Effect of hydrogen peroxide and hyaluronic acid in mouth rinse after third molar extraction: a triple-blind parallel randomized controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to investigate the potential beneficial role of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and hyaluronic acid (HA) combination formulation in socket healing after third molar surgery. Biomaterials, including mouthwash formulations, were hypothesized to contribute to improved socket healing and reduced post-operative complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A triple-blinded parallel randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted at a single-center dental hospital in Milan, Italy. The trial included 114 patients who underwent extraction of impacted, partially erupted, and completely erupted third molars. Patients were randomly assigned to three parallel groups: Group 1 (H2O2 and HA), Group 2 (placebo), and Group 3 (0.2% chlorhexidine). The trial was registered at ClinicalTrial.gov (registration number NCT04438434). The main outcome measures included various parameters related to socket healing, such as pain, inflammation, swelling, plaque index, bleeding index, granulation tissue, suppuration, re-epithelialization, bleeding upon palpation, odor, and taste alteration. Patients were followed up for 7 days. RESULTS: All 114 enrolled patients completed the study, with no dropouts or loss to follow-up. The mean age of patients in the three groups differed (H2O2 and HA: 30.9±14.9; placebo: 27.6±13.1; 0.2% chlorhexidine: 23.05±10.16). Significant reductions (p<0.001) in visual analog scale (VAS) pain levels and other outcome measures were observed in the H2O2 and HA group compared to the placebo group. These findings suggest a positive effect of the H2O2 and HA combination on socket healing after the third molar surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The study concludes that the combination of hydrogen peroxide and hyaluronic acid can be considered a potential mouthwash with beneficial effects on socket healing following third molar surgery. However, additional clinical trials are recommended to validate its effectiveness further and provide additional evidence supporting its use in clinical settings. CLINICALTRIAL: gov: NCT04438434.

What is the use of nutraceuticals in dentistry? A scoping review.

OBJECTIVE: Recently, nutraceuticals have been widely explored in many medical fields and their use is also increasing in oral and dental problems. Since the nutraceutical evidence landscape in the literature has not been fully elucidated yet, this review aims to examine the effects of commercially available nutraceuticals and their potential evidence and applications in dentistry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A scoping review was conducted following the "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR)" checklist. The electronic search was performed using PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science on March 2022. The inclusion criteria include humans, clinical trials, randomized controlled trials (RCT), reviews, and systematic reviews published over the last ten years. RESULTS: 18 studies met the eligibility criteria. There were 2 RCTs, 11 systematic reviews, and four narrative reviews. In most studies, the clinical indications were oral leucoplakia, periodontitis, osseointegration of implants, oral mucositis, oral clefts, and oral health. Probiotics, prebiotics, polyunsaturated fatty acids, and vitamins A, B, C, D, and E were the most common nutraceuticals used in dentistry. CONCLUSIONS: Nutraceuticals are foods that, according to the literature, may be useful for preventing and treating dental diseases.

Optical coherence tomography application for assessing variation in bone mineral content: a preclinical study.

OBJECTIVE: Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) is a non-invasive imaging technique that produces cross-sectional images through biological tissues, allowing three-dimensional reconstruction and analysis. Aim was to evaluate if OCT may discriminate among tissues with different bone density and composition, by measuring the depth of light penetration in porcine and rat bone samples. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two carpal bone samples (2 cm length) were harvested from the porcine forelimb and fixed overnight in 3.7% buffered formal saline. Following fixation, one sample was decalcified in a 1:1 mixture of 8% hydrochloric acid and 8% formic acid solution for three days, with solution changes each day. Samples were imaged using an OCT microscope. Furthermore, the calvaria, ulnar, alveolar and basal bone of the mandible of 6 male and 6 female rats were cleared of overlying soft tissues and scanned under OCT. The light penetration depth in each sample was measured using the software Image J, and Scattering Attenuation Microscopy. RESULTS: In the mineralized bone the average depth (µm) and standard deviation (SD) of light penetration were 790.1±18.05 and 410.4±21.7 for periosteal and endosteal surface, respectively, and 507.3±21.03 for cross-section surfaces, while it was 858.4±32.03 for periosteal surface, 1150±26.9 for endosteal, and 627.3±31.8 for cross-section bone surfaces in demineralized porcine bone. There was a significant difference (p<0.001) in depth of light penetration between normal and de-mineralized bone for all regions evaluated. No systematic significant difference in light penetration depth between-gender was found at any site evaluated, while there were variations between sites (p<0.001). The OCT detected differences in bone mineral and porosity among gender (p<0.0001) CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that OCT may represent a valuable technique to estimate local variations in bone mineral content.

Observational studies on the efficacy of carbamazepine and ascorbyl palmitate in managing trigeminal neuralgia.

