Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
J Clin Oncol ; 41(12): 2269-2280, 2023 04 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36623247

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To improve skin cancer screening among survivors of childhood cancer treated with radiotherapy where skin cancers make up 58% of all subsequent neoplasms. Less than 30% of survivors currently complete recommended skin cancer screening. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This randomized controlled comparative effectiveness trial evaluated patient and provider activation (PAE + MD) and patient and provider activation with teledermoscopy (PAE + MD + TD) compared with patient activation alone (PAE), which included print materials, text messaging, and a website on skin cancer risk factors and screening behaviors. Seven hundred twenty-eight participants from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (median age at baseline 44 years), age > 18 years, treated with radiotherapy as children, and without previous history of skin cancer were randomly assigned (1:1:1). Primary outcomes included receiving a physician skin examination at 12 months and conducting a skin self-examination at 18 months after intervention. RESULTS: Rates of physician skin examinations increased significantly from baseline to 12 months in all three intervention groups: PAE, 24%-39%, relative risk [RR], 1.65, 95% CI, 1.32 to 2.08; PAE + MD, 24% to 39%, RR, 1.56, 95% CI, 1.25 to 1.97; PAE + MD + TD, 24% to 46%, RR, 1.89, 95% CI, 1.51 to 2.37. The increase in rates did not differ between groups (P = .49). Similarly, rates of skin self-examinations increased significantly from baseline to 18 months in all three groups: PAE, 29% to 50%, RR, 1.75, 95% CI, 1.42 to 2.16; PAE + MD, 31% to 58%, RR, 1.85, 95% CI, 1.52 to 2.26; PAE + MD + TD, 29% to 58%, RR, 1.95, 95% CI, 1.59 to 2.40, but the increase in rates did not differ between groups (P = .43). CONCLUSION: Although skin cancer screening rates increased more than 1.5-fold in each of the intervention groups, there were no differences between groups. Any of these interventions, if implemented, could improve skin cancer prevention behaviors among childhood cancer survivors.


Subject(s)
Cancer Survivors , Skin Neoplasms , Text Messaging , Child , Humans , Adult , Middle Aged , Skin Neoplasms/diagnosis , Skin Neoplasms/prevention & control , Survivors , Risk Factors
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35409538

ABSTRACT

Secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure causes chronic illness and occurs at a higher prevalence in low-income communities than the general public. In 2018, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) instituted a smoke-free housing rule for Public Housing Authorities (PHAs) to address persistent health inequities. However, the success of smoke-free housing requires evidence to inform effective implementation approaches. A mixed-methods, cross-sectional survey was conducted in a national sample of PHAs. Questions focused on housing officials' use of specific implementation strategies. Adjusted odds ratios were used to assess associations between implementation approaches and variations among PHAs (i.e., region, size, or recency of policy adoption). Qualitative analyses were conducted to assess the perceived effectiveness of implementation strategies. Resident engagement, staff training, and smoking cessation support were the most frequently used implementation strategies. Engagement with local stakeholders was cited less frequently. Enforcement actions were limited with no violations referred to housing court. Support for policy adherence was identified as a sixth implementation strategy. While most PHAs used at least some evidence-informed implementation strategies, a lack of a systematic approach may limit overall effectiveness. Further research is required to resolve implementation barriers experienced disproportionately by a subset of PHAs, and to inform a best practice implementation framework that meets the needs of a heterogeneous population.


Subject(s)
Smoke-Free Policy , Smoking Cessation , Tobacco Smoke Pollution , Cross-Sectional Studies , Housing , Humans , Public Housing , Tobacco Smoke Pollution/analysis
3.
PLoS One ; 17(3): e0265737, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35358242

