Are there differences in the reoperation rates for operative adjacent-segment disease between ALIF+PS, PLIF+PS, TLIF+PS, and LLIF+PS? An analysis of a cohort of 5291 patients.

OBJECTIVE: Biomechanical factors in lumbar fusions accelerate the development of adjacent-segment disease (ASD). Stiffness in the fused segment increases motion in the adjacent levels, resulting in ASD. The objective of this study was to determine if there are differences in the reoperation rates for symptomatic ASD (operative ASD) between anterior lumbar interbody fusion plus pedicle screws (ALIF+PS), posterior lumbar interbody fusion plus pedicle screws (PLIF+PS), transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion plus pedicle screws (TLIF+PS), and lateral lumbar interbody fusion plus pedicle screws (LLIF+PS). METHODS: A retrospective study using data from the Kaiser Permanente Spine Registry identified an adult cohort (≥ 18 years old) with degenerative disc disease who underwent primary lumbar interbody fusions with pedicle screws between L3 to S1. Demographic and operative data were obtained from the registry, and chart review was used to document operative ASD. Patients were followed until operative ASD, membership termination, the end of study (March 31, 2022), or death. Operative ASD was analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: The final study population included 5291 patients with a mean ± SD age of 60.1 ± 12.1 years and a follow-up of 6.3 ± 3.8 years. There was a total of 443 operative ASD cases, with an overall incidence rate of reoperation for ASD of 8.37% (95% CI 7.6-9.2). The crude incidence of operative ASD at 5 years was the lowest in the ALIF+PS cohort (7.7%, 95% CI 6.3-9.4). In the adjusted models, the authors failed to detect a statistical difference in operative ASD between ALIF+PS (reference) versus PLIF+PS (HR 1.06 [0.79-1.44], p = 0.69) versus TLIF+PS (HR 1.03 [0.81-1.31], p = 0.83) versus LLIF+PS (HR 1.38 [0.77-2.46], p = 0.28). CONCLUSIONS: In a large cohort of over 5000 patients with an average follow-up of > 6 years, the authors found no differences in the reoperation rates for symptomatic ASD (operative ASD) between ALIF+PS and PLIF+PS, TLIF+PS, or LLIF+PS.

Improvements in Quality, Safety and Costs Associated with Use of Implant Registries Within a Health System.

BACKGROUND: Clinical quality registries (CQRs) are intended to enhance quality, safety, and cost reduction using real-world data for a self-improving health system. Starting in 2001, Kaiser Permanente established several medical device CQRs as a quality improvement initiative. This report examines the contributions of these CQRs on improvement in health outcomes, changes in clinical practice, and cost-effectiveness over the past 20 years. METHODS: Eight implant registries were instituted with standardized collection from the electronic health record and other institutional data sources of patient characteristics, medical comorbidities, implant attributes, procedure details, surgical techniques, and outcomes (including complications, revisions, reoperations, hospital readmissions, and other utilization measures). A rigorous quality control system is in place to improve and maintain the quality of data. Data from the Implant Registries form the basis for multiple quality improvement and patient safety initiatives to minimize variation in care, promote clinical best practices, facilitate recalls, perform benchmarking, identify patients at risk, and construct reports about individual surgeons. RESULTS: Following the inception of the Implant Registries, there was an observed (1) reduction in opioid utilization following orthopedic procedures, (2) reduction in use of bone morphogenic protein during lumbar fusion allowing for cost savings, (3) reduction in allograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and subsequent decrease in organizationwide revision rates, (4) cost savings through expansion of same-day discharge programs for joint arthroplasty, (5) increase in the use of cement fixation in the hemiarthroplasty treatment of hip fracture, and (6) organizationwide discontinuation of an endograft device associated with a higher risk for adverse outcomes following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. CONCLUSION: The use of Implant Registries within our health system, along with clinical leadership and organizational commitment to a learning health system, was associated with improved quality and safety outcomes and reduced costs. The exact mechanisms by which such registries affect health outcomes and costs require further study.

Expanding Knowledge of the Causes of Childhood Chorea.

