Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 22
Filter
1.
Clin Oral Investig ; 28(4): 242, 2024 Apr 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38575839

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the literature for mid-sagittal plane establishment approaches to identify the most effective method for constructing the mid-sagittal plane for the evaluation of facial asymmetry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six electronic databases (PubMed, Medline (via Ovid), EMBASE (via Ovid), Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus) and grey literature were searched for the studies that computed the mid-sagittal reference plane three-dimensionally, using a combination of MeSH terms and keywords. The methodological quality and the level of evidence for the included studies were analyzed using QUADAS-2 and GRADE, respectively. RESULTS: The preliminary search yielded 6746 records, of which 42 articles that met the predefined inclusion criteria were included in the final analysis. All the included articles reported the construction of the mid-sagittal reference plane (MSP) using varied methods. The risk of bias and concerns regarding the applicability of the included studies were judged to be 'low'. The level of evidence was determined to be 'low' for the effectiveness of the technique and 'moderate' for the ease of clinical applicability. CONCLUSION: Despite methodological heterogeneity, this review substantiates the comparable efficacy of cephalometric and morphometric MSP construction methods. A fully automated morphometric MSP holds promise as a viable option for routine clinical use. Nevertheless, future prospective studies with an emphasis on the impact, accuracy, and clinical applicability of MSP construction techniques in cases of facial asymmetry are required. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The present review will assist clinicians in selecting the most suitable method for MSP construction, leading to improved treatment planning and ultimately more favorable treatment outcomes.


Subject(s)
Facial Asymmetry , Humans , Facial Asymmetry/diagnostic imaging , Prospective Studies , Cephalometry/methods
2.
Clin Oral Investig ; 27(10): 5813-5826, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37615775

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the outcomes of corrective surgical treatment for craniofacial asymmetry using four different methods with the aim of developing the best technique for craniofacial asymmetry assessment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CBCT images of twenty-one class III subjects with surgically corrected craniofacial asymmetry and twenty-one matched controls were analyzed. Twenty-seven hard tissue landmarks were used to quantify asymmetry using the following methodologies: the asymmetry index (AI), asymmetry scores based on the clinically derived midline (CM), Procrustes analysis (PA), and modified Procrustes analysis (MPA). RESULTS: Modified Procrustes analysis successfully identified pre-operative asymmetry and revealed severe asymmetry at the mandibular regions compared to controls, which was comparable to the asymmetry index and clinically derived midline methods, while Procrustes analysis masked the asymmetric characteristics. Likewise, when comparing the post-surgical outcomes, modified Procrustes analysis not only efficiently determined the changes evidencing decrease in facial asymmetry but also revealed significant residual asymmetry in the mandible, which was congruent with the asymmetry index and clinically derived midline methods but contradictory to the results shown by Procrustes analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In terms of quantifying cranio-facial asymmetry, modified Procrustes analysis has evidenced to produce promising results that were comparable to the asymmetry index and the clinically derived midline, making it a more viable option for craniofacial asymmetry assessment. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Modified Procrustes analysis is proficient in evaluating cranio-facial asymmetry with more valid clinical representation and has potential applications in assessing asymmetry in a wide spectrum of patients, including syndromic patients.

3.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop ; 164(1): e14-e26, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37227323

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to identify a simple yet reliable soft-tissue parameter for the clinical determination of esthetic lip position by investigating the most consistent reference lines and assessing their sensitivity and specificity. METHODS: A total of 5745 records from Chinese patients aged >18 years were screened. In part I of the study, lateral view photographs of 96 subjects (33 males, 63 females) with esthetic facial profiles were selected. The profile esthetics of each photograph was first scored by 52 dental students, followed by 97 laypeople on a 5-point attractiveness scale. For the top 25% of photographs with the highest score for each sex (8 males, 16 females), the consistency of 6 commonly used reference lines were assessed to determine the esthetic lip position. In part II of the study, lip positions relative to Steiner's (S) and Ricketts' (E) lines in the profile photographs of 86 patients (43 males, 43 females) deemed to have an esthetically unpleasing profile were compared with those in 86 Chinese movie star idols (43 males, 43 females). RESULTS: In part I of the study, the S, E, and Burstone's (B) lines exhibited the lowest standard deviations for the upper and lower lips. B line was excluded from further analysis because of its higher mean absolute values, and S and E lines were used for the subjective assessment in part II of the study. In part II, the S line showed a sensitivity of 86.0% and 86.0% and a specificity of 81.4% and 83.7% for males and females, respectively. In contrast, the E line presented a sensitivity of 88.4% and 93.0% and a specificity of 79.1% and 74.4% for males and females, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: S, E, and B lines were the most consistent soft-tissue parameters among both sexes; however, because of the smaller absolute values, the S line would be more convenient among the 3 for a quick clinical assessment of lip position. Moreover, the performance of both S and E lines was similar among both sexes, which supports using these lines in assessing the esthetic lip position.


