Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann ; 17(1): 59-63, 2009 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19515882

ABSTRACT

To compare hospital mortality and postoperative complications in patients with severe coronary artery disease undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with or without coronary endarterectomy, 100 consecutive patients were divided into 2 groups of 50 patients each. Group 1 had coronary endarterectomy, and group 2 had no coronary endarterectomy. There were 87 men and 13 women, with a mean age of 54.79 +/-7.8 years; 48% had stable angina. The right coronary artery was endarterectomized in 22 patients, the left anterior descending artery in 21, and the left circumflex in 7. There were no significant differences in outcomes. There was 1 hospital death in each group. Perioperative myocardial infarction occurred in 2 patients in group 1 and 1 in group 2. Endarterectomy is a suitable option to achieve complete revascularization in patients with refractory angina and severe diffuse disease.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Bypass/mortality , Coronary Artery Disease/mortality , Coronary Artery Disease/surgery , Endarterectomy/mortality , Hospital Mortality , Angina Pectoris/mortality , Angina Pectoris/surgery , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Myocardial Infarction/surgery , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Prospective Studies , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Risk Factors
2.
Curr Drug Saf ; 4(3): 188-98, 2009 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19534641

ABSTRACT

Evidence in the literature is contradictory regarding the precise role of nitric oxide (NO) in modulating systemic inflammatory response induced by cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). We studied the impact of inspired NO gas on physiological function and markers of inflammation-oxidative stress for subjects (n=15, age 62+/-4.5 and 12/3 M/F) scheduled for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) operation. Outcomes from subjects that received 5 ppm and 20 ppm of inspired NO (n=5/group) were compared to those not given NO gas. Breath-to-breath measurement commenced at the start of intubation and continued up to 4h later. Indices of cardiovascular function, alveolar-capillary gas exchange and haematological parameters were not significantly different in outcomes for the inspired NO groups as compared with control. We observed a reduction in mean systemic arterial in all subjects at 30 min and 4h after bypass when compared with pre bypass values. Markers of systemic inflammatory response and oxidative stress increased during CPB particularly at 4h and 24h after the initiation of bypass. In contrast, we observed a reduction in expired NO, at 24h after surgery in the groups given inspired NO. In addition, there was also a significant reduction in oxidative stress markers in blood at 24h after surgery for the groups given inspired NO as compared with the control group. In contrast, cytokines response remained similar in all the three groups at all time points. The results suggested that inspired NO gas has an antioxidant property that reduces the levels of cell death, and is not associated with significantly worse-off physiological outcomes.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents/administration & dosage , Antioxidants/administration & dosage , Cardiopulmonary Bypass/adverse effects , Coronary Artery Bypass/adverse effects , Nitric Oxide/administration & dosage , Oxidative Stress/drug effects , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/prevention & control , Administration, Inhalation , Aged , Biomarkers/blood , Blood-Air Barrier/drug effects , Blood-Air Barrier/metabolism , Cytokines/blood , Female , Hemodynamics/drug effects , Humans , Inflammation Mediators/blood , Lipid Peroxides/blood , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Pulmonary Gas Exchange/drug effects , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/blood , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/etiology , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/physiopathology , Time Factors
3.
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann ; 16(1): 81-5, 2008 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18245716

ABSTRACT

Many centers across the country have used collaborative techniques to identify problems and come up with innovative solutions. Excellent improvements have been made in every aspect of the patient's journey through the cardiac surgery services, such as decreased length of stay, reduced clinical variation and costs, and improved outcome. We looked at how the cardiac surgical team at our center is helping to improve services for patients undergoing coronary revascularization. Improvements are not just focused on waiting lists or operating rooms but reflect the wider experience of patients and their families.


Subject(s)
Cardiology Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Coronary Disease/therapy , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Myocardial Revascularization , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Coronary Disease/diagnosis , Coronary Disease/prevention & control , Coronary Disease/rehabilitation , Critical Pathways/organization & administration , Humans , Length of Stay , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/organization & administration , Pakistan , Patient Discharge , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling , Point-of-Care Systems/organization & administration , Preoperative Care , Program Development , Program Evaluation , Referral and Consultation , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome , Waiting Lists
5.
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann ; 15(6): 497-501, 2007 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18042775