INHERITED AND ACQUIRED CHOREAS: Paolo Claudio M. de Gusmao, Jeff L. Waugh Seminars in Pediatric Neurology Volume 25, April 2018, Pages 42-53 Chorea is a symptom of a broad array of genetic, structural, and metabolic disorders. While chorea can result from systemic illness and damage to diverse brain structures, injury to the basal ganglia, especially the putamen or globus pallidus, appears to be a uniting features of these diverse neuropathologies. The timing of onset, rate of progression, and the associated neurological or systemic symptoms can often narrow the differential diagnosis to a few disorders. Recognizing the correct etiology for childhood chorea is critical, as numerous disorders in this category are potentially curable, or are remediable, with early treatment.

Lateral Mass Screws Versus Pedicle Screws at C7: Reoperation Rates for Operative Adjacent Segment Disease and Nonunion in Posterior Cervical Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To determine if there is a difference in reoperation rates for symptomatic adjacent segment disease (operative ASD) and symptomatic nonunions (operative nonunions) in posterior cervical fusions (PCFs) stopping at C7 using either lateral mass screws (LMS) or cervical pedicle screws (CPS) at C7. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Stopping PCFs at C7 has been controversial because of the risks of adjacent segment disease or nonunions. The two commonly used fixation techniques at the C7 level are LMS and CPS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis from the Kaiser Permanente Spine Registry identified a cohort of patients with cervical degenerative disk disease who underwent primary PCFs stopping at C7 with either LMS or CPS at C7. Demographic and operative data were extracted from the registry, and operative ASD and operative nonunions were adjudicated through chart review. Patients were followed until validated operative ASD or nonunion, membership termination, death, or end of study (March 31, 2022). Descriptive statistics and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were calculated for operative ASDs and operative nonunions. RESULTS: We found 481 patients with PCFs stopping at C7 with either LMS (n=347) or CPS (n=134) at C7 with an average follow-up time of 5.6 (±3.8) years, time to operative ASD of 3.0 (±2.8) years, and to operative nonunion of 1.2 (±0.7) years. There were 11 operative ASDs (LMS=8, CPS=3) and eight operative nonunions (LMS=4, CPS=4). There was no statistical difference between patients stopping at C7 with LMS versus CPS for operative ASDs (HR: 0.68, 95% CI=0.17-2.77, P =0.60) or operative nonunions (HR: 2.09, 95% CI=0.45-8.58, P =0.37). CONCLUSION: A large cohort of patients with PCFs stopping at C7 with an average follow-up of > 5 years found no statistical difference in reoperation rates for symptomatic ASD (operative ASD) or operative nonunion using either LMS or CPS at C7.

Increased risks of vertebral fracture and reoperation in primary spinal fusion patients who test positive for osteoporosis by Biomechanical Computed Tomography analysis.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: While osteoporosis is a risk factor for adverse outcomes in spinal fusion patients, diagnosing osteoporosis reliably in this population has been challenging due to degenerative changes and spinal deformities. Addressing that challenge, biomechanical computed tomography analysis (BCT) is a CT-based diagnostic test for osteoporosis that measures both bone mineral density and bone strength (using finite element analysis) at the spine; CT scans taken for spinal evaluation or previous care can be repurposed for the analysis. PURPOSE: Assess the effectiveness of BCT for preoperatively identifying spinal fusion patients with osteoporosis who are at high risk of reoperation or vertebral fracture. STUDY DESIGN: Observational cohort study in a multi-center integrated managed care system using existing data from patient medical records and imaging archives. PATIENT SAMPLE: We studied a randomly sampled subset of all adult patients who had any type of primary thoracic (T4 or below) or lumbar fusion between 2005 and 2018. For inclusion, patients with accessible study data needed a preop CT scan without intravenous contrast that contained images (before any instrumentation) of the upper instrumented vertebral level. OUTCOME MEASURES: Reoperation for any reason (primary outcome) or a newly documented vertebral fracture (secondary outcome) occurring up to 5 years after the primary surgery. METHODS: All study data were extracted using available coded information and CT scans from the medical records. BCT was performed at a centralized lab blinded to the clinical outcomes; patients could test positive for osteoporosis based on either low values of bone strength (vertebral strength ≤ 4,500 N women or 6,500 N men) and/or bone mineral density (vertebral trabecular bone mineral density ≤ 80 mg/cm3 both sexes). Cox proportional hazard ratios were adjusted by age, presence of obesity, and whether the fusion was long (four or more levels fused) or short (3 or fewer levels fused); Kaplan-Meier survival was compared by the log rank test. This project was funded by NIH (R44AR064613) and all physician co-authors and author 1 received salary support from their respective departments. Author 6 is employed by, and author 1 has equity in and consults for, the company that provides the BCT test; the other authors declare no conflicts of interest. RESULTS: For the 469 patients analyzed (298 women, 171 men), median follow-up time was 44.4 months, 11.1% had a reoperation (median time 14.5 months), and 7.7% had a vertebral fracture (median time 2.0 months). Overall, 25.8% of patients tested positive for osteoporosis and no patients under age 50 tested positive. Compared to patients without osteoporosis, those testing positive were at almost five-fold higher risk for vertebral fracture (adjusted hazard ratio 4.7, 95% confidence interval = 2.2-9.7; p<.0001 Kaplan-Meier survival). Of those positive-testing patients, those who tested positive concurrently for low values of both bone strength and bone mineral density (12.6% of patients overall) were at almost four-fold higher risk for reoperation (3.7, 1.9-7.2; Kaplan-Meier survival p<.0001); the remaining positive-testing patients (those who tested positive for low values of either bone strength or bone mineral density but not both) were not at significantly higher risk for reoperation (1.6, 0.7-3.7) but were for vertebral fracture (4.3, 1.9-10.2). For both clinical outcomes, risk remained high for patients who underwent short or long fusion. CONCLUSION: In a real-world clinical setting, BCT was effective in identifying primary spinal fusion patients aged 50 or older with osteoporosis who were at elevated risks of reoperation and vertebral fracture.

