[Biomechanics of interspinous spacers]. / Biomechanik der interspinösen Platzhalter.

Interspinous spacers are commonly used to treat lumbar spinal stenosis or facet joint arthritis. The aims of implanting interspinous devices are to unload the facet joints, restore foraminal height, and provide stability especially in extension but still allow motion. This paper summarizes several in vitro studies, which compared four different interspinous implants - Coflex, Wallis, DIAM, and X-STOP - in terms of their three-dimensional primary stability, the intradiscal pressure, and stability after cyclic loading. 24 human lumbar spine specimens were divided into four equal groups and tested with pure moments in flexion/extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation: intact, after decompression with hemifacetectomy, and after implantation. Implantation had similar biomechanical effects with all four implants. In extension, they overcompensated the instability caused by the defect and restricted extension to about 50% compared to the intact state. In contrast, in flexion, lateral bending, and axial rotation the values of the range of motion stayed similar compared to the defective state. Intradiscal pressure after implantation was similar to that of the intact specimens in flexion, lateral bending, and axial rotation but much smaller during extension; 50,000 load cycles increased the range of motion in all motion planes by no more than 20%, but in extension motion this was still less than in the intact state.

Biomechanical effect of different lumbar interspinous implants on flexibility and intradiscal pressure.

Interspinous implants are used to treat lumbar spinal stenosis or facet joint arthritis. The aims of implanting interspinous devices are to unload the facet joints, restore foraminal height and provide stability especially in extension but still allow motion. The aim of this in vitro study was to compare four different interspinous implants--Colfex, Wallis, Diam and X-Stop--in terms of their three-dimensional flexibility and the intradiscal pressure. Twenty-four human lumbar spine specimens were divided into four equal groups and tested with pure moments in flexion/extension, lateral bending and axial rotation: (1) intact, (2) defect, (3) after implantation. Range of motion and the intradiscal pressure were determined. In each implant-group the defect caused an increase in range of motion by about 8% in lateral bending to 18% in axial rotation. Implantation had similar effects with all four implants. In extension, Coflex, Wallis, Diam, and X-Stop all overcompensated the instability caused by the defect and allowed about 50% of the range of motion of the intact state. In contrast, in flexion, lateral bending and axial rotation the values of the range of motion stayed about the values of the defect state. Similarly the intradiscal pressure after implantation was similar to that of the intact specimens in flexion, lateral bending and axial rotation but much smaller during extension. All tested interspinous implants had a similar effect on the flexibility: they strongly stabilized and reduced the intradiscal pressure in extension, but had almost no effect in flexion, lateral bending and axial rotation.

Can a modified interspinous spacer prevent instability in axial rotation and lateral bending? A biomechanical in vitro study resulting in a new idea.

BACKGROUND: Interspinous spacers are mainly used to treat lumbar spinal stenosis and facet arthrosis. Biomechanically, they stabilise in extension but do not compensate instability in axial rotation and lateral bending. It would therefore be desirable to have an interspinous spacer available, which provides for more stability also in these two planes. At the same time, the intervertebral disc should not completely be unloaded to keep it viable. To meet these requirements, a new version of the Coflex interspinous implant was developed, called "Coflex rivet", which can be more rigidly attached to the spinous processes. The aim was to investigate whether this new implant compensates instability but still allows some load to be transferred through the disc. METHODS: Twelve human lumbar spine segments were equally divided into two groups, one for Coflex rivet and one for the original Coflex implant. The specimens were tested for flexibility under pure moment loads in the three main planes. These tests were carried out in the intact condition, after creation of a destabilising defect and after insertion of either of the two implants. Before implantation, the interspinous spacers were equipped with strain gauges to measure the load transfer. FINDINGS: Compared to the defect condition, both implants had a strong stabilising effect in extension (P<0.05). Coflex rivet also strongly stabilised in flexion and to a smaller degree in lateral bending and axial rotation (P<0.05). In contrast, in these three loading directions, the original Coflex implant could not compensate the destabilising effect of the defect (P>0.05). The bending moments transferred through the implants were highest in extension and flexion. Yet, they were no more than 1.2 Nm in median. INTERPRETATION: The new Coflex rivet seems be a suitable option to compensate instability. Its biomechanical characteristics might even make it suitable as an adjunct to fusion, which would be a new indication for this type of implant.