Subject(s)
Cephalometry , Esthetics, Dental , Lip , Female , Humans , Male , Asian People , Cephalometry/standards , Esthetics , Lip/anatomy & histology , Reference Standards , Reproducibility of Results , Reference Values , Photography
4.
Saudi Dent J ; 35(1): 95-102, 2023 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36817031

ABSTRACT

Objectives: This "2-arm parallel" trial investigated the recall of information pertinent to obtaining informed consent of parents of orthodontic patients using; either written material and verbal support or an animation. Materials and methods: Parents of patients, aged 12-18 years, about to undergo fixed applaince treatment, were randomized to either receive information by leaflet or by watching an animation. The parents were asked a series of open-ended questions immediately and one year later. The outcome measure was the total median questionnaire score immediately (T0) and one year later (T1). A Mann Whitney U test was performed to test for differences between T0 and T1. Results: 31 parents were randomized into the leaflet group and 33 in to the animation group. The median leaflet group score was 81 (IQR = 27) at the time of consent (T0) and 87 (IQR = 29) a year later (T1), compared to a median score of 76 (IQR = 23) for the animation group at T0 and 87 (IQR = 32) at T1. Statistically, there was no difference in the questionnaire score at (T0) (p = 0.567) and at (T1) (p = 0.522). The average time spent with the clinician in the leaflet group was an additional 9 min in the animation group. Conclusion: The use of a leaflet and verbal information or an animation are equivalent in providing information to the parents of orthodontic patients. The use of an animation reduces the clinical time needed to deliver the information.

5.
Clin Oral Investig ; 26(7): 4947-4966, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35320382

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to determine the site and severity of maxillomandibular asymmetry before and after orthognathic surgery in asymmetric patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Presurgery and postsurgery cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) data of 21 facial asymmetry patients (7 males and 14 females, mean age: 23.0 ± 3.36 years) with soft tissue chin deviation ≥ 3 mm who had undergone bimaxillary surgery were evaluated. Seven midline and twenty bilateral hard tissue landmarks were identified for the evaluation of facial asymmetry and outcomes were assessed against age- and gender-matched control subjects. RESULTS: In the asymmetry group, bilateral landmarks exhibited significant deviation in the mandible and midface regions. Before surgery, asymmetry was more severe at the mandibular midline and sites close to it, in the asymmetry group. Bimaxillary surgery proved to be highly effective, with a significant correction of the menton to a clinically normal value (2.90 mm, p < 0.001). After surgery, significant residual asymmetry was observed at the mental foramen (p = 0.001) in the R-L direction. Moreover, significant asymmetry persisted at the sigmoid notch (p = 0.001) in the S-I direction. CONCLUSIONS: Mandibular midline landmarks and chin peripheral regions contribute significantly to overall facial asymmetry characteristics. Despite significant correction after bimaxillary surgery, asymmetry persisted at several sites, thereby requiring secondary correction. Comprehensive 3D presurgical planning is central for asymmetry correction in a single surgery. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The present study specifies the location of residual asymmetry sites and advocates the correction of those sites during initial surgery.


