Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Am J Surg ; 202(2): 119-26, 2011 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21718960

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Debates continue regarding optimal structures for governance and administration between medical schools and their teaching hospitals. METHODS: Structural integration (SI) for 85 academic health centers was characterized as high (single leader or fiduciary) or low (multiple leaders or fiduciaries). Functional alignment (FA) was estimated from questionnaire responses by teaching hospitals' chief executive officers, and an index was calculated quantifying organizational collaboration across several functional areas. SI and FA were examined for their association with global performance measures in teaching, research, clinical care, finance, and efficiency. RESULTS: AHCs with high SI had significantly higher FA, though overlap between high-SI and low-SI institutions was considerable. SI was not significantly associated with any performance measure. In contrast, FA was significantly associated with higher performance in teaching, research, and finance but not clinical care and efficiency. CONCLUSIONS: FA between medical schools and their primary teaching hospitals more strongly predicts academic health centers' performance than does SI. As demands for greater collaboration increase under health reform, emphasis should be placed on increasing FA rather than SI.


Subject(s)
Academic Medical Centers/organization & administration , Cooperative Behavior , Diagnosis-Related Groups/organization & administration , Hospitals, University/organization & administration , Leadership , Schools, Medical/organization & administration , Academic Medical Centers/economics , Academic Medical Centers/trends , Diagnosis-Related Groups/economics , Diagnosis-Related Groups/trends , Direct Service Costs , Financing, Government , Hospital Costs , Hospitals, University/economics , Hospitals, University/trends , Humans , Schools, Medical/economics , Schools, Medical/trends , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
3.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf ; 36(5): 195-202, 2010 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20480751

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: External reporting of medical errors a adverse events enables learning from the errors of others in the pursuit of systems-level improvements that can prevent future errors. It is logical to presume that medication errors involving the use of anticoagulants, among the most frequently cited product classes involved in harmful medication errors, would be captured in a variety of patient safety reporting programs. METHODS: Data on reported errors involving the anticoagulant heparin were reviewed, compared, and aggregated from the databases of three large patient safety reporting programs-MEDMARX, the Pennsylvania Patient Safety Authority's Patient Safety Reporting System, and the University Health System Consortium, together representing more than 1,000 reporting organizations for 2005 RESULTS: Approximately 300,000 medication errors and near misses were reported to the programs, and 10,359-a mean of 3.6% (range, 3.1%-5.5%)-involved heparin products. The proportion of heparin-related reports that involved patient harm ranged from 1.4% to 4.9%. The phase of the medication use process cited most frequently in harmful events was the administration phase (56% of errors leading to harm), followed by the prescribing phase (19% of errors leading to harm). DISCUSSION: This study represents the first attempt by these three large reporting systems to combine data on a single clinical process. The consistent patterns evident in the reports, such as the percentage of all medication errors that involved heparin, suggests that reporting programs, at least for common events such as medication errors, may reach a point of diminishing returns in which aggregating more reports of a certain type yields no additional insight once a large volume of similar events is captured and analyzed.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight/adverse effects , Heparin/analogs & derivatives , Medication Errors , Safety Management , Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems , Databases as Topic , Heparin/adverse effects , Humans , Medication Errors/statistics & numerical data , Pennsylvania
5.
Acad Med ; 84(11): 1510-5, 2009 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19858806

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The relationship of the quality of teaching hospitals' clinical performance to resident education in quality and patient safety is unclear. The authors studied residents' knowledge of these areas in major teaching hospitals with higher- and lower-quality performance rankings. They assessed the presence of formal and informal quality curricula to determine whether programmatic differences exist. METHOD: The authors used qualitative research methodology with purposeful sampling. They gathered data from individual structured interviews with residents and key educational and quality leaders in six medical schools and teaching hospitals, which represented a range of quality performance rankings, geographic regions, and public or private status. RESULTS: No relationship emerged between a hospital's quality status, residents' curriculum, and the residents' understanding of quality. Residents' definitions of quality and safety and their knowledge of the practice-based learning and systems-based practice competencies were indistinguishable between hospitals. Residents in all programs had extensive patient safety knowledge acquired through an informal curriculum in the hospital setting. A formal curriculum existed in only two programs, both of them ambulatory settings. CONCLUSIONS: Residents' learning about quality and patient safety is extensive, largely through a positive informal curriculum in the teaching hospital and, less frequently, via a formal curriculum. No relationship was found between the quality performance of the teaching hospital and the residents' curriculum or understanding of quality or safety. Residents seem to learn through an informal curriculum provided by hospital initiatives and resources, and thus these data suggest the importance of major teaching hospitals in quality education.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence/standards , Hospitals, Teaching/standards , Internship and Residency/standards , Patient Care/standards , Quality of Health Care/standards , Curriculum , Faculty, Medical/standards , Humans , Qualitative Research , Safety/standards , United States
7.
Acad Med ; 82(12): 1178-86, 2007 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18046123

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Leaders of academic medical centers (AMCs) are challenged to ensure consistent high performance in quality and safety across all clinical services. The authors sought to identify organizational factors associated with AMCs that stood out from their peers in a composite scoring system for quality and safety derived from patient-level data. METHOD: A scoring method using measures of safety, mortality, clinical effectiveness, and equity of care was applied to discharge abstract data from 79 AMCs for 2003-2004. Six institutions (three top and three average performers) were selected for site visits; the performance status of the six institutions was withheld from the site visit team. Through interviews and document review, the team sought to identify factors that were associated with the performance status of the institution. RESULTS: The scoring system discriminated performance among the 79 AMCs in a clinically meaningful way. For example, the transition of a typical 500-bed hospital from average to top levels of performance could result in 150 fewer deaths per year. Abstraction of key findings from the interview notes revealed distinctive themes in the top versus average performers. Common qualities shared by top performers included a shared sense of purpose, a hands-on leadership style, accountability systems for quality and safety, a focus on results, and a culture of collaboration. CONCLUSIONS: Distinctive leadership behaviors and organizational practices are associated with measurable differences in patient-level measures of quality and safety.


Subject(s)
Academic Medical Centers/standards , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Safety Management/organization & administration , Academic Medical Centers/organization & administration , Health Services Research , Humans , Leadership , Organizational Innovation , Organizational Objectives , United States
8.
Am J Med Qual ; 21(2): 91-100, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16533900

ABSTRACT

Studies suggest variable adoption of evidence-based practice guidelines. The authors hypothesized that compliance with guidelines for patients requiring mechanical ventilation would vary among academic medical centers and that this variation might be associated with survival. A total of 1463 intensive care unit cases receiving continuous mechanical ventilation for >96 hours were reviewed. The variation in mortality based on compliance with 6 evidence-based practices was determined, and the effect of each intervention was estimated using a logistic regression model. Compliance varied widely across the participating centers. A strong association with survival was seen for 2 of the 6 practices: sedation management and glycemic control (odds ratios for death of 0.30 and 0.46, respectively, each P < .01). Spontaneous breathing trials, deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis, semi-recumbent positioning, and stress ulcer prophylaxis were not associated with survival in the model. More consistent adoption of these practices represents an opportunity for academic medical centers and was associated with enhanced survival.


Subject(s)
Evidence-Based Medicine , Respiration, Artificial/standards , Survivors , Academic Medical Centers , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Medical Audit , Middle Aged , Practice Guidelines as Topic , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...