Are animal models useful for studying human disc disorders/degeneration?

Intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration is an often investigated pathophysiological condition because of its implication in causing low back pain. As human material for such studies is difficult to obtain because of ethical and government regulatory restriction, animal tissue, organs and in vivo models have often been used for this purpose. However, there are many differences in cell population, tissue composition, disc and spine anatomy, development, physiology and mechanical properties, between animal species and human. Both naturally occurring and induced degenerative changes may differ significantly from those seen in humans. This paper reviews the many animal models developed for the study of IVD degeneration aetiopathogenesis and treatments thereof. In particular, the limitations and relevance of these models to the human condition are examined, and some general consensus guidelines are presented. Although animal models are invaluable to increase our understanding of disc biology, because of the differences between species, care must be taken when used to study human disc degeneration and much more effort is needed to facilitate research on human disc material.

Are the spines of calf, pig and sheep suitable models for pre-clinical implant tests?

Pre-clinical in vitro tests are needed to evaluate the biomechanical performance of new spinal implants. For such experiments large animal models are frequently used. Whether these models allow any conclusions concerning the implant's performance in humans is difficult to answer. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether calf, pig or sheep spine specimens may be used to replace human specimens in in vitro flexibility and cyclic loading tests with two different implant types. First, a dynamic and a rigid fixator were tested using six human, six calf, six pig and six sheep thoracolumbar spine specimens. Standard flexibility tests were carried out in a spine tester in flexion/extension, lateral bending and axial rotation in the intact state, after nucleotomy and after implantation. Then, the Coflex interspinous implant was tested for flexibility and intradiscal pressure using another six human and six calf lumbar spine segments. Loading was carried out as described above in the intact condition, after creation of a defect and after implantation. The fixators were most easily implantable into the calf. Qualitatively, they had similar effects on ROM in all species, however, the degree of stability achieved differed. Especially in axial rotation, the ROM of sheep, pig and calf was partially less than half the human ROM. Similarly, implantation of the Coflex interspinous implant caused the ROM to either increase in both species or to decrease in both of them, however, quantitatively, differences were observed. This was also the case for the intradiscal pressure. In conclusion, animal species, especially the calf, may be used to get a first idea of how a new pedicle screw system or an interspinous implant behaves in in vitro flexibility tests. However, the effects on ROM and intradiscal pressure have to be expected to differ in magnitude between animal and human. Therefore, the last step in pre-clinical implant testing should always be an experiment with human specimens.

Morphological changes of cervical facet joints in elderly individuals.

To better understand the role of facet joint degeneration in chronic neck and back pain epidemiological and morphological data are needed. For the cervical spine, however, such data are rare. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the degree of cartilage degeneration of cervical facet joints with respect to spinal level and age, to investigate whether any region of the joint surface is more often affected by degeneration and to determine the localisation of osteophytes. A total of 128 left-sided facet surfaces from 15 fresh frozen cervical spine specimens (59-92 years) including in maximum C2-C7 were inspected in a way to ensure a direct comparability to data reported for the lumbar spine. First, the macroscopic degree of cartilage degeneration was determined and correlated to spinal level and age. Then, each facet surface was divided into five regions (anterior, posterior, lateral, medial and central) to check whether cartilage degeneration occurs more often in any of these regions. Finally, the localisation of osteophytes was determined. The results showed that the mean degree of cartilage degeneration was 2.8 (+/-0.6) on a scale from Grade 1 (no degeneration) to 4 (severe degeneration). None of all 128 facet surfaces was classified as Grade 1. All spinal levels had about the same degree of degeneration (in mean 2.5-3.0). The youngest age group (<70 years) had a somewhat lower degree of degeneration (2.6) than the oldest (> or = 90 years) (3.1). Cartilage defects were found all over the joint surfaces, none of the five regions was more often affected than the others. Least osteophytes were found on the medial border of the facet joints. In conclusion, the prevalence of cervical facet joint degeneration is probably very high in individuals aged 50 years and more, with a tendency to increase in severity with age. All levels of the middle and lower cervical spine were affected to almost the same degree, whereas in the lumbar spine an increase in degeneration towards the lower levels was reported. Also, in the cervical spine in most cases the cartilage was evenly degenerated all over the joint surface while in the lumbar spine certain regions were reported to be affected predominantly.

