Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot ; 22(4): 359-67, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24974915

ABSTRACT

The present study aims to investigate differences in road safety attitude, driver behaviour and traffic risk perception between Malaysia and Singapore. A questionnaire-based survey was conducted among a sample of Singaporean (n = 187) and Malaysian (n = 313) road users. The data was analysed using confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modelling applied to measure comparative fit indices of Malaysian and Singaporean respondents. The results show that the perceived traffic risk of Malaysian respondents is higher than Singaporean counterparts. Moreover, the structural equation modelling has confirmed perceived traffic risk performing the role of full mediation between perceived driving skills and perceived road safety for both the countries, while perceived traffic skills was found to perform the role of partial mediation between aggression and anxiety, on one hand, and road safety, on the other hand, in Malaysia and Singapore. In addition, in both countries, a weak correlation between perceived driving skills, aggression and anxiety with perceived road safety was found, while a strong correlation exists with traffic risk perception. The findings of this study have been discussed in terms of theoretical, practical and conceptual implications for both scholars and policy-makers to better understand the young drivers' attitude and behaviour relationship towards road safety measures with a view to future research.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Traffic/psychology , Automobile Driving/psychology , Dangerous Behavior , Safety , Accidents, Traffic/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Cross-Cultural Comparison , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , Humans , Incidence , Malaysia , Male , Reproducibility of Results , Risk-Taking , Singapore , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
3.
ScientificWorldJournal ; 2014: 872929, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24711739

ABSTRACT

Existing opinion mining studies have focused on and explored only two types of reviews, that is, regular and comparative. There is a visible gap in determining the useful review types from customers and designers perspective. Based on Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and statistical measures we examine users' perception about different review types and its effects in terms of behavioral intention towards using online review system. By using sample of users (N = 400) and designers (N = 106), current research work studies three review types, A (regular), B (comparative), and C (suggestive), which are related to perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and behavioral intention. The study reveals that positive perception of the use of suggestive reviews improves users' decision making in business intelligence. The results also depict that type C (suggestive reviews) could be considered a new useful review type in addition to other types, A and B.


Subject(s)
Behavior , Intention , Perception , Humans , Internet , Models, Statistical , Pilot Projects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...