Subject(s)
Malocclusion, Angle Class III , Orthognathic Surgical Procedures , Adult , Cephalometry/methods , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/methods , Facial Asymmetry/diagnostic imaging , Facial Asymmetry/surgery , Female , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Male , Malocclusion, Angle Class III/diagnostic imaging , Malocclusion, Angle Class III/surgery , Mandible/diagnostic imaging , Mandible/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
6.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 60(4): 507-512, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35346522

ABSTRACT

This study assessed whether preoperative class III patients could recreate their facial difference based on a profile photograph. Twenty class III pre-surgery bimaxillary orthognathic patients used CASSOS (SoftEnable Technology Ltd.) to manipulate a distorted soft tissue image of them until they felt it resembled their current soft tissue profile. Patients were able to move their upper lip and lower chin backward and forwards, as well as the lower chin up and down. Differences in the mean absolute distance between the patient-perceived position of the upper lip (Labrale superious) and chin (Pogonion) and the actual position of their upper lip and chin were measured on two occasions. Intra-patient reproducibility was found to be excellent (ICC 0.93 to 0.98). All differences were statistically significantly greater than 3mm, and would be clinically significant. Patients were better at re-creating their AP chin position rather than their AP upper lip and vertical chin positions. Approximately half of patients undergoing surgical correction of their class III skeletal pattern were unable to correctly identify their pre-surgical facial profile. Given the lack of awareness of their profile, this questions the validity of using profile planning for informed consent.


Subject(s)
Malocclusion, Angle Class III , Orthognathic Surgery , Orthognathic Surgical Procedures , Cephalometry/methods , Chin , Humans , Lip , Malocclusion, Angle Class III/surgery , Mandible/surgery , Orthognathic Surgical Procedures/methods , Reproducibility of Results
7.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 12254, 2021 06 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34112847

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to evaluate and compare the accuracy of average faces constructed by different methods. Original three-dimensional facial images of 26 adults in Chinese ethnicity were imported into Di3DView and MorphAnalyser for image processing. Six average faces (Ave_D15, Ave_D24, Ave_MG15, Ave_MG24, Ave_MO15, Ave_MO24) were constructed using "surface-based registration" method with different number of landmarks and template meshes. Topographic analysis was performed, and the accuracy of six average faces was assessed by linear and angular parameters in correspondence with arithmetic means calculated from individual original images. Among the six average faces constructed by the two systems, Ave_MG15 had the highest accuracy in comparison with the conventional method, while Ave_D15 had the least accuracy. Other average faces were comparable regarding the number of discrepant parameters with clinical significance. However, marginal and non-registered areas were the most inaccurate regions using Di3DView. For MorphAnalyser, the type of template mesh had an effect on the accuracy of the final 3D average face, but additional landmarks did not improve the accuracy. This study highlights the importance of validating software packages and determining the degree of accuracy, as well as the variables which may affect the result.

8.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop ; 160(1): 11-18.e1, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33902979

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this 2-arm parallel trial was to investigate the recall and comprehension of the information of orthodontic patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment using either the verbal explanation supported with the British Orthodontic Society (BOS) leaflet or 3-dimensional (3D) animated content. METHODS: Patients aged 12-18 years, with no relevant medical history or learning and reading difficulties, who were to undergo orthodontic treatment, were randomized to receive information about fixed orthodontic treatment, using either verbal explanation supported with the BOS leaflet or 3D animated content on the basis of the BOS leaflet. Randomization was performed by block randomization; block size of 4 was used, from which 6 blocks with 6 different sequences (AABB, ABBA, ABAB, BBAA, BAAB, BABA). The blinded author asked patients a series of open-ended questions. The primary outcome measure was the total score of the questions. An independent 2 sample t test was conducted to determine if there was a statistical difference in total questions score between the conventional method (verbal and leaflet) and the 3D animation at the time of consent taking (T0) and again 1 year later (T1). The secondary outcome measure was the time spent by the clinician delivering the information to the patient. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were randomized into each group. After 1 year, 1 patient was lost in each group. At the time of consent, the conventional group scored 79.1 ± 18.4 compared with 76.4 ± 12.8 for the 3D animation group with no statistically significant difference (95% confidence interval, -11.0 to 5.3), (P = 0.492). One year later, again, there was no statistically significant difference (P = 0.639) between the conventional group (75.6 ± 12.3) and the 3D animation group (74.4 ± 9.0) (95% confidence interval, -7.0 to 4.4). The average exposure time to the educational intervention in the conventional group was 8.5 minutes more than the 3D animation group. CONCLUSIONS: The use of 3D animation or verbal and leaflet information is relatively equivalent in transferring knowledge to the orthodontic patient. The use of a 3D animated video reduces the clinician time needed in the clinic to deliver information to the patients and also allows multiple views and better suits the younger generation. Patients undergoing short- or long-term orthodontic treatment do not recall root damage as a risk of orthodontic treatment, which requires special attention from the orthodontist to reinforce this information. REGISTRATION: This trial was not registered. PROTOCOL: The protocol was not published before trial commencement.