Biomechanical performance of the new BeadEx implant in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures: restoration and maintenance of height and stability.

BACKGROUND: Vertebral compression fractures are counted among the most common complications of osteoporosis. For treatment, a new, alternative implant has been developed (BeadEx, Expandis, Hof HaCarmel, Israel). The aim of the present in vitro study was to evaluate whether this implant is able to restore the initial height and three-dimensional stability after fracture and whether it is able to maintain this height and stability during complex cyclic loading. METHODS: The BeadEx implant consists of small titanium rolls, which are pressed into the vertebral body through specially designed, hollow pedicle screws. The height and the three-dimensional flexibility of 18 bisegmental spine specimens (nine T12-L2, nine L3-L5) was measured, first, before and after creating a wedge compression fracture at the middle vertebral body (L1 resp. L4), second, after treatment of the fracture, and, third, during and after complex cyclic loading. The fractures were treated either with BeadEx plus internal fixator, BeadEx plus bone cement or vertebroplasty for comparison. FINDINGS: The height before fracture could almost be restored by BeadEx plus bone cement but not by BeadEx plus fixator and vertebroplasty. The total height loss after cyclic loading was smallest with BeadEx plus bone cement (in median -4.7mm with respect to the intact specimens) but -6.2mm with BeadEx plus fixator and -7.8mm with vertebroplasty. The three-dimensional stability of the specimens was clearly higher if treated with BeadEx plus fixator than with BeadEx plus bone cement or vertebroplasty. INTERPRETATION: From a biomechanical point of view, BeadEx plus bone cement can be recommended as an alternative to vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body fractures. BeadEx plus fixator can be recommended if additional stability is needed.

In vitro fixator rod loading after transforaminal compared to anterior lumbar interbody fusion.

BACKGROUND: Cages are commonly used to assist lumbar interbody fusion. They are implanted from various approaches. In many cases internal fixators are added to provide sufficient stability. However, how the rods of these fixators are loaded and whether the kind of approach affects these loads is still unknown. The aim of this in vitro study therefore was to determine the loads acting on fixator rods and cages after anterior compared to transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. METHODS: Six intact human lumbar spine specimens (L1-5) were loaded in a spine tester with pure moments (+/-7.5 N m) in the frontal, sagittal and transverse plane. Loading was repeated, first, after the segments L2-3 and L4-5 were instrumented either with an anterior or a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage "stand alone" and, second, after additional stabilisation with an internal fixator. The rods of the fixator and the four "corners" of the cages were instrumented with strain gauges. FINDINGS: The loads transmitted through the rods were highest in lateral bending. In this loading direction an axial distraction force of in median up to 140 N, an axial compression force of up to 100 N, and a resultant bending moment of up to 1.1 N m were measured in each rod. These loads tended to be lower for the anterior compared to the transforaminal approach. For comparison, the load applied was +/-7.5 N m. The axial strains recorded in the four "corners" of the cages considerably varied from one specimen to the other. Differences in cage strain between the two approaches could not be detected. INTERPRETATION: The loads acting on the rods of the fixator were small compared to the load that was applied. Thus, other structures such as the cages or the facet joints still play an important role in load transfer. The type of approach (anterior or transforaminal) had only little effect on the loading of the rods. This also applies to the local loading of the cages, which probably more depends on the fit between cage and endplates and on the local stiffness properties of the adjacent vertebral bodies.

