Effect of spacer length of alkanediyl-alpha,omega-bis(dimethylcetylammonium bromide) gemini homologues on the interfacial and physicochemical properties of BSA.

The interactions of bovine serum albumin (BSA) with cationic gemini surfactants alkanediyl-alpha,omega-bis(dimethylcetylammonium bromide) (designated as C(16)C(s)C(16)Br(2), s=4, 5, and 6) and single chain surfactant cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) have been investigated with tensiometry, Rayleigh's scattering, fluorescence spectroscopy, and circular dichroism at physiological pH and 25 degrees C. The results of the multi-technique approach showed that the gemini surfactants interact more efficiently with the proteins than their conventional single chain counterparts and their efficiency increases with decrease in the length of the spacer. The saturation in interfacial tension occurred at a lower concentration in presence of BSA compared to CMC of the surfactants in absence of BSA and the concentration of gemini surfactants corresponding to interfacial saturation decreases with decrease in the spacer length. Fluorescence and circular dichroism spectroscopy results revealed increase in unfolding of BSA with decrease in spacer length of gemini surfactants.

Interaction of bovine serum albumin with cationic single chain+nonionic and cationic gemini+nonionic binary surfactant mixtures.

The interaction of bovine serum albumin (BSA) with cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), C(16)C(4)C(16)Br(2), Brij58, and their binary mixtures has been studied using tensiometry, spectrofluorometry, and circular dichroism at physiological pH and 25 degrees C. The tensiometric profiles of CTAB and C(16)C(4)C(16)Br(2) in the presence of BSA exhibit a single break at a lower surfactant concentration termed as C(1) (concentration corresponding to saturation of the interface) compared to their critical micelle concentration (CMC) in the buffered solution. However, for Brij58, CTAB+Brij58, and C(16)C(4)C(16)Br(2)+Brij58, two breaks were observed, first at the critical aggregation concentration (CAC), corresponding to onset of interaction with BSA and the second at C(1) corresponding to saturation of the interface. The interaction of CTAB+Brij58 and C(16)C(4)C(16)Br(2)+Brij58 mixtures with the BSA solution is discussed in terms of competition between surfactant-surfactant and surfactant-BSA interactions. CTAB+Brij58 and C(16)C(4)C(16)Br(2)+Brij58 mixtures show nonideality with respect to mixed micelle formation, which is reflected in their interaction with the BSA. The interaction of CTAB+Brij58 with BSA decreases with increase in the mole fraction of CTAB in the mixture, whereas in C(16)C(4)C(16)Br(2)+Brij58 the reverse is the case. The results of the present study may prove fruitful in optimizing the properties of surfactant-protein mixtures relevant for many formulations.