Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 50
Filter
1.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 85: 287-298, 2023 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37541045

ABSTRACT

AIM: To compare dynamic nasolabial movement between end-of-treatment cleft and a matched non-cleft group in adult patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen treated adult participants with unilateral cleft lip and palate had images taken using a facial motion capture system performing a maximum smile. Seventeen landmarks were automatically tracked. For each landmark pair, on either side of the midline, changes in the x, y, and z directions were used to analyze the magnitude of displacement and path of motion. An asymmetry score was developed at rest, mid-smile, and maximum smile to assess the shape of the mouth and/or nose. RESULTS: At maximum smile, displacement of right and left cheilion was clinically and statistically (p < 0.05) less in the cleft group. The lip asymmetry score was greater (p < 0.05) at each time point in the cleft group using the clinical midline. Using Procrustes superimposition, the differences were significant (p < 0.05) only at rest and mid-smile. The alar bases were displaced significantly less (p < 0.05) in the z direction in the cleft group. The asymmetry score of the alar base was significantly higher using the clinical midline than using Procrustes superimposition in patients with cleft conditions (p < 0.001). In the cleft group, at maximum smile, the right and left cristae philter moved significantly less (p < 0.05) in the x and z directions. CONCLUSIONS: There was an increase in asymmetry score of the corners of the mouth and alar bases from rest to maximum smile. The lips were similar in shape but oriented differently in the faces of patients with cleft conditions than in individuals without those conditions.


Subject(s)
Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Humans , Adult , Cleft Lip/surgery , Cleft Palate/surgery , Motion Capture , Facial Asymmetry/surgery , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Nose/surgery
2.
J Dent Res ; 101(13): 1590-1596, 2022 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36271667

ABSTRACT

Choosing hypodontia treatment requires young people and parents to consider a large amount of information, identify what is important to them, and make trade-offs between options. This study aimed to examine young people and parents' preferences for hypodontia treatment using discrete choice experiment (DCE). This was a cross-sectional survey of young people (12-16 y) with hypodontia of any severity, at any stage of treatment, and their parents. Participants were recruited from NHS Hospitals in England and Wales. A bespoke DCE questionnaire was developed to measure preferences for 6 attributes of hypodontia treatment (waiting time, treatment time, problems during treatment, discomfort during treatment, bite, appearance). The questionnaire was completed 1) online by young people and parents, individually or together, and 2) by child-parent dyads under observation. Preferences were analyzed using regression models. In total, 204 participants (122 young people, 56 parents, 26 dyads) completed the online questionnaire and 15 child-parent dyads completed the questionnaire under observation. The most important attribute in hypodontia treatment was improvement in appearance, but significant heterogeneity was found in preferences. Four distinct groups of participants were found: group 1 (39%): severe discomfort and problems were most important; group 2 (31%): most concerned about improvement in appearance of teeth and improvement in bite; group 3 (22%): appearance 3 times more important than any other attribute; and group 4 (9%): preferences difficult to interpret. There was variation in how child-parent dyads approached decision-making, with some negotiating joint preferences, while for others, one individual dominated. Making trade-offs in DCE tasks helped some people think about treatment and identify their preferences. Appearance is an important outcome from hypodontia treatment, but preferences vary and potential risks and functional outcome are also important to some people. There is a notable level of uncertainty in decision-making, which suggests further shared decision support would be valuable.


Subject(s)
Anodontia , Humans , Adolescent , Anodontia/therapy , Cross-Sectional Studies , Parents , Surveys and Questionnaires , England , Patient Preference
3.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 48(10): 1372-1379, 2019 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30940397

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to quantify the fluctuating dynamic facial asymmetry during smiling in a group of 'normal' adults, using three-dimensional (3D) motion facial capture technology. Fifty-four male and 54 female volunteers were recruited. Each subject was imaged using a passive markerless 3D motion capture system (DI4D). Eighteen landmarks were tracked through the 3D capture sequence. A facial asymmetry score was calculated based on either a clinically derived midline or Procrustes alignment; scores were based on the Euclidean distance between landmark pairs. Facial asymmetry scores were determined at three time points: rest, median, and maximum frame. Based on the clinically derived midline and on Procrustes alignment, the differences between male and female volunteers, as well as those at the three different time points, were not clinically significant. However, throughout a smile, facial and lip asymmetry scores increased over the duration of the smile. Fluctuating facial asymmetry exists within individuals, as well as between individuals. Procrustes superimposition and the clinically derived midline produced similar asymmetry scores and both are valid for symmetrical faces. However, with facial asymmetry, Procrustes superimposition may not be a valid measure, and the use of the clinically derived midline may be more appropriate, although this requires further investigation.


