Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
JACC Case Rep ; 2(12): 1932-1936, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34317083

ABSTRACT

A 70-year-old male with prior orthotopic heart transplant developed left bundle branch block followed by new-onset left ventricular systolic dysfunction. He underwent His bundle pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy with complete normalization of his ejection fraction. This is the first reported case of left bundle branch block-induced cardiomyopathy in a transplanted heart. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).

3.
Vasc Med ; 22(4): 307-315, 2017 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28693409

ABSTRACT

The impact of heart failure (HF) on long-term survival in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) has not been well described. Outcomes stratified by left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) are also unknown. A single center retrospective chart review was performed for patients who underwent treatment for CLI from 2006 to 2013. Baseline demographics, procedural data and outcomes were analyzed. HF diagnosis was based on appropriate signs and symptoms as well as results of non-invasive testing. Among 381 CLI patients, 120 (31%) had a history of HF and 261 (69%) had no history of heart failure (no-HF). Within the HF group, 74 (62%) had HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and 46 (38%) had HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The average EF for those with no-HF, HFpEF and HFrEF were 59±13% vs 56±9% vs 30±9%, respectively. The likelihood of having concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) was lowest in the no-HF group (43%), higher in the HFpEF group (70%) and highest in the HFrEF group (83%) ( p=0.001). Five-year survival was on average twofold higher in the no-HF group (43%) compared to both the HFpEF (19%, p=0.001) and HFrEF groups (24%, p=0.001). Long-term survival rates did not differ between the two HF groups ( p=0.50). There was no difference in 5-year freedom from major amputation or freedom from major adverse limb events between the no-HF, HFpEF and HFrEF groups, respectively. Overall, the combination of CLI and HF is associated with poor 5-year survival, independent of the degree of left ventricular systolic dysfunction.


Subject(s)
Endovascular Procedures , Heart Failure/complications , Ischemia/therapy , Peripheral Arterial Disease/therapy , Stroke Volume , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/complications , Ventricular Function, Left , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Amputation, Surgical , California , Critical Illness , Disease-Free Survival , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Endovascular Procedures/mortality , Female , Heart Failure/diagnosis , Heart Failure/mortality , Heart Failure/physiopathology , Humans , Ischemia/complications , Ischemia/mortality , Ischemia/physiopathology , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Limb Salvage , Male , Middle Aged , Peripheral Arterial Disease/complications , Peripheral Arterial Disease/mortality , Peripheral Arterial Disease/physiopathology , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/diagnosis , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/mortality , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/physiopathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...