Subject(s)
Comprehension , Patient Education as Topic , Tooth Movement Techniques , Adolescent , Humans , Societies, Dental , Video Recording
9.
J Prosthet Dent ; 122(3): 333-338, 2019 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30955940

ABSTRACT

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Fabrication of conventional facial prostheses is a labor-intensive process which traditionally requires an impression of the facial defect and surrounding tissues. Inaccuracies occur during the facial moulage because of soft-tissue compression, the patient's reflex movements, or the lack of support for the impression material. A variety of 3D imaging techniques have been introduced during the production of facial prostheses. However, the accuracy of the different imaging techniques has not been evaluated sufficiently in this clinical context. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the difference in accuracy of capturing oncology facial defects with multimodal image fusion and laser scanning against a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) reference scan. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten gypsum casts of oncology facial defects were acquired. To produce reference models, a 3D volumetric scan was obtained using a CBCT scanner and converted into surface data using open-source medical segmentation software. This model was cropped to produce a CBCT mask using an open-source system for editing meshes. The multimodal image fusion model was created using stereophotogrammetry to capture the external facial features and a custom optical structured light scanner to record the defect. The gypsum casts were also scanned using a commercial 3D laser scanner to create the laser-scanned model. Analysis of the best fit of each experimental model to the CBCT mask was performed in MeshLab. The unsigned mean distance was used to measure the absolute deviation of each model from the CBCT mask. A paired-samples t test was conducted to compare the mean global deviation of the 2 imaging modalities from the CBCT masks (α=.05). RESULTS: A statistically significant difference was found in the mean global deviation between the multimodal imaging model (220 ±50 µm) and the laser-scanned model (170 ±70 µm); (t(9)=2.56, P=.031). The color error maps illustrated that the greatest error was located at sites distant to the prosthesis margins. CONCLUSIONS: The laser-scanned models were more accurate; however, the mean difference of 50 µm is unlikely to be clinically significant. The laser scanner had limited viewing angles and a longer scan time which may limit its transferability to maxillofacial practice.


Subject(s)
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Face , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Lasers , Photogrammetry
10.
Surgeon ; 16(5): 265-270, 2018 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29275932

ABSTRACT

AIM: Assess the feasibility, validity and precision of multimodal image fusion to capture oncology facial defects based on plaster casts. METHODS: Ten casts of oncology facial defects were acquired. To create gold standard models, a 3D volumetric scan of each cast was obtained with a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scanner (NewTomVG). This was converted into surface data using open-source medical segmentation software and cropped to produce a CBCT mask using an open-source system for editing meshes. For the experimental model, the external facial features were captured using stereophotogrammetry (DI4D) and the defect was recorded with a custom optical structured light scanner. The two meshes were aligned, merged and resurfaced using MeshLab to produce a fused model. Analysis was performed in MeshLab on the best fit of the fused model to the CBCT mask. The unsigned mean distance was used to measure the absolute deviation of each model from the CBCT mask. To assess the precision of the technique, the process of producing the fused model was repeated to create five models each for the casts representing the best, middle and worst results. RESULTS: Global mean deviation was 0.22 mm (standard deviation 0.05 mm). The precision of the method appeared to be acceptable although there was variability in the location of the error for the worst cast. CONCLUSION: This method for merging two independent scans to produce a fused model shows strong potential as an accurate and repeatable method of capturing facial defects. Further research is required to explore its clinical use.