Subject(s)
Facial Asymmetry , Photogrammetry , Adult , Facial Expression , Female , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Male , Range of Motion, Articular , Smiling
4.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 71(9): 1332-1345, 2018 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29958843

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Smile reanimation should be considered from a dynamic perspective. Any intervention should restore normality. To date no such normative dynamic data has been published. AIM: To quantitatively analyse maximal smiles between a healthy group of Caucasian male and female adults using 3D motion capture (4D stereophotogrammetry). METHOD: Using a 3D facial motion capture system 54 males and 54 female volunteers were imaged whilst performing a maximal smile. Eight nasolabial landmarks were digitised and tracked. Differences in displacement and speed of bilateral landmarks between males and females were analysed in each direction (x, y, z and Euclidian), from rest (T0), to median smile (T1) and maximal smile (T2), using paired t-tests and Wilcoxon-Signed Rank tests. RESULTS: In males and females the displacement and speed of the left and right alar base landmarks were similar in the x and y directions but less in the z direction. For the philtrum, the displacement and speed of the bilateral landmarks were similar in the y and z directions, but less in the x direction. The left alar base and left philtrum moved significantly more in males. Left and right cheilion moved a similar amount in the x and y directions but more in the z direction. Labiale superius moved significantly more in the z direction, and labiale inferius moved significantly more in the y direction in males. In conclusion, this study has presented a novel normative data set of dynamic nasolabial complex movement for males and females during maximum smile. The data, as well as providing magnitudes of displacements of the nasolabial complex, also provides the speeds of movement.


Subject(s)
Face/physiology , Facial Expression , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Photogrammetry/methods , Smiling/physiology , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Reference Values , Reproducibility of Results
5.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 47(12): 1587-1595, 2018 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29933911

ABSTRACT

Studies of orthognathic surgery often focus on pre-surgical versus post-surgical changes in facial shape. In contrast, this study provides an innovative comparison between post-surgical and control shape. Forty orthognathic surgery patients were included, who underwent three different types of surgical correction: Le Fort I maxillary advancement, bilateral sagittal split mandibular advancement, and bimaxillary advancement surgery. Control facial images were captured from volunteers from local communities in Glasgow, with patterns of age, sex, and ethnic background that matched those of the surgical patients. Facial models were fitted and Procrustes registration and principal components analysis used to allow quantitative analysis, including the comparison of group mean shape and mean asymmetry. The primary characteristic of the difference in shape was found to be residual mandibular prognathism in the group of female patients who underwent Le Fort I maxillary advancement. Individual cases were assessed against this type of shape difference, using a quantitative scale to aid clinical audit. Analysis of the combined surgical groups provided strong evidence that surgery reduces asymmetry in some parts of the face such as the upper lip region. No evidence was found that mean asymmetry in post-surgical patients is greater than that in controls.


Subject(s)
Facial Asymmetry/surgery , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Orthognathic Surgical Procedures , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Photography , Adult , Anatomic Landmarks , Female , Humans , Male , Principal Component Analysis
6.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 47(2): 276-282, 2018 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28823907

ABSTRACT

This study determined the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of re-orientating three-dimensional (3D) facial images into the estimated natural head position. Three-dimensional facial images of 15 pre-surgical class III orthognathic patients were obtained and automatically re-orientated into natural head position (RNHP) using a 3D stereophotogrammetry system and in-house software. Six clinicians were asked to estimate the NHP of these patients (ENHP); they re-estimated five randomly selected 3D images after a 2-week interval. The differences in yaw, roll, pitch, and chin position between RNHP and ENHP were measured. For intra-rater reliability, the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) values ranged from 0.55 to 0.77, representing moderate reliability for roll, yaw, pitch, and chin position, while for inter-rater reliability, the ICC values ranged from 0.38 to 0.58, indicating poor to moderate reliability. The median difference between ENHP and RNHP was small for roll and yaw, but larger for pitch. There was a tendency for the clinicians to estimate NHP with the chin tipped more posteriorly (6.3±5.2mm) compared to RNHP, reducing the severity of the skeletal deformity in the anterior-posterior direction.


