The risk of pet animals in spreading severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and public health importance: An updated review.

Since the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 was first identified in 2019, it has been reported that the virus could infect a variety of animals either naturally or experimentally. This review discusses the occurrence SARS-CoV-2 in dogs and cats and the role of these animals in transmitting coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) to their owners. The data were collected from epidemiological studies and case reports that focused on studying the occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 in pet animals and their owners. Epidemiological studies and case reports indicate that dogs and cats are infected with SARS-CoV-2 either naturally or experimentally; however, the global number of naturally infected animals is far lower than the number of people who have COVID-19. These studies demonstrate that pet animals acquire the infection from direct contact with COVID-19-infected owners. Currently, there are no studies reporting that dogs and cats can transmit SARS-CoV-2 to other animals and humans, under natural conditions. The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in companion animals (dogs and cats) in different countries worldwide raises concerns that pets are at higher risk for spreading and transmitting SARS-CoV-2 to humans and other animals, which poses a hazard to the public health. Therefore, investigating the role of dogs and cats in the transmission and epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 will help us to design and implement appropriate preventive measures against the further transmission of SARS-CoV-2.

The prognostic value of procalcitonin in critically ill cases of systematic inflammatory response syndrome in dogs.

Using markers for early diagnosis can help to reduce mortality and morbidity in systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). This study investigates the role of procalcitonin (PCT) as a prognostic value in dogs with SIRS in the intensive care unit. Fifty-five dogs were selected and studied. Blood samples were collected and investigated for PCT, white and red blood cells, iron, creatinine, platelet, glucose, albumin, urea, interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), bandcell, body temperature, and hospitalized days and costs. The animals were grouped into survivors and deceased groups, and their results were compared. The results showed negative significant relations between PCT with hematocrit (r 2 = 0.294, P < 0.05) and the serum concentration of iron (r 2 = 0.280, P < 0.05) and also positive relation with IL-6 (r 2 = 0.456, P < 0.01) and TNF-α (r 2 = 0.391, P < 0.01). Significant relations were not seen between PCT with other parameters (P > 0.05). The results also showed a significant relation between glucose and albumin with body temperature (P < 0.05). The results showed that the serum concentrations of PCT, IL-6, and TNF-α were significantly higher in deceased dogs compared with survivors, while white blood cells, glucose, albumin, urea, lymphocyte, neutrophil, and body temperature were higher in survivors compared with others. PCT can be utilized as a prognostic value and helps early diagnosis in dogs with SIRS.

Effects of topical administration of tafluprost and combination of tafluprost and timolol or tafluprost and betaxolol on Schirmer tear test, intraocular pressure, and pupil size in clinically healthy dogs.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of 0.0015% preservative-free (PF) tafluprost alone and in combination with 0.5% timolol maleate or 0.5% betaxolol HCl on Schirmer tear test (STT), intraocular pressure (IOP), and pupil diameter (PD) in clinically normal dogs. METHODS: Twenty-one healthy adult castrated male cross-bred dogs were used in this study. Dogs were randomly divided into three groups. The first group received one drop of (PF) tafluprost (Taf), in a randomly selected eye. The second group received one drop of (PF) tafluprost plus one drop of timolol maleate (Taf-Tim), and the last group received one drop of (PF) tafluprost plus one drop of betaxolol HCl, (Taf-Bet). In all groups, the fellow eyes were served as control and received one drop of saline as a placebo. IOP, STT, and PD measurements were performed at the baseline and every 30 min for the first 2 h, every 2 h for the next 10 h, and at 24 h and 36 h post-instillation (PI). RESULTS: In all groups, significant differences in IOP values were observed between treated and untreated eyes (Taf: p < 0.001, Taf-Tim: p = 0.014, Taf-Bet: p = 0.008). The maximum reduction in mean IOP after unilateral administration of Taf, Taf-Tim, and Taf-Bet was 8.3 mmHg, 10.7 mmHg, and 13 mmHg, respectively. No significant differences in STT values were observed between treated and untreated eyes at any time points. In all groups, significant differences in PD values were observed between treated and untreated eyes in all time points except the baseline and 36 h post-drug instillation (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Tafluprost alone or in combination with timolol and betaxolol was able to reduce intraocular pressure. The greatest effect of the drugs occurred 6 and 8 h PI. The present study revealed that the combination of tafluprost/betaxolol is more potent in decreasing IOP than tafluprost alone or a combination of tafluprost/timolol in healthy dogs.

Genetic characterisation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius in pets and veterinary personnel in Iran: new insights into emerging methicillin-resistant S. pseudintermedius (MRSP).

OBJECTIVES: Methicillin-resistant staphylococci, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (MRSP), pose a threat to animal and human health worldwide. Veterinary staff and pets may play a role in the spread of resistant clones. METHODS: A total of 125 samples from veterinary staff (n=50), dogs (n=49) and cats (n=26) were investigated. Obtained isolates were tested for the methicillin resistance gene mecA and were subjected to multiplex PCR to differentiate coagulase-positive species. Following SCCmec and spa typing, isolates were tested for the presence of various toxin and virulence genes and phenotypic resistance to common antimicrobials. RESULTS: Overall, 4 MRSA were isolated from two veterinarians and two dogs and 19 MRSP were found in eleven dogs (12 isolates) and five cats (7 isolates). The MRSA isolates possessed sea (2) and eta (3) virulence genes and the MRSP isolates possessed sea (6), expA (15), expB (1) and siet (19) genes. SCCmec type II and three spa types (t186, t1816 and t10897) were identified in the MRSA isolates. Most of the MRSP isolates belonged to SCCmec types II (2 isolates) and V (10 isolates); however, the remaining 7 isolates were untypeable and contained class C1 mec. The majority of isolates were multidrug-resistant (MDR). CONCLUSION: These findings show that pets and veterinarians could be potential sources of MDR-MRSA and MDR-MRSP in Iran. Taken together, these findings warrant future investigations on the epidemiology and public-health significance of MDR-MRSA and MDR-MRSP both in veterinarians and companion animals in Iran.