A new acceleration apparatus for the study of whiplash with human cadaveric cervical spine specimens.

The biomechanics of whiplash is often studied using cadaveric cervical spine specimens. One of the most important points in this kind of study is to create realistic loading conditions. The aim of the present project therefore was to develop an acceleration apparatus, which allows the study of whiplash with human cadaveric cervical spine specimens under as realistic loading conditions as possible. The new acceleration apparatus mainly consisted of a sled, a pneumatic acceleration unit and a railtrack and offered several unique features to create more realistic loading conditions. Among these features, the possibility to simulate the passive movements of the trunk is of capital importance. In this new apparatus, first, the general feasibility of whiplash experiments was studied, second, the reproducibility of the impacts was quantified and third, the effect of simulated movements of the trunk on accelerations and loads was examined. In the new acceleration apparatus various types of collisions could reproducibly be simulated. Simulated passive movements of the trunk strongly influenced the loading pattern of the neck. Without pivoting a steep increase of all loading parameters could be observed. This increase was less pronounced if pivoting was allowed. In conclusion, biomechanical aspects of whiplash could reproducibly be examined in the new acceleration apparatus. Due to its significant effects on the loading of the neck, pivoting of the trunk should always be taken into account in future experiments on the biomechanics of whiplash in which isolated cervical spine specimens are used.

In vitro low-speed side collisions cause injury to the lower cervical spine but do not damage alar ligaments.

Whether injuries to the alar ligaments could be responsible for complaints of patients having whiplash injury in the upper cervical spine is still controversially discussed. It is known that these ligaments protect the upper cervical spine against excessive lateral bending and axial rotation movements. The objective of the present in vitro study was therefore to examine whether the alar ligaments or any other structures of the cervical spine are damaged in side collisions. In a specially designed acceleration apparatus, six human osteoligamentous cervical spine specimens were subjected to incremental 90 degrees side collisions from the right (1 g, 2 g, 3 g, etc.) until structural failure occurred. A damped pivot table accounted for the passive movements of the trunk during collision, and a dummy head (4.5 kg) ensured almost physiological loading of the specimens. For quantification of functional injuries, the three-dimensional flexibility of the specimens was tested in a spine tester before and after each acceleration. In all six specimens, structural failure always occurred in the lower cervical spine and always affected the facet joint capsules and the intervertebral discs. In four specimens, this damage occurred during the 2 g collision, while in the other two it occurred during the 3 g and 4 g collision, respectively. The flexibility mainly increased in the lower cervical spine (especially in lateral bending to both sides) and, to a minor extent, in axial rotation. In vitro low-speed side collisions caused functional and structural injury to discoligamentous structures of the lower cervical spine, but did not damage the alar ligaments. Since the effects of muscle forces were not taken into account, the present in vitro study reflects a worst-case scenario. Injury thresholds should therefore not be transferred to reality.

Finite helical axes of motion are a useful tool to describe the three-dimensional in vitro kinematics of the intact, injured and stabilised spine.

The finite helical-axes method can be used to describe the three-dimensional in vitro kinematics of the spine. However, this method still suffers from large stochastic calculation errors and poorly conceived visualisation techniques. The aim of the present study, therefore, was to improve the currently used finite helical axes description, by use of a less error-prone calculation algorithm and a new visualisation technique, and to apply this improved method to the study of the three-dimensional in vitro kinematics of the spine. Three-dimensional, continuous motion data of spinal motion segments were used to calculate the position and orientation of the finite helical axes (FHAs). The axes were then projected on plane antero-posterior, lateral and axial radiographs in order to depict the relation to the anatomy of each individual specimen. A hinge joint was used to estimate the measurement error of data collection and axes calculation. In an exemplary in vitro experiment, this method was used to demonstrate the ability of a prosthetic disc nucleus to restore the three-dimensional motion pattern of lumbar motion segments. In the validation experiment with the hinge joint, the calculated FHAs were lying within +/-2.5 mm of the actual joint axis and were inclined relative to this axis at up to +/-1.5 degrees . In the exemplary in vitro experiment, the position and orientation of the FHAs of the intact specimens were subject to large inter-individual differences in all loading directions. Nucleotomy of the lumbar segments caused the axes to spread out, indicating complex coupled motions. The implantation of the prosthetic disc nucleus, for the most part, more than reversed this effect: the axes became oriented almost parallel to each other. The experiments showed that the present improved description of finite helical axes is a valid and useful tool to characterise the three-dimensional in vitro kinematics of the intact, injured and stabilised spine. The main advantage of this new method is the comprehensive visualisation of joint function with respect to the individual anatomy.