Subject(s)
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Face/diagnostic imaging , Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Wounds and Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Casts, Surgical , Computer Simulation , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Multimodal Imaging , Nose/diagnostic imaging , Optical Imaging , Orbit/diagnostic imaging , Photogrammetry , Prostheses and Implants , Plastic Surgery Procedures/adverse effects , Reproducibility of Results , Wounds and Injuries/etiology , Wounds and Injuries/surgery
11.
Med Biol Eng Comput ; 54(2-3): 475-84, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26133282

ABSTRACT

A multi-view three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry system was developed to capture 3D shape of breasts for breast cancer patients. The patients had received immediate unilateral breast reconstruction after mastectomy by the extended latissimus dorsi flap and without contralateral surgery. In order to capture the whole breast shape including the inframammary fold, the patients were introduced to the imaging room and leaned over the imaging rig to open up the inframammary fold and to expose the entire area of each breast. The imaging system consisted of eight high-resolution ([Formula: see text] pixels) digital cameras and four flash units. The cameras were arranged in four stereo pairs from four different view angles to cover the whole surface of the breasts. The system calibration was carried out ahead of every capture session, and the stereo images were matched to generate four range images to be integrated using an elastic model proposed. A watertight breast mesh model was reconstructed to measure the volume of the breast captured. The accuracy of using the developed multi-view stereophotogrammetry system for breast volume measurement was 11.12cc with SEM 7.74cc, comparing to the measurements of the water displacement method. It was concluded that the 3D stereophotogrammetry image system developed was more reliable than the method of water displacement.


Subject(s)
Mammaplasty/methods , Mastectomy/methods , Photogrammetry/methods , Artifacts , Calibration , Female , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional
12.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 52(10): 934-9, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25241038

ABSTRACT

After orthognathic surgery the forehead remains unchanged. To produce facial harmony, the planned projection of the maxillomandibular complex must be placed in the correct relations to the unchanged position of the forehead. We have compared the anterior soft tissue projection of the maxillomandibular complex relative to the forehead after Le Fort I advancement surgery for correction of maxillary hypoplasia with that of a local reference group chosen by lay assessors. We retrospectively studied 32 patients (16 men and 16 women) all of whom had previously been treated by Le Fort I maxillary advancement. In addition a panel of 8 lay assessors selected a reference group of 24 women and 16 men. Standard profile photographs were taken, and horizontal measurements made, of several landmarks from a true vertical line (TV) passing through glabella. Together with facial harmony values these were compared between the groups. The orthognathic group had significantly more anterior mandibular projection relative to the forehead than the female reference group (p=0.03). As a result half of the horizontal harmony values were smaller in the orthognathic group. For men the position of the mandible, particularly the chin, was acceptable even though it was positioned more anteriorly. We have provided values for maxillomandibular projection derived from lay assessors and identified areas where differences from those of a reference group were detected. The projection of the mid and lower face of the local reference group to the forehead should guide preoperative planning.


Subject(s)
Forehead/anatomy & histology , Mandible/anatomy & histology , Maxilla/surgery , Osteotomy, Le Fort/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Anatomic Landmarks/anatomy & histology , Cephalometry/methods , Chin/anatomy & histology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Lip/anatomy & histology , Male , Malocclusion, Angle Class III/surgery , Maxilla/abnormalities , Nose/anatomy & histology , Orthognathic Surgical Procedures/methods , Photogrammetry/methods , Photography/methods , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
13.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 52(7): 609-14, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24933576

ABSTRACT

Computer packages have been introduced to simulate the movements of the jaw in three dimensions to facilitate planning of treatment. After final 3-dimensional virtual planning, a rapid prototype wafer can be manufactured and used in theatre. Our aim was to assess the accuracy of rapid prototyping of virtual wafers derived from laser scanned dental models using CAD/CAM software. Upper and lower plaster models from 10 orthognathic patients, the articulated models, and the conventional wafers were scanned. The virtual wafers were made from CAD/CAM software, and printed on a stereolithographic printer. We also scanned the articulated models with rapid prototype wafers in place. The validity of the final rapid prototype wafer was measured by the accuracy with which upper and lower models related to one another. The absolute mean error of the rapid prototype wafer when aligned with the dental models was 0.94 (0.09) mm. The absolute distance of the 2 models articulated by conventional and rapid prototype wafers ranged from 0.04 - 1.73mm. The rapid prototype wafers were able to orientate the upper and lower dental models with an absolute mean error of 0.94 (0.09) mm, but it ranged from 0.04-1.73mm.


