Differences in the association between epidural analgesia and length of stay by surgery type: an observational study.

INTRODUCTION: Despite a decline in the use of thoracic epidural analgesia related in part to concerns for delayed discharge, it is unknown whether changes in length of stay (LOS) associated with epidural analgesia vary by surgery type. Therefore, we determined the degree to which the association between epidural analgesia (vs no epidural) and LOS differed by surgery type. METHODS: We conducted an observational study using data from 1747 patients who had either non-emergent open abdominal, thoracic, or vascular surgery at a single tertiary academic hospital. The primary outcome was hospital LOS and the incidence of a prolonged hospital LOS defined as 21 days or longer. Secondary endpoints included escalation of care, 30-day all-cause readmission, and reason for epidural not being placed. The association between epidural status and dichotomous endpoints was examined using logistic regression. RESULTS: Among the 1747 patients, 85.7% (1499) received epidural analgesia. 78% (1364) underwent abdominal, 11.5% (200) thoracic, and 10.5% (183) vascular surgeries. After adjustment for differences, receiving epidural analgesia (vs no epidural) was associated with a 45% reduction in the likelihood of a prolonged LOS (p<0.05). This relationship varied by surgery type: abdominal (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.79, p<0.001), vascular (OR 1.66, 95% CI 0.17 to 16.1, p=0.14), and thoracic (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.20 to 5.70, p=0.93). Among abdominal surgical patients, epidural analgesia was associated with a median decrease in LOS by 1.4 days and a 37% reduction in the likelihood of 30-day readmission (adjusted OR 0.63, 0.41 to 0.97, p<0.05). Among thoracic surgical patients, epidural analgesia was associated with a median increase in LOS by 3.2 days. CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between epidural analgesia and LOS appears to be different among different surgical populations.

A survey assessing the presence of "medical home" for adults with disabilities in Connecticut.

BACKGROUND: The medical home model has been recommended as the best design for healthcare management for individuals with disabilities by the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Academy of Family Physicians. As set forth by these guidelines, a medical home contains the following elements: access to health care, usual source of care, personal doctor or nurse, referrals for specialty care, coordinated care, andperson-centered care. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: This study aimed to gather information from adults with disabilities in Connecticut, and the barriers to achieving the medical home model. The study focused on each of the components that make up the medical home model definition. METHODS: An adultwith a disabilitywas defined as a person 18 years or older with any physical or mental disability that significantly impacted one or more major life activities, as defined by the Americans with Disabilities Act. The adults with disabilities were recruited by email through a variety of list servers and flyers that were mailed to employers of people with disabilities. The study consisted of 88 adults with disabilities who were interviewed via telephone with a 54-item survey that was developed based on the research of medical home models. RESULTS: The most common types of disabilities represented were physical (51%), psychiatric (28%), and neurological (24%). The results ofthe study found that 22% of participants were found to have access to health care, 92% of participants reported they had a usual place they go to receive health care, 77% of participants reported having no problems with the process of referrals, 37% of participants were found to have adequate coordinated care, and 90% of participants were identified as having person-centered care. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, only 7% of participants met the criteria for all aspects of the medical home model. The conclusions drawn from this study indicate a need for increased access to health care, more efficiently designed coordinated care, and more accessible referrals to specialists for adults with disabilities, with access being the largest barrier to adequate health care.

Health and psychosocial correlates of disordered gambling in older adults.

OBJECTIVE: A number of regional prevalence studies suggest that disordered gambling is a clinically significant problem among older adults. However, little research has evaluated whether older adults with a gambling disorder experience increased health, psychiatric, substance use, and social problems as compared with older adults without a gambling disorder. METHODS: A group of 48 older-adult disordered gamblers and 48 older adult non/infrequent gamblers, matched by age, sex, race, and recruitment site, completed the Addiction Severity Index (ASI), Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), and Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36). Multivariate general-linear models evaluated between-group differences on these indices. RESULTS: Compared with non/infrequent gamblers, disordered gamblers reported increased severity of medical, family/social, psychiatric, and alcohol problems on the ASI. They also scored higher on depression, anxiety, paranoid ideation, and psychoticism subscales of the BSI, and lower on vitality, physical functioning, role-physical, general health, and social functioning subscales of the SF-36. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that older adults with a gambling disorder experience increased severity of health and psychosocial problems, compared with older adult non/infrequent gamblers matched by age, sex, race, and recruitment site.

Gambling participation and problems among older adults.

Few studies have evaluated rates of gambling participation and problems in older adults. This study recruited 492 adults aged 65 years and older from bingo sites (n = 132) and senior centers (n = 360). Compared to those recruited from senior centers, participants recruited at bingo events had higher South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS) scores and greater gambling frequency and expenditures. Lifetime rates of combined problem and pathological gambling were 12.9% in the bingo sample and 9.7% in the senior center sample (10.6% overall). Compared to non-problem gamblers, problem and pathological gamblers were more likely to be younger (73 versus 76 years) and male (52% versus 27%). Overall, 39.1% reported gambling at least twice per month over the past year, and 33.7% wagered dollars 50 or more over the prior 2 months. This study suggests that subsets of active older adults have high rates of gambling participation and problems.