Subject(s)
Head/anatomy & histology , Head/diagnostic imaging , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Posture/physiology , Adult , Anatomic Landmarks , Female , Humans , Male , Photogrammetry , Reproducibility of Results , Software
7.
JDR Clin Trans Res ; 3(4): 326-335, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30931788

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Preference experiments are used to understand how patients and stakeholders value aspects of health care. These methods are gaining popularity in dentistry, but quality and breadth of use have not been evaluated. OBJECTIVES: To describe multiattribute stated preference experiment use in dentistry through illustration and critique of existing studies. DATA SOURCES: Systematic literature search of PubMed, Econlit and Ovid for Medline, Embase, PsychINFO, PsychARTICLES, and All EBM Reviews, as well as gray literature. STUDY ELIGIBILITY: Multiattribute stated preference experiments eliciting preferences for dental service delivery, treatments, and oral health states from the perspective of patients, the public, and dental professionals. Outcomes of interest were preference weights and marginal rates of substitution. Study selection was independently performed by 2 reviewers. APPRAISAL: Ten-point checklist published by the International Society of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research was used for quality assessment. SYNTHESIS: Descriptive analysis. RESULTS: Searches identified 12 records published between 1999 and 2015, mostly in nondental academic journals. Studies were undertaken in high-income countries in Europe and the United States. The studies aimed to elicit preference for service delivery, treatment, or oral health states from the perspective of the patients, dentists, or the public via discrete choice experiment methods. The quality scores for the studies ranged from 53% to 100%. LIMITATIONS: A detailed description and critique of stated preference methods are provided, but it was not possible to provide synthesized preference data. CONCLUSIONS: Multiattribute stated preference experiments are increasingly popular, but understanding the methods and outputs is essential for designing and interpreting preference studies to improve patient care. Patient preferences highlight important considerations for decision making during treatment planning. Valuation of health states and estimation of willingness-to-pay are important for resource planning and allocation and economic evaluation. Preference estimates and relative value of attributes for interventions and service delivery inform development and selection of treatments and services (PROSPERO 21.3.17: CRD42017059859). KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER STATEMENT: Understanding patient, professional, and public preferences is fundamental for evidence-based decision making and treatment delivery. Preference elicitation methods can be used to estimate the value given to health states, service delivery, individual treatments, and health outcomes. By describing and appraising the methodology and application of multiattribute stated preference experiments in dentistry, this review provides an essential first step to wider use of well-designed, high-quality preference elicitation methods.


Subject(s)
Decision Making , Patient Preference , Delivery of Health Care , Dentistry , Europe , Humans , United States
8.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 47(6): 732-737, 2018 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29249412

ABSTRACT

This study was performed to compare soft tissue changes in response to mandibular and bimaxillary advancement osteotomy. Preoperative and postoperative cone beam computed tomography scans of 24 cases were analysed: 12 underwent bimaxillary advancement and 12 underwent mandibular advancement. The skeletal surgical movements were measured and soft tissue changes were displayed on a three-dimensional colour map. The intensity and shade of the colour indicated the magnitude and direction of the changes. In the bimaxillary advancement group, maxillary advancement was 5.5±2.7mm with anterior vertical impaction of 2.7±2.5mm; mandibular advancement was 4.6±3.2mm. Most of the mediolateral soft tissue changes were limited to the anatomical boundaries of the paranasal region - the columella together with the alar bases of the nose; these showed clear forward movement, which extended to involve most of the cheeks. In the mandibular surgery group, the mean advancement was 3.5±2.6mm. The chin region, lower lip, and inferior parts of the cheek showed forward shift with minimal changes at the vermilion border, which was only displaced in an upward direction. In conclusion, dense anatomical correspondence is a clinically meaningful method of producing a visual comprehensive analysis of the changes in response to orthognathic surgery.


