Prospective Evaluation of Cognitive Health and Related Factors in Elderly at Risk for Developing Alzheimer's Dementia: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The CHARIOT PRO Main study is a prospective, non-interventional study evaluating cognitive trajectories in participants at the preclinical stage of Alzheimer's disease (AD) classified by risk levels for developing mild cognitive impairment due to AD (MCI-AD). OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to characterize factors and markers influencing cognitive and functional progression among individuals at-risk for developing MCI-AD, and examine data for more precise predictors of cognitive change, particularly in relation to APOE ε4 subgroup. DESIGN: This single-site study was conducted at the Imperial College London (ICL) in the United Kingdom. Participants 60 to 85 years of age were classified as high, medium (amnestic or non-amnestic) or low risk for developing MCI-AD based on RBANS z-scores. A series of clinical outcome assessments (COAs) on factors influencing baseline cognitive changes were collected in each of the instrument categories of cognition, lifestyle exposure, mood, and sleep. Data collection was planned to occur every 6 months for 48 months, however the median follow-up time was 18.1 months due to early termination of study by the sponsor. RESULTS: 987 participants were screened, among them 690 participants were actively followed-up post baseline, of whom 165 (23.9%) were APOE ε4 carriers; with at least one copy of the allele. The mean age was 68.73 years, 94.6% were white, 57.4% were female, and 34.8% had a Family History of Dementia with a somewhat larger percentage in the APOE ε4 carrier group (42.4%) compared to the non-carrier group (32.4%). Over half of the participants were married and 53% had a Bachelor's or higher degree. Most frequently, safety events typical for this population consisted of upper respiratory tract infection (10.4%), falls (5.2%), hypertension (3.5%) and back pain (3.0%). Conclusion (clinical relevance): AD-related measures collected during the CHARIOT PRO Main study will allow identification and evaluation of AD risk factors and markers associated with cognitive performance from the pre-clinical stage. Evaluating the psycho-biological characteristics of these pre-symptomatic individuals in relation to their natural neurocognitive trajectories will enhance current understanding on determinants of the initial signs of cognitive changes linked to AD.

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 2 Study of the Effects of the Vaccine Vanutide Cridificar with QS-21 Adjuvant on Immunogenicity, Safety and Amyloid Imaging in Patients with Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease.

BACKGROUND: Vanutide Cridificar (ACC-001), a novel investigational immunotherapeutic vaccine designed to elicit antibodies against the N-terminal peptide 1-7 of the amyloid-beta peptide, believed to be important in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the immunogenicity, safety and impact of ACC-001 with Quillaja saponaria (QS-21) adjuvant on the reduction of brain fibrillar amyloid burden, assayed by positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, in patients with mild to moderate AD. DESIGN: Randomized, phase 2, interventional study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01284387. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (Mini-Mental State Examination scores 18-26; measurable amyloid burden in the expected range, on the screening 18F-florbetapir PET scan; and a Rosen modified Hachinski ischemic score ≤4). INTERVENTION: Participants were randomized to 3 µg or 10 µg ACC-001 (each in combination with 50 µg QS-21) or placebo (without QS-21). MEASUREMENTS: Primary endpoint was the change from baseline to week 104 in cerebral amyloid burden as measured by the global cortical average (GCA) standard value uptake ratio (SUVR) based on the brain 18F-florbetapir PET composite cortical SUVR between each ACC-001+QS-21 dose compared with placebo. Secondary endpoints included safety, immunogenicity and pharmacodynamics. Exploratory endpoints included cognitive and functional efficacy, and health outcome measures. RESULTS: Of 126 randomized patients (placebo: 40; ACC-001 3 µg+QS-21: 43; and ACC-001 10 µg+QS-21: 43), 125 received study treatment; 92 (73%) completed the study. Change in 18F-florbetapir PET GCA SUVR, was not significantly different between either of the two ACC-001+QS-21 treatment groups and placebo (3 µg +QS-21 vs. placebo diff=-0.03, p=0.54; 10 µg +QS-21 vs. placebo diff=-0.08, p=0.07), but the trend was numerically consistent with a dose response. The geometric mean peak anti-Aß IgG titers were slightly higher in the 10 µg than the 3 µg group. The proportion of responders was similar in both dose groups of ACC-001+QS-21. The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) p-tau changes from baseline in both active treatment groups were not statistically different from placebo, but were numerically consistent with a dose response (3 µg +QS-21 vs. placebo diff=-3.2, p=0.57; 10 µg +QS-21 vs. placebo diff=-7.0, p=0.19). The vMRI showed statistically significant faster treatment-related decrease in brain volume in the 10 µg group but was not significant in the 3 µg group, compared with placebo (3 µg diff =-1.3 mL/year, p=0.50; 10 µg diff=-4.2 mL/year, p=0.02). Measured plasma Aß levels increased in parallel with peak anti-Aß titers after each injection. Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities with edema/effusion (ARIA-E) were more frequent in patients who received ACC-001+QS-21 than placebo (6% vs. 0%) but none were symptomatic. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events in the active groups were injection reactions, and occurred more frequently in the ACC-001+QS-21 groups than the placebo (48% vs 8%), the majority of which were mild and transient. CONCLUSIONS: Primary biomarker efficacy endpoints were not statistically significant in either dose group. The numerical decreases in 18F-florbetapir PET GCA SUVR suggests a dose-related trend for greater reductions in fibrillar amyloid burden in the ACC-001+QS-21 10 µg group compared with placebo. Likewise, while not significant, there was a numerical trend of decreased CSF p-tau levels with ACC-001, possibly consistent with a downstream effect in the ACC-001+QS-21 group. Insufficient antibody titers or quality, insufficient power to detect a difference, or too short duration of follow up may be reasons why a statistically significant response was not observed. Brain volume measures showed faster volume loss in the 10 µg treatment group, similar to the effect seen in few earlier AD immunotherapy trials which may suggest removal of amyloid and resultant decrease in inflammation. No new, unexpected safety signals were detected.

