Long-term outcomes among localized prostate cancer survivors: prospective predictors for return-to-work three years after cancer rehabilitation.

PURPOSE: This study aimed at (1) investigating the work status of men treated by radical prostatectomy due to diagnosis of localized prostate cancer (LPCa) three years after having attended a cancer rehabilitation program and (2) identifying prospective risk factors for not working at this time point. METHODS: In a longitudinal, questionnaire-based multicenter study, 519 working-age LPCa survivors reported on their work status 12 and 36 months following rehabilitation. Chi-square tests/t tests and multivariable logistic regression analysis were used to identify prospective factors associated with not working at 36 months follow-up. RESULTS: Nearly three quarter of LPCa survivors (N = 377, 73%) worked 3 years after post-acute rehabilitation. Most participants (N = 365, 71%) showed continuous return-to-work (RTW) patterns as they worked both 1 and 3 years following rehabilitation. Multivariable regression analysis revealed older age, low or middle socio-economic status as well as resigned and unambitious work behavior and fatigue at the time of attending the rehabilitation program to be prospective factors for not working at 36 months follow-up. Low socio-economic status [Odds ratio (OR) 4.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.07-11.16] and unambitious work behavior [OR 4.48, 95% CI 2.16-9.31] were the strongest predictors. CONCLUSION: Long-term work retention is a realistic goal among LPCa survivors. The results contribute to the identification of at-risk LPCa survivors early in the RTW process. Special attention should be paid to social inequality. Further, interventions related to the management of fatigue and work-related coping styles could improve long-term RTW, as these were relevant, but potentially modifiable factors impeding work retention.

[Role of Clinical, Sociomedical and Psychological Factors on Return to Work of Patients with Breast Cancer 6 Months after Rehabilitation]. / Einfluss klinischer, sozialmedizinischer und psychologischer Faktoren auf die berufliche Reintegration von Patientinnen mit Brustkrebs 6 Monate nach der Rehabilitation.

AIM OF THE STUDY: The majority of patients with non-metastatic breast cancer return to work after tumor therapy. A rate of up to 80% is given in national and international studies, which can vary considerably depending on the study population and the various social systems. However, it is unclear how many patients are reintegrated into work after medical rehabilitation and which clinical, sociodemographic and psychological factors play a role. METHODS: In a multicentre study, clinical and sociodemographic data were collected from breast cancer patients at the beginning of their medical rehabilitation. Subjectively experienced deficits in attention performance (FEDA), depressive symptoms (PHQ-9) and health-related quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30) were recorded using standardized questionnaires. The cognitive performance was also examined using a computer-based test battery (NeuroCog FX). A follow-up survey was carried out 6-9 months after medical rehabilitation. The subjective assessment of one's own cognitive performance (FEDA) was recorded again at this time. RESULTS: 396 of the originally 476 patients were included in the study. In the follow-up survey, 323/396 patients (82%) were again employed. In a regression model, sociodemographic factors proved to be particularly predictive with regard to occupational reintegration: employment at the time of the tumor diagnosis, job preserved after medical rehabilitation, employee status and gradual reintegration according to the Hamburg model (Nagelkerke R2=0.685). This model could not be improved by adding psychological variables. The subjective patient information in all questionnaires was highly correlated (r>0.57; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The vast majority of breast cancer patients return to work after medical rehabilitation. Socio-demographic factors play a crucial role in this. The regression model developed here, including the employment status, professional orientation and gradual reintegration, is of predictive importance and can be used in medical rehabilitation.

Identifying Expectations of Delayed Return to Work in Patients with Prostate Cancer at the Beginning of a Cancer Rehabilitation Program.

Purpose To investigate factors associated with expectations of delayed return to work (RTW) in patients with prostate cancer recently admitted to a cancer rehabilitation program. Methods In this multicenter study, data about expected time until RTW and potential correlates (personal, medical, psychosocial and work-related factors) were obtained from 822 employed cancer rehabilitation participants at the beginning of the program. Participants expecting early RTW (≤ 3 months) and delayed RTW (> 3 months) were compared. Hierarchical multivariate logistic regression was applied to study which factors are associated with expecting delayed RTW. Results In total, 171 cancer rehabilitation participants (21%) expected delayed RTW. Group comparison showed education, type of occupation, income, number of comorbid conditions, tumor stage according to the staging system of the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC), anxiety and depression, quality-of-life functioning scales, urinary and treatment-related symptoms, duration of sick leave, subjective work ability, perceived ability to return to the former job, intention to apply for a disability pension, effort-reward-imbalance and occupational stress to be associated in bivariate analysis with participants' expectations. Multivariate analysis revealed UICC tumor stage III (compared to stages I/II, OR 2.36), lower subjective work ability (OR 0.82), perceived inability to return to the former job (OR 1.88) and intention to apply for a disability pension (OR 1.94) to increase the likelihood of expecting delayed RTW. Conclusions Negative or non-beneficial RTW expectations, which are related to self-perception and behavioral intention, seem to be key factors for expecting delayed RTW. Interventions to early identify and adjust such expectations might empower cancer rehabilitation participants to develop appropriate expectations for work recovery.

Return to work in prostate cancer survivors - findings from a prospective study on occupational reintegration following a cancer rehabilitation program.

