Two-Week Wait Gastrointestinal (GI) Cancer Pathway: A Single Tertiary Centre Experience During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: This article investigated the impact of COVID-19 on the two-week wait referral pathway at the University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust. The conversion rate of these referrals was also explored as an indicator of the appropriateness of referrals from primary care. METHODS: Two-week wait referrals to the Cancer Centre of the University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust from 2018 to 2020 were collected for upper gastrointestinal (UGI), lower gastrointestinal (LGI), and hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgery. The confirmed cancer cases out of these referrals were also recorded. Additionally, the outcomes of the multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings for all patients discussed in June 2018, 2019, and 2020 were collected, and their staging and treatment data were examined. RESULTS: The number of two-week referrals decreased in 2020 compared to the previous two years across the three specialities. This was more pronounced in April, with a reduction of over 50%. The conversion rate of these referrals increased in 2020 compared to 2018 and 2019 among all three specialities. The increase in conversion rate was statistically significant for LGI referrals (2018 vs 2020 p = 0.0056; 2019 vs 2020 p = 0.0005). There was no significant difference in the MDT outcome across the three specialities. CONCLUSION: Two-week wait remains a cornerstone pathway in the management of patients with suspected cancer in the National Health Service. The COVID-19 pandemic appeared to have reduced inappropriate referrals, as evidenced by the increased conversion rate. This did not appear to negatively impact tumour staging and outcomes for those patients who were referred on the pathway.

Faecal immunochemical testing reduces demand and improves yield of Leicester's 2-week pathway for change in bowel habit.

AIM: We look at the effect of introducing the faecal immunochemical test (FIT) in the straight-to-test 2-week pathway for change in bowel habit (CIBH). METHOD: The FIT in primary care triages 2-week wait (2WW) colorectal referrals for patients aged 60 years and above for straight-to-test CT colonography (CTC). We compare the impact of the FIT on numbers of 2WW CTCs, in the year before and after FIT, in both colorectal cancer (CRC) detection and cost-effectiveness at both 4 µg Hb/g faeces and 10 µg Hb/g faeces. RESULTS: At a threshold of 4 µg Hb/g faeces, the positive predictive value of the FIT for diagnosis of CRC is 5.0% with a negative predictive value of 99.8% and a polyp detection rate of 25.5%. The introduction of the FIT resulted in a reduction in the number of CTCs performed through the CIBH pathway from a mean of 143.9 per month prior to the FIT to 66.8 CTCs per month once the FIT was well established. Given a FIT threshold of 10 µg Hb/g the number of CTCs would be predicted to fall by 70.4% to 42.6 CTCs per month resulting in higher CRC and polyp detection rate, and an estimated annual cost saving of £238 258 in our institution. CONCLUSION: The FIT use in primary care improves the yield of 2WW referrals for CIBH alone and reduces the burden and cost of investigations to exclude CRC. Improvements may be possible by increasing the cut-off employed, without adversely affecting the risk of missing a cancer.

Induction Implications: Shaping the Competence and Confidence of Junior Doctors Within Complex Medical Specialties.

Introduction The newly qualified junior doctors in the United Kingdom face challenges due to their limited experience and unfamiliarity with their rotations. We aim to share the experience of establishing a hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgery-specific induction program at the University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust and assess its impact on doctors' knowledge and experience. Methods A booklet was distributed to new junior doctors, and a two-hour structured teaching session was also conducted, with pre- and post-session assessments using multiple-choice questions and a feedback survey. The survey measured understanding of HPB anatomy, interventions, and satisfaction with the teaching methodology. Results The pre-session questionnaire included 22 participants, while the post-session had 20 participants. Regarding HPB anatomy understanding, in the pre-session, six (28.6%) and 11 (52.4%) participants reported levels 2 and 3, respectively, while levels 4 and 5 were reported by three (13.3%) and one (4.8%) participants. In the post-session, levels 4 and 5 were reported by six (30%) and 13 (65%), with only one (5%) reporting level 3 and none at levels 1 or 2. Similar trends were observed in understanding HPB investigation. In the pre-session, levels 2 and 3 were reported by eight (36.4%) and 11 (50%), while levels 4 and 5 were reported by two (9.1%) and one (4%). In the post-session, eight (40%) and 11 (55%) reported levels 4 and 5, with only one (5%) at level 3 and none at levels 1 or 2. For HPB management methods before teaching, levels 2 and 3 were equally reported by eight (36.4%), level 4 by four (22.7%), and none at level 5. After teaching, nine (45%) and 10 (50%) reported levels 4 and 5, with only one (5%) at level 3 and none at levels 1 or 2. Factual knowledge showed a 38% increase, rising from 49% pre-session to 87% post-session. In post-session feedback, 12 (60%) strongly agreed that the session helped augment their medical practice, and six (30%) agreed, with two (10%) neutral. Feedback on the teaching session's organization was positive, with 13 (65%) strongly agreeing that it was structured coherently, and six (30%) agreeing, with only one (5%) neutral regarding the clarity of the structure and delivery method. Conclusion Specialty-specific induction programs are crucial for providing support and ensuring the development of competent doctors. Efforts should be made to create supportive working environments for junior doctors to alleviate stress and improve their well-being.

A Multi-Centre Study to Risk Stratify Colorectal Polyp Surveillance Patients Utilising Volatile Organic Compounds and Faecal Immunochemical Test.

(1) Background: The service capacity for colonoscopy remains constrained, and while efforts are being made to recover elective services, polyp surveillance remains a challenge. (2) Methods: This is a multi-centre study recruiting patients already on polyp surveillance. Stool and urine samples were collected for the faecal immunochemical test (FIT) and volatile organic compounds (VOC) analysis, and all participants then underwent surveillance colonoscopy. (3) Results: The sensitivity and specificity of VOC for the detection of a high-risk finding ((≥2 premalignant polyps including ≥1 advanced polyp or ≥5 premalignant polyps) were 0.94 (95% CI, 0.88 to 0.98) and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.64 to 0.75) respectively. For FIT, the sensitivity was (≥10 µg of haemoglobin (Hb) / g faeces) 0.54 (95% CI, 0.43 to 0.65) and the specificity was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.73 to 0.84). The probability reduction for having a high-risk finding following both negative VOC and FIT will be 24% if both tests are applied sequentially. (4) Conclusion: The diagnostic performance of VOC is superior to FIT for the detection of a high-risk finding. The performance further improves when VOC is applied together with FIT sequentially (VOC first and then FIT). VOC alone or the combination of VOC and FIT can be used as a triage tool for patients awaiting colonoscopy within a polyp surveillance population, especially in resource-constrained healthcare systems.