CMR reveals myocardial damage from cardiotoxic oncologic therapies in breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is a common and increasingly treatable disease. However, survivors have a significantly elevated risk of cardiac events afterwards. This study aimed to characterise cardiac changes during cardiotoxic cancer therapy using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. METHODS: This study involved 34 patients with histologically proven breast cancer and planned cardiotoxic therapy. All patients underwent CMR before starting therapy, and 6 and 12 months thereafter. The CMR protocol included volumetric and functional analyses, parametric mapping, and deformation analysis using feature tracking. As the control group, 10 healthy female volunteers were scanned using the same protocol. RESULTS: With therapy, there was a significant reduction of left ventricular and right ventricular ejection fractions (both p < 0.05) without reaching pathologic values. Left ventricular radial (p = 0.008), circumferential (p = 0.010), and longitudinal strain (p = 0.036) were also reduced at follow-up. In the parametric mapping, there was a significant increase in native T1 time (start: 1037 ± 41 ms vs. 6 months: 1068 ± 51 ms vs. 12 months: 1017 ± 57 ms, p < 0.001) and T2 time (start: 55 ± 4 ms vs. 6 months: 59 ± 3 ms vs. 12 months: 57 ± 3 ms, p = 0.001), with unchanged extracellular volume and relative late gadolinium enhancement. Twelve months after cancer diagnosis, the breast cancer patients exhibited significant impairments in left ventricular global radial (p = 0.001), circumferential (p = 0.001), and longitudinal strain (p = 0.002) and T2 time (p = 0.008) compared to the healthy controls. DISCUSSION: Breast cancer patients receiving cardiotoxic chemotherapy show persistent deterioration in left ventricular strain values. This is accompanied by inflammatory changes in non-invasive tissue characterisation. Larger studies with longer follow-up periods are needed to identify patients at risk and establish preventive and therapeutic approaches.

Disturbances of menstrual cycle after immunization against SARS-CoV-2 and their risk factors: Cross-sectional clinical study.

OBJECTIVE: Abnormalities of the menstrual cycle were reported after infection with SARS-CoV-2 and vaccination against it, but the available data are very heterogeneous, do not reflect intermenstrual variations or regional differences, and their risk factors are missing. METHODS: We performed a survey-based study among 6383 employees and students of Ulm University Hospital in Germany between March 1 and 31, 2021. Attributes of menstrual cycles such as cycle length (CL), menses duration (MD), and bleeding volume (BV) were reported as categorical variables before and after immunization against SARS-CoV-2 (first, second, third vaccination or infection). Additionally, the potential risk factors for cycle changes were evaluated and all participants reported the subjective perception of changes, their duration, and time of occurrence. RESULTS: The final analysis included 1726 participants. CL and BV significantly changed after vaccination, but not MD. The subjective perception showed only slight levels of agreement with the objective changes, with the highest Cohen's kappa for CL. The risk factors for the variations in CL were previous cycle irregularities, and risk factors for the changes in BV were age and body mass index. The combination of vaccines (homogenous or heterogeneous) and different types of immunization (infection and vaccination) had no significant effect on cycle irregularities. CONCLUSION: In summary, immunization against SARS-CoV-2 causes changes in the characteristics of the menstrual cycle, which are mostly temporary. The individual risk factors, but not the type of immunization, can affect the mentioned changes.

Trend natural family planning - an online survey to assess attitudes towards NFP among German-speaking women.

PURPOSE: To study trends regarding the use of contraceptive methods and digital health modalities and to identify target groups of natural family planning (NFP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Using an online questionnaire specifically developed for this study in German (utilizing the online tool at 'www.surveymonkey.com'), we analysed the attitude towards NFP -methods and -apps, the need for contraceptive effectiveness in general, the perceived contraceptive effectiveness of NFP methods, and differences between NFP users and non-NFP users among 779 sexually active German-speaking women of fertile age (18-50 years) from November 2019 to October 2020. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Participants used NFP more frequently than they did five years ago. Women aged 30 years and older, with higher levels of education, who are living with a partner and have children, seem to be the target group for NFP methods. Concerning the wish for contraceptive effectiveness we found significant (p < .001) differences between NFP and non-NFP users. Furthermore, an increasing number of women wants to use NFP-methods and -apps for contraception; thus, non-hormonal contraceptive options should be offered. The majority of current NFP users stated that the handling and effectiveness of NFP have been improved by digitalisation.