BACKGROUND: This prospective multicentre-study aimed to analyze return to work (RTW) among prostate cancer survivors 12 months after having attended a cancer rehabilitation program and to identify risk factors for no and late RTW. METHODS: Seven hundred eleven employed prostate cancer survivors treated with radical prostatectomy completed validated self-rating questionnaires at the beginning, the end, and 12 months post rehabilitation. Disease-related data was obtained from physicians and medical records. Work status and time until RTW were assessed at 12-months follow-up. Data were analyzed by univariate analyses (t-tests, chi-square-tests) and multivariate logistic regression models (OR with 95% CI). RESULTS: The RTW rate at 12-months follow-up was 87% and the median time until RTW was 56 days. Univariate analyses revealed significant group differences in baseline personal characteristics and health status, psychosocial well-being and work-related factors between survivors who had vs. had not returned to work. Patients' perceptions of not being able to work (OR 3.671) and feeling incapable to return to the former job (OR 3.162) were the strongest predictors for not having returned to work at 12-months follow-up. Being diagnosed with UICC tumor stage III (OR 2.946) and patients' perceptions of not being able to work (OR 4.502) were the strongest predictors for late RTW (≥ 8 weeks). CONCLUSIONS: A high proportion of prostate cancer survivors return to work after a cancer rehabilitation program. However, results indicate the necessity to early identify survivors with low RTW motivation and unfavorable work-related perceptions who may benefit from intensified occupational support during cancer rehabilitation.

NeuroCog FX study: A multicenter cohort study on cognitive dysfunction in patients with early breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Complaints about cognitive dysfunction (CD) reportedly persist in approximately one third of breast cancer patients, but the nature of CD and possible risk factors are unknown. METHODS: A cross-sectional, multicenter study was set up at 9 German oncological rehabilitation centers. Objective cognitive performance was assessed by the NeuroCog FX test, a short computerized screening (duration <30 minutes) which assesses working memory, alertness, verbal/figural memory, and language/executive. Patients' test performance was correlated with treatment factors (chemo-, radiotherapy), subjective performance (FEDA), depression (PHQ-9), quality of life (EORTC QLQ-30), and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: From February 2013 to December 2014, a clinically homogenous sample of 476 patients was recruited (early tumor stage [T0-T2]: 93%; node-negative: 67%; chemotherapy: 61%; radiotherapy: 84%). NeuroCog FX could be administered in 439 patients (92%; median age: 50 [24-62] years). Patients showed decreased performance in attentional-executive functions (but not verbal/figural memory) and a 3-fold rate of CD in terms of below average performance in at least 1 cognitive domain (42%). Approximately 40% of the patients also reported subjective cognitive impairment (FEDA). No therapy-specific effect on test performance was obtained in the NeuroCog FX test. CONCLUSIONS: Breast cancer survivors showed objective attentional-executive and subjective cognitive impairments. No therapy-specific adverse side effect on objective cognitive performance was found. Depression strongly contributed to objective and subjective cognitive complaints and reduced quality of life.

Outcomes across the return-to-work process in PC survivors attending a rehabilitation measure-results from a prospective study.

PURPOSE: Approximately 60% of patients are able to work following a cancer diagnosis. The return-to-work (RTW) process after disability can be conceptualized as a multi-phase construct. This study investigated RTW outcomes throughout the RTW process among survivors of prostate cancer (PC) attending a cancer rehabilitation measure. METHODS: The study was based on a sample of 837 employed PC survivors enrolled in a longitudinal multicenter study. Data was collected at the beginning of the rehabilitation measure, at the end and at 12-month follow-up by means of self-report questionnaires. We compared outcomes with regard to age (<60 and ≥60 years) and socio-economic status (SES; lower, middle, higher) using t tests or univariate ANOVA for metrical and chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. RESULTS: In the off-work phase, most survivors reported positive expectations regarding future work, including responsiveness of their work environment. Nevertheless, one fourth intended to apply for a disability pension. At 12-month follow-up, the RTW rate was 87% and 62% when applying more conservative criteria of RTW. Among survivors who had returned to work, most reported stability of the work situation. Survivors with lower SES showed least favorable outcomes throughout the RTW process, while older age was less consistently of negative impact. CONCLUSIONS: Survivors reported many favorable RTW outcomes, but low SES might be a barrier at various stages of the RTW process. Thus, special attention must be paid to the role of social inequalities during rehabilitation and work reintegration to help survivors managing the RTW process.

Psychosocial and physical outcomes of in- and outpatient rehabilitation in prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: A radical prostatectomy might lead to an impaired quality of life. Aim of the study was to analyse the impact of inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation on psychosocial and physical outcomes in patients after surgery. METHODS: Six hundred nineteen inpatients and 95 outpatients, treated for localized prostate cancer by prostatectomy, completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and two quality-of-life questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-PR25) at the beginning and end of rehabilitation as well as 12 months after rehabilitation. Data were analysed by using t-tests, chi(2) - tests and analyses of variance with repeated measures. RESULTS: Compared to a population sample, patients reported a significantly worse quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30) and more anxiety (HADS) at the beginning of rehabilitation. Physical, role and social functioning increased significantly over time for in- and outpatients. Patients still reported lower emotional functioning (EORTC QLQ-C30), anxiety (HADS) and prostate cancer-specific physical symptoms (EORTC QLQ-PR25) 1 year after rehabilitation, although symptom levels decreased significantly over time. The setting did not have an independent significant effect in the multivariate model. CONCLUSIONS: In- and outpatients reported an increased quality of life 1 year after rehabilitation with respect to their physical constitution and their reintegration into social life. Nonetheless, both groups still struggled with problems due to surgery. The results indicated that both settings seem to be supportive in the recovery process but that patients seem to require additional support with aftercare for treating surgery-related problems as well as emotional discomfort.