Honeybee products for the treatment and recovery from viral respiratory infections including SARS-COV-2: A rapid systematic review.

BACKGROUND: This rapid review systematically evaluated the effects of honeybee products compared to controls for the prevention, duration, severity, and recovery of acute viral respiratory tract infections (RTIs), including SARS-CoV-2, in adults and children. METHODS: Cochrane rapid review methods were applied. Four English databases plus preprint servers and trial registries were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The evidence was appraised and synthesized using RoB 2.0 and GRADE. RESULTS: 27 results were derived from 9 RCTs that included 674 adults and 781 children. In hospitalized adults with SARS-CoV-2, propolis plus usual-care compared to usual-care alone reduced the risk of shock, respiratory failure and kidney injury and duration of hospital admission. Honey was less effective than Guaifenesin for reducing cough severity at 60-minutes in adults with non-specific acute viral RTIs. Compared to coffee, honey plus coffee, and honey alone reduced the severity of post-infectious cough in adults. Honey reduced the duration of cough in children compared to placebo and salbutamol; and the global impact of nocturnal cough after one night compared to usual-care alone and pharmaceutical cough medicines. CONCLUSION: More studies are needed to robustly assess honeybee's role in SARS-CoV-2 and non-specific viral respiratory infections. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: CRD42020193847.

Study of Natural Products Adverse Reactions (SONAR) in Adults with Mental Health Conditions: A Cross-Sectional Study.

INTRODUCTION: Mental illness is a leading cause of non-fatal disease burden worldwide. Natural health products (NHPs) are sought by patients with mental health conditions as a safer and more 'natural' option than conventional pharmacotherapy; however, the possible adverse events (AE) and interactions between NHPs and prescription medicines are not fully known. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine (i) the prevalence of adult patients with mental health conditions taking prescription medications only, NHPs only, NHPs and prescription medications concurrently, or neither, (ii) which prescription medications and NHPs are most commonly used, (iii) AEs (serious and non-serious) experienced in the last 30 days for each product use group. METHODS: Mental health clinics in Alberta and Ontario, Canada, were included in an active surveillance study investigating NHP-drug interactions. On their first clinic visit, adult mental health patients were provided with a form inquiring about prescription drug use, NHP use, and any undesirable health events experienced in the last month. Healthcare professionals were also asked to report AEs. RESULTS: A total of 3079 patients were screened at 11 mental health clinics in Alberta and Ontario. In total, 620 AEs were reported in 447 patients (14.9%). The majority of adverse events were seen in patients using both NHPs and prescription medicines (58.8%), followed by patients taking only prescription medicines (37.1%), NHPs only (3.4%) and neither (0.67%). Combining NHPs and prescription medications increases the likelihood of experiencing AEs (OR 2.1; p < 0.001; 95% CI 1.7-2.6). CONCLUSIONS: Adult patients with mental health conditions who are taking both prescription medications and NHPs are more likely to report an adverse event than patients taking prescription drugs or NHPs alone. Polypharmacy increases the likelihood of an adverse event. Active surveillance is feasible and could contribute to enhanced pharmacovigilance.

Study of Natural products Adverse Reactions (SONAR) in children seen in mental health clinics: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Paediatric mental health patients frequently use natural health products (NHP) in addition to prescription medications, but very little is known about adverse events and possible NHP-drug interactions. OBJECTIVE: To determine: (1) the prevalence of paediatric mental health patients taking prescription medications only, NHP only, both NHP and prescription medications concurrently or neither; (2) which prescription medications and NHP are most commonly used in paediatric mental health populations and (3) adverse events experienced in the last 30 days (serious and non-serious). DESIGN: Cross-sectional surveillance study. SETTING: Paediatric mental health clinics. POPULATION/INTERVENTION: On their first clinic visit, paediatric mental health patients were provided with a form inquiring about prescription drug use, NHP use and any undesirable event experienced in the last month. RESULTS: Of the 536 patients included in this study, 23% (n=120) reported taking only prescription medication(s), 21% (n=109) reported only NHP use, 21% (n=112) reported using both NHP and prescription drugs concurrently, and 36% (n=191) reported using neither. Overall, there were 23 adverse events reported; this represents 6.3%, 2.8%, 10.8% and 0.6% of each population, respectively. The majority of patients who experienced an adverse event reported taking more than one NHP or prescription drug. No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: Nearly half of the paediatric mental health patients in this study were taking NHPs alone or in addition to prescription medications. Active surveillance identified multiple adverse events associated with NHP and prescription drug use; none were serious. Healthcare professionals were encouraged to initiate conversations regarding NHP use.

Study of natural health product-drug adverse reactions (S.O.N.A.R.) in patients seeking mental health services.