Subject(s)
Computer-Aided Design , Orthognathic Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , Acrylic Resins/chemistry , Computer-Aided Design/standards , Dental Articulators , Dental Materials/chemistry , Equipment Design/standards , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/standards , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/standards , Jaw Relation Record/instrumentation , Lasers , Models, Dental , Patient Care Planning , Pilot Projects , Printing, Three-Dimensional , Silicones/chemistry , Surface Properties , User-Computer Interface
14.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg ; 42(6): 885-9, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24534682

ABSTRACT

This study was carried out on volunteers to evaluate a newly developed interactive software package aimed at informing prospective Le Fort I osteotomy patients regarding the surgical technique and possible complications. The aim of the study was to compare two methods of information delivery; a multi-media tablet device delivering both graphic and verbal information, and an audio device delivering essentially the same information in verbal form only. The null hypothesis was that there would be no difference between the efficiencies of the two methods. The subjects' ability to recall the information delivered by both devices was assessed using a questionnaire. The tablet device participants scored an average of 15.48 points, while the audio device participants scored an average of 268 points. The difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001), suggesting that the multi-media tablet device was more effective method.


Subject(s)
Multimedia , Osteotomy, Le Fort/methods , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Adult , Bone Plates , Bone Screws , Bone Transplantation/methods , Computer Graphics , Computers, Handheld , Female , Humans , Hypesthesia/etiology , Ilium/surgery , Male , Maxilla/surgery , Mental Recall , Osteotomy, Le Fort/adverse effects , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Postoperative Complications , Software , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tape Recording/instrumentation , Tissue and Organ Harvesting/methods , Transplant Donor Site/surgery
15.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 66(5): 634-9, 2013 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23402935

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To date breast assessment has been conducted mainly subjectively. However lately validated objective three-dimensional (3D) imaging was developed. The study aimed to assess breast reconstruction subjectively and objectively and conduct a comparison. METHODS: In forty-four patients after immediate unilateral breast reconstruction with solely the extended latissimus dorsi flap the breast was captured by validated 3D imaging method and standardized 2D photography. Breast symmetry was subjectively evaluated by six experts who applied the Harris score giving a mark of 1-4 for a poor to excellent result. An error study was conducted by examination of the intra and inter-observer agreement and agreement on controls. By Procrustes analysis an objective asymmetry score was obtained and compared to the subjective assessment. RESULTS: The subjective assessment showed that the inter-observer agreement was good or substantial (p-value: <0.0001). There was moderate agreement on the controls (p-value: <0.0001) and fair (p-values: 0.159, 0.134, 0.099) to substantial (p-value: 0.005) intra-observer agreement. The objective assessment revealed that the reconstructed breast showed a significantly smaller volume compared to the opposite side and that the average asymmetry score was 0.052, ranging from 0.019 to 0.136. When comparing the subjective and objective method the relationship between the two scores was highly significant. CONCLUSION: Subjective breast assessment lacked accuracy and reproducibility. This was the first error study of subjective breast assessment versus an objective validated 3D imaging method based on true 3D parameters. The substantial agreement between established subjective breast assessment and new validated objective method supported the value of the later and we expect its future role to expand.


Subject(s)
Breast/surgery , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/instrumentation , Mammaplasty/methods , Photography/instrumentation , Surgical Flaps , Equipment Design , Female , Humans , Reproducibility of Results
16.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 65(12): e332-7, 2012 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22766492