Vanutide Cridificar (ACC-001) and QS-21 Adjuvant in Individuals with Early Alzheimer's Disease: Amyloid Imaging Positron Emission Tomography and Safety Results from a Phase 2 Study.

BACKGROUND: ACC-001 is an investigational therapeutic vaccine designed to elicit antibodies against the N-terminal peptide 1-7 of the amyloid-beta peptide, believed to be important in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate safety, immunogenicity, impact on brain amyloid, and other exploratory endpoints in participants receiving ACC-001. DESIGN: Randomized, phase 2, interventional study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov ID NCT01227564. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals with early Alzheimer's disease (Mini-Mental State Examination scores ≥25, a global Clinical Dementia Rating of 0.5, and evidence of elevated baseline brain amyloid burden). INTERVENTION: Participants were randomized to ACC-001 3 µg or 10 µg with QS-21 adjuvant (50 µg), or placebo. MEASUREMENTS: The primary endpoint was change in brain amyloid burden by 18F-florbetapir positron emission tomography in composite cortical standard uptake value ratio. RESULTS: A total of 63 participants were randomized and 51 completed the study. At week 104, no significant differences were observed in 18F-florbetapir positron emission tomography composite cortical standard uptake value ratio between either ACC-001 dose compared with placebo. In both ACC-001 + QS-21 treatment groups, following the initial immunization, the anti-amyloid-beta geometric mean titers increased after each subsequent vaccination and then declined, with less apparent decline after the later compared with earlier immunizations. The majority of treatment-emergent adverse events in the ACC-001 + QS-21 groups were injection site reactions, which occurred at a greater rate in active treatment groups than in the placebo group. No amyloid-related imaging abnormalities of edema or effusion were reported. CONCLUSION: No statistically significant differences were observed between groups in the change from baseline brain amyloid burden despite apparently robust systemically measured anti-amyloid-beta antibody response at both dose levels. Insufficient antibody titers, poor quality immune response, short duration of treatment, or small sample size may have resulted in these findings. The safety and tolerability profile was acceptable.

Two double-blinded, randomized, comparative trials of 4 human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) envelope vaccines in HIV-1-infected individuals across a spectrum of disease severity: AIDS Clinical Trials Groups 209 and 214.

The potential role of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-specific immune responses in controlling viral replication in vivo has stimulated interest in enhancing virus-specific immunity by vaccinating infected individuals with HIV-1 or its components. These studies were undertaken to define patient populations most likely to respond to vaccination, with the induction of novel HIV-1-specific cellular immune responses, and to compare the safety and immunogenicity of several candidate recombinant HIV-1 envelope vaccines and adjuvants. New lymphoproliferative responses (LPRs) developed in <30% of vaccine recipients. LPRs were elicited primarily in study participants with a CD4 cell count >350 cells/mm(3) and were usually strain restricted. Responders tended to be more likely than nonresponders to have an undetectable level of HIV-1 RNA at baseline (P=.067). Induction of new cellular immune responses by HIV-1 envelope vaccines is a function of the immunologic stage of disease and baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA level and exhibits considerable vaccine strain specificity.