Subject(s)
Face , Orthognathic Surgical Procedures , Adolescent , Adult , Anatomic Landmarks , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Female , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Male , Mandibular Advancement , Mandibular Osteotomy , Maxilla/surgery , Middle Aged , Osteotomy, Le Fort , Osteotomy, Sagittal Split Ramus , Treatment Outcome
9.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 46(3): 394-400, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27998665

ABSTRACT

Clinicians are accustomed to viewing conventional two-dimensional (2D) photographs and assume that viewing three-dimensional (3D) images is similar. Facial images captured in 3D are not viewed in true 3D; this may alter clinical judgement. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of using conventional photographs, 3D images, and stereoscopic projected 3D images to rate the severity of the deformity in pre-surgical class III patients. Forty adult patients were recruited. Eight raters assessed facial height, symmetry, and profile using the three different viewing media and a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS), and appraised the most informative viewing medium. Inter-rater consistency was above good for all three media. Intra-rater reliability was not significantly different for rating facial height using 2D (P=0.704), symmetry using 3D (P=0.056), and profile using projected 3D (P=0.749). Using projected 3D for rating profile and symmetry resulted in significantly lower median VAS scores than either 3D or 2D images (all P<0.05). For 75% of the raters, stereoscopic 3D projection was the preferred method for rating. The reliability of assessing specific characteristics was dependent on the viewing medium. Clinicians should be aware that the visual information provided when viewing 3D images is not the same as when viewing 2D photographs, especially for facial depth, and this may change the clinical impression.


Subject(s)
Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Malocclusion, Angle Class III/pathology , Patient Care Planning , Photography , Adult , Female , Hong Kong , Humans , Male , Reproducibility of Results
10.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 54(7): 812-7, 2016 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27325452

ABSTRACT

We describe the comprehensive 3-dimensional analysis of facial changes after Le Fort I osteotomy and introduce a new tool for anthropometric analysis of the face. We studied the cone-beam computed tomograms of 33 patients taken one month before and 6-12 months after Le Fort I maxillary advancement with or without posterior vertical impaction. Use of a generic facial mesh for dense correspondence analysis of changes in the soft tissue showed a mean (SD) anteroposterior advancement of the maxilla of 5.9 (1.7) mm, and mean (SD) minimal anterior and posterior vertical maxillary impaction of 0.1 (1.7) mm and 0.6 (1.45) mm, respectively. It also showed distinctive forward and marked lateral expansion around the upper lip and nose, and pronounced upward movement of the alar curvature and columella. The nose was widened and the nostrils advanced. There was minimal forward change at the base of the nose (subnasale and alar base) but a noticeable upward movement at the nasal tip. Changes at the cheeks were minimal. Analysis showed widening of the midface and upper lip which, to our knowledge, has not been reported before. The nostrils were compressed and widened, and the lower lip shortened. Changes at the chin and lower lip were secondary to the limited maxillary impaction.


Subject(s)
Cephalometry , Maxilla/anatomy & histology , Osteotomy, Le Fort , Face , Humans , Lip , Maxilla/surgery , Nose
11.
Surgeon ; 14(2): 63-8, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24947501

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Rapid maxillary expansion (RME) is used to expand the narrow maxilla. Dental and skeletal affects have previously been reported but few studies have reported on the overlying soft tissue changes. This study reports on the immediate effects of RME on the naso-maxillary facial soft tissue using 3D stereophotogrammetry. METHODS: Fourteen patients requiring upper arch expansion using RME as part of their full comprehensive orthodontic plan were recruited. Cone beam CT scans and stereophotogrammetry images were taken for each patient; pre-RME activation (T0) and immediately post-RME expansion (T1). Based on twenty-three landmarks, 13 linear and 3 angular measurements were made from each of the stereophotogrammetry images. A linear measurement at ANS was taken from each CBCT image. Using a Wilcoxon signed rank test, the pre-RME and post-RME measurements were compared. RESULTS: The mean separation of the anterior nasal spine was 3.8 mm ± 1.2 mm. The largest median increase was in nasal base width (1.6 mm), which was statistically significant (p = 0.001). Changes in the nasal dorsum height, nasal tip protrusion, philtrum width, and upper lip length were not statistically significant (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in the nostril linear measurements, expect for columella width (p = 0.009). Naso-labial angle decreased but was not statistically significant (p = 0.276). The only statically significant angular change was an increase in the nasal tip displacement angle (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Rapid maxillary expansion produces subtle changes in the naso-maxillary soft tissue complex. There is an increase in nasal base width, retraction and flattening of the nasal tip. These changes are small, less than 2 mm and variable between patients.


