Exploring barriers and enablers to simulation-based training in emergency departments: an international qualitative study (BEST-ED Study).

INTRODUCTION: Simulation-based training (SBT) has gained significant traction within emergency medicine. The growing body of evidence describes the benefits that SBT can bring. However, identifying barriers and enablers when establishing successful SBT programmes in busy emergency departments (EDs), and ensuring longevity of such programmes, can be difficult. OBJECTIVE: We aim to identify barriers and enablers to SBT in busy EDs. METHODS: We explored and analysed the thoughts, experience and opinions of professionals involved in SBT and organisational support. 32 participants across 15 international sites were invited to a semistructured interview process. We included participants from a variety of backgrounds, from clinical staff to management staff. Transcribed interview data was classified and coded based on capability, opportunity and motivation behaviour (COM-B) domains and analysed based on theoretical domains framework. Frequency of the most mentioned thematic domain among participants is reported. RESULTS: The interview data revealed several common themes, including the following: knowledge and skills (90%), support and leadership (96%), mental barriers (87.5%), local culture (96.6%), dedicated space (65.2%), time constraints (46.8%), social influence (87.5%), education (90.6%), professional development (68.75%), exams (59.3%) and personal goals (93.75%). Management staff was observed to prioritise resource, staffing and flow, while the clinical cohort tended to focus on specialty and personal development when it came to simulation training in the ED. CONCLUSION: Potential barriers and enablers to SBT and in situ simulation for EDs were identified through interviews conducted in this study. The central themes in terms of barriers and enablers were local culture, leadership, individual needs, resources and optimisation. A tailored approach is vital for establishing a successful SBT and in situ simulation programme.

COVID-19 Outbreak Response for an Emergency Department Using In Situ Simulation.

In January 2020, the WHO declared COVID-19 an epidemic in China and the possibility of evolving into a pandemic. During early phases, most emergency departments did not have contingency plans for an outbreak of this scale and therefore necessitating adequate preparation. This study aims to describe the utility of in situ simulation in identifying system errors and latent safety hazards in response to preparation for the expected COVID-19 surge. We also aim to describe the corrective measures taken to improve our outbreak response locally. We hope that others may be able to use this information as foresight in preparing their own departments for this outbreak. The emergency department and anesthesiology department of Galway University Hospital conducted a series of multidisciplinary, in situ simulations to rapidly identify operational errors and latent safety hazards in response to this outbreak. Each simulation involved an interdisciplinary response to a suspected/COVID-19 patient. The cases were used as a training opportunity for staff and ultimately a platform to expeditiously implement system changes in response to deficits identified during the simulations. Conclusively, with the complexities and intricate structure of every emergency department, we understood that preparation for an outbreak requires evaluation of the current system before implementing any changes. It is not a "one size fits all" concept. Therefore, conducting in situ simulations and the use of foresight, is pivotal as it could prevent loss of resources and time in preparing for an outbreak.

Evaluation of an Assertive Management and Integrated Care Service for Frequent Emergency Department Attenders with Substance Use Disorders: The Impact Project: Evaluating an assertive management service for frequent ED attenders with substance use disorders.

INTRODUCTION: Frequent attenders to Emergency Departments (ED) often have contributing substance use disorders (SUD), but there are few evaluations of relevant interventions. We examine one such pilot assertive management service set in Sydney, Australia (IMPACT), aimed at reducing hospital presentations and costs, and improving client outcomes. METHODS: IMPACT eligibility criteria included moderate-to-severe SUD and ED attendance on ≥5 occasions in the previous year. A pre-post intervention design examined clients' presentations and outcomes 6 months before and after participation to a comparison group of eligible clients who did not engage. RESULTS: Between 2014 and 2015, 34 clients engaged in IMPACT, with 12 in the comparison group. Clients demonstrated significant reductions in preventable (p < 0.05) and non-preventable (p < 0.01) ED presentations and costs, and in hospital admissions and costs (p < 0.01). IMPACT clients also reported a significant reduction in use days for primary substance (p < 0.01). The comparison group had a significant reduction (p < 0.05) in non-preventable visits only. CONCLUSIONS: Assertive management services can be effective in preventing hospital presentations and costs for frequent ED attenders with SUDs and improving client outcomes, representing an effective integrated health approach. The IMPACT service has since been refined and integrated into routine care across a number of hospitals in Sydney, Australia.