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Errors derive from the variability seen in the repeat volume measurements for a particular individual. The aim of this study was to evaluate the variation and errors of a three-dimensional (3D) multiple stereo camera system for objective breast assessment. It was also investigated whether there was any correlation between these errors and the size of the breast. METHODS: A prototype eight camera multiple stereophotogrammetry system was utilized. The volumes of nine plaster breast models were determined by 3D imaging and the correlation between the size of the models and the variability of the measurements was investigated after ten repeats. The breasts of six live volunteers were examined following a specific protocol. The breasts were captured six times, three times each on two different occasions; from each breast capture a three-dimensional model was built and the breast volume was measured three times with breast analysis tool (BAT) software. This allowed for an assessment of the variability introduced at each stage of the measurement procedure. The correlation between the size of the breast and the variability of the measurements was investigated. Results of volume measurements by water displacement method, repeated ten times with the plaster models and six times with the live models, were used for comparison. RESULTS: The correlation between the size of the plaster models and the variability of the measurements revealed a significant correlation (p = 0.033), indicating that the larger the model, the more variable were the results. The correlation between the size of the breasts in the live models and the variability of the results revealed a non-significant correlation (p = 0.342), but there was a visible trend that the larger breasts showed more variable results. The average variation in the repeated measurements on each individual was found to be 32.95 cc across the two different poses, 19.43 cc across the various captures, and 28.32 across the different volume calculations with the BAT software. The error is less than what is clinically visible with the human eye, which is about 50 cc variation in volume by subjective assessment. As a proportion of the mean volume, namely 6.9%, 4.0% and 5.9% respectably, the values are small and indicate that the reproducibility of the system is good. CONCLUSION: The 3D imaging system using multiple stereo cameras revealed a positive correlation between the size of plaster models and the breasts of live models and the reproducibility of the measurements, indicating that the variation was higher for the larger sizes. The relationship was significant in the plaster models but not in the live models, although a trend was observed. The assessment of the variation and errors of the system was part of the necessary procedure that should be considered for the validation of any new measurement technology for breast assessment.


Subject(s)
Breast/anatomy & histology , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/instrumentation , Photogrammetry/instrumentation , Adult , Diagnostic Errors , Female , Humans , Linear Models , Phantoms, Imaging , Reproducibility of Results
17.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 65(9): 1209-15, 2012 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22525253

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The latissimus dorsi muscle flap is a common method for the reconstruction of the breast following mastectomy. The study aimed to assess the quality of this reconstruction using a three-dimensional (3D) imaging method. The null hypothesis was that there was no difference in volume between the reconstructed breast and the opposite side. METHODS: This study was conducted in forty-four patients who had had immediate unilateral breast reconstruction by latissimus dorsi muscle flap. The breast was captured using the 3D imaging system. Ten landmarks were digitised on the 3D images. The volume of each breast was measured by the application of Breast Analysis Tool software. The symmetry of the breast was measured using Procrustes analysis. The impact of breast position, orientation, size and intrinsic shape on the overall breast asymmetry was investigated. RESULTS: The null hypothesis was rejected. The reconstructed breast showed a significantly smaller volume when compared to the opposite side, p < 0.0001, a mean difference of 176.8 cc and 95% CI (103.5, 250.0). The shape and the position of the reconstructed breast were the main contributing factors to the measured asymmetry score. CONCLUSIONS: 3D imaging was efficient in evaluating the outcome of breast surgery. The latissimus dorsi muscle flap on its own for breast reconstruction did not restore the volume and shape of the breast fully lost due to complete mastectomy. The modification of this method and the selection of other or additional surgical techniques for breast reconstruction should be considered. The asymmetry analysis through reflection and Procrustes matching was a useful method for the objective shape analysis of the female breast and presented a new approach for breast shape assessment. The intrinsic breast shape and the positioning of the breast were major components of postoperative breast asymmetry. The reconstructed breast was smaller overall than the un-operated breast at a significant level when assessing the breast volume using the surface area. 3D imaging by multiple stereophotogrammetry was a useful tool for volume measurements, shape analysis and the evaluation of symmetry.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Mammaplasty/methods , Surgical Flaps , Adult , Anatomic Landmarks , Cohort Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Graft Rejection , Graft Survival , Humans , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted , Mastectomy/methods , Middle Aged , Muscle, Skeletal/transplantation , Photogrammetry , Postoperative Care/methods , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , United Kingdom
18.
Eur J Radiol ; 81(3): e406-13, 2012 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22260897