Are Octogenarians at Higher Risk of Complications After Elective Lumbar Spinal Fusion Surgery? Analysis of a Cohort of 7880 Patients From the Kaiser Permanente Spine Registry.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study with chart review. OBJECTIVE: To determine if there is a difference in risk of adverse outcomes following elective posterior instrumented lumbar spinal fusions for patients aged 80 years and above compared with patients aged 50 to 79 years. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Patients aged 80 years and above are undergoing elective lumbar spinal fusion surgery in increasing numbers. There are conflicting data on the risks of intraoperative and postoperative complications in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients aged 80 years and above were compared with 50 to 79 years (reference group) using time-dependent multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression with a competing risk of death for longitudinal outcomes and multivariable logistic regression for binary outcomes. Outcome measures used were: (1) intraoperative complications (durotomy), (2) postoperative complications: 30-day outcomes (pneumonia); 90-day outcomes (deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, emergency room visits, readmission, reoperations, and mortality); and two-year outcomes (reoperations and mortality). RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 7880 patients who underwent primary elective posterior instrumented lumbar spinal fusion (L1-S1) for degenerative disk disease or spondylolisthesis. This was subdivided into 596 patients were aged 80 years and above and 7284 patients aged 50 to 79. After adjustment, patients aged 80 years and above had a higher likelihood of durotomy [odds ratio (OR)=1.43, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.02-2.02] and 30-day pneumonia (OR=1.81, 95% CI=1.01-3.23). However, there was a lower risk of reoperation within two years of the index procedure (hazard ratio=0.69, 95% CI=0.48-0.99). No differences were observed for mortality, readmissions, emergency room visits, pulmonary embolism, or deep vein thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of 7880 elective posterior instrumented lumbar fusion patients for degenerative disk disease or spondylolisthesis, we did not observe any significant risks of adverse events between patients aged 80 years and above and those aged 50 to 79 except for higher durotomies and 30-day pneumonia in the former. We believe octogenarians can safely undergo lumbar fusions, but proper preoperative screening is necessary to reduce the risks of 30-day pneumonia.