Subject(s)
Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Maxilla , Nasal Bone , Palatal Expansion Technique , Palate , Photogrammetry/methods , Child , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies
12.
Br Dent J ; 219(10): 479-80, 2015 Nov 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26611301

ABSTRACT

Stereopsis and its role in dental practice has been a topic of debate in recent editions of this Journal. These discussions are particularly timely as they come at a point when virtual reality simulators are becoming increasingly popular in the education of tomorrow's dentists. The aim of this article is to discuss the lack of robust empirical evidence to ascertain the relationship (if any) between stereopsis and dentistry and to build a case for the need for further research to build a strong evidence base on the topic.


Subject(s)
Dentistry , Depth Perception , Dentistry/methods , Dentistry/standards , Dentists/psychology , Dentists/standards , Evidence-Based Dentistry , Humans
13.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 44(7): 914-20, 2015 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25752242

ABSTRACT

The three-dimensional (3D) changes in hard tissue position following orthognathic surgery have been reported using 3D cephalometry, changes in volume, principal component analysis, and changes based on the surface model of the hard tissue. The aim of this study was to determine the validity of using surface models as a method of assessing positional changes of the maxilla and mandible. The actual unidirectional movement of the maxilla (advancement or downgraft) and the mandible (advancement), together with bidirectional movement of the maxilla (simultaneous advancement and downgraft) were simulated on a plastic skull. Following cone beam computed tomography scanning of each surgical simulation, the actual surgical movement was compared to the analysis based on surface model movement using the mean absolute distance of all points, the 90th percentile, and the root mean square (RMS) distance. All three methods of assessment of analysis consistently underestimated the actual amount of surgical movement. The movement was approximately one-third to one-half of the actual surgical movement. The use of surface meshes and point-to-point measurements grossly underestimates the 3D changes in the maxilla and mandible in simulated surgical procedures. Currently there are limitations in fully describing the true positional changes of the maxilla or the mandible in three dimensions.


Subject(s)
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Mandible/surgery , Maxilla/surgery , Orthognathic Surgical Procedures , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Equipment Design , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Mandible/diagnostic imaging , Maxilla/diagnostic imaging , Models, Anatomic , Osteotomy, Le Fort , Reproducibility of Results
14.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 53(2): 153-7, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25432431

ABSTRACT

Prediction of postoperative facial appearance after orthognathic surgery can be used for communication, managing patients' expectations,avoiding postoperative dissatisfaction and exploring different treatment options. We have assessed the accuracy of 3dMD Vultus in predicting the final 3-dimensional soft tissue facial morphology after Le Fort I advancement osteotomy. We retrospectively studied 13 patients who were treated with a Le Fort I advancement osteotomy alone. We used routine cone-beam computed tomographic (CT) images taken immediately before and a minimum of 6 months after operation, and 3dMD Vultus to virtually reposition the preoperative maxilla and mandible in their post operative positions to generate a prediction of what the soft tissue would look like. Segmented anatomical areas of the predicted mesh were then compared with the actual soft tissue. The means of the absolute distance between the 90th percentile of the mesh points for each region were calculated, and a one-sample Student's t test was used to calculate if the difference differed significantly from 3 mm.The differences in the mean absolute distances between the actual soft tissue and the prediction were significantly below 3 mm for all segmented anatomical areas (p < 0.001), and ranged from 0.65 mm (chin) to 1.17 mm (upper lip). 3dMD Vultus produces clinically satisfactory 3-dimensional facial soft tissue predictions after Le Fort I advancement osteotomy. The mass-spring model for prediction seems to be able to predict the position of the lip and chin, but its ability to predict nasal and paranasal areas could be improved.


Subject(s)
Face/anatomy & histology , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/statistics & numerical data , Orthognathic Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Osteotomy, Le Fort/statistics & numerical data , Patient Care Planning/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Cephalometry/statistics & numerical data , Chin/diagnostic imaging , Computer-Aided Design/statistics & numerical data , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/statistics & numerical data , Face/diagnostic imaging , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Forecasting , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/statistics & numerical data , Lip/diagnostic imaging , Male , Malocclusion, Angle Class III/surgery , Mandible/diagnostic imaging , Maxilla/diagnostic imaging , Nose/diagnostic imaging , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
15.
Surgeon ; 13(3): 132-8, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24325933