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate a registration approach for 2-dimension (2D) based on characteristic localization to achieve 3-dimension (3D) fusion from images of PET, CT and MR one by one. METHOD: A cubic oriented scheme of"9-point & 3-plane" for co-registration design was verified to be geometrically practical. After acquisiting DICOM data of PET/CT/MR (directed by radiotracer 18F-FDG etc.), through 3D reconstruction and virtual dissection, human internal feature points were sorted to combine with preselected external feature points for matching process. By following the procedure of feature extraction and image mapping, "picking points to form planes" and "picking planes for segmentation" were executed. Eventually, image fusion was implemented at real-time workstation mimics based on auto-fuse techniques so called "information exchange" and "signal overlay". RESULT: The 2D and 3D images fused across modalities of [CT+MR], [PET+MR], [PET+CT] and [PET+CT+MR] were tested on data of patients suffered from tumors. Complementary 2D/3D images simultaneously presenting metabolic activities and anatomic structures were created with detectable-rate of 70%, 56%, 54% (or 98%) and 44% with no significant difference for each in statistics. CONCLUSION: Currently, based on the condition that there is no complete hybrid detector integrated of triple-module [PET+CT+MR] internationally, this sort of multiple modality fusion is doubtlessly an essential complement for the existing function of single modality imaging.


Subject(s)
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Multimodal Imaging , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Positron-Emission Tomography , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Image Enhancement/methods , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted , Male , Middle Aged
19.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg ; 40(3): 243-7, 2012 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21752662

ABSTRACT

The quality of care delivered to 74 patients undergoing orthognathic surgery was assessed using a patient satisfaction questionnaire and data collected from hospital case records. Surgical complications, hospital services, patient satisfaction, and impact on quality of life, were the main aspects considered. The majority of patients reported that their treatment objectives had been achieved and that they were satisfied with the quality of care provided. The main concern of the patients regarding the clinic was the waiting time before an appointment could be offered. Eating and breathing difficulties and low mood after surgery were the main reported complications. Sixty-three patients experienced post-operative weight loss. The importance of a nutritious, high calorie soft diet should be emphasised and the use of menthol inhalations following maxillary osteotomies should be considered more frequently. Clinicians should be aware of post-operative low mood, which may require psychological support. We developed a sensitive assessment battery with comprehensive parameters to audit quality of orthognathic surgery service, and recommend that a similar approach should be considered by teams which undertake management of orthognathic patients.


Subject(s)
Dental Clinics/standards , Dental Service, Hospital/standards , Orthognathic Surgical Procedures/standards , Patient Care Team/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Administration, Inhalation , Adult , Affect , Dental Audit , Eating/physiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Hypesthesia/etiology , Male , Maxilla/surgery , Menthol/administration & dosage , Nasal Decongestants/administration & dosage , Orthognathic Surgical Procedures/psychology , Osteotomy/methods , Patient Satisfaction , Postoperative Complications , Quality of Life , Respiration , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Trigeminal Nerve Injuries/etiology , Weight Loss
20.
Biomed Tech (Berl) ; 57(5): 413-22, 2012 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25854668

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Because there is no complete three-dimensional (3D) hybrid detector integrated PET+MRI internationally, this study aims to investigate a registration approach for a two-dimensional (2D) hybrid based on characteristic localization to achieve a 3D fusion from the images of PET and MRI as a whole. METHODS: A cubic-oriented scheme of "9-point and 3-plane" for a coregistration design was verified to be geometrically practical. Through 3D reconstruction and virtual dissection, human internal feature points were sorted to combine with preselected external feature points for matching process. By following the procedure of feature extraction and image mapping, the processes of "picking points to form planes" and "picking planes for segmentation" were executed. Eventually, the image fusion was implemented at the real-time workstation Mimics based on auto-fuse techniques called "information exchange" and "signal overlay". RESULTS: A complementary 3D image across PET+MRI modalities, which simultaneously present metabolic activities and anatomic structures, was created with a detectable rate of 56%. This is equivalent to the detectable rate of PET+CT or MRI+CT with no statistically significant difference, and it facilitates a 3D vision that is not yet functional for 2D hybrid imaging. CONCLUSIONS: This cross-modality fusion is doubtless an essential complement for the existing toolkit of a 2D hybrid device. Thus, it would potentially improve the efficiency of diagnosis and therapy for oncology.


Subject(s)
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Positron-Emission Tomography , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Positron-Emission Tomography/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...