No Difference in Reoperation Rates for Adjacent Segment Disease (Operative Adjacent Segment Disease) in Posterior Cervical Fusions Stopping at C7 Versus T1/T2: A Cohort of 875 Patients-Part 1.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study with chart review. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there is a difference in reoperation rates for adjacent segment disease ([ASD] operative ASD) in posterior cervical fusions (PCFs) that stop at -C7 versus -T1/T2. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There are surgical treatment challenges to the anatomical complexities of the cervicothoracic junction. Current posterior cervical spine surgery is based on the belief that ASD occurs if fusions are stopped at C7 although there is varying evidence to support this assumption. METHODS: Patients were followed until validated reoperations for ASD, membership termination, death, or March 31, 2020. Descriptive statistics and 5-year crude incidence rates and 95% confidence intervals for operative ASD for PCF ending at -C7 or -T1/T2 were reported. Time-dependent crude and adjusted multivariable Cox-Proportional Hazards models were used to evaluate operative ASD rates with adjustment for covariates or risk change estimates more than 10%. RESULTS: We identified 875 patients with PCFs (beginning at C3 or C4 or C5 or C6) stopping at either -C7 (n = 470) or -T1/T2 (n = 405) with average follow-up time of 4.6 (±3.3) years and average time to operative ASD of 2.7 (±2.8) years. Crude overall incidence rates for stopping at -C7 (2.12% [1.02%-3.86%]) and -T1/T2 (2.48% [1.25%-4.40%]) were comparable with no statistical difference in risk (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.47, 95% confidence interval = 0.61-3.53, P = 0.39). In addition, we observed no differences in the probability of operative ASD in competing risk time-dependent models (Grey test P  = 0.448). CONCLUSION: A large cohort of 875 patients with PCFs stopping at -C7 or -T1/T2 with an average follow-up of more than 4 years found no statistical difference in reoperation rates for ASD (operative ASD).Level of Evidence: 3.

No difference in reoperation rates for nonunions (operative nonunions) in posterior cervical fusions stopping at C7 versus T1/2: a cohort of 875 patients.

OBJECTIVE: The challenges of posterior cervical fusions (PCFs) at the cervicothoracic junction (CTJ) are widely known, including the development of adjacent-segment disease by stopping fusions at C7. One solution has been to cross the CTJ (T1/T2) rather than stopping at C7. This approach may have undue consequences, including increased reoperations for symptomatic nonunion (operative nonunion). The authors sought to investigate if there is a difference in operative nonunion in PCFs that stop at C7 versus T1/T2. METHODS: A retrospective analysis identified patients from the authors' spine registry (Kaiser Permanente) who underwent PCFs with caudal fusion levels at C7 and T1/T2. Demographics, diagnoses, operative times, lengths of stay, and reoperations were extracted from the registry. Operative nonunion was adjudicated via chart review. Patients were followed until validated operative nonunion, membership termination, death, or end of study (March 31, 2020). Descriptive statistics and 2-year crude incidence rates and 95% confidence intervals for operative nonunion for PCFs stopping at C7 or T1/T2 were reported. Time-dependent crude and adjusted multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate operative nonunion rates. RESULTS: The authors identified 875 patients with PCFs (beginning at C3, C4, C5, or C6) stopping at either C7 (n = 470) or T1/T2 (n = 405) with a mean follow-up time of 4.6 ± 3.3 years and a mean time to operative nonunion of 0.9 ± 0.6 years. There were 17 operative nonunions, and, after adjustment for age at surgery and smoking status, the cumulative incidence rates were similar between constructs stopping at C7 and those that extended to T1/T2 (C7: 1.91% [95% CI 0.88%-3.60%]; T1/T2: 1.98% [95% CI 0.86%-3.85%]). In the crude model and model adjusted for age at surgery and smoking status, no difference in risk for constructs extended to T1/T2 compared to those stopping at C7 was found (adjusted HR 1.09 [95% CI 0.42-2.84], p = 0.86). CONCLUSIONS: In one of the largest cohort of patients with PCFs stopping at C7 or T1/T2 with an average follow-up of > 4 years, the authors found no statistically significant difference in reoperation rates for symptomatic nonunion (operative nonunion). This finding shows that there is no added risk of operative nonunion by extending PCFs to T1/T2 or stopping at C7.

Bilateral papilledema with vision loss due to post-COVID-19-induced thiamine deficiency: illustrative case.