A phase II study of two HIV type 1 envelope vaccines, comparing their immunogenicity in populations at risk for acquiring HIV type 1 infection. AIDS Vaccine Evaluation Group.

Several immunogens induce HIV-specific neutralization and in vitro lymphoproliferation in adults at low HIV-1 risk, but responses in persons at high HIV-1 risk are not known. We performed a multicenter, double-blinded, adjuvant-controlled trial with two gp120 vaccines in 296 HIV-1-uninfected volunteers, including 176 reporting higher HIV-1 risk activities. The immunogens were remarkably well tolerated. After three immunizations, 210 of 241 vaccinees (87%) developed neutralizing antibodies, which persisted in 59% after 2 years. The injection drug users receiving SF-2/gp120 had decreased antibody responses relative to the lower risk groups. Envelope-specific lymphoproliferation peaked after two immunizations, and 54% of vaccinees mounted a DTH reaction to gp120 after 4 years. In summary, these immunogens have low adverse reactogenicity and induce durable antibody and T cell responses to the prototype strains. Unexpected differences in antibody responses among diverse HIV-1 risk strata lend support to the conduct of expanded phase II trials in populations other than low-risk volunteers.

ACTG 260: a randomized, phase I-II, dose-ranging trial of the anti-human immunodeficiency virus activity of delavirdine monotherapy. The AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 260 Team.

ACTG 260 was an open-label, four-arm trial designed to study the safety and anti-human immunodeficiency virus (anti-HIV) activity of delavirdine monotherapy at three ranges of concentrations in plasma compared to those of control therapy with zidovudine or didanosine. Delavirdine doses were adjusted weekly until subjects were within their target trough concentration range (3 to 10, 11 to 30, or 31 to 50 microM). A total of 113 subjects were analyzed. At week 2, the mean HIV type 1 (HIV-1) RNA level declines among the subjects in the three delavirdine arms were similar (0.87, 1.08, and 1.02 log10 for the low, middle, and high target arms, respectively), but by week 8, the subjects in the pooled delavirdine arms showed only a 0.10 log10 reduction. In the subjects in the nucleoside arm, mean HIV-1 RNA level reductions at weeks 2 and 8 were 0.67 and 0.55 log10, respectively. Because viral suppression by delavirdine was not maintained, the trial was stopped early. Rash, which was usually self-limited, developed in 36% of subjects who received delavirdine. Delavirdine monotherapy has potent anti-HIV activity at 2 weeks, but its activity is time limited due to the rapid emergence of drug resistance.

Safety and immunogenicity of an HLA-based HIV envelope polyvalent synthetic peptide immunogen. DATRI 010 Study Group. Division of AIDS Treatment Research Initiative.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a polyvalent (PV) HIV envelope synthetic peptide immunogen, C4-V3. The immunogen comprised four peptides containing T-helper epitopes from the fourth constant region (C4) of gp120 of HIV-1MN, and T-helper, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte HLA-B7-restricted, and B-cell neutralizing epitopes from the gp120 third variable region (V3) of four clade B HIV-1 isolates, HIV-1MN, HIV-1RF, HIV-1EV91, and HIV-1Can0A. DESIGN: A pilot, Phase I controlled trial [Division of AIDS Treatment Research Initiative (DATRI) 010] conducted at a single center. METHODS: Ten HIV-infected, HLA-B7-positive patients with CD4 cells > 500 x 10(6)/l were enrolled. Eight patients received the C4-V3 PV immunogen emulsified in incomplete Freund's adjuvant in five intramuscular injections over 24 weeks, and two controls received incomplete Freund's adjuvant alone. All subjects were followed for 52 weeks. RESULTS: Four out of eight C4-V3 PV recipients generated at least fourfold rise in serum antibody titers to at least three immunogen peptides in contrast to none of the control subjects. Four out of eight C4-V3 PV recipients and none of the controls had an at least fourfold rise in neutralizing antibodies to either HIV-1MN, HIV-1RF, or HIV-1(4489-5) laboratory-adapted HIV isolates. 3H-Thymidine incorporation assays of peripheral blood mononuclear cells increased at least fivefold over the baseline stimulation index to at least one of the immunogen peptides in two consecutive post-immunization timepoints in five out of eight C4-V3 PV recipients versus none of the controls. CD4 cell counts and plasma HIV RNA levels did not change in patients who received either C4-V3 PV or adjuvant alone. Adverse events consisted primarily of grade 1 injection site reactions in six subjects (four C4-V3 recipients, two controls). CONCLUSIONS: C4-V3 PV synthetic peptides demonstrated both immunogenicity and safety in HIV-infected patients.

