetate and medroxyprogesterone acetate) are appetite stimulants. 2) They can be useful in managing anorexia and weight loss in cancer patients, especially in the palliative setting, despite the potential side-effects of these agents. 3) The most effective way of using these drugs is not known. Inclusion in clinical trials is recommended. 4) Cyproheptadine, metoclopramide, nandrolone and pentoxif line should not be used outside prospective clinical trials. 5) Hydrazine sulfate should not be used.