Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Saudi Med J ; 27(5): 657-60, 2006 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16680256

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in acute and chronic cholecystitis in terms of complications, conversion rates, reason of conversion and hospital stay. METHODS: Between April 1999 and March 2004, we retrospectively evaluated all patients admitted for symptomatic gall bladder disease in the Department of General Surgery, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan. All patients who underwent LC for symptomatic cholelithiasis were included. They were classified as group A [having acute cholecystitis (AC)] and group B [with chronic cholecystitis (CC)] based on the operative findings and histological diagnosis. RESULTS: Out of 725 patients who underwent LC, 173 patients were included in group A and 552 patients in group B. Conversion rate was 6% for group A and O.7% for group B (p<0.0001). Two patients (0.3%) in group B, while one patient (0.5%) in group A sustained bile duct injury (p>0.05). Two patients (1.1%) in group A and 4 patients (0.7%) in group B developed sub-hepatic bile collections (p>0.05). The mean hospital stay was 1.2 +/- 1.1 days for group A and 1.7 +/- 2.1 days for group B (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe and effective procedure in almost all patients presenting with symptomatic cholelithiasis.


Subject(s)
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic/adverse effects , Cholecystitis/surgery , Duodenum/injuries , Gallbladder Diseases/surgery , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Bile Ducts/injuries , Chronic Disease , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...