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The transverse skeletal effects of rapid maxillary expansion (RME) have previously been assessed using cone-beam CT (CBCT). However, to date the majority of studies assess the changes based on two-dimensional slice images, which under utilises the three-dimensional (3D) data captured. This study optimizes the volumetric CBCT data by generating 3D rendered surface models to quantity and visualize the immediate 3D changes of the mid-facial bone surfaces following RME. METHODS: The sample consisted of 14 patients who required RME prior to fixed appliances. Pre-treatment (T0) and immediate post expansion (T1) CBCT images were taken. Following superimposition the mid face was divided into six anatomical regions. A one-sample t-test was used to determine if the differences between the two surfaces were significantly ≥0.5 mm. FINDINGS: All regions showed a change following RME ≥ 0.5 mm. The maxillary and nasal bones showed 2.3 mm and 2.4 mm expansion respectively, followed by the zygomatic bones (1.4 mm), 2 cases showing asymmetric expansion. CONCLUSIONS: The use of 3D surface rendered models allows quantification and visualisation of 3D changes in the mid-facial skeleton at anatomical sites distant of RME activation. Following activation there can be a pan mid-facial expansion, including not only the maxilla but also the nasal lateral bones and zygomas. The response was highly variable and asymmetric expansion can occur.


Subject(s)
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Facial Bones/diagnostic imaging , Facial Bones/surgery , Palatal Expansion Technique , Adolescent , Child , Computer Simulation , Female , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Male , Maxilla/diagnostic imaging , Maxilla/surgery , Nasal Bone/diagnostic imaging , Nasal Bone/surgery , Zygoma/diagnostic imaging , Zygoma/surgery
16.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 44(1): 132-8, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25305699

ABSTRACT

Since the introduction of three-dimensional (3D) orthognathic planning software, studies have reported on their predictive ability. The aim of this study was to highlight the limitations of the current methods of analysis. The predicted 3D soft tissue image was compared to the postoperative soft tissue. For the full face, the maximum and 95th and 90th percentiles, the percentage of 3D mesh points ≤ 2 mm, and the root mean square (RMS) error, were calculated. For specific anatomical regions, the percentage of 3D mesh points ≤ 2 mm and the distance between the two meshes at 10 landmarks were determined. For the 95th and 90th percentiles, the maximum difference ranged from 7.7 mm to 2.2 mm and from 3.7 mm to 1.5 mm, respectively. The absolute mean distance ranged from 0.98 mm to 0.56 mm and from 0.91 mm to 0.50 mm, respectively. The percentage of mesh with ≤ 2 mm for the full face was 94.4-85.2% and 100-31.3% for anatomical regions. The RMS error ranged from 2.49 mm to 0.94 mm. The majority of mean linear distances between the surfaces were ≤ 0.8 mm, but increased for the mean absolute distance. At present the use of specific anatomical regions is more clinically meaningful than the full face. It is crucial to understand these and adopt a protocol for conducting such studies.


Subject(s)
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Face/anatomy & histology , Face/diagnostic imaging , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Orthognathic Surgical Procedures , Software , Surgery, Computer-Assisted , Anatomic Landmarks , Humans , Osteotomy, Le Fort , Predictive Value of Tests
17.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 43(7): 907-16, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24583138

ABSTRACT

The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the feasibility of measuring the change in magnitude, speed, and motion similarity of facial animations in head and neck oncology patients, before and after lip split mandibulotomy. Seven subjects (four males, three females) aged 42-80 years were recruited. The subjects were asked to perform four facial animations (maximal smile, lip purse, cheek puff, and grimace) from rest to maximal position. The animations were captured using a Di4D motion capture system, which recorded 60 frames/s. Nine facial soft tissue landmarks were manually digitized on the first frame of the three-dimensional image of each animation by the same operator and were tracked automatically for the sequential frames. The intra-operator digitization error was within 0.4mm. Lip purse and maximal smile animations showed the least amount of change in magnitude (0.2mm) following surgery; speed difference was least for smile animation (-0.1mm/s). Motion similarity was found to be highest for lip purse animation (0.78). This pilot study confirmed that surgery did influence the dynamics of facial animations, and the Di4D capture system can be regarded as a feasible objective tool for assessing the impact of surgical interventions on facial soft tissue movements.