BACKGROUND: Bilateral papilledema with vision loss is considered a neurosurgical emergency due to high intracranial pressure. However, it may not be the only cause of papilledema. The authors reported an association among coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), bilateral papilledema, blindness, and Wernicke's encephalopathy (WE). OBSERVATIONS: An 18-year-old woman presented to the neurosurgery service with rapid profound vision loss and bilateral papilledema. She had COVID-19 3 months earlier with subsequent loss of smell (anosmia) and taste (ageusia), which resulted in hyperemesis and a 43-lb weight loss. Examination revealed ataxia, horizontal nystagmus, and blindness. Magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance venography of her brain were normal. Presumptive diagnosis of WE was made, and she was treated with intravenous thiamine with restoration of vision within 48 hours. Patient's thiamine level was less than half the normal value. LESSONS: Neurosurgeons should be aware of this unique correlation between papilledema and vision loss and its association with WE due to post-COVID-19 hyperemesis and weight loss from anosmia and ageusia.

Does Impaired Glymphatic Drainage Cause Glymphedema? A Review Tailored to Neurocritical Care and Neurosurgery.

Research into the glymphatic system reached an inflection point with steep trajectory in 2012 when it was formally recognized and named, but the historical roots for it are solid and deep, dating back to pioneers such as Cushing, Weed, and Dandy. We provide an overview of key discoveries of the glymphatic system, which promotes bulk flow of fluid and solutes throughout the brain parenchyma. We also discuss the lymphatic drainage of the central nervous system. Evidence is building that failure of the glymphatic system causes glymphedema in patients commonly managed by neurocritical care and neurosurgery specialists. We review research supporting this for decompressive craniectomy, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and normal-pressure hydrocephalus. We argue that it is time for a paradigm shift from the traditional model of cerebrospinal fluid circulation to a revised model that incorporates the glymphatic pathway and lymphatic clearance. These recent breakthroughs will inspire new therapeutic approaches to recognize, reverse, and restore glymphatic dysfunction and to leverage this pathway to deliver brain-wide therapeutics.

PLF+PS or ALIF+PS: which has a lower operative nonunion rate? Analysis of a cohort of 2,061 patients from a National Spine Registry.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Although fusion rates in posterolateral lumbar fusions with pedicle screws (PLF+PS) and anterior lumbar interbody fusions with pedicle screws (ALIF+PS) have been reported, there has been no consensus on superiority with respect to clinical outcome and nonunion rates. Most studies determine nonunion rates based on radiographic studies; however, many of these nonunions are asymptomatic and may not require reoperations. Hence, a potentially more clinically useful measure is the reoperation rate for symptomatic nonunions, which we term the operative nonunion rate. PURPOSE: To determine if there is a difference in operative nonunion rates between PLF+PS versus ALIF+PS. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Adult patients (≥18 years old) with the diagnosis of lumbar spondylolisthesis or lumbar spinal stenosis who underwent primary elective PLF+PS and ALIF+PS for 1-level and 2-level fusions (L4-S1) between 2009 and 2018. OUTCOME MEASURES: Reoperation rates for symptomatic nonunions (ie, operative nonunion rates). METHODS: Patients were followed until validated operative nonunions, membership termination, death, or 03/31/2019. Descriptive statistics and 2-year incidence rates for operative nonunions were calculated by fusion-level, fusion type, and levels fused. Time-dependent multivariable Cox-Proportional Hazards regression was used to evaluate operative nonunion rates with adjustment for covariates or risk change estimates more than 10%. RESULTS: We identified 2,061 patients (PLF+PS:1,491, ALIF+PS:570) with average follow-up time of 4.8 (±3.1) years and average time to operative nonunion of 1.3 (±1.2) yrs. Comparatively, unadjusted 1-level and 2-level incidence rates for operative nonunions were higher in PLF+PS versus ALIF+PS. For 1-level procedures these were 0.9% (95% CI=0.4-1.6) versus 0.6% (95% CI=0.1-2.1); 2-level, 2.0% (95% CI=0.8-4.0) versus 0.9% (95% CI=0.1-3.3). However, there were no observed significant differences in risks for operative nonunions in multivariable models comparing PLF+PS versus ALIF+PS (HR=0.3, 95% CI=0.1-1.1), 1-level versus 2-level fusions (HR=1.8, 95% CI=0.8-4.3), or by fusion level (L4-L5: HR=1.0, 95% CI=0.4-2.7; L5-S1: HR=2.0, 95% CI=0.7-5.4). CONCLUSIONS: A large cohort of patients with lumbar fusions between L4 to S1 and an average follow-up of >4 years found that although there was a trend for higher operative nonunions in PLF+PS compared with ALIF+PS, this was not statistically significant. The role of spinal alignment was not investigated.

