Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Prenat Diagn ; 42(12): 1554-1561, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36097373

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine foetal losses for DCDA and MCDA twins following transabdominal CVS or amniocentesis performed <22+0  weeks. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study conducted in the UK and Belgium 01/01/00-01/06/20. Cases with unknown chorionicity, monochorionic complications or complex procedures were excluded. Uncomplicated DCDA and MCDA twins without invasive procedures were identified as controls. We reported foetal losses <24+0  weeks and losses of genetically and structurally normal foetuses. RESULTS: Outcomes were compared for DCDA foetuses; 258 after CVS with 3406 controls, 406 after amniocentesis with 3390 controls plus MCDA foetuses, 98 after CVS with 1124 controls, and 160 after amniocentesis with 1122 controls. There were more losses <24+0  weeks with both procedures in DCDA (CVS RR 5.54 95% CI 3.38-9.08, amniocentesis RR 2.36 95% CI 1.22-4.56) and MCDA twins (CVS RR 5.14 95% CI 2.51-10.54, amniocentesis RR 7.01 95% CI 3.86-12.74). Losses of normal foetuses were comparable to controls (DCDA CVS RR 0.39 95% CI 0.05-2.83, DCDA amniocentesis RR 1.16 95% CI 0.42-3.22, MCDA CVS RR 2.3 95% CI 0.71-7.56, and MCDA amniocentesis RR 1.93 95% CI 0.59-6.38). CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates increased foetal losses for DCDA and MCDA twins following CVS and amniocentesis with uncertain risk to normal foetuses.


Subject(s)
Amniocentesis , Chorionic Villi Sampling , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Chorionic Villi Sampling/adverse effects , Amniocentesis/adverse effects , Pregnancy, Twin , Retrospective Studies , Fetus
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36123247

ABSTRACT

Monochorionic monoamniotic (MCMA) twin pregnancy is rare and associated with increased complication rates when compared with singletons, dichorionic and monochorionic diamniotic pregnancy in general. Monoamnionicity presents an enormous challenge following its accurate diagnosis, where the absence of an inter-twin membrane subsequently results in cord entanglement and consistently fluctuating foetal position. Furthermore, the detection of twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) in MCMA pregnancy can be challenging in the absence of amniotic fluid volume discordance without the presence of the inter-twin dividing membrane. Early surveillance of foetal anatomy permits early recognition of foetal structural anomalies, the twin reversed arterial perfusion (TRAP) sequence and conjoined twins. However, the evidence on how best to monitor MCMA pregnancies remains inadequate, though observational studies have demonstrated that once surveillance is initiated, the potential risk of foetal death decreases significantly. In-utero foetal demise can be acute and unpredictable in MCMA pregnancies, despite close surveillance. Elective preterm delivery is usually advocated when the risk of foetal loss upon continuing the pregnancy outweighs the risk of prematurity - around 33 weeks' gestation by caesarean section. Nevertheless, the optimal prenatal surveillance regimen and prompts for delivery have yet to be defined.


Subject(s)
Fetofetal Transfusion , Pregnancy, Twin , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Humans , Female , Cesarean Section , Ultrasonography, Prenatal/methods , Gestational Age , Fetofetal Transfusion/diagnostic imaging , Fetal Death/etiology , Twins, Monozygotic
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...