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Participation in American-style football (ASF), one of the most popular sports worldwide, has been associated with adverse health outcomes. However, prior clinical studies of former ASF players have been limited by reliance on subjective self-reported data, inadequate sample size, or focus on a single disease process in isolation. OBJECTIVE: To determine the burden of objective multi-system pathology and its relationship with subjective health complaints among former professional ASF players. METHODS: The In-Person Assessment is a case-control, multi-day, deep human phenotyping protocol designed to characterize and quantify pathology among former professional ASF players. Participants, recruited from an on-going large-scale longitudinal cohort study, will include 120 men who report either no health conditions, a single health condition, or multiple health conditions across the key domains of cardiometabolic disease, disordered sleep, chronic pain, and cognitive impairment. Data will be collected from validated questionnaires, structured interviews, physical examinations, multi-modality imaging, and functional assessments over a 3-day study period. A pilot study was conducted to assess feasibility and to obtain participant feedback which was used to shape the final protocol. RESULTS: This study provides a comprehensive assessment of objective multi-system pathology and its relationship with subjective health complaints among former professional ASF players. CONCLUSION: The study will determine whether subjective health complaints among former professional ASF players are explained by objective explanatory pathology and will provide novel opportunities to examine the interrelatedness of co-morbidities. It is anticipated that this protocol will be applicable to other clinical and occupational populations.


Subject(s)
Football , Athletes , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Multimorbidity , Pilot Projects , United States
4.
Ann Neurol ; 88(1): 106-112, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32281676

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: American-style football (ASF) has gained attention because of possible links between repetitive head injury and neurodegenerative diseases. Although postmortem pathologic changes consistent with chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) have been reported in ASF players, there are currently no established premortem diagnostic criteria for CTE. Nevertheless, presented with symptoms of cognitive impairment, clinicians treating former players may be inclined to suggest CTE without a thorough exploration of comorbid factors that demonstrate similar clinical phenotypes to putative CTE. METHODS: A survey of 3,913 former ASF players aged 24 to 89 was conducted for those who responded by March 2019. RESULTS: Despite being a postmortem diagnosis, 108 players (2.8%) self-reported clinician-diagnosed CTE. The percentage of players under age 60 years reporting a CTE diagnosis was 2.3% versus 3.7% in participants age 60 or older. Comorbidities in participants self-reporting CTE were significantly more common, including sleep apnea, hypercholesterolemia, obesity, indicators of past or current depression, hypertension, prescription pain medication use, heart conditions, and low testosterone when compared to non-CTE respondents. Patterns of reporting for obesity, hypertension, heart conditions, or hypercholesterolemia differed between older and younger participants. Cognitive impairment symptoms were significantly higher in participants self-reporting CTE. INTERPRETATION: Some former professional football players have been clinically diagnosed with CTE, a postmortem condition. Comorbidities that can affect cognition were associated with CTE diagnoses in both older and younger players. Although underlying neuropathology cannot be ruled out, treatable conditions should be explored in former athletes demonstrating CTE-linked clinical phenotypes or symptoms as a means of improving cognitive health in these patients. ANN NEUROL 2020 ANN NEUROL 2020;88:106-112.


Subject(s)
Athletes , Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy/diagnosis , Cognitive Dysfunction/diagnosis , Football/injuries , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy/psychology , Cognitive Dysfunction/psychology , Humans , Middle Aged , Quality of Life/psychology , Young Adult
5.
J Invest Dermatol ; 139(9): 1898-1905.e2, 2019 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30959042

ABSTRACT

Because rates of skin cancer are greater among adult survivors of childhood cancer who received radiation therapy than among the general population, the National Cancer Institute recommends skin self-examinations and annual physician examination. There has been no comprehensive assessment of survivors' adherence to the skin cancer screening guidelines associated with skin self-examination (SSE) and physician whole-body skin examination (PSE). We conducted a cross-sectional survey of radiation-treated, adult 5-year survivors of childhood cancer, diagnosed between 1970 and 1986, in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study cohort. Multivariate multinomial logit regression investigated the association between demographic, cancer diagnosis, patient activation, cancer treatment characteristics, and skin cancer screening practice. Among 728 survivors, 13.1% reported performing SSE in the prior 2 months plus receiving PSE in the prior 12 months, and 16.4% and 11.0% reported performing only an SSE or a PSE, respectively; 59.5% of survivors reported having had neither. Participants at the highest patient activation score were most likely to report SSE plus PSE compared with neither (adjusted relative risk ratio = 4.16, 95% confidence interval = 1.34-12.85). Most adult survivors of childhood cancer who had radiation therapy do not practice strategies that promote early detection of skin cancer. Interventions designed to activate survivors to increase their participation in screening are needed.