BACKGROUND: Natural health products (N.H.P.s) are frequently used by mental health patients, who are also more likely to be given prescription medications. Few patients report use of N.H.P.s to their health care providers, increasing the challenges of safe N.H.P. use. OBJECTIVE: To determine: (1) the proportion of patients seeking mental health services taking prescription drugs only, N.H.P.s only, prescription drug-N.H.P.s concurrently and neither, (2) which prescription drugs and N.H.P.s are most commonly used by these patients, either alone or in combination, (3) what proportion of patients in each of the above groups report an adverse event (A.E.) using active surveillance, and (4) what type of A.E.s are reported in these patient groups. METHOD: Employing active surveillance, participating clinicians from six mental health clinics in Edmonton, Alberta asked individuals seeking mental health services about (i) prescription drug use, ii) N.H.P. use, and iii) experiences of A.E.s. RESULTS: Of 1466 patients with complete screening data available, 672 (45.8%) patients took prescription drugs only, 79 (5.4%) took N.H.P.s only, 279 (19.0%) took N.H.P.s and drugs concurrently and 436 (29.7%) took neither. In total, 147 patients reported an A.E., representing 10.7%, 2.5%, 25.5% and 0.5% of each population, respectively. Compared with prescription drug use, patients reporting concurrent N.H.P.-drug use were 2.8 times more likely to experience an A.E. (95% C.I.: 2.0-4.1; p < 0.001). A key limitation of the study is the lack of causality assessment of A.E.s reported; additionally, the patient population reflects a population that phones a provincial mental health phone line with or without referral from a mental health professional. CONCLUSION: Nearly one-fifth of patients seeking mental health services take N.H.P.s and prescription drugs concurrently; these patients are also at a greater risk of experiencing an A.E. Active surveillance provides a valuable means of detecting such A.E.s and can be incorporated into the medical histories obtained by clinicians.

Efficacy of acupuncture treatment of sexual dysfunction secondary to antidepressants.

BACKGROUND: Antidepressants including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) are known to cause secondary sexual dysfunction with prevalence rates as high as 50%-90%. Emerging research is establishing that acupuncture may be an effective treatment modality for sexual dysfunction including impotence, loss of libido, and an inability to orgasm. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine the potential benefits of acupuncture in the management of sexual dysfunction secondary to SSRIs and SNRIs. SUBJECTS: Practitioners at the START Clinic referred participants experiencing adverse sexual events from their antidepressant medication for acupuncture treatment at the Mood and Anxiety Disorders, a tertiary care mood and anxiety disorder clinic in Toronto. DESIGN: Participants received a Traditional Chinese Medicine assessment and followed an acupuncture protocol for 12 consecutive weeks. The acupuncture points used were Kidney 3, Governing Vessel 4, Urinary Bladder 23, with Heart 7 and Pericardium 6. Participants also completed a questionnaire package on a weekly basis. OUTCOMES MEASURED: The questionnaire package consisted of self-report measures assessing symptoms of depression, anxiety, and various aspects of sexual function. RESULTS: Significant improvement among male participants was noted in all areas of sexual functioning, as well as in both anxiety and depressive symptoms. Female participants reported a significant improvement in libido and lubrication and a nonsignificant trend toward improvement in several other areas of function. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests a potential role for acupuncture in the treatment of the sexual side-effects of SSRIs and SNRIs as well for a potential benefit of integrating medical and complementary and alternative practitioners.

Alcohol selectively impairs negative self-relevant associations in young drinkers.

The stress-dampening effects of alcohol have been attributed to 'appraisal disruption'- decreased ability of stimuli to evoke threatening associations in memory. Appraisal disruption could apply to oneself as well as situational stimuli. This question was investigated in undergraduate drinkers (n=90/Gender) with low or high anxiety sensitivity (AS; n=90/AS Group), a trait linked with hyper-vigilance to threat. Subjects received alcohol (0.7 g/kg males; 0.63 g/kg females), placebo or soft drink and performed a speech about their appearance. Sequence of drink administration and speech advisory (threat) was manipulated between subjects: Threat before Drink, Threat after Drink, No-Threat Control. The Implicit Association Test measured self-relevant associations based upon time to classify positive and negative attribute words (e.g. Cute, Ugly) paired with self-relevant or non-self-relevant object words (e.g. Me, Them). Alcohol selectively slowed negative self-relevant decisions, regardless of other factors. Relative fluency of negative versus positive decisions (D) correlated inversely with state anxiety and systolic blood pressure immediately before speech performance, and correlated directly with severity of alcohol problems. These findings are consistent with the Appraisal Disruption hypothesis. Preferential impairment of negative self-relevant associations may decrease perceived vulnerability under alcohol and increase risk for alcohol problems in young drinkers.

Effects of drink-stress sequence and gender on alcohol stress response dampening in high and low anxiety sensitive drinkers.

BACKGROUND: This study tested the appraisal disruption hypothesis of alcohol stress response dampening (SRD) in male and female high or low anxiety sensitive (AS) undergraduates. The hypothesis predicts that alcohol SRD will be greater when drinking occurs before versus after stress exposure. High AS males' predominant social-evaluative concerns further implied that alcohol SRD to a social stressor (i.e., a speech) would be relatively stronger in high AS males than in high AS females. METHODS: Male and female (n=90/gender) high and low AS participants (>or=70th;