Operative Nonunion Rates in Posterolateral Lumbar Fusions: Analysis of a Cohort of 2591 Patients from a National Spine Registry.

OBJECTIVE: Radiographic nonunion rates in the literature for posterolateral lumbar fusions with pedicle screws (PLFs) range from 8.1% to 43.3% but may not represent nonunion rates. A few small studies have reported reoperations for symptomatic nonunions (operative nonunions) to range from 3.2% to 13.9%. The objective of this study is to determine operative nonunion rates for 1-level, 2-level, 3-level, and ≥4-level PLFs and to determine the risks for these nonunions. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study, using data from the Kaiser Permanente Spine Registry, identified adult patients (≥18 years old) who underwent PLFs for degenerative disc disease. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression and Kaplan-Meier survival estimates using the log-rank statistic were used to evaluate operative nonunion rates. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 2591 patients with single-level and multilevel PLFs with mean follow-up of 4.6 years, time to operative nonunion of 1.52 years, and 2-year operative nonunion rate of 1.08%. Compared with single-level fusions, patients with 3-level and ≥4-level fusion had 2.8 and 3.7 times higher risk of operative nonunions. Patients with PLFs involving L5-S1 had 2.5 times the risk of an operative nonunion compared with those without. CONCLUSIONS: Our study reports results from one of the largest cohort of patients for the first time with single-level and multilevel instrumented PLFs and found a 2-year operative nonunion rate of 1.08% with increased risk of nonunion for constructs that included L5-S1 and ≥3-level fusions. Operative nonunion combines clinical and radiographic data and provides an alternative measure of fusion rates.

PLF Versus PLIF and the Fate of L5-S1: Analysis of Operative Nonunion Rates Among 3065 Patients with Lumbar Fusions from a Regional Spine Registry.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study with chart review. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the reoperation rates for symptomatic nonunions (operative nonunion rates) between posterolateral fusions with pedicle screws (PLFs) and posterior interbody fusion with pedicle screws (PLIFs). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although radiographic nonunions in PLFs and PLIFs are well documented in the literature, there is no consensus on which technique has lower nonunions. Since some radiographic nonunions may be asymptomatic, a more clinically useful measure is operative nonunions, of which there is minimal research. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study, using data from the Kaiser Permanente Spine Registry, identified adult patients (≥18 years' old) who had elective single and multilevel PLFs and PLIFs. Descriptive statistics and 2-year incidence rates for operative nonunions were calculated by fusion-level (1-3), fusion type (PLF vs. PLIF), and levels fused (L3 to S1). Time-dependent multivariable Cox-Proportional Hazards regression was used to evaluate nonunion reoperation rates with adjustment for covariates. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 3065 patients with PLFs (71.6%) and PLIFs (28.4%). Average age was 65.0 ±â€Š11.7, average follow-up time was 4.8 ±â€Š3.1 years, and average time to operative nonunion was 1.6 (±1.3) years. Single and multilevel incidence rates for nonunions after PLF versus PLIF were similar except for three-level fusions (2.9% [95% confidence interval, CI = 1.0-6.7] vs. 7.1% [95% CI = 0.2-33.9]). In adjusted models, there was no difference in risk of operative nonunions in PLIF compared to PLF (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.8, 95% CI = 0.4-1.6); however, patients with L5-S1 constructs with PLFs had 2.8 times the risk of operative nonunion compared to PLIFs (PLF: HR = 2.8, 95% CI = 1.3-6.2; PLIF: HR = 1.5, 95% CI = 0.4-5.1). CONCLUSION: In a large cohort of patients with >4 years of follow-up, we found no difference in operative nonunions between PLF and PLIF except for constructs that included L5-S1 in which the risk of nonunion was limited to PLF patients.Level of Evidence: 3.

Does the use of preoperative bisphosphonates in patients with osteopenia and osteoporosis affect lumbar fusion rates? Analysis from a national spine registry.