Safety profile of phase I and II preventive HIV type 1 envelope vaccination: experience of the NIAID AIDS Vaccine Evaluation Group.

The NIAID-sponsored AIDS Vaccine Evaluation Group was established in 1988 to perform phase I/II clinical trials with candidate preventive HIV-1 vaccines. This report includes safety data from 1398 HIV-negative, healthy volunteers who were enrolled into 25 phase I and 1 phase H multicentered, randomized, double-blind studies evaluating seven recombinant HIV-1 envelope vaccines, two V3 loop synthetic peptide vaccines, and two live poxvirus-vectored recombinant envelope vaccines. All studies but three were placebo controlled; the placebo was either the adjuvant alone or, in studies of recombinant poxvirus vaccines, it was the vector with no gene insert or a non-HIV gene insert. All candidate vaccines were generally well tolerated. The only adverse effects that were clearly related to vaccination were occasional acute local and systemic reactions that were associated with the adjuvants. Three adjuvants in particular were associated with moderate to severe local reactions: alum plus deoxycholate (ImmunoAg), MTP-PE (Biocine Corp.), and QS21 (Genentech, Inc.). MTP-PE was also associated with self-limited severe systemic reactions. There were no serious adverse laboratory toxicities and no evidence of significant immunosuppressive events after receipt of the candidate vaccines. A few volunteers experienced symptoms that might relate to an underlying immunopathologic mechanism (rash, hemolytic anemia, arthralgia), but their presentations were mild and their incidence was low. Eleven volunteers were diagnosed with malignancies during or after their participation, which was within the 95% confidence interval of the number of cases predicted by the National Cancer Institute SEER (Program for cancer surveillance, epidemiology, and end result reporting) database. In conclusion, the envelope-based recombinant or synthetic candidate HIV-1 vaccines appear to be safe and this work has prepared the way for the testing of increasingly complex candidate HIV-1 vaccines.

Isolation and characterization of human papillomavirus type 6-specific T cells infiltrating genital warts.

The potential role of T cells in the control of human papillomavirus type 6 (HPV-6) infections is an appealing premise, but their actual role has been sparsely investigated. Since HPV-6 infections are confined to the epithelium, such an investigation should focus on the T cells present at the site of infection (i.e., the warts). Therefore, we isolated wart-infiltrating lymphocytes (WIL) from patients with clinically diagnosed anogenital warts. These WIL were characterized by their phenotype and their specificity for E7 and L1 proteins of HPV-6. The phenotype of WIL varied drastically from patient to patient, as determined by their expression of CD4, CD8, T-cell receptor alpha/beta chain (TCR alpha beta), and TCR gamma delta. Despite this heterogeneity in phenotype, HPV-6 E7 and/or L1-specific WIL, as determined by lymphoproliferation, could be isolated from more than 75% of the patients studied. Among all L1 peptides recognized by WIL, peptides 311-330 and 411-430 were the most consistently detected, with seven of nine patients for whom L1 peptide reactivity was observed responding to at least one of them. Moreover, the HPV-6 epitopic peptides recognized by WIL differed to some extent from those recognized by peripheral T cells.

Thalidomide for the treatment of oral aphthous ulcers in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases AIDS Clinical Trials Group.

BACKGROUND: In patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, aphthous ulceration of the mouth and oropharynx can become extensive and debilitating. Preliminary reports suggest that thalidomide may promote the healing of oral aphthous ulcers. METHODS: We performed a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of thalidomide as therapy for oral aphthous ulcers in HIV-infected patients. The patients received a four-week course of either 200 mg of thalidomide or placebo orally once per day. They were evaluated weekly for the condition of the ulcers, their quality of life, and evidence of toxicity. Assays were performed for plasma tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha), soluble TNF-alpha receptors, and HIV RNA. RESULTS: Sixteen of 29 patients in the thalidomide group (55 percent) had complete healing of their aphthous ulcers after four weeks, as compared with only 2 of 28 patients in the placebo group (7 percent; odds ratio, 15; 95 percent confidence interval after adjustment for group sequential testing, 1.8 to 499; unadjusted P<0.001). Pain diminished and ability to eat improved with thalidomide treatment. The adverse effects noted with thalidomide included somnolence and rash (7 patients each), and 6 of the 29 patients discontinued treatment because of toxicity. Thalidomide treatment increased HIV RNA levels (median increase, 0.42 log10 copies per milliliter; increase with placebo, 0.05; P=0.04). With thalidomide treatment there were unexpected increases in the plasma concentrations of TNF-alpha and soluble TNF-alpha receptors. CONCLUSIONS: Thalidomide is an effective treatment for aphthous ulceration of the mouth and oropharynx in patients with HIV infection.