Subject(s)
Facial Expression , Head and Neck Neoplasms/physiopathology , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Photogrammetry/instrumentation , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Feasibility Studies , Female , Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Prospective Studies
18.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 43(4): 454-9, 2014 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24091003

ABSTRACT

A method of producing a composite model consisting of a three-dimensional printed mandible bearing plaster teeth is presented. Printed models were obtained from cone beam computed tomograms (CBCT) of dry human mandibles. The plaster casts of the teeth were obtained from impressions of the teeth of the dry mandibles. The distorted teeth of the printed models were removed and replaced by the plaster casts of the teeth using a simple transfer jig. The accuracy of the composite models obtained from six mandibles was assessed from laser scans. The scans of the dry mandibles and the composite models were superimposed and the magnitude of the discrepancies at six points on the dentition and six on the mandible were obtained. It was concluded that the errors of the method were small enough to be clinically significant. The use of the composite models is illustrated in two clinical cases.


Subject(s)
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Facial Asymmetry/surgery , Mandible/diagnostic imaging , Models, Dental , Orthognathic Surgical Procedures/methods , Patient Care Planning , Anatomic Landmarks/diagnostic imaging , Facial Asymmetry/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , In Vitro Techniques , Mandible/surgery , Models, Anatomic , Skull/anatomy & histology , Skull/diagnostic imaging
19.
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir ; 46(6): 342-9, 2014 Dec.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25564948

ABSTRACT

AIM: The aim of this presentation is the explanation of a mathematical analysis of a landmark-based procrustes calculation. The various components of breast symmetry and their impact on breast reconstruction have been examined. METHOD: In an objective breast shape analysis asymmetries are quantified as a measure of the difference between a 3D landmark configuration of a breast and its mirror image. 10 landmarks, 4 on each side and 2 for a definition of the midline were defined. For each landmark the 3D coordinates were calculated statistically with the help of the software Programme R. Over a midline from the jugulum to the manubrium sterni, a mirror image of the breast was constructed. The data for the breast to be reconstructed and the non-operated breast from 44 patients were investigated. The statistical differences of the Procrustes analysis were used for an asymmetry score and the proportions of the individual components were calculated. These included size, location and orientation of the breast as well as the individual inherent morphological surface form data of the breast. RESULTS: All 44 patients exhibited breast asymmetries and the mean asymmetry score amounted to 0.52. A calculation of the proportions of the individual components making up the asymmetry score revealed that morphological surface data made the largest contribution to the asymmetry score, closely followed by location, i. e., positioning of the breast on the thoracic wall. In contrast, the size of the breast and its orientation were of lesser relevance. CONCLUSION: When considering breast symmetry in plastic surgery, the form plays a more important role than the size as objectively calculated by the statistical procrustes analysis. Almost equally important as the form is the positioning of the breast on the thoracic wall which contributes significantly more to total breast symmetry than axial displacements.


Subject(s)
Breast/abnormalities , Breast/anatomy & histology , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Mathematical Computing , Models, Theoretical , Female , Humans , Mammaplasty/methods , Organ Size
20.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 42(11): 1488-93, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23644040

ABSTRACT

During cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scanning, intra-oral metallic objects may produce streak artefacts, which impair the occlusal surface of the teeth. This study aimed to determine the accuracy of replacement of the CBCT dentition with a more accurate dentition and to determine the clinical feasibility of the method. Impressions of the teeth of six cadaveric skulls with unrestored dentitions were taken and acrylic base plates constructed incorporating radiopaque registration markers. Each appliance was fitted to the skull and a CBCT performed. Impressions were taken of the dentition with the devices in situ and dental models were produced. These were CBCT-scanned and the images of the skulls and models imported into computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) software and aligned on the registration markers. The occlusal surfaces of each dentition were then replaced with the occlusal image of the corresponding model. The absolute mean distance between the registration markers in the skulls and the dental models was 0.09±0.02mm, and for the dentition was 0.24±0.09mm. When the method was applied to patients, the distance between markers was 0.12±0.04mm for the maxilla and 0.16±0.02mm for the mandible. It is possible to replace the inaccurate dentition on a CBCT scan using this method and to create a composite skull which is clinically acceptable.


Subject(s)
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/methods , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Tooth/diagnostic imaging , Artifacts , Humans , Mandible/diagnostic imaging , Maxilla/diagnostic imaging , Models, Anatomic , Models, Dental , Pilot Projects , Software
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...