Omalizumab Re-Treatment and Step-Up in Patients with Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: OPTIMA Trial.

BACKGROUND: Omalizumab shows greater clinical benefit with 300 mg dose than with the 150 mg dose. OBJECTIVE: To determine outcomes postwithdrawal, relapse, and re-treatment in omalizumab responders, and from stepping up to 300 mg after insufficient symptom control with 150 mg. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized (3:4), open-label, noncomparator study (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02161562). A total of 314 adult patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria and symptomatic on H1-antihistamines were enrolled between August 1, 2014, and November 6, 2015. Patients received 150 mg/300 mg omalizumab, every 4 weeks for 24 weeks. Omalizumab 150 mg dose could be stepped up to 300 mg between week 8 and week 24, if the 7-day sum of the daily Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7) was more than 6. If patients relapsed after treatment withdrawal at week 24, they could be re-treated with the same dose on which omalizumab was started. Patients on 300 mg could extend treatment by 12 weeks if they did not achieve symptom control on 300 mg in the initial dosing phase. The primary end point was the proportion of well-controlled patients who relapsed postwithdrawal, and achieved symptom control at the end of re-treatment. Symptom control was assessed using UAS7 (UAS7 ≤ 6 = well controlled). RESULTS: Overall, 115 of 314 patients had adequate symptom control at week 24 (end of the initial dosing period) and 56 were re-treated after relapse postwithdrawal; 87.8% (95% CI, 78.6%-96.9%) regained symptomatic control (UAS7 ≤ 6). Most (141 of 178) patients initially treated with 150 mg required step-up to 300 mg, which resulted in a 9.5-point (95% CI, 7.6-11.3) improvement in UAS7 over the mean change observed initially on 150 mg. CONCLUSIONS: Step-up to 300 mg helps a greater proportion of patients achieve symptom control, and re-treatment with omalizumab is as effective as initial therapy.

Predicting Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria Symptom Return After Omalizumab Treatment Discontinuation: Exploratory Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Omalizumab is highly effective in controlling chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) symptoms; however, patients can experience symptom return on treatment discontinuation. Pivotal clinical trials have identified 2 categories of patients who experience symptom return: rapid and slow. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify potential predictors of the speed of symptom return after stopping omalizumab treatment. METHODS: Phase III randomized controlled trial (RCT) data from ASTERIA I (n = 319; 6 × 4 weekly injections of omalizumab 75, 150, 300 mg or placebo; NCT01287117) and ASTERIA II (n = 323; 3 × 4 weekly injections of omalizumab 75, 150, 300 mg, or placebo; NCT01292473) were pooled to identify predictors of symptom return after stopping omalizumab treatment (16-week follow-up). The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regularization regression model was used to select predictive variables, and relapse probability was represented using heatmap visualizations. Model accuracy was tested using data from the GLACIAL phase III RCT (n = 336; 6 × 4 weekly injections of omalizumab 300 mg or placebo; NCT0126493). RESULTS: Of 746 variables assessed, 2 were selected by the model as predictors of symptom return: baseline urticaria activity score over 7 days (UAS7) and early area above the curve (AAC; determined by plotting the UAS7 scores across time points). Results suggest that high baseline UAS7 and low UAS7 AAC (slow decrease of symptoms) indicate a higher probability of rapid symptom return than low baseline UAS7 and high UAS7 AAC. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the probability of rapid symptom return in patients with CSU who discontinue treatment with omalizumab can be estimated based on baseline UAS7 and early treatment response.

Comparison of Urticaria Activity Score Over 7 Days (UAS7) Values Obtained from Once-Daily and Twice-Daily Versions: Results from the ASSURE-CSU Study.

