Ventral hernia repair in India: a Delphi consensus.

PURPOSE: While research on inguinal hernias is well-documented, ventral/incisional hernias still require investigation. In India, opinions on laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) techniques are contested. The current consensus aims to standardize LVHR practice and identify gaps and unfulfilled demands that compromise patient safety and therapeutic outcomes. METHODS: Using the modified Delphi technique, panel of 14 experts (general surgeons) came to a consensus. Two rounds of consensus were conducted online. An advisory board meeting was held for the third round, wherein survey results were discussed and the final statements were decided with supporting clinical evidence. RESULTS: Experts recommended intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) plus/trans-abdominal retromuscular/extended totally extraperitoneal/mini- or less-open sublay operation/transabdominal preperitoneal/trans-abdominal partial extra-peritoneal/subcutaneous onlay laparoscopic approach/laparoscopic intracorporeal rectus aponeuroplasty as valid minimal access surgery (MAS) options for ventral hernia (VH). Intraperitoneal repair technique is the preferred MAS procedure for primary umbilical hernia < 4 cm without diastasis; incisional hernia in the presence of a vertical single midline incision; symptomatic hernia, BMI > 40 kg/m2, and defect up to 4 cm; and for MAS VH surgery with grade 3/4 American Society of Anaesthesiologists. IPOM plus is the preferred MAS procedure for midline incisional hernia of width < 4 cm in patients with a previous laparotomy. Extraperitoneal repair technique is the preferred MAS procedure for L3 hernia < 4 cm; midline hernias < 4 cm with diastasis; and M5 hernia. CONCLUSION: The consensus statements will help standardize LVHR practices, improve decision-making, and provide guidance on MAS in VHR in the Indian scenario.

MIS retromuscular repair of lateral incisional hernia: technological deliberations and short-term outcome.

BACKGROUND: Lateral abdominal wall hernias (LAWH) constitute about 1-4% of hernia surgical procedures. They represent a unique surgical challenge on account of their potential for anatomical complexity and consequent operative technical demand. Furthermore, LAWH repairs are currently not standardized, and remain contentious, despite a variety of approaches. These repairs are attendant with not insignificant morbidity and recurrence rates. We profile here our endoscopic and hybrid surgical approach to the management of LAWH and early therapeutic outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective review of our hernia clinical database between March 2018 and December 2020 was performed to extract all LAWH (with and without an associated midline component) patients, who underwent an enhanced-view totally extra peritoneal (eTEP) hernia repair with a transversus abdominis release (TAR), or a hybrid repair. Initial outcome data (6-month follow-up) is profiled here. The primary outcome measures were hernia recurrence and hernia-site bulging. The secondary measures were surgical site occurrence (SSO) and hernia-related quality of life (QoL). RESULTS: A total of 33 LAWH patients underwent an eTEP TAR or hybrid hernia repair. 11 patients had an associated midline defect and 12 were recurrent hernias. The mean hernia defect area was 84.2 ± 49 cm2 and mean mesh size was 859.6 ± 263 cm2. There was no hernia recurrence at initial follow-up of 24 months. The SSO rate was 12%. The CCS QoL scores were 34.6 ± 2 pre-operatively, and improved to 27.2 ± 4 at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Our endoscopic and hybrid technique is a safe, reproducible, and technically promising approach for the repair of LAWH. Thorough knowledge of the surgical anatomy of the lateral abdominal wall and advanced endosurgical skills are imperative for good outcomes. We await the long-term results of our LAWH cohort to confirm the findings.

e-TEP repair for midline primary and incisional hernia: technical considerations and initial experience.

INTRODUCTION: The Enhanced-View Totally Extra Peritoneal Rives-Stoppa (e-TEP-RS) Technique for the repair of large, complex, ventral abdominal hernias has gained popularity especially in overcoming the disadvantages with Intra Peritoneal Onlay Mesh (IPOM) repairs and to enable siting of a large prosthetic mesh in an anatomical plane distinct from the abdominal cavity and its contents. Evolving variations of the original technique have allowed the definitive repair of such defects in a reproducible manner. We present our initial experience of this approach and detailed steps of our native technical modifications in overcoming the challenges in performing this complex and potentially challenging procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective review of the clinical data of midline, large, complex, ventral abdominal hernia patients who underwent e-TEP-RS with and without Transversus Abdominis Release (TAR). Patients, with or without Diastasis of Rectus Abdominis Muscle (DRAM) were included. Key outcomes measured were post-operative pain, operative morbidity, readmission, Quality of Life (QoL), hernia recurrence. RESULTS: A total of 58 midline, ventral abdominal hernia patients who underwent e-TEP-RS with and without Transversus Abdominis Release (TAR), between March 2018 and December 2019 were studied. Mean defect area was 41.0 ± 28 cm2 and the mean mesh surface area was 473.5 ± 165 cm2. e-TEP-RS was done in 35 cases, e-TEP RS TAR in 15 cases and e-TEP-RS with e-TEP inguinal in 08 cases. There was no intraoperative morbidity. Mean duration of surgery was 156.2 ± 40 min and mean blood loss was 40.5 ± 26 cc. The CCS QoL scores improved from 34.6 (± 2) pre-operatively to 27.2 (± 4) at the end of 6 months. One patient had a supra-umbilical recurrence following bilateral TAR over the superior edge of the mesh. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 22 months, with a mean of 14 months. Major complications (n = 12; 20.7%) were seroma formation and prolonged ileus. CONCLUSION: The e-TEP-RS technique for large, complex, midline, ventral abdominal hernias can be used with excellent results and acceptable morbidity. This technique is technically challenging and should be mastered in relatively smaller ventral hernias to achieve good results before attempting it in larger, complex ones.