[Accident analytics for structural traumas of the cervical spine]. / Unfallanalytik bei strukturellen Verletzungen der Halswirbelsäule.

The differentiation between degenerative syndromes of the cervical spine and post-traumatic symptoms requires accident analysis. Experiments with human subjects yield data only in the low-energy range, and there are still no accident analyses of structural traumas of the cervical spine. From 1 January 2000 to 30 April 2002, 15 patients with structural injuries to the cervical spine due to car accidents were treated in the Department of Trauma Surgery of the University of Ulm. In 11 of these cases, the DEKRA Ulm completed an appraisal of the accident process.With lateral impacts, structural injuries to the cervical spine can occur even at speeds of only ca 10 km/h. Injuries to the alar ligaments are produced by frontal collisions with substantial differences in speed. Data from accident analysis of structural injuries to the cervical spine must be taken into consideration in causality examinations of distortions of the cervical spine.

Expression and localization of estrogen receptor alpha, estrogen receptor beta and progesterone receptor in the bovine oviduct in vivo and in vitro.

This study examined the regulation and localization of estrogen receptors alpha and beta (ERalpha, ERbeta) and progesterone receptor (PR) in the bovine oviduct. Oviduct epithelial cells from cycling cows (in vivo) were investigated. In addition, the reactivity of a cell suspension culture stimulated with physiological doses of estradiol-17beta (E2) or progesterone (P4) was tested (in vitro). The specific steroid receptor expression of oviductal cells was quantified for mRNA using real-time RT-PCR. Furthermore, steroid receptor proteins were analyzed by Western blotting and localized by immunohistochemistry in situ. Obvious cyclic changes of receptor expression in vivo were observed and concurrent expression patterns were detected in vitro. PR and ERalpha mRNA transcripts were elevated in vivo during the follicular phase. The highest PR and ERalpha protein expression was detected subsequently during the early-luteal phase. In vitro, E2-supplementation resulted in an upregulation of PR and ERalpha. Both ERbeta mRNA and protein expression were highest during the luteal phase in vivo and elevated ERbeta expression levels were observed in vitro after P4 treatment. Evidence is provided for a varying expression of ERalpha, ERbeta and PR in bovine oviducts at different cycle stages in vivo, respectively under steroid supplementation in vitro. The region specific and cycle dependent expression differences point towards a functional importance of the three steroid receptors in the bovine oviduct, the site of fertilization and early embryonic development.

[Stabilizing effect and sintering tendency of 3 different cages and bone cement for fusion of cervical vertebrae segments]. / Stabilisierende Wirkung und Sinterungstendenz dreier unterschiedlicher Cages und Knochenzement zur Fusion von Halswirbelsäulensegmenten.