Subject(s)
Cancer Survivors/statistics & numerical data , Early Detection of Cancer/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Self-Examination/statistics & numerical data , Skin Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cancer Survivors/psychology , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Early Detection of Cancer/psychology , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/mortality , Office Visits/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Self-Examination/psychology , Skin/radiation effects , Skin Neoplasms/etiology , Young Adult
6.
Am J Health Promot ; 33(1): 107-117, 2019 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29772910

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: As public housing agencies and other low-income housing providers adopt smoke-free policies, data are needed to inform implementation approaches that support compliance. DESIGN: Focused ethnography used including qualitative interviews with staff, focus groups with residents, and property observations. SETTING: Four low-income housing properties in Massachusetts, 12 months postpolicy adoption. PARTICIPANTS: Individual interviews (n = 17) with property staff (managers, resident service coordinators, maintenance, security, and administrators) and focus groups with resident smokers (n = 28) and nonsmokers (n = 47). MEASURES: Informed by the social-ecological model: intrapersonal, interpersonal, organizational, and community factors relating to compliance were assessed. ANALYSIS: Utilized MAXQDA in a theory-driven immersion/crystallization analytic process with cycles of raw data examination and pattern identification until no new themes emerged. RESULTS: Self-reported secondhand smoke exposure (SHSe) was reduced but not eliminated. Challenges included relying on ambivalent maintenance staff and residents to report violations, staff serving as both enforcers and smoking cessation counsellors, and inability to enforce on nights and weekends. Erroneous knowledge of the policy, perception that SHSe is not harmful to neighbors, as well as believing that smokers were losing their autonomy and being unfairly singled out when other resident violations were being unaddressed, hindered policy acceptance among resident smokers. The greatest challenge to compliance was the lack of allowable outdoor smoking areas that may have reduced the burden of the policy on smokers. CONCLUSION: Smoke-free policy implementation to support compliance could be enhanced with information about SHSe for smokers and nonsmokers, cessation support from external community partners, discussion forums for maintenance staff, resident inclusion in decision-making, and framing the policy as part of a broader wellness initiative.


Subject(s)
Public Housing , Smoke-Free Policy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Focus Groups , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Middle Aged , Poverty/psychology , Smoking Cessation/methods , Smoking Cessation/psychology , Young Adult
7.
Am J Health Behav ; 40(6): 738-748, 2016 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27779942

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: As tobacco use becomes increasingly concentrated in communities of low socio-economic position (SEP), scalable cessation interventions are needed. Head Start programs offer one setting in which a family-focused intervention can be implemented in low SEP communities. We assessed the experiences of Head Start (HS) staff who received training in a pilot motivational interviewing (MI) tobacco intervention, to improve future feasibility. METHODS: Focus group interviews were conducted with HS staff to assess their reactions to MI training and their use of MI in their work with families. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis and a 4-step approach informed by grounded theory. RESULTS: HS staff reported advantages of MI beyond its use as a tobacco intervention, despite systematic barriers to broad implementation. Facilitators of MI use included enhanced engagement with families, and opportunities for professional development. Barriers to MI use included limited institutional support and low priority for a tobacco intervention among families with pressing social and financial concerns. CONCLUSIONS: HS Staff voiced support for broader training in MI interventions in HS programs. System-wide standards to ensure adequate training and support for an MI tobacco intervention were identified as priorities.


Subject(s)
Early Intervention, Educational , Motivational Interviewing , Smoking Cessation , Adult , Attitude to Health , Early Intervention, Educational/statistics & numerical data , Female , Focus Groups , Humans , Male , Smoking , Smoking Cessation/methods , Smoking Cessation/psychology
8.
Trials ; 16: 109, 2015 Mar 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25873142

