Periodontal treatment and vascular inflammation in patients with advanced peripheral arterial disease: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Observational studies support an association between periodontitis and cardiovascular diseases. The study objective was to assess vascular inflammation after periodontal treatment in patients with peripheral arterial disease. METHODS: Ninety patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and severe periodontitis were enrolled in a randomized, controlled trial. Thirty patients underwent non-surgical periodontal therapy and received additional systemic antibiotics (PT1 group), while 30 patients received the same therapy without antibiotics (PT2 group). The remaining thirty patients did not receive periodontal therapy (CG, control group). The primary outcome of this treatment was a reduction in vascular inflammation three months after periodontal treatment as determined by 18F-FDG PET/CT values. Secondary outcomes were changes in the inflamed periodontal surface area (PISA) and other periodontal parameters, changes in vascular biomarkers, and adverse cardiovascular events. RESULTS: After three months of treatment, a significant improvement in periodontal health was observed in the treatment groups. However, no difference in the primary outcome in the aorta was observed in the three study groups (median target to background ratio follow-up/baseline, PT1 1.00; 95% CI 0.97-1.10, PT2 1.00; 95% CI 0.98-1.1, CG 1.1; 95% CI 0.99-1.1, p = 0.75). No significant differences were detected in most diseased segments and active segments. In addition, no differences were observed in 18F-FDG uptake in the carotid, iliac, femoral, and popliteal arteries. No differences with regard to relative changes in vascular biomarkers were noted, and no serious cardiovascular adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Periodontal treatment was effective and safe but did not reduce vascular inflammation in patients with PAD.

Diagnostic and prognostic value of additional SPECT/CT in sentinel lymph node mapping in breast cancer patients.

THE AIM: of the study was to demonstrate the diagnostic and prognostic value of SPECT/CT in sentinel lymph node mapping (SLNM) in patients with invasive breast cancer. METHODS: 114 patients with invasive breast cancer with clinically negative lymph nodes were included in this retrospective study as they were referred for SLNM with 99mTc-nanocolloid. Planar image acquisition was accomplished in a one-day or two-day protocol depending on the schedule of the surgical procedure. Low dose SPECT/CT was performed after the planar images. The sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) was considered false negative if a primary recurrence developed within 12 months after SLNB in the axilla from which a tumor-free SLN had been removed. RESULTS: Between December 2009 and December 2011, 114 patients (pts.) underwent SLNM with additional SPECT/CT. Planar imaging identified in 109 pts. 139 SLNs, which were tumor-positive in 42 nodes (n = 41 pts.). SPECT/CT identified in 81 pts. 151 additional SLNs, of which 19 were tumor-positive and led to therapy change (axillary lymph node dissection) in 11 pts. (9.6 %). Of overall 61 tumor-positive SLNs (n = 52 pts.) SPECT/CT detected all, whereas planar imaging detected only 42 of 61 (P < 0.0001). No patient had lymph node metastasis within 12 months after SLNB in the axilla from which a tumor-free SLN had been removed resulting in a false-negative rate of 0 %. The local relapse rate was 1.8 % leading to a 4-year disease-free survival rate of 90 %. CONCLUSION: Among patients with breast cancer, the use of SPECT/CT-aided SLNM correlated due to a better anatomical localization and identification of planar not visible SLNs with a higher detection rate of SLNs. This led to therapeutic consequences and an excellent false-negative and 4-year disease-free survival rate.