OBJECTIVE: Bisphosphonates are used to increase bone strength in treating osteopenia and osteoporosis, but their use for increasing lumbar fusion rates has been controversial. The objective of this study was to determine if preoperative treatment with bisphosphonates affects the reoperation rates for nonunions (operative nonunion rates) following lumbar fusions in patients with osteopenia or osteoporosis. METHODS: The authors conducted a cohort study using data from the Kaiser Permanente Spine Registry. Patients (aged ≥ 50 years) with a diagnosis of osteopenia or osteoporosis who underwent primary elective lumbar fusions for degenerative disc disease, deformity, or spondylolisthesis were included in the cohort. Repeated spinal procedures at the index lumbar levels were noted through chart review. Reoperations for symptomatic nonunions (operative nonunions), time to nonunion, and the nonunion spine level(s) were also identified. The crude 2-year cumulative incidence of operative nonunions was calculated as 1 minus the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to evaluate the association between preoperative bisphosphonate use and operative nonunion after adjustment for covariates. Analysis was stratified by osteopenia and osteoporosis diagnosis. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 1040 primary elective lumbar fusion patients, 408 with osteopenia and 632 with osteoporosis. Ninety-seven (23.8%) patients with osteopenia and 370 (58.5%) patients with osteoporosis were preoperative bisphosphonate users. For the osteopenia group, no operative nonunions were observed in patients with preoperative bisphosphonate, while the crude 2-year incidence was 2.44% (95% CI 0.63-4.22) in the nonuser group. For the osteoporotic group, after adjustment for covariates, no difference was observed in risk for operative nonunions between the preoperative bisphosphonate users and nonusers (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.20-4.55, p = 0.964). CONCLUSIONS: To the authors' knowledge, this study presents one of the largest series of patients with the diagnosis of osteopenia or osteoporosis in whom the effects of preoperative bisphosphonates on lumbar fusions were evaluated using operative nonunion rates as an outcome measure. The results indicate that preoperative bisphosphonate use had no effect on the operative nonunion rates for patients with osteoporosis. Similar indications were not confirmed in osteopenia patients because of the low nonunion frequency. Further studies are warranted to the determine if preoperative and postoperative timing of bisphosphonate use has any effect on lumbar fusion rates.

Lumbar Spine Fusion Patients See Similar Improvements in Physical Activity Level to Non-Spine Fusion Patients Following Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The impact of prior lumbar spinal fusion on the change in physical activity level following total hip arthroplasty (THA) has not been thoroughly examined. Therefore, we sought to compare the change in physical activity level following THA for patients with and without a history of lumbar spine fusion. METHODS: Patients who underwent primary elective THA were identified using an integrated healthcare system's Total Joint Replacement Registry (2010-2013). Prior lumbar spine fusion was identified using the healthcare system's Spine Registry. Physical activity was self-reported by patients and measured in min/wk. Generalized linear models were used to evaluate the association between prior spine fusion and the change in physical activity from 1 year pre-THA to 1-2 years post-THA. RESULTS: Of 11,416 THAs, 90 (0.8%) had a history of lumbar spinal fusion. Patients with a prior lumbar fusion had a median physical activity level of 28 min/wk prior to THA compared to 45 min/wk in the patients with no history of lumbar spinal fusion. One year after THA, patients with a history of lumbar spinal fusion reported a median of 120 min/wk of physical activity compared to 150 min/wk for patients without a history of lumbar spinal fusion. The difference in physical activity level change between groups was not statistically significant (estimate = -23.1, 95% confidence interval -62.1 to 15.9, P = .246). CONCLUSION: Patients with prior lumbar fusion were found to have lower self-reported physical activity levels than patients without spine fusion both before and after THA surgery. However, both groups saw the same degree of improvement in physical activity level following THA. These findings may help in counseling patients who have had a prior lumbar spine fusion and in setting appropriate expectations prior to THA.

Are Hygromas and Hydrocephalus After Decompressive Craniectomy Caused by Impaired Brain Pulsatility, Cerebrospinal Fluid Hydrodynamics, and Glymphatic Drainage? Literature Overview and Illustrative Cases.

