Identification of Medication-Related Risks in Bariatric Surgery Patients by Performing Structured Medication Reviews.

PURPOSE: More medication-related issues are seen with the growing demand for bariatric surgery, because of possible altered pharmacokinetics after surgery. Collaboration with a pharmacist could improve the short- and long-term safety and efficacy of pharmacotherapy in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a structured medication review to identify medication-related risks before bariatric surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The impact on pharmacy-led interventions of introducing a structured medication review was evaluated in a historically controlled study. In the retrospective part, we evaluated patient characteristics, medication use, and number of pre-surgery consultations with a pharmacist before the introduction of medication reviews. A flowchart was developed to detect the use of medicines with risks associated with bariatric surgery. In the prospective part, we evaluated pharmacy-led interventions after the introduction of structured medication reviews using the flowchart. Outcome effectiveness was measured through the number of pre-surgery pharmacy-led interventions. RESULTS: Before using the flowchart for screening on risk medicines, 40 (2.6%) pharmacy-led interventions were identified in 1536 patients. In the prospective group, 195 patients were included and 88 (45%) interventions were identified (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A structured medication review before bariatric surgery significantly increased the number of pharmacy-led interventions in bariatric surgery patients. This procedure will shift interventions to pre-surgery instead of post-surgery, contributing to the optimization of pharmacotherapy at an early stage.

Practical Value of Anti-Xa Activity in the Evaluation of Extracorporeal Circuit Anticoagulation during Haemodialysis: Results of a Cross-Sectional Single-Centre Study.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Anticoagulation of the extracorporeal circuit is essential for adequate haemodialysis (HD). Low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) are safe and sufficient towards achieving this goal. In the Netherlands, dosage is based on bodyweight and adjusted based on clinical events. LMWH levels during dialysis can be quantified through measurement of the anti-Xa activity and a target range of 0.5-1.0 IU/mL has been proposed. We aimed to evaluate the practical value of the anti-Xa activity to guide LMWH dosage in HD patients. Additionally, the value of the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) was investigated. METHODS: All prevalent adult HD patients of our dialysis clinic were included. APTT and anti-Xa activity were measured before, during and after 2 dialysis sessions. Clinical and dialysis characteristics, including LMWH dosage, were derived from digital patient charts. RESULTS: Our final study cohort consisted of 83 patients. LMWH dosage during dialysis was appropriate for bodyweight in 61% of cases, of which 50% reached an anti-Xa activity within the putative target range of 0.5-1.0 IU/mL. Forty-six percent of patients had an anti-Xa activity >1.0 IU/mL. Anti-Xa levels during and after dialysis were significantly correlated (r = 0.803, p < 0.01). No thrombotic or haemorrhagic complications were observed in this study. Correlation of APTT with anti-Xa activity was poor. CONCLUSION: Anti-Xa activity measurements during dialysis can identify patients in whom LMWH dosage should be lowered in a subsequent dialysis session. Whether such an intervention leads to a decrease in haemorrhagic complications needs to be evaluated in prospective studies.