Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Poult Sci ; 100(4): 100997, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33610898

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of genotype, sex, dietary protein level, and their interactions on select carcass characteristics and meat quality of fast- (Ross 308), medium- (Hubbard JA757) and slow-growing (ISA Dual) chickens (n = 2,520). The diet of the low-protein group of chickens had 6% lower CP than the commercial diet fed to the control group. When the chickens reached an average live weight of 2 kg, 10 males and 10 females of each genotype and the diet were selected for slaughter and breast meat-quality analysis. The dressing out and breast percentages were lower in the JA757 (-2.0 and -5.9%, respectively) and ISA Dual chickens (-9.9 and -14.3%, respectively) than those in the Ross 308 chickens. The ISA Dual chickens had higher abdominal fat percentage, higher DM and protein contents and lower ether extract content and shear force value in breast meat than the other genotypes. Significant interaction effects of genotype, sex, and diet were found on the color of breast skin. Among the various combinations of genotype, sex, and diet group, Ross 308 females fed the low-protein diet had the highest redness and yellowness of breast skin, highest pH45 value, and largest fibers, whereas ISA Dual females had the lowest color parameters and pH45 value, and ISA Dual males had the smallest muscle fibers. The low-protein diet was associated with decreased abdominal fat percentage and changes in meat quality parameters, including increased darkness, meat color intensity, drip loss, and muscle fiber area, in all genotypes. The results indicated greater differences in meat quality owing to genotype than to sex or dietary protein level.


Subject(s)
Chickens , Diet , Meat , Pectoralis Muscles , Animal Feed/analysis , Animals , Chickens/genetics , Diet/veterinary , Diet, Protein-Restricted/veterinary , Dietary Proteins/metabolism , Female , Genotype , Male , Meat/standards , Pectoralis Muscles/chemistry , Pectoralis Muscles/growth & development
2.
Poult Sci ; 100(2): 760-764, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33518130

ABSTRACT

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of quantitative feed restriction (FR) in fast-, medium-, and slow-growing meat-type male and female chickens on their growth, feed consumption, economic efficiency, carcass composition, and gastrointestinal microbiota. In the experiment, fast-growing Ross 308, medium-growing Hubbard JA 757 and slow-growing ISA Dual chickens of both sexes were exposed to quantitative FR between 14 and 21 d of age. During the FR, restricted chickens received 70% of the amount of feed consumed by the ad libitum (AL) group. Live weight at the end of the experiment was affected by genotype (P < 0.001), sex (P < 0.001), feeding regime (P < 0.001), and their interaction (P < 0.001). The highest final weight was in AL and FR ISA Dual males and the lowest was in AL and FR females of the same genotype. A similar tendency was observed in daily weight gain and feed intake. Carcass traits were predominantly affected by genotype. However, interactions of genotype, sex, and feeding regime were observed in thigh (P < 0.001) and abdominal fat (P < 0.001) proportions. Concerning gastrointestinal microbiota, only Escherichia coli was affected by genotype. Feed restriction in slow-growing dual-purpose chickens might improve economic potential; however, further research is needed to reveal the involvement of variable processes, which are unclear and affect production.


Subject(s)
Chickens/growth & development , Diet/veterinary , Genotype , Microbiota , Animal Feed/analysis , Animals , Body Weight , Chickens/classification , Chickens/genetics , Chickens/microbiology , Female , Male , Meat/analysis , Sex Factors
3.
Br Poult Sci ; 60(5): 548-553, 2019 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31157551

ABSTRACT

1. The relationships between the main components of the body and body protein among males and females of BUT 6 (BUT) and Hybrid Converter (HYB) turkey strains were examined. 2. The weights of breast meat, breast skin, drumstick meat, drumstick skin, thigh meat, thigh skin and wing-plus-skin as well as the head, neck, feet, blood, heart, liver and gizzard were measured at different stages of growth after which all components of each bird were minced together in order to determine the feather-free body protein weight of each bird sampled. Using the weights of the components and the protein content of each bird the allometric relationships between the components and body protein were determined and then compared for each strain x sex combination. 3. By excluding the breast weights at day-old and at 7 d, the remaining points produced an acceptable allometric relationship (R2 = 0.992). Thigh weight could be predicted for all strain x sex combinations using one allometric equation, as could drumstick skin weight. Breast and thigh skin weights differed between males and females. Females of the HYB strain exhibited heavier drumstick and wing-plus-skin weights at a given body protein weight than the other three strain x sex combinations. These differences in both the constant term and regression coefficient in the allometric equations between genotypes are probably due to differences in the amount of lipid that is deposited in these tissues. 4. Sexes differed in the allometric relationships for head, feet, heart and liver, while breeds differed in gizzard weight. A common relationship between the four genotypes could be used to predict the weight of blood in the carcass. 5. The allometric equations fitted to the data in this trial enable the accurate prediction of the weights of the different physical components given the weight of body protein.


Subject(s)
Meat/analysis , Turkeys/growth & development , Weight Gain , Animals , Body Composition/genetics , Female , Genotype , Male , Organ Size/genetics , Random Allocation , Turkeys/genetics , Weight Gain/genetics
4.
Br Poult Sci ; 60(5): 539-547, 2019 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31157554

ABSTRACT

1. The potential growth of modern turkey genotypes was measured using male and female BUT 6 (BUT) and Hybrid Converter (HYB) strains. At one-day-old, 720 male and 960 female poults were randomly allocated to 48 littered pens in two houses with 30 males or 40 females of each strain per pen. Five feeds of decreasing protein content were fed to both sexes during the growing period. 2. Birds were weighed at 1, 7, 14, 21, 35, 56, 77, 119 d (males only), 126 d (females only) and 140 d (males only) and, on each occasion, six birds were selected and removed for carcass analysis. 3. Growth was similar in both strains, but the growth rate of females appeared to decline relative to the earlier trajectory after 70 d, and this tendency being greater in HYB females. 4. HYB birds of both sexes had more feathers than BUT to 77 d, but thereafter these differences were non-significant. A single allometry between feather and body protein weight was observed over all genotypes with no differences apparent between sexes within strains. The Gompertz curve adequately described the growth of body protein, water and ash. 5. Body lipid (g/100g bodyweight) declined in the early stages of growth. This might reflect an energy deficiency in the diet or might indicate that the present description of lipid growth does not apply in turkeys as it does in other species. 6. Whereas the description of body growth, feather growth and the chemical components of growth given in this paper may not fully reflect the true potential of the genotypes used, nevertheless they provide useful information regarding the latest genotypes available in the turkey industry. Some of the observations suggested that current performance might be improved if further research is conducted regarding dietary energy transactions.


Subject(s)
Body Composition , Feathers/growth & development , Turkeys/growth & development , Weight Gain , Animals , Body Composition/genetics , Female , Genotype , Male , Random Allocation , Turkeys/genetics , Weight Gain/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...