BACKGROUND: Poorly understood cranial fluid accumulations are frequently observed after decompressive craniectomy and often termed "external hydrocephalus." These findings are difficult to explain using traditional models of hydrocephalus. METHODS: Representative cases, clinical management, and literature overview are presented. RESULTS: We present a hypothesis that abnormal cranial fluid accumulations develop after decompressive craniectomy in a vulnerable subset of patients as a result of 1) the large compliant cranial defect with durotomy causing reduced internal brain expansion, ventricular squeezing, and pulsatile cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) circulation; 2) impaired pulsatile CSF flow along major cerebral arteries and the adjoining perivascular spaces (Virchow-Robin spaces); 3) reduced clearance of interstitial fluid by the glymphatic system; and 4) redistribution of CSF from the subarachnoid space into the subdural and subgaleal compartments and the ventricles. CONCLUSION: Closure of the cranial defect with cranioplasty improves cerebral blood flow and CSF pulsatile circulation and is frequently sufficient to resolve the external hydrocephalus.

Exclusion criteria for dysphagia for outpatient single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using inpatient data from a spine registry.

OBJECTIVES: Reported incidence of dysphagia after ACDFs has been as high as 79%. There, however, have been no studies that have specifically looked at developing a criteria for reducing the incidence of dysphagia for outpatient ACDFs. The aim of this study was to determine the risks factors for significant dysphagia that will exclude patients from outpatient single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusions (ACDFs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using the Kaiser Permanente Spine registry database, between January 2009 and September 2013, we identified all inpatients (there were no outpatients) who underwent primary elective one-level ACDFs. A cohort of patients were identified with in-hospital length of stay (LOS) > 48 h in which the reason for continued admission was primarily significant dysphagia (DG). Patient's demographics and intraoperative data (ACDF levels (upper [C2-3, C3-4], middle [C4-5, C5-6], lower [C6-7, C7-T1]), and operative times (<100, 100-199, ≥ 200, minutes)) was used to determine risk factors for dysphagia. RESULTS: We found 747 single-level ACDF cases with a cohort of 239 (32.0%) who met the criteria for dysphagia (DG) with > 48 h admission. The DG group and non-dysphagia group (NDG) had similar demographics. Diabetes was excluded from regression analysis due to the low frequency. Compared to the lower spine level (C5-6, C7-T1), the upper spine level (C2-3, C3-4) ACDF had a higher likelihood for dysphagia (OR = 2.23, 95% CI = 1.35-3.68, p = 0.0016); no difference was found for middle spine level (C4-5, C5-6) ACDF. CONCLUSION: Single-level ACDF at the upper cervical spine (C2-3, C3-4) was found to be the only risk factor for dysphagia with LOS > 48 h based on inpatient data from a spine registry. Age, BMI category, gender, ASA classification, smoking, and operative time were not predictive factors. These findings should be used for excluding patients who undergo outpatient single-level ACDF surgery to reduce significant postoperative dysphagia.

Reoperation for Symptomatic Nonunions in Atlantoaxial (C1-C2) Fusions with and without Bone Morphogenetic Protein: A Cohort of 108 Patients with >2 Years Follow-Up.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if there is a difference in reoperation rates for symptomatic nonunions in atlantoaxial (C1-C2) fusions with or without bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) using data from a national spine registry and to analyze the different types of bone grafts used in the non-BMP group. METHODS: Data from the Kaiser Permanente spine registry were used to identify patients with C1-C2 fusions with >2 years follow-up. Patient characteristics, diagnosis, operative times, length of stay, and reoperations were extracted from the registry. The data set was divided into patients with and without BMP. Further analysis was made of the different types of non-BMP grafts as well as the instrumentation used. RESULTS: In our cohort, we found 58 patients (53.7%) with BMP and 50 patients (46.3%) without with an average follow-up time of 5 years (interquartile range, 2.04-8.49). The BMP versus non-BMP groups differed in admitting diagnosis, operative times, length of stay, and follow-up times. There were no reoperations for symptomatic nonunions in both groups. The non-BMP group included iliac crest graft (with or without allograft [+/-] allograft); lamina (+/- allograft); and allograft alone. CONCLUSIONS: Using one of the largest retrospective studies on C1-C2 fusions with and without BMP, we found no difference in reoperation rates for symptomatic nonunions. For the non-BMP group, we found that lamina (+/- allograft) or allograft alone may also be just as effective as iliac crest graft (+/- allograft) in having no reoperations for symptomatic nonunions.