Impact of postpartum pain and birth pain management on the pelvic floor function. A retrospective study including over 300 mothers.

OBJECTIVES: It is known that pregnancy and childbirth bring biological, psychological and social changes in a woman's life. Studies regarding the pelvic floor function focus on the year after delivery, but unfortunately, long-term studies are rare. Furthermore, an association between postpartum pain and birth pain management on the pelvic floor function has rarely been examined. The aim of this study is the evaluation of the pelvic floor function years after delivery in order to detect possible risk factors. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study. All women who delivered in our hospital between 2015 and 2016 were contacted by mail between 2018 and 2019 and asked to participate. The letters included study information, declaration of consent, the "Pelvic floor questionnaire for pregnant women and women after childbirth" (PFQ), contact information and pre-paid envelopes. Questions about pain after childbirth and the management of birth related fear and pain were particularly of interest in the surveys. The interested participants were asked to return the completed declaration of consent and the questionnaire. Overall, 308 women were included in the analysis. Due to the large number of participants, different subgroups were defined in order to compare influencing factors adequately. RESULTS: No significant association between the mode of delivery and the total score of the PFQ was found after 3-4 years in primiparous women (p = 0.688). Our study also showed that recorded pain after childbirth and insufficient pain and fear management after childbirth had a negative impact on the pelvic floor function (total scores: pain after childbirth p = 0.00; no pain management p = 0.04; no fear management p = 0.021). CONCLUSION: No association was found between delivery mode and pelvic floor function in primiparous women three to four years after childbirth. On the other hand, a negative impact of birth related pain and fears on the pelvic floor function years after delivery was significant. Therefore, these revealing findings should certainly be considered in postpartum management.

Consensus Statement on the Management of Waldenström Macroglobulinemia Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

In the light of the COVID-19 pandemic, the International Workshop on Waldenström Macroglobulinemia (IWWM) Treatment Recommendations Panel felt the need to provide a consensus statement for the management of Waldenström Macroglobulinemia (WM) patients during this challenging time. We followed the current recommendations by the American Society of Hematology, which have been modified accordingly to fit the specific realities associated with the management of WM. In this Consensus Statement, the Panel addresses questions related to treatment initiation, preferred therapies, minimizing visit to clinics and infusions centers, supportive care and guidance for WM patients in clinical trials. Finally, we also provide information on timing and appropriateness of testing and management of COVID-19 infected patients, as well as ways to get physicians and patients involved in registry studies that could help others.

Pregnancy induced Cushing's syndrome and primary aldosteronism: a case report.

BACKGROUND: First manifestation of Cushing's syndrome during pregnancy is rare. The diagnosis of both Cushing's and primary aldosteronism within a pregnancy has not been previously documented. Diagnosis is especially challenging due to the normal physiological changes that occur during pregnancy. Consequently, many tests that are normally used for diagnosis are not reliable. Tumor based etiologies can be surgically removed. Etiologies that are not tumor based are challenging to treat during pregnancy. CASE PRESENTATION: A 25 year old G1P0 was admitted in the 22 5/7 week of pregnancy with elevated blood pressure (200/100 mm Hg), acne, moon facies, abdominal striae and hirsutism. With five antihypertensive medications her blood pressure remained 190/100 mm Hg. The patient was admitted to the ICU for intravenous medications and monitoring. She was diagnosed with Cushing's syndrome and primary aldosteronism. In spite of therapy with spironolactone and metyrapone she developed preeclampsia and was delivered in the 26 0/7 week of pregnancy. At her follow up visit eight weeks postpartum she had blood pressure within normal limits, no clinical signs or symptoms, and all medications had been discontinued. CONCLUSIONS: Early diagnosis of pregnancy induced Cushing's syndrome and primary aldosteronism requires an interdisciplinary approach. Late detection has been associated with increased perinatal morbidity and mortality including but not limited to placental abruption and intrauterine demise. Collaboration is essential in the optimization of maternal and fetal outcomes.