Attitudes and behaviors that differentiate clergy with positive mental health from those with burnout.

Clergy provide significant support to their congregants, sometimes at a cost to their mental health. Identifying the factors that enable clergy to flourish in the face of such occupational stressors can inform prevention and intervention efforts to support their well-being. In particular, more research is needed on positive mental health and not only mental health problems. We conducted interviews with 52 clergy to understand the behaviors and attitudes associated with positive mental health in this population. Our consensual grounded theory analytic approach yielded five factors that appear to distinguish clergy with better versus worse mental health. They were: (1) being intentional about health; (2) a "participating in God's work" orientation to ministry; (3) boundary-setting; (4) lack of boundaries; and (5) ongoing stressors. These findings point to concrete steps that can be taken by clergy and those who care about them to promote their well-being.

Facilitators and Barriers to Naloxone Kit Use Among Opioid-Dependent Patients Enrolled in Medication Assisted Therapy Clinics in North Carolina.

BACKGROUND Naloxone-an opioid antagonist that reverses the effects of opioids-is increasingly being distributed in non-medical settings. We sought to identify the facilitators of, and barriers to, opioid users using naloxone kits in North Carolina.METHODS In 2015, we administered a 15-item survey to a convenience sample of 100 treatment seekers at 4 methadone/buprenorphine Medication Assisted Therapy (MAT) clinics in North Carolina.RESULTS Seventy-four percent of participants reported having ever gotten a naloxone kit; this percentage was higher for females (81%) than males (63%) (P = .06). The primary reason given for not having a kit was not knowing where to get one. Only 6% had heard of kits from the media and only 5% received one from a medical provider. Among kit recipients, 56% of both females and males reported mostly or sometimes carrying the kit, with additional participants reporting always. Reasons for not carrying a kit were no longer being around drugs, forgetting it, and the kit being too large. Men discussed the difficulties of carrying the naloxone kits, which are currently too large to fit in a pocket. Ninety-four percent of naloxone users reported intending to call emergency services in case of an overdose emergency.LIMITATIONS Study limitations included a small sample, participants limited to MAT clinics, and a predominantly white sample.CONCLUSIONS MAT treatment seekers reported a willingness to carry and use naloxone kits. Education, outreach, media, and medical providers need to promote naloxone kits. A smaller kit may increase the likelihood of men carrying one.

Low knowledge and perceived Hepatitis C risk despite high risk behaviour among injection drug users in Kathmandu, Nepal.

BACKGROUND: In Nepal, prevalence of Hepatitis C (HCV) among injecting drug users (IDUs) has been measured at 50% and knowledge of the virus is low. Rehabilitation and harm reduction attendees constitute populations to whom health care providers can deliver services. As such, characterizing their drug use and risk profiles is important for developing targeted service delivery. We measured drug use and risk patterns of IDUs participating in residential rehabilitation as well as those contacted through needle exchanges to identify correlates of drug use frequency, risky injection practices as well as HCV testing, knowledge and perceived risk. METHODS: We collected cross-sectional data from one-on-one structured interviews of IDUs contacted through needle-exchange outreach workers (n=202) and those attending rehabilitation centres (behaviour immediately prior to joining rehabilitation) (n=167). RESULTS: Roughly half of participants reported injecting at least 30 times in the past 30 days and individuals with previous residential rehabilitation experience reported frequent injection far more than those without it. About one in fourteen respondents reported past week risky injection practices. Participants were over three times as likely to report risky injection if they consumed alcohol daily (17.2%) than if they did not (5.0%) (p=0.002). Those who reported injecting daily reported risky injection practices (11.9%) significantly more than non-daily injectors (1.8%) (p<0.001). Respondents reported high HCV infection rates, low perceived risk, testing history and knowledge. HCV knowledge was not associated with differences in risky injecting. CONCLUSION: Treatment centres should highlight the link between heavy drinking, frequent injection and risky injecting practices. The link between rehabilitation attendance and frequent injection may suggest IDUs with more severe use patterns are more likely to attend rehabilitation. Rehabilitation centres and needle exchanges should provide testing and education for HCV. Education alone may not be sufficient to initiate change since knowledge did not predict lower risk.