BACKGROUND: The Urticaria Activity Score summed over 7 days (UAS7) assesses the itch severity and hive count in chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) using once- or twice-daily diary-based documentation. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the comparability of twice-daily versus once-daily versions of the UAS and the resulting UAS7 values. METHODS: Data came from the ASSURE-CSU study. The twice-daily and once-daily UAS7 was calculated from morning and evening ratings, as well as from exact 24-h evening ratings of hive count and itch severity, respectively. Three UAS7 scores were computed: UAS7 twice daily (UAS7TD), UAS7 once daily for maximum itch (UAS7OD1MAX), and UAS7 once daily for average itch (UAS7OD2AVG). UAS7 values were assigned to five score bands (0, 1-6, 7-15, 16-27, 28-42), reflecting urticaria-free to severe disease activity. The score values and score band ratios of the UAS7TD and UAS7OD versions were compared and assessed for correlation by weighted Cohen's kappa statistics. RESULTS: Data from 614 patients were analyzed. All three versions of the UAS7 yielded very similar results, with a mean (standard deviation) UAS7TD, UAS7OD1MAX, and UAS7OD2AVG of 17.3 (10.49), 17.7 (8.90), and 16.2 (8.68), respectively. Correlation coefficients between UAS7TD and UAS7OD1MAX, UAS7TD and UAS7OD2AVG, and UAS7OD1MAX and UAS7OD2AVG were 0.94, 0.95, and 0.99, respectively, showing very high positive pairwise correlation. The weighted kappa coefficient, κ (95% confidence interval) was 0.78 (0.75-0.82) for UAS7TD versus UAS7OD1MAX, and 0.82 (0.78-0.85) for UAS7TD versus UAS7OD2AVG, demonstrating substantial agreement. CONCLUSIONS: The once- and twice-daily UAS7 scores were highly consistent, supporting the use of either version when evaluating CSU activity.

Efficacy and safety of omalizumab for the treatment of refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria in Japanese patients: Subgroup analysis of the phase 3 POLARIS study.

BACKGROUND: Omalizumab, a humanized anti-IgE monoclonal antibody, proved efficacious and well tolerated in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) refractory to H1 antihistamines (H1AH) in the POLARIS study (NCT02329223), a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in East Asian patients. However, data in Japanese patients, who have specific baseline characteristics (e.g., low angioedema incidence, different background medications) that may impact clinical outcomes, are lacking. This pre-specified analysis presents additional patient-level data over time, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics data for omalizumab and IgE, and efficacy and safety data for omalizumab in Japanese patients. METHODS: Japanese patients (N = 105) were randomized 1:1:1 to omalizumab 300 mg, 150 mg, or placebo by subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks. Efficacy and safety were assessed primarily based on changes from baseline to Week 12 in weekly itch-severity scores (ISS7) and weekly urticaria activity scores (UAS7), and incidence of adverse events (AEs), respectively. Patient-level UAS7 data over time were also reviewed. RESULTS: At Week 12, least squares mean (LSM) changes from baseline in ISS7 were greater with omalizumab vs. placebo (-9.54 and -7.29 for omalizumab 300 mg and 150 mg, respectively, vs. placebo [-5.17]). Corresponding LSM changes from baseline in UAS7 were -21.61 and -15.59 (vs. placebo [-10.88]). Most responders in the omalizumab 300 mg group displayed improvement of disease activity within 2-4 weeks and had well-controlled symptoms during the treatment period. Overall AE incidence was similar across treatment arms. CONCLUSIONS: This subgroup analysis demonstrated that omalizumab is a well-tolerated, beneficial option for treatment of CSU in H1AH-refractory Japanese patients.

Efficacy and safety of omalizumab in Japanese and Korean patients with refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with chronic spontaneous/idiopathic urticaria (CSU/CIU) do not respond adequately to treatment with non-sedating H1 antihistamines (H1AH). There are limited studies on use of omalizumab as add-on therapy for treatment of CSU in an Asian population. OBJECTIVE: The POLARIS study (NCT02329223), representing the first randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial of omalizumab for CSU in an Eastern Asian population, evaluated efficacy and safety of omalizumab as add-on therapy for treatment of CSU. METHODS: This 26-week multicenter (41 Japanese/Korean sites) study enrolled patients (12-75 years) who were symptomatic despite H1AH treatment. Eligible participants (N=218) were randomized 1:1:1 to receive three subcutaneous injections of omalizumab 300mg, 150mg, or placebo every 4 weeks, followed by 12 weeks of follow-up. Primary outcome was change from baseline to Week 12 (Wk12) in weekly itch severity score (ISS7). Safety was assessed through the summary of adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were generally well balanced across treatment groups. At Wk12, statistically significant decreases from baseline were observed in ISS7 with omalizumab vs placebo (mean changes -10.22, -8.80, and -6.51 for omalizumab 300mg, 150mg and placebo; p<0.001 and p=0.006 vs placebo, respectively). Overall AE incidence was similar across treatment groups (54.8%, 57.7%, and 55.4% in omalizumab 300mg, 150mg, and placebo groups, respectively); nasopharyngitis was the most frequently reported AE in all treatment arms. CONCLUSION: The POLARIS study demonstrates that omalizumab is an efficacious and well-tolerated add-on therapy in Japanese and Korean H1AH-refractory patients with CSU.

