Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
2.
PLoS One ; 11(2): e0148163, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26829641

ABSTRACT

Poor retention in HIV medical care is associated with increased mortality among patients with HIV/AIDS. Developing new interventions to improve retention in HIV primary care is needed. The Department of Veteran Affairs (VA) is the largest single provider of HIV care in the US. We sought to understand what veterans would want in an intervention to improve retention in VA HIV care. We conducted 18 one-on-one interviews and 15 outpatient focus groups with 46 patients living with HIV infection from the Michael E. DeBakey VAMC (MEDVAMC). Analysis identified three focus areas for improving retention in care: developing an HIV friendly clinic environment, providing mental health and substance use treatment concurrent with HIV care and encouraging peer support from other Veterans with HIV.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Veterans Health , Veterans , Adult , Aged , Female , Health Care Surveys , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Primary Health Care , United States/epidemiology
3.
J Healthc Qual ; 36(5): 26-31, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23731235

ABSTRACT

Routine HIV testing in primary care is now recommended in the United States. The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has increased the number of patients tested for HIV, but overall HIV testing rates remain low. A promising intervention for increasing HIV testing is nurse-initiated rapid testing (NRT). The purpose of this study was to build upon our previous research by implementing NRT in primary care clinics at two geographically distinct VA medical centers, and then conduct an evaluation to identify the barriers and facilitators to implementing and sustaining it. Semistructured telephone interviews were conducted with providers and stakeholders at two VA medical centers, one each on the East Coast and in the Southwest. Fieldnotes were developed following each interview and qualitatively coded for emerging themes. Findings indicate NRT was well integrated in both settings. NRT took little time to conduct, was well received by patients, and did not disrupt clinical scheduling. However, there were some sustainability challenges, including difficulties using the electronic medical record, and the challenges of new care practice structures. Implementing NRT is feasible in VA primary care settings. However, organizational challenges should be taken into account for subsequent efforts to implement NRT in VA primary care settings.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections/diagnosis , HIV Infections/nursing , Mass Screening/methods , Veterans Health/statistics & numerical data , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Electronic Health Records , Female , Hospitals, Veterans , Humans , Male , Program Evaluation , United States , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Veterans
4.
Sex Transm Dis ; 40(4): 341-5, 2013 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23486502

ABSTRACT

Nurse-initiated HIV rapid testing (NRT) increases testing/receipt of results compared with traditional testing. We implemented NRT in primary care clinics at 2 Veterans Affairs hospitals.At site 1, 2364 tests were conducted; 5 HIV positives were identified. At site 2, 2522 tests were conducted; 9 HIV positives were identified. Success varied across demographic/clinical strata.


Subject(s)
AIDS Serodiagnosis/methods , HIV Seropositivity/diagnosis , HIV Seropositivity/epidemiology , Mass Screening/nursing , Primary Health Care , Female , HIV Antibodies/immunology , HIV Seropositivity/immunology , HIV Seropositivity/nursing , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , United States/epidemiology , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Veterans/statistics & numerical data
5.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16928441

ABSTRACT

Several lines of evidence suggest that omega-3 fatty acids may be important in the pathophysiology, treatment or prevention of bipolar disorder (BD). Electronic and manual searches were conducted in order to review the literature relevant to the etiology and treatment of BDs with omega-3 fatty acids. We also present data from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study conducted at three sites (N = 10) comparing an omega-3 fatty acid (docosahexaenoic acid, DHA) versus placebo, added to psychosocial treatment for women with BD who chose to discontinue standard pharmacologic treatment while attempting to conceive. While some epidemiologic and preclinical data support the role of omega-3 fatty acids in BD, clinical trials to date have yielded conflicting results. In our pilot study of 10 Caucasian women taking DHA while attempting to conceive (BP1 = 9, BPII = 1), age 27-42 years, DHA was well tolerated and suggests that a larger study would be feasible. The elucidation of the potential role of omega-3 fatty acids as a treatment for BD requires further study. The current data are not sufficient to support a recommendation of monotherapy treatment as a substitute for standard pharmacologic treatments. However, judicious monotherapy in selected clinical situations, or adjunctive use, may be warranted pending further data from adequately powered controlled clinical trials. Our pilot trial of DHA in women who plan to stop conventional psychotropics in order to conceive suggests that such trials are feasible.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Fatty Acids, Omega-3/therapeutic use , Adult , Bipolar Disorder/etiology , Bipolar Disorder/prevention & control , Double-Blind Method , Fatty Acids, Omega-3/physiology , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Pilot Projects , Placebos , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome
6.
Am J Psychiatry ; 160(5): 996-8, 2003 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12727707

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study was an evaluation of the omega-3 fatty acid docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) for the treatment of major depression. METHOD: Thirty-six depressed patients were randomly assigned to receive DHA, 2 g/day, or placebo for 6 weeks. Response was defined a priori as a > or =50% reduction in the score on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale. Thirty-five participants were evaluable; 18 received DHA, and 17 received placebo. RESULTS: Response rates were 27.8% in the DHA group and 23.5% in the placebo group. The difference in response rates between groups did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: This trial failed to show a significant effect of DHA monotherapy in subjects with major depression.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder/drug therapy , Docosahexaenoic Acids/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Depressive Disorder/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Placebos , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Treatment Outcome
7.
J Clin Psychiatry ; 63(5): 391-5, 2002 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12019662

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We report a clinical trial of olanzapine in the treatment of prominent apathy in the absence of depression in patients on long-term treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for nonpsychotic major depression. METHOD: Participants were 21 men and women who met DSM-IV criteria for major depressive disorder in full remission (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS] score < or = 12) who had been taking an SSRI for at least 3 months. Data are presented (last observation carried forward) based on 20 enrolled participants who completed at least 1 follow-up visit. Participants had significant symptoms of apathy, defined as a Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness scale (CGI-S) score > or = 3, an Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES) score > 30, and a MADRS item 8 (inability to feel) score > or = 2. Participants with a personal or family history of psychosis were excluded. Olanzapine was titrated in 2.5-mg increments at weekly intervals, until CGI-S score improved > or = 2 points from baseline or > or = 1 point with dose-limiting side effects, and participants continued in the protocol for 8 weeks at a stable dose following this improvement. RESULTS: Improvement was clinically evident and demonstrable on all symptom assessments: AES (mean +/- SD change in score = -21.3 +/- 8.7; p < .0001), CGI-S (-2.7 +/- 0.9; p < .0001), MADRS (-5.6 +/- 5.9; p = .001), and MADRS item 8 (-2.2 +/- 1.4; p < .0001). The mean dose of olanzapine was 5.4 +/- 2.8 mg/day. CONCLUSION: These preliminary data suggest that olanzapine may be effective in treating apathy syndrome in nonpsychotic patients taking SSRIs.


Subject(s)
Affective Symptoms/drug therapy , Affective Symptoms/psychology , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Depressive Disorder/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Pirenzepine/analogs & derivatives , Pirenzepine/therapeutic use , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Adult , Affective Symptoms/diagnosis , Aged , Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Benzodiazepines , Depressive Disorder/diagnosis , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Olanzapine , Pirenzepine/administration & dosage , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...