Important requirement for spinal fusion devices for segment are that they provide sufficient stability and guarantee a low subsidence risk. An important requirement for spinal fusion devices for segments are that they provide sufficient stability and guarantee a low subsidence risk. Therefore, in the following in vitro study, the stabilizing effect and subsidence tendency of cervical fusion cages and bone cement were investigated during cyclic loading. The WING cages (Medinorm AG) and BAK cages (Spinetec) made of titanium, the carbon fiber reinforced PEEK cage from Acromed (DePuy Acromed), and bone cement (PMMA, Sulzer) were tested. Twenty-four human cervical spine specimens were first tested intact with a standardized flexibility test (+/- 2.5 Nm). Then the implants were inserted and the primary stability determined. For the simulation of the postoperative loading of the cervical spine a cyclic loading protocol with 700 loading cycles was performed. In this test pure moments +/- 2.0 Nm in 9 different loading directions in randomized order were applied together with a 50 N preload to simulate the weight of the head. The subsidence and "long term stability" was measured after 50, 100, 200, 300, 500, and 700 cycles. All implants had a stabilizing effect in all directions most obviously in lateral bending. Here the range of motion was between 20.9% (AcroMed Cage), and 62% (BAK Cage) with respect to the intact specimen (100%). In laterial bending, flexion, and axial rotation the AcroMed cage stabilized the most followed by the bone cement, WING and BAK Cage. In extension the specimens treated with bone cement were the most stable. After 700 loading cycles the specimens with the BAK cage lost 1.6 mm in height, with the WING Cage 0.8 mm, with the Acromed 0.7 mm, and with the bone cement 0.5 mm. Two Acromed Cages dislocated during the long term testing. Cages have the potential to stabilize as effectively as bone cement. A smaller contact area, however, causes a higher subsidence risk compared to bone cement but increases the fusion area, thus increasing the chance of obtaining bony fusion.

[Dislocation tendency, stabilizing effect and sintering tendency of different lumbar vertebrae cages in an in vitro experiment]. / Dislokationstendenz, stabilisierende Wirkung und Einbruchtendenz unterschiedlicher LWS-Cages im In-vitro-Experiment.

For biomechanical purposes, interbody fusion cages should not dislocate, should provide high stability, and should have a low subsidence risk. Zientek (Marquardt Medzintechnik), Stryker (Stryker Implants), and Ray lumbar interbody fusion cages (Surgical Dynamics) were tested in this study. They were implanted by pairs from a posterior approach without further stabilization. In a first step, each cage design was implanted into four human L3-4 segments and extracted posteriorly under an axial preload of 200 N. In a second step, standard flexibility tests were carried out with 24 human L2-3 and L4-5 specimens in an intact condition, directly after cage implantation, and after cyclic axial compression loading (200-1000 N, 40,000 cycles, 5 Hz). In a third step, a destructive axial compression test was carried out. Maximum pullout force was highest with Ray cages (median 945 N), followed by Zientek (605 N) and Stryker cages (130 N). With all three cage designs, primary stability was higher in lateral bending and flexion than in extension and axial rotation. Implantation of Ray cages caused a decreased range of motion in all three loading directions ranging between 49% and 99%. Zientek cages only stabilized in lateral bending, flexion, and extension (45-78%) and Stryker cages in none of the three loading directions. Cyclic loading caused an increased range of motion in all cases up to 190%. Axial compression force at failure was 8413 N with Ray cages, 8359 N with Stryker cages, and 5486 N with Zientek cages. The cage design seems to influence the dislocation tendency. In this regard, threaded cages or cages with anchorage systems seem to provide more security. The stabilizing effect seems to be mainly influenced by factors such as the degree of distraction or destruction of the facet joints rather than by the cage design.

Mechanically simulated muscle forces strongly stabilize intact and injured upper cervical spine specimens.

Although muscles are assumed to be capable of stabilizing the spinal column in vivo, they have only rarely been simulated in vitro. Their effect might be of particular importance in unstable segments. The present study therefore tests the hypothesis that mechanically simulated muscle forces stabilize intact and injured cervical spine specimens. In the first step, six human occipito-cervical spine specimens were loaded intact in a spine tester with pure moments in lateral bending (+/- 1.5 N m), flexion-extension (+/- 1.5 N m) and axial rotation (+/- 0.5 N m). In the second step, identical flexibility tests were carried out during constant traction of three mechanically simulated muscle pairs: splenius capitits (5 N), semispinalis capitis (5 N) and longus colli (15 N). Both steps were repeated after unilateral and bilateral transection of the alar ligaments. The muscle forces strongly stabilized C0-C2 in all loading and injury states. This was most obvious in axial rotation, where a reduction of range of motion (ROM) and neutral zone to <50% (without muscles=100%) was observed. With increasing injury the normalized ROM (intact condition=100%) increased with and without muscles approximately to the same extend. With bilateral injury this increase was 125-132% in lateral bending, 112%-119% in flexion-extension and 103-116% in axial rotation. Mechanically simulated cervical spine muscles strongly stabilized intact and injured cervical spine specimens. Nevertheless, it could be shown that in vitro flexibility tests without muscle force simulation do not necessarily lead to an overestimation of spinal instability if the results are normalized to the intact state.