OBJECTIVE: Ascorbyl palmitate is a fat-soluble ester of vitamin C and is used as an antioxidant food additive. While literature reports that ascorbyl palmitate can prevent exacerbation of pain and improve the quality of life of patients suffering from pain, this is not yet supported by clinical trial data. Our study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of ascorbyl palmitate in managing trigeminal neuralgia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was carried out in a single-centre clinical trial in which subjects suffering from trigeminal neuralgia (N=11) were included. All patients were on carbamazepine when first included and, after washout period, received Ascorbyl palmitate. Eligible patients had the most severe trigeminal neuralgia pain in the oral cavity or pain on touching trigger zones, aged 20 years or older, were capable of proper assessment of the severity of pain and their condition, and had experienced multiple episodes of intraoral pain for at least 3 months with a pain intensity of more than 4 points on the numerical rating scale. The Brief Pain Questionnaire was used to evaluate patient's quality of life. RESULTS: A total of 11 patients were included with a mean age 55.36±10.67 years (7 males, 4 females). Most patients had compression by the superior cerebellar artery and vascular loops upon magnetic resonance examination. The mean numerical rating scale score for carbamazepine after one month was 7.9±0.56 (95% CI 7.49, 8.30). Similarly, for ascorbyl palmitate was 5.5±1.50 (95% CI 4.42, 6.57) (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Ascorbyl palmitate can be used as an adjunct intervention in managing trigeminal neuralgia pain. According to the results, ascorbyl palmitate prevents frequent exacerbation of pain and improves patient quality of life.

Open reduction and internal fixation without rigid maxillomandibular fixation: evidence based or merely a surgical dictum? A comparative pilot study on 24 cases.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the results and immediate postoperative complications following open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular fractures with or without postoperative maxillo-mandibular fixation MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study spanned over a period of 24 months, extending from October 2015 to October 2017. The study sample comprised 24 subjects between the age range of 18 to 65 years. They were randomly divided into two groups: Group A included subjects in whom open reduction and internal fixation was followed by maxilla-mandibular fixation for 15 days, and Group B subjects in whom only open reduction and internal fixation was done, followed by immediate mobilization. The outcomes evaluated were swelling, pain, simplified oral hygiene index and occlusion. The subjects were followed for all these outcomes on 1st, 7th and 15th days. The occlusion was assessed for 5 days. Any other intra/post-operative complications were additionally noted. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference between the groups for swelling, pain and occlusion. The patients with postoperative maxilla-mandibular fixation had poorer oral hygiene when compared to the other group (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of maxilla-mandibular fixation post open reduction and internal fixation seems to offer no additional benefits to the patients. According to the results of the study, this traditional surgical dictum seems to be used by the surgeons due to the lack of any scientific evidence. However, further studies should be conducted to confirm this statement.

Dimensional and histomorphometric evaluation of biomaterials used for alveolar ridge preservation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: This systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to answer to the following questions: (a) In patients undergoing alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction, which grafting material best attenuates horizontal and vertical ridge resorption, as compared to spontaneous healing?, and (b) which material(s) promotes bone formation in the extraction socket? MATERIALS AND METHODS: The MEDLINE, SCOPUS, CENTRAL, and EMBASE databases were screened in duplicate for RCTs up to March 2021. Two independent authors extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Primary outcomes were ridge horizontal and vertical dimension changes and new bone formation into the socket. Both pairwise and network meta-analysis (NMA) were undertaken to obtain estimates for primary outcomes and compare different grafting materials. RESULTS: Eighty-eight RCTs were included, with a total of 2805 patients and 3073 sockets. Overall, a total of 1740 sockets underwent alveolar ridge preservation with different materials (1432 were covered by a membrane). Pairwise meta-analysis showed that, as compared to spontaneous healing, all materials statistically significantly reduced horizontal and vertical shrinkage. According to the multidimensional scale ranking of the NMA, xenografts (XG) and allografts (AG), alone or combined with bioactive agents (Bio + AG), were the most predictable materials for horizontal and vertical ridge dimension preservation, while platelet concentrates performed best in the percentage of new bone formation. CONCLUSIONS: Alveolar ridge preservation is effective in reducing both horizontal and vertical shrinkage, as compared to untreated sockets. NMA confirmed the consistency of XG for ridge dimension preservation, but several other materials and combinations like AG, Bio + AG, and AG + alloplasts, produced even better results than XG in clinical comparisons. Further evidence is needed to confirm the value of such alternatives to XG for alveolar ridge preservation. Bio + AG performed better than the other materials in preserving ridge dimension and platelet concentrates in new bone formation. However, alloplasts, xenografts, and AG + AP performed consistently good in majority of the clinical comparisons. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: XG and Bio + AG demonstrated significantly better performance in minimizing post-extraction horizontal and vertical ridge dimension changes as compared with other grafting materials or with spontaneous healing, even if they presented the worst histological outcomes. Allografts and other materials or combinations (AG + AP) presented similar performances while spontaneous healing ranked last.