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Advances in treatment have increased childhood cancer 5-year survival rates to greater than 80%. However, children previously treated with radiation are at significantly increased risk of developing subsequent neoplasms, the most common of which are skin cancers. The National Cancer Institute and Children's Oncology Group have issued recommendations for survivors treated with radiation to perform monthly skin self-examinations and receive a physician skin examination at least annually, as early detection has demonstrated markedly improved outcomes in the diagnosis and treatment of skin cancers. The goal of the present study is to increase rates of skin self-examinations and clinical skin examinations among adult survivors of childhood cancer treated with radiation. METHODS/DESIGN: This randomized controlled trial uses a 3-group comparative effectiveness design comparing: (1) Patient Activation and Education (PAE) including text messaging, print and web-based tutorials over 12 months; (2) PAE plus physician activation (PAE + MD) adding physician activation/educational materials about survivors' increased skin cancer risk and conducting full-body skin exams; and (3) PAE plus physician activation, plus teledermoscopy (PAE + MD + TD) adding participant receipt of a dermatoscope intended to empower them to photograph suspect moles or lesions for review by the study dermatologist. DISCUSSION: The current study addresses barriers to screening in this population by providing educational and motivational information for both survivors and physicians regarding the value of periodic skin examinations. It also utilizes innovative mobile health technology to encourage and motivate (that is activate) survivors to conduct skin self-examinations, request physician exams, and obtain treatment when worrisome lesions are found. Finally, as a comparative effectiveness trial, this study isolates the effects of adding specific components to the patient activation intervention to test the most effective intervention for enhancing skin examination vigilance among this high-risk group. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02046811 ; Registration date: 22 January 2014.


Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/etiology , Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Skin Neoplasms/etiology , Survivors/psychology , Canada , Comparative Effectiveness Research , Dermoscopy/methods , Early Detection of Cancer , Health Behavior , Humans , Internet , Motivation , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/diagnosis , Pamphlets , Predictive Value of Tests , Research Design , Risk Factors , Self-Examination , Skin Neoplasms/diagnosis , Telepathology/methods , Text Messaging , United States
9.
Am J Public Health ; 104(10): 1928-34, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25208003

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We assessed current home smoking behaviors and secondhand smoke (SHS) levels among parents of children in low-income, racial/ethnic minority communities in Massachusetts. METHODS: We used a cross-sectional design to assess home smoking rules, smoking status, cigarettes smoked in the home, and barriers and benefits to attaining a smoke-free home among 138 caregivers (mean age=30.0 years; 92% women) of children aged 0 to 6 years, between April 2010 and September 2012. Indoor SHS was assessed using a nicotine dosimeter. RESULTS: Households with no ban reported a higher weekly mean number of cigarettes smoked in the home (114 cigarettes/week) than homes with partial (71 cigarettes/week) or complete (30 cigarettes/week) bans (P<.01). Smoking occurred outside more than inside homes with partial or complete bans. Air nicotine levels were positively associated with no household smoking ban, current smoking by the caregiver, and smoking indoors. CONCLUSIONS: Strategies to reduce home SHS should focus on a "complete" home smoking ban and smoking cessation. SHS mitigation strategies such as smoking outside were associated with lower SHS among participants unable to maintain a complete ban, and might enhance the likelihood of longer term success while immediately reducing home SHS.


Subject(s)
Parents , Residence Characteristics/statistics & numerical data , Smoking/epidemiology , Tobacco Smoke Pollution/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Massachusetts , Poverty/statistics & numerical data , Smoking/ethnology , Smoking Cessation/methods , Socioeconomic Factors
10.
Tob Control ; 22(4): 250-4, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22184207

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Protection of workers from second-hand smoke (SHS) in occupational settings is an important policy priority, yet little attention has been given to SHS protection for home visitation health workers, who number almost 2 million in the USA. Self-reported SHS exposure, SHS mitigation strategies and suggestions for further SHS exposure reduction approaches were obtained from home visitation health workers in Massachusetts. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among Massachusetts Early Intervention workers (N=316) at their state-wide conference in April 2010. RESULTS: Eighty-three per cent of respondents reported at least 1 hour per month of SHS exposure, and 16% reported at least 11 hours per month. Nevertheless, only 22% of workers counselled clients on maintaining a smoke-free home. Fewer than 30% of workers had ever voiced concerns to their employing agency, and just 12% had raised their concerns directly with clients. Only 14% stated that their agency had rules designed to protect workers from SHS. CONCLUSIONS: SHS exposure occurs frequently among home visitation health workers. The data point to a substantial population who are not protected from SHS exposure by formal policies.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants , Air Pollution, Indoor , Health Personnel , House Calls , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Smoking , Tobacco Smoke Pollution/prevention & control , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Massachusetts , Middle Aged , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Occupations , Smoking Prevention , Tobacco Smoke Pollution/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL