Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
J Headache Pain ; 25(1): 65, 2024 Apr 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38664605

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite recent advancements in migraine treatment, some patients continue to endure significant disease burden. Due to the controlled nature of randomized trials in migraine prevention, many real-world patients with comorbidities or prior exposure to certain therapies are excluded. Capturing evidence of the effectiveness of treatment in real-world clinical settings can further shape treatment paradigms. The objective of this study was to develop a comprehensive understanding of both patients' and physicians' real-world experiences with eptinezumab for chronic migraine (CM). METHODS: REVIEW (Real-world EVidence and Insights into Experiences With eptinezumab) is an observational, multi-site (n = 4), US-based study designed to evaluate real-world experiences of patients treated with eptinezumab and their treating physicians. Patients were ≥ 18 years of age, with a diagnosis of CM, who had completed ≥ 2 consecutive eptinezumab infusion cycles (≥ 6 months of exposure). The study included a retrospective chart review, a patient survey, and a semi-structured physician interview that assessed patient and/or physician satisfaction with elements of daily living / well-being, migraine symptomology, and perspectives of the eptinezumab infusion experience. RESULTS: Of the 94 patients enrolled, 83% (78/94) were female, the mean age was 49.2 years, and the mean time since migraine diagnosis was 15.4 years. Before eptinezumab treatment, patients experienced a mean of 8 self-reported "good" days/month, which increased to 18 after treatment. Most patients took, on average, ≥ 10 days/month of prescription and/or over-the-counter medication (81% [75/93] and 66% [61/93], respectively) to treat migraine attacks before eptinezumab treatment, which dropped to 26% (24/93) and 23% (21/93) following eptinezumab treatment. Prior to receiving eptinezumab, 62% (58/93) of patients indicated being at least slightly concerned about infusions; after eptinezumab infusion, this dropped to 14% (13/93). These patient survey findings were consistent with physician responses. CONCLUSION: This real-world evidence study demonstrated high overall satisfaction with the effectiveness of eptinezumab treatment for CM among most patients and their physicians.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Migraine Disorders , Patient Satisfaction , Humans , Migraine Disorders/drug therapy , Female , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Male , Adult , Middle Aged , United States , Chronic Disease , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
2.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 22(1): 162, 2022 Feb 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35135555

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with headache often seek urgent medical care to treat pain and associated symptoms that do not respond to therapeutic options at home. Urgent Cares (UCs) may be suitable for the evaluation and treatment of such patients but there is little data on how headache is evaluated in UC settings and what types of treatments are available. We conducted a study to evaluate the types of care available for patients with headache presenting to UCs. DESIGN: Cross-Sectional. METHODS: Headache specialists across the United States contacted UCs to collect data on a questionnaire. Questions asked about UC staffing (e.g. number and backgrounds of staff, hours of operation), average length of UC visits for headache, treatments and tests available for patients presenting with headache, and disposition including to the ED. RESULTS: Data from 10 UC programs comprised of 61 individual UC sites revealed: The vast majority (8/10; 80%) had diagnostic testing onsite for headache evaluation. A small majority (6/10; 60%) had the American Headache Society recommended intravenous medications for acute migraine available. Half (5/10) had a headache protocol in place. The majority (6/10; 60%) had no follow up policy after UC discharge. CONCLUSIONS: UCs have the potential to provide expedited care for patients presenting for evaluation and treatment of headache. However, considerable variability exists amongst UCs in their abilities to manage headaches. This study reveals many opportunities for future research including the development of protocols and professional partnerships to help guide the evaluation, triage, and treatment of patients with headache in UC settings.


Subject(s)
Migraine Disorders , Quality Improvement , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Cross-Sectional Studies , Headache/diagnosis , Headache/therapy , Humans , United States
3.
New Microbes New Infect ; 36: 100697, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32483490

ABSTRACT

Recently observed similarities in COVID-19 susceptibility among genetically related individuals hints at a selectivity of the SARS-CoV-2 virus that hinges on the affinity for select genetic profiles prevalent in the human species. The selectivity determines susceptibility of clinical disease and extent of pathogenesis, including fatal lung and myocardial injury, and may be more cogent than the recently reported risk factors. The selectivity of the SARS-CoV-2 virus for human genetic profiles as a factor of the virulence appears to be a novel feature and was not previously noted in the epidemics of widespread viral respiratory illnesses in humans.

4.
Headache ; 60(2): 430-440, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31758548

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The injection interval for onabotulinumtoxinA (BoNTA) in the management of chronic migraine (CM) is 12 weeks (78-84 days). The aim of this study was to review patient-reported wearing off effect (WOE) of the therapeutic benefit of BoNTA near the end of the treatment cycle. We intended to describe the demographics of patients at baseline and compare groups of patients with multiple episodes of WOE. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients with CM who received uninterrupted BoNTA therapy from January 2014 to March 2018. The data from patient-reported WOE (worsening headache variables and neck pain) that occurred during the 4 weeks (28 days) prior to the scheduled re-injection of BoNTA for treatment cycles with injection interval ≤13 weeks and without obvious confounding factors were reviewed. RESULTS: We identified 98 eligible patients and analyzed 471 treatment cycles. Forty-three unique patients reported at least 1 occurrence of WOE. About 24/43 patients reported 1 WOE event and 19/43 patients reported ≥2 WOE events. Between the 2 groups, anxiety disorder and opioid use for headache were statistically significantly different. In the former group, the median interquartile range (IQR) dose of BoNTA was 165 (155, 175) units and the median IQR duration of the antinociceptive effect of BoNTA was 66.5 (63, 71.5) days. In the latter group, the median IQR dose of BoNTA was 167 (155, 173.3) units and the median IQR duration of the antinociceptive effect of BoNTA was 65.3 (62.5, 68.8) days. Up to 32% of these patients reported an increase in the use of abortive therapies to manage the symptoms of WOE. DISCUSSION: The primary goal of BoNTA in the treatment of CM is to mitigate the development of central sensitization. Since the 12-week injection paradigm may not provide sustained antinociceptive effect in all patients, it may account for the failure of response to BoNTA. Repeated occurrences of the WOE can potentially lead to medication overuse and impact quality of life.


Subject(s)
Analgesics/pharmacology , Botulinum Toxins, Type A/pharmacology , Migraine Disorders/drug therapy , Migraine Disorders/prevention & control , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Patient Satisfaction , Adult , Analgesics/administration & dosage , Botulinum Toxins, Type A/administration & dosage , Central Nervous System Sensitization/drug effects , Chronic Disease , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Tertiary Care Centers , Time Factors
5.
Ochsner J ; 17(3): 292-295, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29026366

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Trigeminal trophic syndrome (TTS) is an uncommon disorder of the trigeminal nerve tract and trigeminal brainstem nucleus. The syndrome is characterized by a triad of unilateral crescentic ulcers with anesthesia and paresthesias of the involved trigeminal dermatomes. CASE REPORT: A 24-year-old right-handed black female presented to our emergency department with a 4-week history of rapidly progressive painless desquamation/denudation of skin over her right face and scalp. Four weeks prior, she had been admitted to another institution for seizures and was diagnosed with seizures provoked by synthetic marijuana use. She was afebrile during her initial presentation at our institution. Dermatologic examination revealed denudation of the epidermis and partial dermis over the right frontal, parietal, and temporal scalp with associated alopecia. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, the association of disorders of the trigeminal nerve pathway, including TTS, with the use of synthetic marijuana has not been previously reported. The long-term neurologic effects of synthetic marijuana are difficult to predict, and the pathologic underpinnings of TTS are largely unknown. Further studies dedicated to exploring the underlying molecular and cellular mechanisms may translate into effective therapies and approaches to halt and reverse the process and prevent tissue destruction and cosmetic disfigurement.

7.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 151(2 Suppl): S1-S40, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25273878

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Tinnitus is the perception of sound without an external source. More than 50 million people in the United States have reported experiencing tinnitus, resulting in an estimated prevalence of 10% to 15% in adults. Despite the high prevalence of tinnitus and its potential significant effect on quality of life, there are no evidence-based, multidisciplinary clinical practice guidelines to assist clinicians with management. The focus of this guideline is on tinnitus that is both bothersome and persistent (lasting 6 months or longer), which often negatively affects the patient's quality of life. The target audience for the guideline is any clinician, including nonphysicians, involved in managing patients with tinnitus. The target patient population is limited to adults (18 years and older) with primary tinnitus that is persistent and bothersome. PURPOSE: The purpose of this guideline is to provide evidence-based recommendations for clinicians managing patients with tinnitus. This guideline provides clinicians with a logical framework to improve patient care and mitigate the personal and social effects of persistent, bothersome tinnitus. It will discuss the evaluation of patients with tinnitus, including selection and timing of diagnostic testing and specialty referral to identify potential underlying treatable pathology. It will then focus on the evaluation and treatment of patients with persistent primary tinnitus, with recommendations to guide the evaluation and measurement of the effect of tinnitus and to determine the most appropriate interventions to improve symptoms and quality of life for tinnitus sufferers. ACTION STATEMENTS: The development group made a strong recommendation that clinicians distinguish patients with bothersome tinnitus from patients with nonbothersome tinnitus. The development group made a strong recommendation against obtaining imaging studies of the head and neck in patients with tinnitus, specifically to evaluate tinnitus that does not localize to 1 ear, is nonpulsatile, and is not associated with focal neurologic abnormalities or an asymmetric hearing loss. The panel made the following recommendations: Clinicians should (a) perform a targeted history and physical examination at the initial evaluation of a patient with presumed primary tinnitus to identify conditions that if promptly identified and managed may relieve tinnitus; (b) obtain a prompt, comprehensive audiologic examination in patients with tinnitus that is unilateral, persistent (≥ 6 months), or associated with hearing difficulties; (c) distinguish patients with bothersome tinnitus of recent onset from those with persistent symptoms (≥ 6 months) to prioritize intervention and facilitate discussions about natural history and follow-up care; (d) educate patients with persistent, bothersome tinnitus about management strategies; (e) recommend a hearing aid evaluation for patients who have persistent, bothersome tinnitus associated with documented hearing loss; and (f) recommend cognitive behavioral therapy to patients with persistent, bothersome tinnitus. The panel recommended against (a) antidepressants, anticonvulsants, anxiolytics, or intratympanic medications for the routine treatment of patients with persistent, bothersome tinnitus; (b) Ginkgo biloba, melatonin, zinc, or other dietary supplements for treating patients with persistent, bothersome tinnitus; and (c) transcranial magnetic stimulation for the routine treatment of patients with persistent, bothersome tinnitus. The development group provided the following options: Clinicians may (a) obtain an initial comprehensive audiologic examination in patients who present with tinnitus (regardless of laterality, duration, or perceived hearing status); and (b) recommend sound therapy to patients with persistent, bothersome tinnitus. The development group provided no recommendation regarding the effect of acupuncture in patients with persistent, bothersome tinnitus.


Subject(s)
Practice Guidelines as Topic , Tinnitus/diagnosis , Tinnitus/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Humans , Young Adult
8.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 151(4): 533-41, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25274374

ABSTRACT

The American Academy of Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery Foundation (AAO-HNSF) has published a supplement to this issue featuring the new Clinical Practice Guideline: Tinnitus. To assist in implementing the guideline recommendations, this article summarizes the rationale, purpose, and key action statements. The 13 recommendations developed address the evaluation of patients with tinnitus, including selection and timing of diagnostic testing and specialty referral to identify potential underlying treatable pathology. It will then focus on the evaluation and treatment of patients with persistent primary tinnitus, with recommendations to guide the evaluation and measurement of the impact of tinnitus and to determine the most appropriate interventions to improve symptoms and quality of life for tinnitus sufferers.


Subject(s)
Tinnitus/diagnosis , Tinnitus/therapy , Audiometry , Complementary Therapies , Directive Counseling , Hearing Aids , Humans , Patient Education as Topic , Tinnitus/etiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...