Pharmacokinetics of F105, a human monoclonal antibody, in persons infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1.

F105 is a human monoclonal antibody that binds to the CD4 binding site of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp120 and neutralizes clinical and laboratory isolates of the human immunodeficiency virus. This phase I study investigated the disposition of the antibody in humans. F105 was administered over a 60-minute period at two dose levels, 100 and 500 mg/m2. Blood samples were obtained for up to 56 days. The clearance of the antibody was 0.33 ml/min with a corresponding half-life of approximately 13 days. Peak concentrations achieved at the higher dose level were 216.19 +/- 9.62 micrograms/ml. The disposition of the drug was linear for the doses studied. Simulations were performed to design future studies aimed at investigating the efficacy of the antibody. This study concluded that F105 can be administered as a bolus dose every 21 days.

A dose-ranging study of a prototype synthetic HIV-1MN V3 branched peptide vaccine. The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases AIDS Vaccine Evaluation Group.

A phase I double-blind trial was done to examine the safety and immunogenicity of a prototype synthetic human immunodeficiency virus type 1 MN strain (HIV-1MN) third variable region domain (V3) branched peptide vaccine in HIV-1-uninfected healthy adult volunteers. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive 20, 100, or 500 micrograms of vaccine or alum adjuvant control on days 0, 28, and 168. The vaccine was well-tolerated and appeared safe. Induction of binding antibody to V3 MN branched peptide was vaccine dose-related and was detectable in 9 of 10 subjects in the highest-vaccine-dose group. HIV-1MN-neutralizing antibody was detected after the third 500-micrograms dose in 8 of 10 subjects at the 90% neutralization end point. V3 MN peptide stimulated lymphocyte proliferation in 15 (75%) of 20 subjects after vaccination. In conclusion, this prototype vaccine was safe and it induced humoral and cell-mediated immune responses.

A phase I evaluation of the safety and immunogenicity of vaccination with recombinant gp160 in patients with early human immunodeficiency virus infection. Military Medical Consortium for Applied Retroviral Research.

BACKGROUND: Despite multiple antiviral humoral and cellular immune responses, infection with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) results in a progressively debilitating disease. We hypothesized that a more effective immune response could be generated by post-infection vaccination with HIV-specific antigens. METHODS: We performed a phase I trial of the safety and immunogenicity of a vaccine prepared from molecularly cloned envelope protein, gp160, in 30 volunteer subjects with HIV infection in Walter Reed stage 1 or 2. The vaccine was administered either on days 0, 30, and 120 or on days 0, 30, 60, 120, 150, and 180. HIV-specific humoral and cellular immune responses were measured; local and systemic reactions to vaccination, including general measures of immune function, were monitored. RESULTS: In 19 of the 30 subjects both humoral and cellular immunity to HIV envelope proteins increased in response to vaccination with gp160. Seroconversion to selected envelope epitopes was observed, as were new T-cell proliferative responses to gp160. Response was associated with the CD4 cell count determined before vaccination (13 of 16 subjects [81 percent] with greater than 600 cells per milliliter responded, as compared with 6 of 14 [43 percent] with less than or equal to 600 cells per milliliter; P = 0.07) and with the number of injections administered (87 percent of subjects randomly assigned to receive six injections responded, as compared with 40 percent of those assigned to three injections; P = 0.02). Local reactions at the site of injection were mild. There were no adverse systemic reactions, including diminution of general in vitro or in vivo cellular immune function. After 10 months of follow-up, the mean CD4 count had not decreased in the 19 subjects who responded, but it had decreased by 7.3 percent in the 11 who did not respond. CONCLUSIONS: This gp160 vaccine is safe and immunogenic in volunteer patients with early HIV infection. Although it is too early to know whether this approach will be clinically useful, further scientific and therapeutic evaluation of HIV-specific vaccine therapy is warranted. Similar vaccines may prove to be effective for other chronic infections.