Field evaluations of concentrated spray applications of microencapsulated sex pheromone for codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae).

The application of a microencapsulated (MEC) sex pheromone formulation (Checkmate CM-F) for codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.), in low volume, concentrated sprays was evaluated in a series of small plot and grower trials in apple, Malus domestica Borkhausen, and pear, Pyrus communis L. Preliminary tests found that MEC sprays applied at 172-207 kilopascals in 12-23 liters/ha deposited the highest density of microcapsules per leaf. The addition of a latex sicker did not increase the deposition of microcapsules. Small plot tests in 2004 compared the effectiveness of two low-volume sprayers against a standard high-volume spray (926 liters/ha) applied at 1,379 kilopascals. Moth catches and fruit injury were significantly lower in plots treated with the low-volume sprays compared with plots treated with the standard sprayer. These results suggest that concentrating the MEC formulation increases the deposition of microcapsules and improves its effectiveness. Larger trials were conducted with a low-volume sprayer in 4-ha plots within commercial apple (2005-2006) and pear orchards (2005) paired with similar plots treated with hand-applied pheromone dispensers. Levels of fruit injury were not significantly different between pheromone treatments in any of the three tests. Moth catches, however, were significantly higher in the MEC- versus the dispenser-treated apple plots in 2005. No difference was found in the fruit injury levels in MEC-treated apple orchards in 2005 caused by irrigation method, but moth catches were significantly higher in overhead versus undertree orchards. The advantages and current limitations of using MEC sex pheromone sprays to supplement current grower's management strategies for codling moth is discussed.

Rainfastness of a microencapsulated sex pheromone formulation for codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae).

The rainfastness of a microencapsulated sex pheromone formulation for codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.), was evaluated in a series of laboratory experiments with detached apple, pear, and walnut leaves. Increasing the intensity and duration of simulated rainfall significantly increased the removal of microcapsules from both the top and bottom of apple leaves. The removal of microcapsules was significantly higher from the top versus the bottom of leaves at all rates tested. Leaf angle was a significant factor affecting the removal of microcapsules from the top surface of apple leaves with fewer microcapsules removed, because leaves were oriented with a steeper downward angle. Both leaf surfaces of apple and pear retained a higher proportion of microcapsules than walnut leaves, and the bottom surface of apple leaves retained significantly more than pear leaves. Three spray adjuvants were evaluated as stickers for microcapsules. No difference was found in the number of microcapsules deposited on apple leaves among three stickers tested at rates from 0.06 to 0.25%. However, in a second test a latex sticker significantly increased the deposition of microcapsules on apple leaves compared with a polyvinyl polymer and a pine resin sticker at a rate of 0.06%. Significantly more microcapsules were retained on the bottom versus the top of apple leaves with all stickers. The latex and polyvinyl stickers significantly increased the retention of microcapsules versus the pine resin sticker and the control on apple leaves. In another test, the addition of 0.06% latex sticker did not increase the deposition of microcapsules on any of the three leaf types. However, the addition of the latex sticker significantly increased the retention of microcapsules on the top of apple and pear leaves and the bottom of apple leaves. The addition of a latex sticker did not affect the retention of microcapsules on walnut leaves.

Monoaminergic effects of high-dose corticotropin in corticotropin-responsive pediatric opsoclonus-myoclonus.

Children with the opsoclonus-myoclonus syndrome (OMS) usually respond to corticotropin (adrenocorticotrophic hormone, ACTH) treatment but the mechanism of benefit is unknown. We previously showed that both cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) homovanillic acid (HVA) and 5-hydroxyindole-acetic acid (5-HIAA) concentrations are low in pediatric OMS. In this study, we measured levels of CSF Dopa, catecholamines, deaminated metabolites of catecholamines, as well as HVA and 5-HIAA in eight patients before and during treatment with ACTH. All the children were ACTH-responsive with 50-70% improvement in multiple clinical features of OMS. ACTH treatment reduced the HVA concentration in every child by a mean of 21% (p < 0.001). Treatment with ACTH was associated with significant correlations between dopaminergic markers such as HVA, dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC), and Dopa. There were no significant changes in the CSF concentrations of the noradrenergic markers norepinephrine (NE) and dihydroxyphenylglycol (DHPG), or the serotonergic marker 5-HIAA. The only child with a marked inflammatory pattern in CSF, which was reversed by ACTH, was atypical for a large increase in NE and decrease in 5-HIAA during ACTH treatment. Beneficial effects of ACTH in OMS are not associated with normalization of HVA or 5-HIAA levels. The pattern of decreased HVA and unchanged DOPAC levels could reflect decreased extraneuronal uptake of catecholamines (which steroids inhibit) or decreased 0-methylation of catecholamines in nonneuronal cells.

An implicit world view in technology and its consequences for contemporary life.

To summarize, when the technological way of thinking is taken to the extreme it becomes a world view that is associated with a particular danger, in that it is not taken by its proponents as one of many competing world views but is considered uncritically to be a fact, not a hypothesis. Through a series of applications of the fallacy of hypothesis/fact confusion and through uncritical use of the technological frame of mind, one can inevitably become committed to an overarching physicalism, materialism, mechanicalism, and determinism, perhaps without even knowing that one has such afflictions. My own discipline, philosophy, which I regard as a science in the broad sense previously mentioned, has not escaped being captured by this technological mind-set, much to its detriment. I refer readers who are interested in the plight of philosophy in this age to the works of Hilary Putnam, Bruce Wilshire, Ludwig Wittgenstein, or Charles Peirce. I take this step because I am not a machine, and if I didn't stop now, I would feel guilty about taking too much of your time.