Regulation of the expression and bioactivation of the epidermal growth factor receptor system by estradiol in pig oviduct and endometrium.

Growth factors, such as epidermal growth factor (EGF), have been suggested to mediate local effects of steroid hormones within female reproductive tissue. In the present study, the influence of estrogen on the expression and bioactivity of the EGF receptor (EGF-R) system was investigated in pigs. Oviducal and endometrial tissue from gilts was analysed either at two different time points after ovulation (Day 12 and Day 20), or from ovariectomized animals, with or without steroid-replacement treatment. Estrogen receptor protein concentrations were significantly down-regulated both in oviducal and endometrial tissue under estrogen-influence, in contrast to increased progesterone receptor concentrations. Transcript levels of EGF and transforming growth factor alpha remained unchanged in both the oviduct and endometrium during treatment. Oviducal EGF-R mRNA was found to be increased after estradiol treatment with concurrent increases in EGF-R protein. However, in endometrial tissue of estradiol-substituted ovariectomized pigs, the receptor transcript was significantly reduced, indicating a different regulation of EGF-R transcription within the endometrium. The bioactivity of the EGF-R, analysed by tyrosine kinase assays, was preserved throughout experiments in the porcine oviduct and endometrium without obvious changes caused by the steroids. In conclusion, estradiol may play a key role during the proliferation and differentiation of porcine oviducal tissue by activating the important paracrine or autocrine EGF system through its receptor. The cell-specific influence of progesterone during regulation of the EGF-R expression in the endometrium requires further investigation.

Effects of neck movements on stability and subsidence in cervical interbody fusion: an in vitro study.

OBJECT: The aim of this in vitro study was to determine the influence of simulated postoperative neck movements on the stabilizing effect and subsidence of four different anterior cervical interbody fusion devices. Emphasis was placed on the relation between subsidence and spinal stability. METHODS: The flexibility of 24 human cervical spine specimens was tested before and directly after being stabilized with a WING, BAK/C, AcroMed I/F cage, or with bone cement in standard flexibility tests under 50 N axial preload. Thereafter, 700 pure moment loading cycles (+/- 2 Nm) were applied in randomized directions to simulate physiological neck movements. Additional flexibility tests in combination with measurements of the subsidence depth were conducted after 50, 100, 200, 300, 500, and 700 loading cycles. In all four groups, simulated postoperative neck movements caused an increase of the range of motion (ROM) ranging from 0.4 to 3.1 degrees and of the neutral zone from 0.1 to 4.2 degrees. This increase in flexibility was most distinct in extension followed by flexion, lateral bending, and axial rotation. After cyclic loading, ROM tended to be lower in the group fitted with AcroMed cages (3.3 degrees in right lateral bending, 3.5 degrees in left axial rotation, 7.8 degrees in flexion, 8.3 degrees in extension) and in the group in which bone cement was applied (5.4 degrees, 2.5 degrees, 7.4 degrees, and 8.8 degrees, respectively) than in those fixed with the WING (6.3 degrees, 5.4 degrees, 9.7 degrees, and 6.9 degrees, respectively) and BAK cages (6.2 degrees, 4.5 degrees, 10.2 degrees, and 11.6 degrees, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Simulated repeated neck movements not only caused an increase of the flexibility but also subsidence of the implants into the adjacent vertebrae. The relation between flexibility increase and subsidence seemed to depend on the implant design: subsiding BAK/C cages partially supported stability whereas subsiding WING cages and AcroMed cages did not.