ABSTRACT

Anticoagulation in pregnancy was evaluated in 33 women with a mechanical heart valve prosthesis who had 53 pregnancies between 1994 and 2006. Their mean age at valve operation was 24.4 +/- 5.4 years, and 22 (67%) had isolated mitral valve disease. Of these patients, 22 had a single pregnancy, 5 had 2 pregnancies, 3 had 3, and 3 had 4. In 43 pregnancies, the patients took warfarin throughout; in the other 10, heparin was used in the first trimester followed by warfarin until the last 15 days. Mean international normalized ratio and warfarin levels before, during, and after pregnancy were similar. Complications occurred in 3 (6%) women who had thrombosed valves: 2 (20%) in the heparin group and 1 (2%) who had warfarin only. Live births resulted from 37 (70%) pregnancies. There were significantly more abortions in the heparin group (6; 60%) than the warfarin group (8; 19%). Hemorrhage requiring transfusion occurred in 2 (5%) patients in the warfarin group. All live births resulted in healthy babies. It was concluded that anticoagulation with warfarin is safe during pregnancy in women with mechanical heart valves.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Heparin/therapeutic use , Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular/prevention & control , Thrombosis/prevention & control , Warfarin/therapeutic use , Abortion, Spontaneous/chemically induced , Administration, Oral , Adult , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Heparin/administration & dosage , Heparin/adverse effects , Humans , Pakistan , Patient Selection , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Prosthesis Design , Risk Assessment , Thrombosis/etiology , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Warfarin/administration & dosage , Warfarin/adverse effects
6.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med ; 8(1): 52-9, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17293269

ABSTRACT

The enormous progress in interventional cardiology during the last 10 years has resulted in a major change in the spectrum of patients referred for coronary artery bypass grafting. Several large retrospective analyses, meta-analyses, and the randomized trials that addressed different aspects of ONCAB and OPCAB to date have compared the two surgical strategies. It is suggested that patients may achieve an excellent outcome with either type of procedure, and individuals' outcomes more likely depend on factors other than whether they underwent ONCAB or OPCAB. Nevertheless, there appear to be trends in most studies. These trends include less blood loss and need for transfusion, less myocardial enzyme release up to 24 h, less early neurocognitive dysfunction, and less renal insufficiency after OPCAB and propensity to lower costs, thereafter proving OPCAB to be safe and clinically effective. Here, we review the physiological advantages and clinical outcomes of OPCAB for myocardial revascularization and examine whether either strategy is superior and in which patients.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Bypass, Off-Pump/methods , Myocardial Revascularization/methods , Humans , Meta-Analysis as Topic , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
7.
Acute Card Care ; 8(4): 196-209, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17162546

ABSTRACT

Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) has been suggested to be a cause of complex systemic inflammatory response that significantly contributes to several adverse postoperative complications. In the last few years, off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) has gained widespread attention as an alternative technique to conventional on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (ONCAB). However, a degree of uncertainty regarding the relative merits of ONCAB and OPCAB continues to be a significant issue. Surgeons supporting off-pump surgery, state that the avoidance of the CPB leads to significantly reduced myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury, postoperative systemic inflammatory response and other biological derangements, a feature that may improve the clinical outcomes. However, perfection in perioperative care, surgical technique and methods of attenuating the untoward effects of CPB has resulted in better clinical outcome of ONCAB as well. Possible reasons of these controversial opinions are that high-quality studies have not comprehensively examined relevant patient outcomes and have enrolled a limited range of patients. Some studies may have been too small to detect clinically important differences in patient outcomes between these two modalities. We present a review of the available scientific interpretation of the literature on OPCAB with regard to safety, hemodynamic changes, inflammation, myocardial preservation and oxidative stress. We also sought to determine from different reported retrospective and randomized control studies, the initial and the long-term benefits of this approach, despite the substantial learning curve associated with OPCAB.


Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Bypass/adverse effects , Coronary Artery Bypass, Off-Pump , Clinical Trials as Topic , Humans , Inflammation Mediators/blood , Oxidative Stress , Reperfusion Injury/etiology , Reperfusion Injury/prevention & control , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/etiology , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/prevention & control
8.
Heart Surg Forum ; 9(3): E630-7, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16687345

ABSTRACT

The enormous progress in interventional cardiology during the last 10 years has resulted in a major change in the spectrum of patients referred for coronary bypass surgery. These patients are older and sicker and frequently have had previous percutaneous coronary interventions. Consequently, cardiac surgery is responding by adding new surgical techniques: off-pump open-chest coronary bypass surgery (OPCAB), minithoracotomy bypass surgery, videothoracoscopic (robotic) procedures, etc. Several registries published to date have proved OPCAB to be safe and clinically effective. Randomized studies and meta-analysis research in this field provide scientific support and suggest that myocardial, renal, and neurological functions, amongst others, are better preserved by OPCAB than by classic techniques that use a cardiopulmonary bypass pump (CPB). Moreover, avoidance of CPB yields significantly reduced oxidative stress and systemic inflammatory response. This results in higher safety for ischemic heart disease patients undergoing revascularization, thus offsetting the propensity to lower costs. The present review examines the physiological advantages and clinical outcomes of this simple mode of myocardial revascularisation and evaluates the wider implications arising from its evolution.


Subject(s)
Clinical Trials as Topic , Coronary Artery Bypass, Off-Pump/methods , Coronary Artery Bypass, Off-Pump/trends , Coronary Artery Disease/surgery , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , Forecasting , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...