Management of orthodontically induced white spot lesions: A survey of the orthodontic practitioners of Pakistan.

Objective: To assess the level of awareness among orthodontic practitioners about the diagnosis and management of orthodontically induced white spot lesions. METHODS: The cross-sectional study was conducted from August 28, 2022, to March 3, 2023, at Bakhtawar Amin Medical and Dental College, Multan, and comprised orthodontic specialists and postgraduate residents. Data was collected using a 14-item questionnaire regarding diagnosis and management of orthodontically induced white spot lesions. The questionnaire was disseminated online, and the responses were compared between the groups. Data was analysed using SPSS 24. RESULTS: Of the 278 subjects, 205(73.7%) were residents; 156(75%) females and 49(24%) males with mean professional experience of 4.24±4.08 years. There were 73(26.3%) specialists; 44(60.3%) females and 29(39.7%) males with mean professional experience 9.07±4.85 years. There were 48(66%) specialists and 131(64%) residents who thought the most commonly affected teeth with WSL were maxillary central incisors, while 30(41%) specialists and 38(33%) residents said the least commonly affected tooth was maxillary canine. Among the specialists, 29(38%) considered halting treatment and regular follow-up as the best approach for managing white spot lesions detected during orthodontic treatment, while 76(37%) residents preferred to use fluorides and casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate. There were significant differences between the specialists and residents for the items related to the incidence of white spot lesions, timing for additional precautions and measures for detection, management during active treatment and modalities of prevention (p<0.05). Conclusion: Despite being fairly common in orthodontic patients, the awareness regarding white spot lesions and related management protocols was found to be dubious in orthodontic practitioners, depicting lack of a standardised protocol.

Alveolar bone loss and root resorption in mesialized second molars in mandibular first molar extraction cases as compared to contralateral non-extraction side in young adults: A retrospective cross-sectional study.

INTRODUCTION: The alveolar bone loss (ABL) and external apical root resorption (EARR) depict the safety of mesialization of mandibular second molars into the extraction space of mandibular first molars. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ABL and EARR after closure of mandibular first molar extraction space by mesialization of second molar on extraction side (ES) as compared to the contralateral non-extraction side (NES). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study was carried out using the pre and posttreatment orthodontic records of young adults with complete set of permanent dentitions treated with extraction of unilateral mandibular first molar and non-extraction treatment on the contralateral side. All patients underwent mini-implant supported mesialization of second molar on ES. The ABL and EARR of second molar on ES and contralateral NES were measured on digital orthopantomograms. The ABL and EARR of second molars on ES and contralateral NES were compared using independent sample t-test. RESULTS: A total of 36 subjects (14 males and 22 females) were included in the study. The mean treatment duration for molar mesialization was 28.75±8.05months. The mean crown and root movements of mandibular second molar on ES were 10.94±1.25mm and 9.04mm±1.14mm, as compared to 0.91±1.01mm and 0.77±0.83mm on contralateral NES, respectively. The mean ABL and EARR at mandibular second molar were found to be significantly greater on the ES than the contralateral NES (P<0.001 and<0.05, respectively). A total of seven patients (19.4%) experienced ABL≥1mm on ES as compared to none in the contralateral NES. EARR of>2mm of at least one root was found in seven patients (19.4%) in ES as compared to four (11%) in contralateral NES. CONCLUSION: There was small but statistically significant difference in the ABL and EARR of mesialized mandibular second molar at first molar ES as compared to the contralateral NES. For majority of patients this difference was small but few isolated cases experienced severe ABL and EARR.

Secundum Atrial Septal Defect With Early Presentation of Eisenmenger Syndrome and Right-Heart Failure: A Rare Case Report and Literature Review.

Eisenmenger syndrome, the most advanced form of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), poses a considerable risk to the survival and quality of life of patients. It is more commonly seen in large intra-cardiac defects like ventricular septal defects (VSD) or patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), and rarely in atrial septal defects (ASD). Early diagnosis is the single most important step in the definitive management of the condition; otherwise, only conservative treatment can be offered. In this report, we present the case of a 20-year-old female patient diagnosed with Eisenmenger syndrome secondary to a large secundum ASD. The patient responded well to medical treatment.

Endovascular repair of a large profunda femoris artery pseudoaneurysm.

Profunda femoris artery aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms are a rare cause of peripheral arterial aneurysms but their risk of rupture is quite high. We have presented a case of a left lower leg pseudoaneurysm. We have shown that endovascular repair with angioplasty and stenting is a suitable treatment method for such a pseudoaneurysm. Due to the limited data on this disease, we suggest multi-institute collaboration to identify and standardize management for the treatment.

Acute postoperative pain management by a surgical team in a tertiary care hospital: patients satisfaction.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the acute postoperative pain management by a surgical team and patient satisfaction in a tertiary care teaching hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 105 patients, ASA I & II, both sexes, mean age of 35.1 +/- 14.6 years, scheduled for general surgery under routine practice conditions, were included in the study. All patients were assessed 12 and 24 hours postoperatively by two numerical visual analogue scale (VAS 0-10), related to rest and dynamic pain. Patients were also requested to indicate their satisfaction level with the help of VAS. Data was analyzed by SPSS version 10. Student t test was applied to find significant differences between the groups. RESULTS: At 12 hours postoperatively mean rest and dynamic pain scores were 3.85 +/- 2.45 and 5.32 +/- 2.61 respectively. At 24 hours postoperatively mean rest and dynamic pain scores were 2.84 +/- 1.86 and 4.65 +/- 2.47 respectively. Overall, female patients experienced more pain but there was no statistically significant difference apart from rest pain at 24 hours. Forty-seven (44.8%) patients were very satisfied, 42 (40%) moderately satisfied and 16 (15.2%) patients were mildly satisfied with the pain management. CONCLUSION: Overall management of acute postoperative pain by surgical team in a tertiary care hospital was satisfactory. Most of patients were moderately to very satisfied by the care provided.