Resistance of the lumbar spine against axial compression forces after implantation of three different posterior lumbar interbody cages.

BACKGROUND: The aim of using interbody fusion cages is to distract the degeneratively decreased disc height to decompress the neural structures in the intervertebral foramina and allow bony fusion. Prerequisite for a successful fusion therapy is a high resistance against subsidence and breakage. METHOD: Three types of implants, a cylindrical threaded titanium cage (Ray) (1c), a bullet shaped PEEK cage (Stryker) (1a) and a rectangular titanium cage with an endplate anchorage device (Marquardt) (1b) were implanted in eight monosegmental lumbar spine specimens (L 2/3 and L 4/5). Each specimen underwent a cyclic loading test with 40000 cycles at a rate of 5 Hz. A cyclic axial compression force ranging from 200 Newton [N] to 1000 N was applied and the axial translation recorded simultaneously to determine the subsidence tendency. After this procedure the specimens were tested with a progressive axial force until breakage. FINDINGS: There were only small differences in the subsidence tendency for the three cage designs. The height reduction due to cyclic loading ranged between 0.9 mm (Marquardt), 1.2 mm (Stryker) and 1.4 mm (Ray). The median break force ranged from 5486 N (Marquardt), 8359 N (Stryker) to 8413 N (Ray). No correlation between bone mineral density and failure load could be detected. INTERPRETATION: Endplate preparation and cage design of the tested implants do not seem to influence the resistance of the segment against cyclic axial compression. The compression with a continuously increasing load revealed that an implant-bone failure is not to be expected in physiological limits for all three cage types.

Subsidence resulting from simulated postoperative neck movements: an in vitro investigation with a new cervical fusion cage.

STUDY DESIGN: A biomechanical in vitro subsidence test of different cervical interbody fusion devices was performed using a new testing protocol that simulates physiologic conditions. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of simulated postoperative neck movements on the subsidence of the new WING cervical interbody fusion cage in comparison with two other cages and bone cement. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cervical interbody fusion cages sometimes cause complications because of subsidence into the adjacent vertebrae with collapse of the intervertebral space. Complications such as cage dislocation or nonunion with instability also have been reported. To prevent such complications, the new WING cervical interbody fusion cage (Medinorm AG, Quierschied, Germany) has been developed. Its area of contact with the adjacent vertebrae is supposed to be large enough to resist excessive subsidence and small enough to prevent stress protection of the tissue growing in the cage. METHODS: In this study, 24 human cervical spine specimens were tested after stabilization with either a WING, BAK/C, AcroMed I/F cage or bone cement. Then, in a new testing protocol, 700 pure-moment loading cycles (+/-2 Nm) were applied in randomized directions (lateral bending, flexion-extension, and axial rotation alone or in combination with each other) to simulate the patient's neck movements during the first few postoperative days. Measurements of the subsidence depth (total height loss) in combination with flexibility tests (+/-2.5 Nm) were performed before cyclic loading and after 50, 100, 200, 300, 500, and 700 loading cycles. RESULTS: Cyclic loading caused subsidence in all four device groups, most distinct with BAK/C-cages (1.63 mm after 700 loading cycles) followed by the new WING (0.90 mm) and the AcroMed (0.82 mm) cages. No statistically significant difference could be found among the three cage designs. However, all three cage types showed a significantly higher subsidence depth than bone cement (0.48 mm;P = 0.023 between each of the three cage-types and bone cement). A moderate correlation between bone mineral density and subsidence depth could be found only in the BAK/C group (r2 = 0.495). A large subsidence depth after 700 loading cycles was associated with a large flexibility increase in the WING (r2 = 0.786) and AcroMed groups (r2 = 0.21), but with a small flexibility increase in the BAK/C group (r2 = 0.58). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative neck movements caused subsidence in all cervical interbody implant types. The new WING cage and the AcroMed cage seemed to have a better resistance against subsidence than the BAK/C cage. However, all three cage types had a significantly higher subsidence tendency than bone cement.