Delayed post-extraction implants placed using a modified Summers technique: Preliminary results of a single cohort study.

The aim of this retrospective case series was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of the patients that underwent implant surgery with a modification of the sinus lift summers protocol. Forty healthy patients in need for oral rehabilitation with dental implants were included in this study. Inclusion criterion was the need for extraction of one compromised tooth due to persistent abscess/ periodontitis/cyst in the atrophic posterior maxilla region. The treatment consisted of two stage surgery for all patients. In the first stage, after tooth extraction, the sockets were preserved with allogenic bone graft and equine collagen membrane. After 4-5 months, 40 implants with a sandblasted surface, were inserted with osseodensification technique and a modification of the Summers sinus lift protocol for fracturing the sinus floor. The implant survival rate was the primary outcome. Intra- and postoperative complications were additional criteria for success. The mean follow-up from implant surgery was 28.0±7.3 (standard deviation) months (range 17.8-43.4 months). One implant was lost before the delivery of the prosthesis. The overall implant survival rate was 97.5%. The overall mean peri-implant marginal bone level change after 6 and 12 months of function was, respectively, 0.26±0.24 mm (95% CI: 0.19, 0.34 mm) and 0.71±0.36 mm (95% CI: 0.60, 0.82 mm). Marginal bone loss was statistically significant at both time frames respect to implant placement, and also the difference between 6 and 12 months was significant (p<0.001 in both cases). No biological nor mechanical complications were recorded throughout the observation period. As a conclusion, the technique presented in this cohort study can be an effective and safe alternative to standard maxillary sinus floor augmentation procedures and immediate implant insertion protocol, especially in cases of periodontitis and infected sites, which can represent a high risk for implant failure in patients with atrophic posterior maxilla.

Effect of concentrated growth factors on quality of life of patients undergoing implant therapy: a cohort study.

Pain, bad taste, and impaired daily activity after implant therapy are common sequelae. Concentrated growth factors (CGF) are a platelet concentrate with a favourable effect on wound healing, but there is still no evidence regarding its potential benefits for reducing postoperative pain and symptoms. Therefore, aim of this prospective comparative study was to determine the effect of CGF on quality of life (QoL) of patients after implant therapy. Fifty-two consecutive patients with one missing mandibular molar were included in the study and alternatively assigned to two groups. Control group received standard implant treatment, and test group received CGF associated with implants. Standard periapical radiographs were taken before and after procedure. Post-operative care consisted of 0.2% chlorhexidine digluconate solution twice daily for 10 days. A QoL questionnaire (OHIP-14) for bad taste, pain and limitation in daily activities was filled and returned one week post-operatively. Daily pain was also assessed through Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) on a 1-100 scale. Parametric test (chi-square) was performed to compare the results of the questionnaire between the two groups using STATA statistical software. All patients correctly filled and returned the questionnaire. Significantly higher proportions of patients of test group reported no bad taste, pain, and limited activity, (24/26, 13/26, and 25/26, respectively) respect to control. Postoperative pain with VAS score was significantly lower in the test group on day 1, 2, and 3 as compared to control. CGF positively influenced QoL when associated with implant rehabilitation of mandibular molars, minimizing post-operative discomfort.

Knowledge, practices and perceptions regarding oral health preventive measures among Mexican dental students: a cross-sectional survey study.

Although oral diseases are mostly preventable, they remain a global public health problem. Thus, there is a need for trained personnel to actively intervene in promoting oral health, to prevent and timeously detect oral diseases, and, in turn, to provide comprehensive quality healthcare. The main objective of the study was to evaluate the knowledge, practices and perceptions regarding oral health preventive measures amongst undergraduate dental students. This cross-sectional study was conducted between the period October 2017 and January 2018. The subjects included were undergraduate students of the dental science program at the School of Dentistry, in Leon Guanajuato, Mexico. A validated questionnaire was used to identify knowledge of preventive dentistry and the frequency of oral health preventive actions in the dental school clinics. Besides, perception towards prevention in dentistry was assessed. A total of N=232 undergraduate students participated of whom 65.9% (N=153) were women. More than half of the students 59.5%, (N=138) rated their knowledge on the prevention of oral diseases as good, followed by 32.8% (N=75) of students who rated it as regular. 49% (N=97) of the students performed frequently preventive treatments in their daily clinical practice. 90% (N=217) think that the main reason of low practice of prevention in dentistry is the lack of commitment of the dentist. 72.8% (N=169) mention that there should be professionals dedicated exclusively to preventive dentistry. Students of second grade demonstrated better prevention knowledge and tended to engage more frequently in preventive activities (p<0.05). In conclusion, our study found that, second-year students perform preventive practices more frequently and these practices decrease as their studies progress. It should be sought to create positive attitudes towards prevention not only in the year in preventive dentistry, but also throughout the entire career. This enables students to become trained professionals that can deliver preventive services to their patients.