Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Vestn Ross Akad Med Nauk ; 71(5): 375-84, 2016.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29297667

ABSTRACT

Background: For the treatment of patients with degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine the technique of pedicle fixation is widespread, when after open decompression channel structure locking screws are introduced into the vertebral body through the back vertebra legs. We first used a fundamentally new way of fixing the rear using the facet-boards Cage «Facet Wedge¼, when posterior fixation is done by closing the facet joints with minimally invasive, percutaneous method. We have not found data on the clinical efficacy of facet fixation in scientific literature. Aims: To compare the clinical efficacy of facet fixation combined with interbody fusion in the treatment of patients with degenerative lumbar spine disease. Materials and Methods: The study included 145 patients who were divided into 2 groups. The study group with long-term observation included patients (n=100) who underwent a new method for lumbar fixation; the method comprises unilateral or bilateral implantation of titanium Cage «facet Wedge¼ in the joint space facet joint in combination with the anterior, lateral, and transforaminal interbody fusion. Clinical comparison group (n=45) included retrospectively recruited patients who were performed titanium pedicle screw installation after open decompression and interbody fusion posterior lumbar fixation. Dynamic observation and comprehensive evaluation of the treatment clinical results was carried out for 18 months after surgery. Results: Cage facet installation technology is quite simple, universal for the stabilization of the rear of the complex after interbody fusion from the front, side, and rear access; and does not require the intraoperative application of expensive high-tech equipment. Comparative analysis of the main group showed significantly better results in terms of the duration of the operation [CG 125 (90; 140) min, the CCG 205 (160; 220) min; p=0.01], the volume of blood loss [CG 80 (70; 120) ml, CCG 350 (300; 550) ml; p=0.008], activation time [CG 2 (1; 2) days, 4 CCG (3; 5) days; p=0.02], length of hospitalization [CG 9 (10; 11) days, the CCG 13 (12; 15) days; p=0.03], the level of pain on a visual analog scale [CG 3 (2; 4) mm, CCG 15 (12; 18) mm; p=0.001], quality of life (by index Oswestry) [CG 8 (6; 8) points, the CCG 23 (20; 28) points, p=0.003], and labor rehabilitation [CG 3 (2; 6) months, CCG 9 (6; 12) months; p=0.0001]. The number of postoperative complications in group 1 was 13%, in the 2nd ­ 31,1% (p=0,0012). The new method involves fixing the back with considerably less surgical trauma of paravertebral soft tissue that results in early activation of patients, reduction of stay in hospital period, and better functional recovery of patients. Conclusions: The application of facet fixation combined with interbody fusion in the treatment of patients with degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine allows achieving the best clinical outcomes and fewer postoperative complications during the short and long-term follow-up if compared with the traditional method of transpedicular stabilization. The combination of low-impact and reliability facet fixation techniques for posterior stabilization of the operated segment creates favorable conditions for the restoration of a functional condition of patients, full social and physical rehabilitation.


Subject(s)
Fracture Fixation , Intervertebral Disc Degeneration , Intervertebral Disc Displacement , Lumbar Vertebrae , Postoperative Complications , Spinal Fusion , Zygapophyseal Joint/surgery , Adult , Female , Fracture Fixation/adverse effects , Fracture Fixation/instrumentation , Fracture Fixation/methods , Humans , Intervertebral Disc Degeneration/diagnosis , Intervertebral Disc Degeneration/psychology , Intervertebral Disc Degeneration/surgery , Intervertebral Disc Displacement/diagnosis , Intervertebral Disc Displacement/psychology , Intervertebral Disc Displacement/surgery , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Lumbar Vertebrae/pathology , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Pedicle Screws , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Quality of Life , Recovery of Function , Retrospective Studies , Russia , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Spinal Fusion/methods , Treatment Outcome
2.
Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko ; (4): 18-21; discussion 22, 2005.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16404960

ABSTRACT

The paper provides a comparative analysis of the results of treatment in the patients with disk hernia at the lumbosacral levels, who have been endoscopically operated on by a modified procedure described by J. Destandau and by the routine procedure. In the study group, 58 patients (31 males and 27 females) were operated on. The results of treatment were assessed, by using the MacNab spinal endoscopic intervention scale: there were good results in 88% of cases, fair results in 8.6%, and poor ones in 3.4% (2 patients). In the control group, these were 77.4, 17.8, and 4.8%, respectively. The procedure proposed by the authors for fenestration of the intervertebral disk may extend indications for endoscopic diskectomy and its capacities in ossified disk hernias. Two-stage traction of the root may minimize its injury, particularly in herniated median and paramedian disks.


Subject(s)
Intervertebral Disc Displacement/surgery , Intervertebral Disc/surgery , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Sacrum/surgery , Adult , Aged , Endoscopy/methods , Female , Humans , Intervertebral Disc/pathology , Lumbar Vertebrae/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Sacrum/pathology , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...