ABSTRACT
We performed a prospective, randomized trial comparing ultrasound guidance of suprapubic bladder aspiration with unguided aspiration. The acquisition of urine improved with ultrasound guidance from 60% to 96.4%. The number of needle insertions decreased and the amount of urine obtained increased. Ultrasonography is a useful tool for bladder aspiration.
Subject(s)
Drainage/methods , Specimen Handling/methods , Urinary Bladder/diagnostic imaging , Urine , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Prospective Studies , UltrasonographyABSTRACT
To test the hypothesis that increased positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) could prevent deterioration of pulmonary function and lead to more rapid recovery of lung function, we randomly assigned 74 patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) at four centers to receive either high (12 to 14 cm H2O) or low (3 to 5 cm H2O) PEEP. The two groups were similar in terms of weight, gestational age, diagnosis, and pre-ECMO course. All other aspects of care were identical. Dynamic lung compliance was measured at baseline and every 12 hours. Radiographs of the chest were obtained daily. Survival rates were similar in the two groups: 36 of 40 for low PEEP and 34 of 34 for high PEEP. The duration of ECMO therapy was 97.4 +/- 36.3 hours in the high-PEEP group and 131.8 +/- 54.5 hours in the low-PEEP group (p less than 0.01). Dynamic lung compliance throughout the first 72 hours of ECMO was significantly higher in patients receiving high PEEP. Radiographic appearance of the lungs correlated well with lung compliance: patients receiving high PEEP had significant deterioration of the radiographic score less frequently than those receiving low PEEP. High PEEP also was associated with significantly fewer complications. We conclude that PEEP of 12 to 14 cm H2O safely prevents deterioration of pulmonary function during ECMO and results in more rapid lung recovery than traditional lung management with low PEEP.
Subject(s)
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Positive-Pressure Respiration/methods , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/methods , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Lung/physiopathology , Lung Compliance , Male , Oxygen/administration & dosage , Oxygen/blood , Prospective Studies , Radiography , Respiratory Insufficiency/physiopathology , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapy , Survival Rate , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
One hundred forty-four newborn infants with pulmonary interstitial emphysema were stratified by weight and severity of illness, and randomly assigned to receive treatment with high-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) or rapid-rate conventional mechanical ventilation (CV) with short inspiratory time. If criteria for treatment failure were met, crossover to the alternate ventilatory mode was permitted. Overall, 45 (61%) of 74 infants met treatment success criteria with HFJV compared with 26 (37%) of 70 treated with CV (p less than 0.01). Eighty-four percent of patients who crossed over from CV to HFJV initially responded to the new treatment, and 45% ultimately met success criteria on HFJV. In contrast, only 9% of those who crossed over from HFJV to CV responded well to CV (p less than 0.01), and the same 9% ultimately met success criteria (p less than 0.05). Therapy with HFJV resulted in improved ventilation at lower peak and mean airway pressures, as well as more rapid radiographic improvement of pulmonary interstitial emphysema, in comparison with rapid-rate CV. Survival by original assignment was identical. When survival resulting from rescue by the alternate therapy in crossover patients was excluded, the survival rate was 64.9% for HFJV, compared with 47.1% for CV (p less than 0.05). The incidence of chronic lung disease, intraventricular hemorrhage, patent ductus arteriosus, airway obstruction, and new air leak was similar in both groups. We conclude that HFJV, as used in this study, is safe and is more effective than rapid-rate CV in the treatment of newborn infants with pulmonary interstitial emphysema.