Timing and duration of omalizumab response in patients with chronic idiopathic/spontaneous urticaria.

BACKGROUND: Few data are available that describe response patterns in patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU)/chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) treated with omalizumab. OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe response patterns by using data from the 3 pivotal omalizumab CIU/CSU trials. METHODS: Every 4 weeks, randomized patients received dosing with placebo or 75, 150, or 300 mg of omalizumab (ASTERIA I: n = 318, 24 weeks; ASTERIA II: n = 322, 12 weeks) or placebo or 300 mg of omalizumab (GLACIAL: n = 335, 24 weeks). Response was defined as well-controlled urticaria (weekly Urticaria Activity Score [UAS7] ≤ 6) or complete response (UAS7 = 0). RESULTS: Response rates were dose dependent and highest with 300 mg of omalizumab. Some patients responded early (before week 4). At week 12, a higher proportion of patients treated with 300 mg of omalizumab reported a UAS7 ≤ 6 (26.0% [75 mg of omalizumab], 40.0% [150 mg of omalizumab], 51.9% [300 mg of omalizumab], and 11.3% [placebo] for ASTERIA I; 26.8% [75 mg of omalizumab], 42.7% [150 mg of omalizumab], 65.8% [300 mg of omalizumab], and 19.0% [placebo] for ASTERIA II; and 52.4% [300 mg of omalizumab] and 12.0% [placebo] for GLACIAL) or a UAS7 = 0 (11.7% [75 mg of omalizumab], 15.0% [150 mg of omalizumab], 35.8% [300 mg of omalizumab], and 8.8% [placebo] for ASTERIA I; 15.9% [75 mg of omalizumab], 22.0% [150 mg of omalizumab], 44.3% [300 mg of omalizumab], and 5.1% [placebo] for ASTERIA II; and 33.7% [300 mg of omalizumab] and 4.8% [placebo] for GLACIAL). In patients receiving 300 mg of omalizumab with 24 weeks of treatment, median time to achieve a UAS7 ≤ 6 was 6 weeks (ASTERIA I and GLACIAL) and median time to achieve a UAS7 = 0 was 12 or 13 weeks (ASTERIA I and GLACIAL, respectively). Some patients who achieved well-controlled urticaria or complete response sustained response throughout the treatment period. CONCLUSION: Benefits of omalizumab treatment were evident early (before week 4) in some patients and persisted to week 24. Use of 300 mg of omalizumab demonstrated best results in controlling CIU/CSU symptoms.

Interleukin 17A: toward a new understanding of psoriasis pathogenesis.

Molecular and cellular understanding of psoriasis pathogenesis has evolved considerably over the last 30 years beginning in the early 1980s when psoriasis was thought to be a skin disease driven by keratinocyte hyperproliferation. During the next 20 years, the role of the immune system and T-helper (Th) cells in psoriasis pathogenesis was recognized. The presence of the interleukin (IL)-12 cytokine in psoriatic lesions led to the postulate that psoriasis is mediated by Th1 cells. Recent evidence has revealed a role for Th17 cells, and other immune cells, as proximal regulators of psoriatic skin inflammation. IL-17A, the principal effector cytokine of Th17 cells, stimulates keratinocytes to produce chemokines, cytokines, and other proinflammatory mediators thereby enabling IL-17A to bridge the innate and adaptive immune systems to sustain chronic inflammation. This model underlies the rationale for inhibiting IL-17A signaling as a potential therapeutic approach to disrupt the psoriatic inflammatory loop. Several monoclonal antibodies that inhibit the IL-17 pathway are in clinical development. These agents exhibit promising clinical efficacy and tolerability profiles including immunohistochemical improvement in psoriatic plaques. Results from clinical trials with IL-17 pathway inhibitors are refining our understanding of psoriasis pathogenesis and may provide a new therapeutic approach for patients with moderate to severe psoriasis.