Treatment of genu valgum by a novel percutaneous transverse metaphyseal osteotomy of the distal femur in children and adolescents.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcomes of a novel percutaneous medial supracondylar femoral osteotomy and above-knee cast technique in children and adolescents as a minimally invasive surgical intervention for treatment of genu valgum. METHODS: In this prospective study, 60 patients (70 knees) with a tibiofemoral angle more than 15° were treated with a novel medial percutaneous supracondylar femoral osteotomy and above-knee cast and followed up for an average of 29 months. The radiological outcome was measured with MAD, TFA, and mLDFA. The functional outcome was evaluated by a modified Böstman score. RESULTS: The preoperative mean MAD, TFA, and mLDFA were 2.9 cm, 16.3°, and 79.2° respectively. The Böstman score averaged preoperatively 23.1. There was a significant improvement of all radiological and clinical outcome measures (P < 0.001). Per Böstman score, 2 knees in one patient (3%) showed an unsatisfactory result, while 14 (20%) and 54 (77%) knees had a good or excellent result, respectively. Two patients (three limbs) needed early re-casting. Other complications were not encountered. CONCLUSION: In experienced hands, percutaneous transverse metaphyseal femoral osteotomy and above-knee casting appear to be a safe, supracondylar cost-effective, and reliable minimally invasive acute correction technique in genu valgum in children and adolescents. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-therapeutic.

Treatment of non-united femoral neck fracture by a novel subtrochanteric angulation lateral translation valgus osteotomy (SALVA osteotomy).

PURPOSE: The ideal treatment of non-united and neglected fracture neck femur in the young adult still remains unclear and is characterized by many biological and biomechanical challenges. METHODS: Twenty-one patients with non-united or neglected fracture neck femur aged between 19 and 50 years were treated by a novel subtrochanteric valgus osteotomy and were followed up for a mean of 26.7 months. Patients were assessed by radiological parameters, the Harris Hip Score, Oxford Knee Score, and Askin Bryan Criteria to categorize the overall outcome of the patients at 24 months. Other outcome measures included the occurrence of AVN, adductor lever arm, leg length discrepancy, and mechanical implant failure. RESULTS: All patients treated with the SALVA osteotomy consolidated and displayed a marked improvement of functional and radiological outcome measures. Nevertheless, there were 2 mechanical failures in patients with marked osteopenia and three developed AVN. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with un-united/neglected fracture neck femur, SALVA osteotomy appears to be reliable and reproducible. It also restores the abductor lever arm and improves the leg length discrepancy. Technically less demanding conversion to arthroplasty remains still possible prospectively.

Dynamic stabilization for degenerative diseases in the lumbar spine: 2 years results.

Following lumbar fusion, adjacent segment degeneration has been frequently reported. Dynamic systems are believed to reduce main fusion drawbacks. We conducted a retrospective study on patients with degenerative lumbar disease treated with posterior dynamic stabilization with monoaxial hinged pedicular screws and lumbar decompression. VAS and ODI were used to compare clinical outcomes. As radiological outcomes, LL and SVA were used. 51 patients were included with an average follow-up of 24 months. 13 patients were revised because of postoperative radiculopathy (n=4), subcutaneous hematoma (n=2), L5 screw malposition (n=1) and adjacent segment disease (n=6). The mean ODI score 41 preoperatively compared to 36 postoperatively. The mean VAS scores for back and leg pain were 5.3 and 4.2, respectively compared to 4.5 and 4.0 postoperatively. The mean SVA was 5.3 cm preoperatively, and 5.7 cm postoperatively. The mean LL was 47.5° preoperatively and 45.5° postoperatively. From our data, which fail to show significant improvements and reflect a high revision rate, we cannot generally recommend dynamic stabilization as an alternative to fusion. Comparative trials with longer follow-ups are required.