Comparison of Surgical Outcome of Bipolar Scissors with Conventional Cold Dissection Tonsillectomy.

Background The tonsillectomy is the most common Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) surgical procedure. Different methods have been used to improve the outcome of the surgery. One such method is tonsillectomy performed with bipolar scissors. In our scenario, the comparison of bipolar scissors tonsillectomy with conventional cold dissection has not been done. Objective To compare the surgical outcomes of bipolar scissors tonsillectomy and conventional cold dissection tonsillectomy. Method A prospective randomized study was conducted in 40 patients who underwent tonsillectomy on one side using bipolar scissors and on the other side using conventional cold dissection. Intraoperative blood loss, operation time, postoperative pain, and postoperative hemorrhage were all analyzed in both surgical techniques. Result The median operative time was 10 minutes for bipolar scissors compared with 12 minutes for conventional cold dissection, with a p-value of 0.390 which was not statistically significant. The median blood loss was 48 mL on the bipolar scissors side and 60 mL on the conventional cold dissection side, with a p-value of 0.232 which was also not statistically significant. The overall postoperative hemorrhage rate was 12.5%. Of these, 4 (10%) occurred on the bipolar scissors side (left side mainly) and 1 (2.5%) on the conventional cold dissection side (also left side), with a p-value of 0.002 which was statistically significant. There was no statistically significant difference in the pain scores between the two methods in both rest and swallowing (p > 0.05). Conclusion The bipolar scissors did not show any benefit over conventional cold dissection in terms of surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, or postoperative pain. However, postoperative hemorrhage was more common with bipolar scissors. Therefore, conventional cold dissection remains a safe technique for tonsillectomy in adult patients.

Rhino-Orbital Mucormycosis in a COVID-19 Patient: A Dreadful Challenge.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a pandemic disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2). COVID-19 infections may be associated with a wide range of bacterial and fungal co-infections. Recent studies are reporting invasive fungal infection associated with severe COVID-19. Herein, we report a case of COVID-19 rhino-orbital mucormycosis infection caused by Rhizopus sps in a 32 year old diabetic patient who was successfully managed with early aggressive debridement of infected tissue endoscopically with extended ethmoidectomy by modified Denker's approach along with orbital decompression and antifungal therapy with Liposomal Amphotericin B and Posaconazole. Serial diagnostic nasal endoscopy showed no evidence of progression of the infection. The patient was discharged on 21st day of hospitalization still on oral Posaconazole for a total of 3 months.

A study of Deep Neck Space Infections at Kathmandu University Dhulikhel Hospital.

Background Deep neck infections are severe infections in potential spaces and fascial planes of the neck. Despite antibiotic therapy, these infections continue to cause significant morbidity and mortality. Objective To determine the clinical features, predisposing factors, socio demographic factors and complications associated with deep neck infections. Method Prospective study conducted in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kathmandu University Dhulikhel Hospital between March 2018 and June 2020. Seventy-five patients with deep neck infections were enrolled. Result Submandibular abscess was most frequently observed (41.3%), followed by submental abscess (25.3%), parotid abscess(9.3%), ludwig's angina (6.7%), posterior triangle of neck abscess (4%), retropharyngeal abscess (2.7%), parapharyngeal space abscess (2.7%), and multiple space infections (8%). Staphylococcus aureus was the most common organism (53.3%), followed by Beta hemolytic Streptococcus (12%) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (12%). A negative culture was seen in 22.7%. Sixty-eight percent of patients underwent incision and drainage. Incision and drainage with dental extraction was done in 26.7%, four percent underwent incision and drainage with debridement and dental extraction, whereas 1.3% underwent incision and drainage with tracheostomy. Eight percent patients required Intensive care unit admission. Seven patients had descending mediastinitis, four out of which developed sepsis. When age and duration of hospital stay were correlated by using Pearson correlation coefficient, a remarkable correlation was observed (p=.020). Noteworthy relationship was not observed between different locations of deep neck infections and duration of hospital stay (p=.202). Conclusion Early identification of deep neck infections is often challenging. Proper knowledge and extreme vigilance is necessary when dealing with these complex entities to avoid life-threatening complications.